Dozens Arrested at Mass Protests Across Israel
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Israeli police fired water cannons at crowds of protesters demanding a deal to free the remaining hostages in Gaza and arrested 38 people "for acts including disturbing public order and endangering public safety," a police spokesperson told Newsweek.
Why It Matters
Many Israelis have grown increasingly critical of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's handling of the more than 22-month war in Gaza, as hostages remain captive and calls mount for their release and a ceasefire deal with Hamas. Meanwhile, those in Netanyahu's Cabinet have called for a more aggressive military offensive in Gaza.
Netanyahu has vowed to take Gaza City by force, a stance that has divided Israelis who fear further military action could endanger the hostages' survival.
What To Know
On Sunday, relatives and friends of hostages taken by Hamas, a Palestinian militant group, on October 7, 2023, called a nationwide strike. Around 25 hostages are believed be alive in Gaza. The protests took place across Israel, some outside of politician's homes, military bases, and highways.
The Israel police spokesperson told Newsweek in an email statement Sunday that "actions such as setting fires and blocking major roads are violations of the law. The Israel Police will act decisively against such behavior while ensuring that all citizens may exercise their rights safely and within the law."
Police also shared with Newsweek a video showing hundreds of protesters sitting in public spaces, followed by a water cannon spraying demonstrators blocking a road. Local news outlets also posted videos of protesters blocking Tel Aviv's Ayalon Highway.
Some protestors were spotted with signs seeking to end the war in Gaza.
Demonstrators take part in a protest demanding the immediate release of hostages held by Hamas and calling for the Israeli government to reverse its decision to take over Gaza City and other areas in the...
Demonstrators take part in a protest demanding the immediate release of hostages held by Hamas and calling for the Israeli government to reverse its decision to take over Gaza City and other areas in the Gaza Strip, in Tel Aviv on August 17. More
AP Photo/Maya Levin
What People Are Saying
Former hostage Arbel Yehoud said during a demonstration in Tel Aviv on Sunday: "The only way to bring (hostages) back is through a deal, all at once, without games."
Hostages Families Forum said on Sunday: "There is no time – not for the lives wasting away in hell, nor for the fallen who may vanish in the ruins of Gaza."
Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich on Sunday said the demonstrations were: "A bad and harmful campaign that plays into Hamas' hands, buries the hostages in the tunnels and attempts to get Israel to surrender to its enemies and jeopardize its security and future."
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told the Cabinet on Sunday: "Those who call today for an end to the war without defeating Hamas are not only hardening Hamas' position and delaying the release of our hostages, they are also ensuring that the horrors of October 7 will repeat themselves over and over again."
What Happens Next?
The strike affecting several businesses is set to continue through Sunday.
Hamas and Israel have made no progress on a cease-fire or hostage exchange, while Israel has pressed ahead with operations to seize Gaza City.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
17 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump's Reset With Zelensky Triggers Warning From MAGA
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Back in February, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky left the White House early after a tense meeting with Donald Trump that ended in a heated exchange. This week, he stood in the same room smiling for cameras, cracking jokes with Trump, and accepting compliments on his suit from the assembled press pool as European leaders looked on. The shift in tone was stark. Administration officials described the atmosphere as "terrific" and "really productive," and Vice President JD Vance — who clashed with Zelensky during the previous visit — kept a low profile. Yet for Trump's MAGA base, the change in mood did little to ease concerns over what came next. Trump's sudden openness to offering NATO-style security guarantees to Ukraine has drawn a sharp rebuke from his hardcore allies, reigniting tensions over America's role in the war. Steve Bannon, the former White House strategist and a leading voice in the "America First" movement, launched a direct attack on the proposed security deal. Speaking on his War Room podcast, Bannon condemned the talks as globalist overreach — though he stopped short of naming Trump directly. "I want to give a security guarantee to the citizens of the United States on these invaders right now. That's the security guarantee I want," Bannon said. "This entire war is so that Ukraine could be a Western country. Well, I don't give a tinker's d---." BANNON: Why should America give Ukraine an Article 5 security guarantee? This war started with EU and NATO globalists forcing Russia's hand. Now they want U.S. taxpayers on the hook for trillions while Larry Fink takes over Davos. Total scam. — Grace Chong, MBI (@gc22gc) August 18, 2025 His objections reflect a growing unease among conservatives who see the potential for Article 5-like protections — NATO's mutual defense clause — as a fundamental betrayal of the movement's anti-interventionist core. "There can't be any guarantee here from