SALT Caucus Republicans seethe at $10K cap in Senate's ‘big, beautiful bill'
Moderate House Republicans from high-tax blue states are seething at the Senate's proposal to keep the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap at $10,000, setting the stage for a showdown over one of the thorniest aspects of the GOP's 'big, beautiful bill.'
Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee set off a frenzy Monday afternoon when they released text for their part of the GOP megabill, which lowered the SALT deduction cap from $40,000 — the product of tenuous negotiations between House moderates and Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) — to $10,000, matching the cap in current law.
Senate Republicans have said that the number in the text is merely a placeholder to continue negotiations across the Capitol. But House Republicans in the SALT Caucus are warning in no uncertain terms that they will not accept anything lower than the $40,000 deduction cap they landed last month.
'We have been crystal clear that the SALT deal we negotiated in good faith with the Speaker and the White House must remain in the final bill,' Reps. Andrew Garbarino (R-N.Y.) and Young Kim (R-Calif.), co-chairs of the SALT Caucus, wrote in a statement. 'Instead of undermining the deal already in place and putting the entire bill at risk, the Senate should work with us to keep our promise of historic tax relief and deliver on our Republican agenda.'
Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), another key member of the group, was more succinct, writing on the social platform X that the proposal was 'DEAD ON ARRIVAL' and warning in a statement that a $40,000 deduction cap 'is the deal and I will not accept a penny less.'
'If the Senate reduces the SALT number, I will vote NO and the bill will fail in the House,' he added.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) told reporters Monday afternoon that the $10,000 deduction cap is a 'marker' for talks with House Republicans, and that they will find a number in the middle that satisfies both camps.
'We understand that it's a negotiation,' Thune said. 'Obviously there had to be some marker in the bill to start with. But we're prepared to have discussions with our colleagues here in the Senate and figure out a landing spot.'
If a deduction cap below $40,000 remains in the bill, and Senate Republicans approve it, the legislation is unlikely to pass the House, where it must go for final approval before landing on President Trump's desk. House Republicans can only afford to lose three votes and still pass the bill — assuming full attendance and all Democrats vote 'no' — and far more have come out against the new SALT provision.
'The Senate doesn't have the votes for $10k SALT in the House,' Rep. Nick LaLota (R-N.Y.), a vocal member of the SALT Caucus, wrote on X, with a photo of Daveed Diggs portraying Thomas Jefferson in 'Hamilton' and a caption reading 'you don't have the votes; you don't have the votes.'
'And if they're not sold on the House's $40k compromise, wait until they crash the [One Big Beautiful Bill Act] and [Tax Cuts and Jobs Act] expires—when SALT goes back to unlimited at year-end,' he added. 'They won't like that one bit.'
Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) wrote on X that 'Everyone knows this 10K number will have to go up. And it will. NY Republicans will fight and deliver real tax relief for our overly taxed constituents (unlike NY Democrats who have failed the people of NY over and over crushing them with high taxes).'
SALT for months has been one of the most contentious parts of the GOP's bill full of Trump's legislative priorities, with moderate House Republicans from high-tax blue states — including representatives from New York, New Jersey and California, many of whom helped secure the conference's majority — pushing for a higher deduction cap, and deficit hawks pressing to keep it low.
After months of negotiations, members of the House's SALT Caucus landed a deal with leadership for a $40,000 deduction cap for individuals making $500,000 or less — quadruple the current $10,000 deduction cap. They warned their colleagues in the upper chamber not to tamper with the number.
Johnson, who negotiated the $40,000 deduction cap with members of the SALT Caucus, said he urged the Senate on a number of occasions to be 'cautious' in how it changed their bill, especially the SALT provision.
'I've been very consistent from the very beginning: I've encouraged them to be very cautious in changing terms of the bill, especially on SALT because it took us, as I've said over and over and over, it took us over a year to negotiate those terms, and it's very delicate,' he said last week.
But once Senate Republicans got their hands on the package, they quickly warned that they would lower the number, staking opposition to the higher deduction cap that they view as an unfair subsidy for blue states. With zero Senate Republicans hailing from blue states that benefit from a higher SALT deduction cap, the issue has no champion in the upper chamber.
It remains unclear where SALT conversations will go from here. With the party's July 4 deadline quickly approaching, Senate Republicans can still change parts of their package, whether it be through an amendment or on the floor. Even so, SALT Caucus Republicans in the House are warning that they are sticking by the $40,000 cap.
