Study: EU livestock density limits would mostly affect pig sector
That's according to a study published by the European Joint Research Centre (JRC), authored by researchers Maria Bielza, Franz Weiss, Jordan Hristov, and Thomas Fellman.
The study found that livestock density limits reduce nitrogen surplus, especially in hotspot regions.
The European Green Deal (EGD) and Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) reforms aim to achieve substantial environmental and climate objectives, requiring changes in agricultural practices.
The researchers explained that livestock density limits could be one of the measures to reduce adverse environmental impacts associated with intensive livestock production, particularly nitrogen pollution and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
Their study examined the effects of imposing maximum limits on livestock units (LSU) per hectare of utilised agricultural area across the EU.
The analysis focuses on both the economic and environmental impacts of livestock density restrictions, with particular emphasis on their influence on production, nitrogen surplus, ammonia emissions, nitrate leaching, and GHG emissions.
Study on livestock density limits
Using the Common Agricultural Policy Regional Impact Analysis (CAPRI) model, a detailed agricultural sector model, the study simulates impacts of different livestock density thresholds (2 LSU/ha and 1.4 LSU/ha) at regional and grid levels.
The model facilitated an evaluation of the potential changes in production, market prices, trade dynamics, and environmental indicators, providing a comprehensive view of the policy's potential outcomes.
The study stated: 'The need to maintain the livestock sector intensity within certain limits was already acknowledged in the 1992 MacSharry reform of the CAP, where compliance with stocking density thresholds was necessary to receive beef support.'
A maximum threshold of 1.4 LSU/ha of forage or grassland areas has been proposed for grazing animals to define extensive livestock farming, and is one of the values used in various CAP Strategic Plans (e.g., coupled income support in France, eco-schemes in Germany and Ireland, Agri-Environment and Climate Measures in Belgium-Wallonia).
A 2 LSU/ha threshold has been used to approximate the value of 170kg N/ha from manure in the organic farming regulation and the CAP.
This threshold was first introduced in the 1992 CAP reform for the special premium for male bovines and the suckler cow premium, together with the 1.4 LSU/ha limit for the additional extensification premium.
Additional requirements as part of cross-compliance were introduced in the 2003 CAP reform, following the legislative standards of 2 LSU/ha in the Agenda 2000 and a maximum of 170kg N/ha from manure in the Nitrates Directive.
The study outlines that despite continued support and efforts to limit livestock density across the EU, several member states and regions considerably exceed recommended nitrogen limits.
Findings
According to the findings, implementing livestock density limits results in reduced EU livestock numbers, particularly affecting the pig sector, followed by beef with dairy least affected.
Lower supply of animal products leads to a general increase in producer and consumer prices. Producer price increases (see graph below) are highest for pigmeat, eggs and beef according to the research.
Source: 'Impacts of reduced livestock density on European agriculture and the environment' published by JRC
Farming practices shift toward extensification, with environmental benefits including reductions in ammonia emissions, nitrates leaching, and nitrogen surplus.
However, a considerable amount of GHG emissions reduction in the EU could be offset by emission leakage to non-EU regions, diminishing the net global environmental benefits, according to the researchers.
The study's findings offer insights for EU policymakers and agricultural stakeholders into the complexities associated with enforcing livestock density limits.
The authors explained that the results underscore the importance of balancing agricultural production with environmental sustainability and highlight the need for comprehensive strategies that account for both local and global environmental impacts.
The study suggests that integrated measures are essential to achieving the EGD's ambitious environmental objectives.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
4 days ago
- Irish Examiner
Groundbreaking ammonia sensor developed at UCC
Farmers may benefit from a newly-developed ammonia sensor as it improves real-time detection. Researchers at University College Cork (UCC) have developed the sensor to help advance real-time detection of ammonia pollution. The development of the sensor was the result of the EU-funded RADICAL project led by UCC. The technology hopes to transform environmental monitoring as we know it, removing the cost barriers to farmers and supporting the enhancement of sustainable farming practices. Efficient detection of ammonia is essential for reducing air and water pollution, safeguarding human health, promoting sustainable agriculture, and shaping climate and environmental policies. Practical alternative to current sensors The researchers at UCC have developed the sensor out of silicon nanowire, promising a less bulky and more practical alternative to the spectroscopic sensors currently used to measure ammonia levels. The new sensor is said to be sensitive and precise while also consuming minimal power, and can operate at room temperature, allowing for real-time air quality monitoring. The sensor is designed to be compatible with existing technologies and is cost-effective and simple to produce. Initially designed to detect free radicals in the air, the team realised after meeting with several air quality companies that sensors for gases such as nitrogen dioxide from traffic fumes and ammonia from industry and agriculture were high on the priority list. The new technology can quickly and reliably detect ammonia, even in small amounts, and provide a portable solution for use in diverse environments. Vaishali Vardhan, lead author of the paper, said: 'This new sensor is a powerful tool for both air quality monitoring and research. "It is low in cost, small, and suitable for large-scale deployment. What distinguishes our technology is the use of bare silicon nanowires — avoiding complex hybridisation techniques — which makes the sensor more affordable and scalable. "The integration of UV light further boosts its sensitivity, enabling efficient detection of ammonia at low concentrations.' With ammonia playing a major role in Irish agriculture, and also sourced from vehicle emissions, it has become a growing concern. Once in the atmosphere, ammonia reacts with acidic gases to form particulate matter (PM2.5), which is harmful to human health and can lead to respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. Direct exposure can irritate the skin, eyes, and lungs. Excess ammonia in an environment causes water pollution, leading to algal blooms and eutrophication, which harm aquatic life. It also impacts air quality and climate. RADICAL project coordinator, Professor Justin Holmes, commented: 'This pioneering technology is set to revolutionise environmental monitoring in the agricultural sector. It will allow farmers to make more informed decisions, benefiting both their businesses and the environment as a whole.'
