logo
Being an annoying neighbour could see you slapped with £400 fine over little-known rule

Being an annoying neighbour could see you slapped with £400 fine over little-known rule

Yahoo23-02-2025

It's a nightmare when your outdoor bin is full before collection day. There's always the temptation to walk a little ways down the road and sling your bursting bin bags into your unsuspecting neighbour's bin, but you should be careful before doing so.
London waste management experts BusinessWaste.co.uk have issued a warning over using your neighbour's bin.
Using your neighbour's bin is actually deemed to be a form of antisocial behaviour that might be considered fly-tipping, so in short, no, you can't. 'Bin stuffing' is an offence that not many are aware of and can lead to massive fines.
READ MORE: Martin Lewis responds to worries cash ISA limit could be reduced to £4,000
READ MORE: Rachel Reeves breaks silence on cash ISA '£4,000 limit' reports
The thinking behind this that it can lead to serious inconveniences for your neighbour. Even a small bag of rubbish thrown in another person's bin can lead to unnecessary tension and a logistical headache for the bin owner.
The local authorities decide on the level of fines from minor flytipping cases like bin stuffing. The penalty often ranges from £150 to £400, depending on the severity of the offence and local council rules.
Failing to pay the fine could me you get taken to court and the fine is increased. Further escalation could even land you with a criminal record, debt recovery that impacts your credit score or even imprisonment.
Though it seems unlikely you will be fined for this, it does happen. In December 2024, a Birmingham resident was fined £1,000 for the offence, The Mirror reported.
Being the victim of bin stuffing can be a real nuisance. To avoid this happening, if possible, move your bin to a more secure and difficult location to access.
If this fails, consider speaking to the neighbour and explaining the trouble its causing you. Beyond this it might be necessary to take further action.
Many local councils provide guidance and can offer solutions, including locking your bin or marking it clearly to deter misuse. If all else fails, contact your local council to file a formal complaint, providing evidence where possible.
Mark Hall, waste collection expert at BusinessWaste, says: 'Good neighbourly relations are built on respect and understanding. Handling waste properly is not just a matter of legal obligation; it's also a significant component of living harmoniously in close quarters.
'Ensuring that each household takes responsibility for their own waste is key to maintaining not only cleanliness and order, but also a pleasant environment for everyone in the community.'
Get the top stories from across London directly to your inbox. Sign up for MyLondon's The 12 HERE to get the biggest stories every day

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Urgent warning to iPhone owners to install iOS 18.5 now: ‘Users need to act'
Urgent warning to iPhone owners to install iOS 18.5 now: ‘Users need to act'

Yahoo

time6 days ago

  • Yahoo

Urgent warning to iPhone owners to install iOS 18.5 now: ‘Users need to act'

Data experts are urging iPhone users to install the new iOS 18.5 update, which includes a fix to prevent hackers from gaining access to personal content. According to The Mirror, Apple has acknowledged that the most recent software update corrects a significant security gap that could potentially allow hackers to get into personal data such as photos, messages and app information. 'Apple acted fast, but users need to act, too. Updating your device is one of the most important things you can do to protect your private information,' a representative from Safe Data Storage said. 'Tell your parents, your grandparents, your neighbor — anyone with an iPhone. These updates aren't optional anymore — they're your first line of defense.' The latest software fix, which is compatible with iPhone XS models and later, deals with a vulnerability that involves 'processing a maliciously crafted image [that] may lead to unexpected app termination or corrupt process memory,' according to Apple. Apple claimed it solved the issue by implementing 'improved input sanitization' and urged that iOS 18.5 'includes important security fixes and is recommended for all users.' There have been no reports of users being manipulated so far, but security experts note that these kinds of vulnerabilities tend to be targeted and misused quickly once it becomes more widely known. 'Many people assume iPhones are immune to serious threats, but no device is immune to a vulnerability like this,' Safe Data Storage explained. 'If someone sends you a seemingly innocent image and your phone hasn't been updated, it could silently wreak havoc or grant intruders access to your private files.' Those who have an iPhone XS or later are being urged to update their phones as soon as possible and to offer assistance to elders or users who aren't as knowledgeable about technology. 'The longer someone delays updating, the longer they leave that door open,' Safe Data Storage warned. 'And many people – especially grandparents or those less tech-savvy – don't realize just how important these updates are.' Safe Data Storage also provided some simple steps to take to enhance your iPhone's day-to-day security: Disable message previews on the lock screen: This prevents sensitive messages from being seen when your phone is unattended. To change this, go to Settings > Notifications > Messages > Show Previews, set to Never. Enable two-factor authentication for Apple ID: This provides extra security and protection, even if someone else has your password. To do this, go to Settings > [your name] > Password and Security, activate Two-Factor Authentication. Restrict app access to personal data: Many apps ask for access to contacts, photos or location without it being a requirement. To alter this, go to Settings > Privacy and Security, then look through each section and change permissions where necessary.

