Nine killed in WW2 bomber crash remembered
Eighty years after nine airmen lost their lives in a bomber crash in Surrey, a service to commemorate them has been held.
An American Air Force B-17G flying fortress bomber crashed during bad weather in Reigate while returning from a mission over Germany on 19 March 1945.
On Wednesday, a service took place at the crash site on Reigate Hill.
Tim Richardson, an RAF veteran and historian for the National Trust in Surrey, said: "The aircraft flew over Reigate, startled a bus queue, disappeared into the clouds covering the hill. A huge crash, silence and that was it."
Flying in formation, the American crew had been told to split up to avoid collision and to make their way back to base after the weather "closed in" at the English Channel, he added.
Mr Richardson said the reaction at the time was one of "horror".
"The impact was so severe that all nine men died almost instantly," he told BBC Radio Surrey, adding that one crewman was found half a mile (0.8km) away from the plane wreck.
The crash site is now marked by a pair of carved wing tips and cared for by the National Trust.
Sculptor Roger Day completed the memorial on the North Downs Way for the 70th anniversary of the crash.
It replicates the size of the destroyed aircraft and includes fuselage aluminium from the crash.
He told Secret Surrey: "It's so tragic, because of their bravery obviously. But also being so near the end of the war, they could have been home, free."
The service featured a wreath-laying ceremony, including one presented by US Air Attaché Lt Col Dan Benson, and the head boy and head girl of The Royal Alexandra and Albert School.
HM Lord-Lieutenant of Surrey, Michael More-Molyneux, said Lt Col Dan Benson's attendance was a "powerful testament to our shared history".
He added: "The presence of our cadets and scouts at the ceremony brought a sense of reverence and the passing on of history from one generation to the next."
Follow BBC Surrey on Facebook, and on X. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@bbc.co.uk or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250.
D-Day nurse remembered 80 years after death
The abseiling cleaners who dust off old RAF planes
Funeral held for 'last' WW2 RAF bomber pilot
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
10 hours ago
- CNBC
I'm a psychologist who studies couples: Here's what people fight about the most in relationships—and No. 1 will surprise you
Even the happiest couples encounter conflict. But what they fight about reveals a lot about what's missing in the relationship. As a psychologist who studies couples, I've found that there are many similar topics that come up again and again. And the first step to resolving the conflicts is to know what those topics are. According to a YouGov poll of 1,000 American adults, and based on my research, here are the most common reasons couples fight — and the psychology behind each one. A sour tone or attitude — a slightly raised voice, a sarcastic comment, an eye-roll mid-conversation — is by far the most common reason couples fight. To the person exhibiting it, it might not seem like a big deal. But to the partner on the receiving end, it hits a direct nerve because it signals contempt. In marital research, contempt is one of the most reliable predictors of divorce. Unlike overt criticism or stonewalling (shutting down emotionally), contempt disguises itself with non-verbal gestures and body language. How to move past it: Resist the impulse to strike back. Fighting fire with fire never works, so try naming the effect instead: "That felt condescending. Can we try again?" This gives your partner the chance to course-correct, and it doesn't instantly escalate things. If you're the one delivering the tone, check in with yourself before saying anything more. Are you feeling unheard? Frustrated? Overwhelmed? Pinpointing what's fueling the contempt is the first step to expressing yourself without hurting the relationship. Arguments about family relations often reflect fundamental misalignments and unmet needs. One partner might feel unsupported or sidelined, especially if their spouse seems to default to defending their side of the family. In situations involving children, arguments usually boil down to value clashes — where each partner feels like their core parenting beliefs are being dismissed. Neither partner is "right" or "wrong" in these scenarios. In fact, they're more than likely seeking the exact same thing: someone who's on their side. How to move past it: A good place to start is to reassure one another. For example: "I love my family, but you're still my partner. How can we find a solution that meets both of our needs and values?" Then talk about your limits as a team: what to do when a line is crossed, or how to show solidarity in front of others (even when you disagree privately). People often assume that arguments about chores are about the chores themselves — the dishes left in the sink, the laundry piling up, the trash that never gets taken out. But if that were true, these issues could be quickly fixed with a simple chore chart. Rather, the real problem is the uneven distribution of labor. According to research, one partner in a relationship usually shoulders the bulk of domestic work. But they aren't just folding the clothes and cooking the meals, they're also managing appointments, coordinating the bills and keeping mental tabs on everyone's well-being but their own. This "invisible load" goes largely unacknowledged, and that lack of recognition is usually where the fight starts. How to move past it: This dynamic can often be changed if the load is named out loud. Even just saying, "I didn't realize how much you were holding, thank you," gives your partner the acknowledgement they've been needing to hear. From there, work together to redistribute tasks in a way that feels sustainable. Fairness won't look like a 50/50 split every day, but it should feel like something you both have a hand in. This is one of the trickiest arguments to navigate. In many cases, by the time couples are arguing about they talk to each other, the original issue has likely already been lost in translation. For example, one partner is upset about an unfair distribution of chores, or they're frustrated with how their in-laws treat them. But when these concerns are brought up, research shows they can quickly go off the rails when the other engages with them ineffectively — or with hostility. If the conversation is met with defensiveness, criticism or stonewalling, the fight will shift its focus from the initial issue. Instead, it becomes a matter of how poorly the conversation is going. How to move past it: One simple strategy successful couples use is the "five second rule": They have a designated word or phrase that signals: "We're spiraling, let's take a time-out." This gives a much-needed pause, without the negative effects of storming out. When you return to the conversation, try to see eye-to-eye before continuing to air out your grievances: "I want to understand why you're upset, and I want you to understand the same for me. You share your side, then I'll share mine."