Agriland
03-08-2025
- Agriland
Study: Impact of deforestation for farming worse than thought
Growing food leads to greater environmental costs than previously known. A study published by Cambridge University has shown that deforestation for farmland is causing around 60% more damage to biodiversity than previously estimated. The study, carried out in Columbia, is the largest ever survey of rainforest birdlife conducted, recording 971 different species living in Columbian forests and pastures. After combing over a decade's worth of results and data from the study, Cambridge reported that the food we eat is coming at a greater environmental cost than previously thought. The study highlighted how the use of small-scale local surveys led to the discrepancy in the damage estimation, with no representation of large-scale damage previously being represented in studies. University of Cambridge's Department of Plant Sciences and Conservation Research Institute, and senior author of the report, Professor David Edwards was surprised by the result. He said: 'When people want to understand the wider impact of deforestation on biodiversity, they tend to do a local survey and extrapolate the results, but the problem is that tree clearance is occurring at massive spatial scales, across all sorts of different habitats and elevations. 'When we looked the biodiversity impact of deforestation across 13 different eco-regions in Colombia, we found a 62% greater biodiversity loss than local survey results would indicate.' Almost one third of Columbia is made up of rainforest, hosting a wide range of exotic animal and plant life, many of which have very specific habitat requirements The report highlighted how there is biodiversity offsetting schemes in place, which support development of biodiversity in a bid to offset species losses in areas cleared out. However these schemes are only affective if accurate habitats can be recreated for the species. Trees are also being cleared at huge scales in Colombia and other tropical regions to create growing space for major agricultural crops including rubber, oil palm, sugar cane, and coffee. Edwards said: 'The food we eat comes with a much greater environmental cost than we thought. "We need policymakers to think much more about the larger scale biodiversity impact of deforestation.' While Columbia is not part of the EU-Mercosur trade agreement, this study highlights the implications further deforestation may have in other countries if the deal is finalised.
Agriland
01-08-2025
- Agriland
Time of Sampling May Affect Eu Soil Health Monitoring Study
An organisation that is building a comprehensive map of European soils and their condition is warning that the EU's Soil Monitoring Law may be omitting a vital factor in assessing soil health in the bloc. The EU plans to record and map the various soil types and soil health throughout the bloc, as envisaged through its proposed Soil Monitoring Law. The law will make the monitoring of soil health mandatory, as part of efforts to have all soils in a healthy condition by 2050, in line with the EU Zero Pollution ambition. Article 31 of the draft law states: "It is therefore appropriate to lay down criteria for sampling points that are representative of the soil condition under different soil types, climatic conditions, and land use." The three variables mentioned will play a vital role in deciding where soils should be sampled in the vast area that the EU covers. However, evidence is now emerging that a fourth variable should also be included and that is the time of sampling, which could significantly affect the results and render the overall picture inaccurate if not included. The warning comes from an article published by AI 4 Soil Health, an organisation which is building a comprehensive map of European soils and their condition. Soil sampling is the only way to really get to know a soil. Image: Petrol Post Driver The author, Dr. Peter Lehmann of ETH University Zurich, makes reference to a study carried out in Switzerland which notes how water-absorbing capabilities of soils can very throughout the year, depending on weather patterns. Although the research was carried out in natural forest, the findings indicate that all soils - wherever their location and use - will be subject to similar influences. If these factors are not included in the final analysis for monitoring soil health, then the AI $ Soil Health map will likely fail to be within the 5% margin of error required by the EU. The research demonstrated that the health of the soil can change significantly during dry summer months. A water repellent layer can form at the surface as the organic chemistry of this zone changes in response to prolonged drought. Soil can appear less healthy when dry Those tending the land are well aware of this affect, as a summer shower will often not be absorbed by the soil, it takes a good soak for the soil to start absorbing the water. It is the top 2cm that are responsible for this, which can give healthy, well-structured soil a water-resistant cap that adversely affects essential soil functions further on down the soil profile. A further aspect of the soil function studied was the action of two extracellular soil enzymes that play an important role in the decomposition of organic carbon compounds and how they might be affected by soil conditions. The study showed that one enzyme was more affected by the soil moisture while the other responded more to soil temperature,. This reinforced the notion that weather patterns can distort our present assessments of soil health, and may have been doing so for some time. The depth and type of cultivation may alter the soil's response to drought and so effect its apparent health Dr. Lehmann concluded that the timing of measurements is crucial and depends on which specific soil functions are being assessed. He also notes that another key lesson is the importance of where measurements are taken. "The top surface layer plays a critical role in determining whether a soil can provide essential services like water storage and support for plant growth, or whether it should be considered unhealthy." he notes. Just on this last point, the sun wheel-type implements that are sold as mechanical weeders here in Ireland are marketed as crust-breaking tools on the continent and said to work well as such when used in dry periods. Sun wheel implements will keep the layer of soil open for rain to penetrate. It is perhaps the disturbance of this water-repellent top layer of soil that is the secret to their success in drier areas of the EU, making them generally superfluous here in damper conditions.