Trump judicial nominee wrote op-ed in favor of literacy tests for voters
Trump judicial nominee wrote op-ed in favor of literacy tests for voters

Yahoo

time7 days ago

  • Yahoo

Trump judicial nominee wrote op-ed in favor of literacy tests for voters

Donald Trump's administration isn't being subtle in the steps it's taking to recreate the conditions of the segregated Jim Crow era. And one of his judicial nominees for a lifetime appointment once wrote in favor of one of the era's main tools for voter suppression. In March, the Trump administration lifted an express ban on the funding of federal contractors that support segregated facilities. Earlier this month, the administration ended a decadeslong school desegregation order issued to a Louisiana parish notorious for its history of educational discrimination. Taken together with his efforts to purge diversity, equity and inclusion programs from public and private institutions, the moves make a credible argument for Trump being the most pro-segregation president in living memory. Now HuffPost reports that one of his recent judicial nominees, Missouri's Solicitor General Joshua Divine, appears to favor one of the hallmarks of the Jim Crow era, with the outlet noting his past support for requiring prospective voters to pass a literacy test. According to HuffPost: One of President Donald Trump's nominees to a federal judgeship, Josh Divine, argued in a college opinion piece that people should be required to take literacy tests in order to vote — despite such tests being outlawed by the Voting Rights Act of 1965 because they were routinely used to keep Black people from voting. 'People who aren't informed about issues or platforms — especially when it is so easy to become informed these days — have no business voting, which is why I propose state-administered literacy tests,' Divine wrote in October 2010 in The Mirror, a publication of the University of Northern Colorado. At the time, he was a junior at the university. 'In the Civil Rights Act, literacy tests were banned because they were used as a form of discrimination in that they were only administered to certain groups of people,' he said, 'but literacy tests themselves are not a bad thing.' Some people might argue it's unfair to judge a man on views he expressed as a college junior, but there's a long tradition of scrutinizing judicial nominees' past writings that I don't think Divine should be excused from. After all, 2010 wasn't even that long ago! As HuffPost notes, it's not clear whether Divine still stands by his support for literacy tests for voting, and the Missouri Attorney General's Office did not immediately return MSNBC's request for comment. But that Divine ever expressed support for literacy tests — let alone in an op-ed that acknowledges their use as a racist tool to undermine civil rights — seems like it should give pause to the senators considering his nomination. Divine's nomination reminded me of the far-right Federalist Society director Leonard Leo, who's helped steer the conservative movement's judicial appointments for years. Leo's infatuation with returning America to pre-New Deal jurisprudence, a period when legalized racism was rampant, is well-documented; Joshua Divine, who is himself a contributor to the Federalist Society, seems suited to help Leo pursue that goal. This article was originally published on

The Daily T: Police are just the start — Reeves' spending headaches will only get worse
The Daily T: Police are just the start — Reeves' spending headaches will only get worse

Yahoo

time28-05-2025

  • Yahoo

The Daily T: Police are just the start — Reeves' spending headaches will only get worse

With Rachel Reeves announcing her spending review in just two weeks, there's a desperate jostle for last-minute cash before budgets get drastically cut. Angela Rayner wants more money for social housing so that she can meet the Government's target for 1.5m new homes by the end of the parliament. Ed Milliband also wants more money so that he can meet Labour's pledge for net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. But perhaps the most striking intervention comes from the UK's top police chiefs — including Sir Mark Rowley — who today warned that the government won't hit their targets to halve knife crime and rates of violence against women and girls, as well as to recruit 13,000 additional police officers, if budgets are reduced. However, with a £3bn increase in funding since 2016, as well as an extra 20,000 officers added to the force in the same period, do they actually deserve or need more money? Can Rachel Reeves juggle the twin requirements of bringing the economy under control, whilst also trying to placate her party and her fellow ministers' instincts to increase public spending? And is she being left swinging in the wind by her own Prime Minister? Labour also risks being outflanked by Nigel Farage, who this week promised to raise the two-child benefit cap and to fully restore winter fuel payments to pensioners. But as economist Tom Clougherty tells The Daily T, the Reform UK leader will come under scrutiny in the coming years to show his numbers add up. Elsewhere, away from Westminster, King Charles is in Canada at the state opening of parliament — and did he make a not-so-subtle dig at Donald Trump's ambitions to annex his northerly neighbours? Watch episodes of the Daily T here. You can also listen on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts, and subscribe to The Daily T newsletter for updates. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store