'The $40,000 SALT deduction was carefully negotiated along with other tax provisions by the House of Representatives and we all had to give a little to obtain the votes to pass the Big Beautiful Bill,' Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-N.Y.) wrote on X. 'For the Senate to leave the SALT deduction capped at $10,000 is not only insulting but a slap in the face to the Republican districts that delivered our majority and trifecta.'
'We understand that it's a negotiation. Obviously there had to be some marker in the bill to start with. But we're prepared to have discussions with our colleagues here in the Senate and figure out a landing spot.'
Al Weaver contributed.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
17 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump weighs US role amid Israel-Iran conflict
It's Tuesday. The next two weeks will be *extremely* humid for most of the U.S. Brace yourselves — and your hair. 🥵 Check out this humidity map In today's issue: Trump touts 'control of the skies' over Iran Situation Room team assembled Vance shares Team Trump's thinking Wading through 'big, beautiful' text Mike Lee confronted by Senate colleague All eyes on the Situation Room: President Trump has assembled his national security team in the Situation Room today to weigh the U.S.'s options as Israel and Iran's brewing conflict unfolds. 🚨 He just posted an update on the situation in the Middle East: 'We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran. Iran had good sky trackers and other defensive equipment, and plenty of it, but it doesn't compare to American made, conceived, and manufactured 'stuff.' Nobody does it better than the good ol' USA,' Trump posted on Truth Social. Trump also sent a warning to the 'so-called 'Supreme Leader,'' arguing he's an 'easy target' — and called for 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER.' ^ He also rejected his own director of national intelligence's assessment of Iran's nuclear capabilities earlier this year, telling reporters this morning he 'doesn't care' what Tulsi Gabbard said and insisting Iran was close to obtaining a nuclear weapon. Vice President Vance also publicly weighed in, giving what may be the clearest signal that Trump is weighing whether to get involved. 'He may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment,' Vance said of Trump. 'That decision ultimately belongs to the president.' Read Vance's full post The big question — will the U.S. get involved?: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced the U.S. will send deployments to the Middle East, stressing they are to be 'defensive.' White House spokesperson Alex Pfeiffer was then quick to shut down any suggestion that the U.S. would get involved, aside from '[defending] American interests.' Trump has urged a diplomatic solution. The Trump administration told Middle Eastern allies over the weekend that the U.S. will *not* get actively involved in the conflict unless Iran targets Americans, per Axios. He clearly wants a deal to be made with Iran, but Israel's preemptive strikes have made that much more difficult. Who has Trump's ear?: Trump was set to meet Tuesday morning with his one-stop-shop for foreign policy advice, Secretary of State/national security adviser Marco Rubio, Vice President Vance and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Dan Caine, per Politico. 💡 Some context to Trump's team: Rubio has been fairly hawkish on foreign involvement in his career, while Vance has a more isolationist worldview. Both have closely followed Trump's 'America First' approach. Caine was not well known before his nomination — and was viewed at the time as being an unconventional pick. Plus, remember when Trump gutted his National Security Council in May, dismissing dozens of foreign policy experts? This is one of the most perilous moments for Trump's national security team since retaking office. I wonder how these shifting dynamics will affect moments like this. Coming up later: In The Hill's Evening Report, Jonathan Easley will bring you the latest on Trump's huddle with his national security team as the day unfolds. Click here to sign up & get it in your inbox. What are the U.S.'s options?: The New York Times's David E. Sanger and Jonathan Swan argues Trump has two choices: ' Last-Chance Diplomacy or a Bunker-Busting Bomb.' 🗨️ Follow today's live blog 🍁 Isn't Trump supposed to be in Canada?: Trump cut his Group of Seven (G7) Summit trip short, abruptly flying back to Washington, D.C., late on Monday, after sending an ominous Truth Social warning to Iranians. 'Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!' Trump posted. Trump's reason for leaving Canada: Trump says it's easier to stay on top of the developments in the Middle East in person than by phone. 'Just to be a little bit, I think, more well versed, not having to use telephones so much,' Trump told reporters. 'Being on the scene is much better.' ➤ MEANWHILE — THE G7 IS STILL HAPPENING: The remaining six world leaders at the G7 in Alberta, Canada, are carrying on with their last day of the summit, sans Trump. This was a loss for Ukraine: Trump had been expected to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on the sidelines of the summit. His sudden departure means Zelensky lost his critical face time with the U.S. president. Lighter tidbit: Trump dropped some trade documents while standing alongside British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. 📹 Watch The big, beautiful bill (Senate's version): The Senate Finance Committee has unveiled its highly anticipated text of President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' That means the full Senate bill text is public — and now the monumental task of getting nearly all Senate Republicans on board begins. Here's what's in it: 🔷 Medicaid: Like the House's bill, the Senate's bill would impose work requirements for Medicaid beneficiaries. 