Rupee to rise at open after dollar reverses tariff ruling-spurred rally
MUMBAI, May 30 (Reuters) - The Indian rupee is poised to open higher on Friday, after the U.S. dollar's rally, which was sparked by a U.S. court ruling on tariff policy, proved short-lived.
The 1-month non-deliverable forward indicated a open in the 85.36-85.40 range, versus the previous session's close of 85.5075.
So far this week, the Indian currency has been in a 84.78 to 85.70 range and is on track for a marginal weekly decline.
The rupee "is in a space where you have to play the ranges" with the near-term range defined by recent price action between 85.00 and 85.80, a currency trader at a Mumbai-based bank said.
"Moves below 85 (on dollar/rupee) and past 86 are difficult to imagine at this stage."
The dollar index, which had touched an intraday high of 100.48 on Thursday, slipped to 99.30, allowing Asian currencies to recover from losses.
The dollar had initially found support after a U.S. court ruling blocked most of former President Donald Trump's proposed tariffs.
However, a federal appeals court later issued a temporary pause on the ruling, allowing the tariffs to remain in place for now. Senior officials from the Trump administration had anyway downplayed the impact of the ruling blocking the tariffs, expressing confidence it would be overturned on appeal and indicating that alternative legal avenues to impose tariffs remain available.
While the initial court ruling sparked optimism, it does not eliminate the uncertainty surrounding the U.S. trade policy, ANZ Bank said in a note.
"The appeal process could drag on for months, adding to trade policy uncertainty,' ANZ noted, while pointing out that legal experts have suggested that the administration does indeed have other legal authorities to levy tariffs.
The dollar was further pressured by data that showed the number of Americans filing new applications for jobless benefits rose more than expected last week.
KEY INDICATORS:
** One-month non-deliverable rupee forward at 85.5; onshore one-month forward premium at 13.25 paise
** Dollar index at 99.30 ** Brent crude futures down 0.4% at $63.9 per barrel ** Ten-year U.S. note yield at 4.42% ** As per NSDL data, foreign investors bought a net $542.6 million worth of Indian shares on May. 28
** NSDL data shows foreign investors sold a net $41.3 million worth of Indian bonds on May. 29
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
35 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump's mass firings of federal workers must remain on hold, court rules
A federal appeals court ruled on Friday night that President Donald Trump 's orders for mass removals of federal staff and several agencies will remain on hold. The Trump administration had requested that the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals freeze an earlier order from a lower court that put a stop to the mass firings at several agencies, CNN noted. The new court order is a significant step back for the president and his attempt to radically reduce the size of the federal government. The widespread firings, known as reductions in force (RIFs), have remained on hold since May 9, following the earlier ruling by U.S. District Judge Susan Illston stating that Trump needed congressional authorization for such a wholesale makeover of the federal government. The three-judge panel on the 9th Circuit stated in a two-to-one ruling that Trump's executive order in question 'far exceeds the President's supervisory powers under the Constitution.' The majority found that the challengers could succeed on the merits of their arguments that the mass firings were illegal, and argued that the administration didn't manage to meet the other factors that would have prompted an emergency appellate intervention. The president had previously requested that the Supreme Court take on the case. That request didn't go anywhere initially. It's likely, however, that the issue will end up before the top court in the land once more. The case was put forward by unions representing federal employees, outside groups, and local governments. They challenged the executive order Trump signed in February, which called for a widespread restructuring of the government, along with directives from the Office of Personnel Management and the Office of Management and Budget to enact the president's policy. The offices asked that agencies send in plans for how they would implement Trump's order to slash the workforce. The challengers argued that both OPM and OMB were making the final decisions on the size of the firings for each agency. They put forward evidence that proposals for less radical cuts were being shot down, making the firings illegal. The lawsuit also took aim at the involvement of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The agencies covered by the previous ruling by Illston, halting the firings, include almost every cabinet department, such as the departments of Energy, Health and Human Services, Defense, Homeland Security, Justice, Interior, State, Labor, and Treasury. The 9th Circuit said on Friday that Congress, not the president, gave agencies the power to enact widespread firings. Bill Clinton appointee, Senior Circuit Judge William Fletcher, said in the majority ruling that the 'kind of reorganization contemplated by the Order has long been subject to Congressional approval.' Fletcher was joined in the majority by a Joe Biden appointee, Circuit Judge Lucy Koh. Dissenting from the ruling was George W. Bush appointee Circuit Judge Consuelo Maria Callahan, who wrote that 'the President has the right to direct agencies, and OMB and OPM to guide them, to exercise their statutory authority to lawfully conduct RIFs.' 'We are gratified by the court's decision today to allow the pause of these harmful actions to endure while our case proceeds,' the groups challenging the president's orders said in a statement, CNN noted.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Pete Hegseth calls on Asia to boost military spending in face of ‘imminent' threat from China