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Removal of beach sea defences given go-ahead
Work to remove sea defences from a Dorset beach is due to begin in September after the scheme to "allow nature to take its course" received planning consent. The National Trust is proposing "managed realignment" followed by "no intervention" at Middle Beach, Studland, in response to climate change and coastal erosion. It said the stone gabions were "collapsing and a risk to the public" and their removal would result in a more natural beach within two years. Dorset Council approved the application after receiving no objections from Natural England, conservation and environment officers and Studland Parish Council. The site, between South Beach and Knoll Beach, is next to a 120-space car park. Bracken and sycamore saplings in a neighbouring area will also be removed as part of wider works to create areas of open sand for invertebrate species, breeding birds and reptiles, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service. The agent, on behalf of the trust, said: "Once the defences are removed, the shoreline will readjust quite rapidly to a natural alignment, in line with the shoreline management plan, and ensuring the beach future." The trust said the works would result in a natural cove and an enhanced wildlife habitat for sand lizards and birds. Work will also be timed to "minimise the impact on beachgoers, and avoid disturbing sand lizards during the egg-laying period". It said the cafe, toilets and beach would remain open. A beach cafe which operated at the site for more than 70 years was demolished by the National Trust in 2023 due to erosion, with a replacement opened in the car park. You can follow BBC Dorset on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram. Sea defences could be removed at beauty spot Cafe on eroding beach closes ahead of demolition Beach cafe set to be torn down in New Year National Trust Dorset Council Local Democracy Reporting Service
Business Insider
14 hours ago
- Business Insider
I'm 92 and still live independently. I make sure to stay active, and I don't eat a lot of red meat.
This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Mira Armstrong, a 92-year-old from Porepunkah, Australia. It has been edited for length and clarity. I built my home with my husband, Bruce, in 1956. Now that I'm 92 years old, I still live independently. I hope I croak it here. I was born in Poland in 1933 during the Depression. My father was a shoemaker and in the army reserve. When World War II broke out, he was taken prisoner and sent to Germany. My mother, siblings, and I followed. I got a rough start to life Life was pretty tough. We lived in a derelict, abandoned farmhouse and weren't allowed to go to school because we weren't German citizens. While German children were at school, we'd scavenge at the dump — once, we even found an old gramophone. Toward the end of the war, I remember hearing American planes overhead. An old German man cycled through our village, sounding a siren as they approached. They never bombed our village, only cities and factories. I remember watching thousands of British airmen being marched past on foot. They stopped and ate grass because they were so hungry. I wish I knew how to speak English back then, but I didn't. We moved to Australia after the war, and things changed After the war, we were moved from one displaced persons camp to another. Europe was in chaos. We spent some time in Italy, then came to Australia aboard the SS Skaugum. My father got a job in the ship's kitchen and was finally able to buy toothpaste. We'd cleaned our teeth with ash during the war. When we arrived in Melbourne on March 28, 1950, I was 17. It felt like heaven. Everything was so strange and unusual. We were finally free. My family eventually settled in Porepunkah, Victoria, and I met my husband, Bruce, at the local swimming hole. One day, he waited in his truck to pick my sister and me up from work, and that was it. We were married in 1954 — I was 21, Bruce was 24. Longevity could be hereditary — my mum lived to 97. She was hardworking and survived many hardships, too. But I have also made a few lifestyle choices that may have helped. Being active has always been a priority When I was younger, I used to cycle 24 kilometers to and from work, even to church in high heels. I did everything fast, whether it was housework or heaving hay bales around our farm. When Bruce and I built our house, we dug the foundation holes and the well by hand. We had five kids, and I was constantly busy. I worked in hospitality and retail, never behind a desk. These days, I still walk a lot, mainly around the house and outside, and I like to garden. I eat a balanced diet, and I don't drink or smoke I eat everything — probably because I remember the starvation during the war. Once, we went for four days without food. For breakfast, I have porridge or Weetabix. I eat soup full of veggies, wholemeal toasties, chicken, fish, and walnuts. There's not a lot of red meat in my diet. My vice is fruit, though I have to be careful because I'm borderline diabetic. I never smoked or drank, and I only recently started drinking coffee. Staying social and volunteering is key Our home was always social — full of friends and family. I enjoy spending time with my eight grandkids and eight great-grandkids. I've also done a lot of volunteer work: 29 years with Meals on Wheels, 14 years with the op shop, and years of church work. I get bored easily, and I enjoy giving back. My faith has given me comfort in tough times Bruce died in 1977 shortly after a trucking accident. He was 47 years old, I was 44. I still had three boys at home and about 70 cows to manage on our farm. It was a horrendous time, and I went through hell. I did three part-time jobs and took care of everything on autopilot. After Bruce died, I started cursing God and stopped going to church. Then, in 1992, my youngest son, Graham, was killed in a road accident. It was very difficult, and that's when I returned to church. My faith has brought me comfort ever since. I make sure to keep my mind active I keep my mind active with puzzles and reading. I enjoy thrillers, and hot romances, too. After Bruce died, I'd read romance novels through the night. In the morning, I didn't even remember what they were about. These days, I enjoy feeding the birds and gardening. For what it's worth, these habits may have led to my longevity, and they've surely contributed to my enjoyment of life. But my No. 1 tip for a long life? Don't die!