🔷 Trump's 2017 tax cuts: The Senate's bill extends the core elements of Trump's tax cuts but has a lower increase for the child tax credit (Senate: $2,200 per child, House: $2,500). 🔷 Taxes on tips: It creates a new deduction for taxes on tips, overtime pay and car loan interest but doesn't make them fully deductible. 🔷 Green energy tax credits: The Senate's bill will significantly roll back green energy tax credits but is more flexible than what the House passed. 🔷 SALT: The Senate's version nixes the deal Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) negotiated. State and local tax (SALT) deductions would be rolled back to $10,000 a year, instead of the new $40,000 limit. 🔷 Debt limit: The Senate's bill would raise the debt ceiling by $5 trillion, $1 trillion more than the House's bill. Sen. Smith confronted Sen. Lee over his social media posts: Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.) confronted Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) on Monday over his comments about the fatal shooting of a prominent Minnesota state lawmaker. 📸 The confrontation 📹 Lee wouldn't answer questions about his posts or the confrontation What were Lee's comments?: He blamed Democrats for the fatal shooting. 'This is what happens When Marxists don't get their way,' Lee wrote Sunday on his personal account on the social platform X. He then wrote, 'Nightmare on Waltz Street,' referring to Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D), alongside a photo of the suspected shooter. Democrats have fiercely condemned Lee's comments. Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) told MSNBC that she also plans to talk to Lee. 'What I'm going to tell him is: This isn't funny,' she said. COMING UP The House is out. The Senate is in. President Trump is back in Washington. (All times EST) 2:15 p.m.: Two Senate votes, one confirmation and a vote to end debate on another nominee. 📆 Today's agenda 2:30 p.m.: Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell holds a news conference. 💻 Livestream 4:30 p.m.: Two more Senate votes. 🐝 INTERNET BUZZ 🍺 Celebrate: Today is National Root Beer Day. 🍭 Jell-O may not be quite as electric blue anymore: Kraft Heinz says it will remove all artificial dyes from its U.S. products by the end of 2027.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Solar stocks clobbered as Senate targets early end to wind and solar credits in Trump tax bill
Solar stocks got hit hard on Tuesday after the Senate proposed to put an end to wind and solar incentives years earlier than scheduled. Shares of Sunrun (RUN), the largest US rooftop panel installer, tumbled more than 40%. SolarEdge Technologies (SEDG) also dropped more than 40%, while Enphase Energy (ENPH) tanked more than 20%. The Senate version of the bill, which is still in draft form, would phase out Biden-era tax credits in 2028, rather than starting in 2032 under current law. Tax breaks for other sources of power, such as hydropower, geothermal and nuclear, would remain in place until 2036. The Senate proposal appears to have surprised investors, who expected lobbying efforts in recent weeks to have convinced legislators to roll back similar provisions passed in the House at the end of May. "The Senate version of the tax bill contained mostly disappointing news for solar and wind," Raymond James investment strategy analyst Pavel Molchanov wrote in a note on Tuesday morning. Molchanov noted that the Senate proposal would begin cutting the amount of credits sharply starting in 2026, and reach zero by 2028. The Senate proposal does allow for residential solar credit to expire 180 days after the bill's enactment — rather than at year-end 2025. "Although it is a minor tweak in timing, it could translate into some demand pull-in during the early months of 2026," said the strategist. Prior to the Senate's proposal, the analyst said if the bill were "finalized and signed into law in its current form — that would create a lot of disruption and layoffs, project cancellations, potentially bankruptcies." That forecast has start to play out after financial lender Solar Mosaic filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection earlier this month, followed by residential solar provider Sunnova Energy (NOVA). The clean energy industry has had a volatile year as elevated interest rates have kept borrowing costs high. President Trump's return to the White House has added pressure to the sector, with his administration talking down green energy initiatives in favor of fossil fuels. On the manufacturing side, companies involved with batteries and panels have leaned into plans to onshore operations in response to Trump's tariff policies. In a move welcomed by the solar sector, the US Department of Commerce announced plans to impose tariffs as high as 3,521% on panel imports from four Southeast Asian countries. Despite a recent rally fueled by hopes that clean energy tax credits might be preserved, the Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) is down more than 4% year to date. Ines Ferre is a senior business reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on X at @ines_ferre. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Washington Post
20 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Schumer calls for increased security for senators
Politics Schumer calls for increased security for senators June 17, 2025 | 4:46 PM GMT Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) on June 17 called for additional security measures to better protect elected officials in the wake of the Minnesota shooting.