The US secretary of defence has called on Asian countries to boost their military spending to increase regional deterrence against China, which was 'rehearsing for the real deal' when it comes to taking over Taiwan. Pete Hegseth, addressing the Shangri-la Dialogue in Singapore on Saturday, reiterated pledges to increase the US presence in the Indo-Pacific and outlined a range of new joint projects, including expanding access to military ship and plane repair, including in Australia. 'US allies in the Indo-Pacific can and should upgrade their own defences,' Hegseth said. 'It has to be clear to all that Beijing is credibly preparing to potentially use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific … There's no reason to sugar coat it. The threat China poses is real, and it could be imminent.' He said Donald Trump's administration had pushed European countries to boost their defensive spending, taking on a greater 'burden' of responding to conflicts in their region, and it was time for Asian nations to do the same. Hegseth, who in March was revealed to have told a Signal group chat that Europe was 'pathetic' and 'freeloading' on US security support in the region, told the Singapore conference it was 'hard to believe' he was now saying this, but Asian countries should 'look to allies in Europe as a newfound example'. 'Deterrence doesn't come on the cheap … time is of the essence.' He said the renewed European focus on their region – particularly the Russia-Ukraine war – allowed the US to shift focus to its 'priority theatre' in the Indo-Pacific. Hegseth said the US did not seek to 'pressure' Asian countries to 'embrace or adopt policies or ideologies', but instead wanted to 'work with you where our shared interests align for peace and prosperity'. 'We're not here to preach to you about climate change or cultural issues,' he said. 'But a threat gathers. 'We do not seek conflict with Communist China. We will not seek to instigate, subjugate or humiliate China. President Trump and US have an immense respect for China and their civilisation. But we will not be pushed out of this critical region.' In his speech Hegseth also took a swipe at the absence of any senior Chinese delegate at this year's conference. 'We are here this morning and, notably, someone else isn't,' he said. Hegseth also appeared to reference comments by the French president, Emmanuel Macron, at the conference on Friday that a 'sense that [the US's] promise might not be so ironclad is ushering in a new instability'. 'An alliance cannot be ironclad if in reality or perception it is one-sided,' Hegseth said on Saturday. 'As allies share the burden we can increase our focus on the Indo-Pacific, our priority theatre.' He said the US would conduct its 'first-ever live-fire test of its mid-range capability system in Australia' in coming months, and had expanded cooperations and joint exercises. It would also establish repair capability and capacity programs in the region, including for P-8 radar systems in Australia for the US and its allies, while expanding contracts for regional ship repair. Hegseth's speech reiterated much of the Trump administration's defence and security position – blaming the previous administration for problems, pledging to strengthen the US military and secure the US border against unregulated immigration, while repeating plans to 'take back the Panama canal'. He said Trump was spending $1tn – a 13% increase – on defence next year, citing advance weapons plans including the controversial Golden Dome. Speaking in Singapore after Hegseth's address, US Democratic senator Tammy Duckworth told reporters that his comments about the US remaining in the Indo-Pacific region were welcome but he found his words 'patronising of our friends in the Indo-Pacific in particular'. 'I've gotta say his idea that we're going to wrap ourselves around you – we don't need that kind of language. We just need to stand together,' Duckworth said. 'The US is not asking people to choose between the US and [China] … But we will make sure international norms are maintained and ask our friends to help us uphold them.'
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
China urges halt to auto industry's bruising price wars
SHANGHAI, May 31 (Reuters) - China called on Saturday for its automotive industry to halt brutal price wars, as a threat to the sector's health and sustainable development, after key executives jousted over pricing pressure following large discounts offered to buyers. Tension between some top players in the world's largest auto market has spilled into the open as competition intensifies, with price wars begun in early 2023 showing little sign of abating, despite concern among both government and industry. The industry ministry vowed to step up efforts to correct what it called excessive competition, the official news agency Xinhua said on Saturday. "There are no winners in a 'price war', let alone a future," the agency cited an unidentified ministry official as saying. The comments came after fresh incentives offered last week on more than 20 models by electric vehicle giant BYD ( opens new tab, that prompted several rivals, such as Geely ( opens new tab and Chery ( to follow suit. The ministry's comments echo a similar call, also on Saturday, by the China Association of Auto Manufacturers (CAAM) for a truce in the price wars, saying they affect profitability and efficiency. It added that a new round of price war "panic" was touched off in China after substantial discounts offered on May 23 by an automaker it did not identify. It proposed remedies such as auto companies sticking to the principle of fair competition and larger players refraining from market monopolies. "Apart from reducing the price of goods according to law, enterprises shall not dump goods at prices below cost," it added. BYD's incentives, which include government trade-in subsidies, can cut the domestic cost of its BYD Seagull electric hatchback to as little as 55,800 yuan ($7,750). On Friday, a BYD executive had decried as alarmist comments by the chief of Great Wall Motor that the industry was "unhealthy". Great Wall's ( opens new tab Wei Jianjun had said pricing pressure was hammering the bottom lines of car companies and suppliers. ($1=7.1991 Chinese yuan renminbi)