the United States, because that's going to inextricably link us to this conflict," Bannon told Politico. "If we don't fund this, it stops happening. The Europeans don't have the hardware or the money." U.S. President Donald Trump meets with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office at the White House on August 18, 2025 in Washington, DC. President Trump is hosting President Zelensky at the White House... U.S. President Donald Trump meets with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office at the White House on August 18, 2025 in Washington, DC. President Trump is hosting President Zelensky at the White House for a bilateral meeting and later an expanded meeting with European leaders to discuss a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine. More Getty Images Online, the grassroots echoed that frustration. "All I heard were Article 5 and security guarantees," one user wrote on X. "If POTUS agrees with that, we MAGA are out. Sorry, but you broke your promise." Highlighting that divine, another wrote: "Get out of Ukraine! No more US money! No more US weapons! No Article 5 US security guarantees! World War II is over!" Ukraine Cannot Join NATO, Trump Says Trump, for his part, has drawn a firm line. In a series of posts ahead of the summit, he reiterated that Ukraine would not join NATO, declaring "no going into NATO by Ukraine" and claiming Zelensky "can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to." Instead, Trump has backed the idea of a standalone security framework — stopping short of NATO membership — that would still offer Ukraine significant protection. According to U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff, that framework could include "security guarantees," obligating the U.S. and European allies to respond if Ukraine is attacked. Witkoff called the potential agreement "game-changing," though the details remain vague. Chief Strategist to the President Steve Bannon speaks during the Semafor World Economy Summit 2025 at Conrad Washington on April 23, 2025 in Washington, DC. Chief Strategist to the President Steve Bannon speaks during the Semafor World Economy Summit 2025 at Conrad Washington on April 23, 2025 in Washington, DC."When we talk about security guarantees, we're talking about the security of the entire European continent," French President Emmanuel Macron said. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte added that discussions would include guarantees similar to those already extended to alliance members. While Trump said Tuesday he gave "his assurance" that no U.S. troops would be sent to defend Ukraine's border, a senior official told Politico the president might support a U.S. peacekeeping role "if it was the final piece of the puzzle." That ambiguity has only deepened anxiety among MAGA-aligned Republicans. Many see any military commitment abroad as a step back toward the kind of endless wars Trump once promised to end. "The war we got to win is right here in this country," Bannon said. "That's the war that we got to be focused on." Like the MAGA base, Ukraine has been wary of what security guarantees will ultimately look like. Zelensky said the U.S. had sent a strong signal on the matter but noted he could not provide concrete details until more were finalized in the next 10 days. However, Zelensky also stressed that peace must be "lasting" and not repeat the shortcomings of the "so-called 'security guarantees' of 1994." "They didn't work," Zelensky said on Monday.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Hamas must give up control': Fatah official lays out vision for Gaza after war
Al-Hayek stresses that the Palestinian Authority should govern Gaza after the war and urges international backing for reconstruction. GAZA CITY - Munther Al-Hayek, spokesperson for the Palestinian Fatah Movement in the Gaza Strip, spoke with The Media Line about Fatah's vision for post-war Gaza. He described a future government under Prime Minister Mohammad Mustafa, the removal of Hamas from power, coordination with Arab states, and the role of the Palestinian Authority (PA). Discussing governance after the war, Al-Hayek said Gaza should be administered by a government headed by Mustafa and stressed that Hamas should be pressured to step down. He explained that Fatah is engaged in 'intensive and ongoing communications' with Egypt and other Arab countries about postwar arrangements. Al-Hayek pointed out that an Arab-Islamic plan—endorsed by both the Arab Summit and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation in Jeddah - calls for the PA to 'impose its legal jurisdiction over the Gaza Strip.' 'The day following the war must be distinctly Palestinian,' he told The Media Line, noting that Israel has rejected proposals giving the PA control. He added that the PA is 'the official and legitimate face of the State of Palestine.' According to Al-Hayek, Fatah believes the Mustafa government should take full legal authority in Gaza, backed by 'all political parties, including Fatah and the Palestinian factions,' so it can 'fulfill its administrative and governance responsibilities in Gaza, particularly the day after the war.' He said that afterward, the process should move toward 'legislative, presidential, and National Council elections, allowing the Palestinian people to choose their future leadership.' Ending war is immediate priority Ending the war, he continued, was the immediate priority. 'Right now, all we are thinking about is ending the war in the Gaza Strip,' he said, 'and then moving towards a political process that leads to the establishment of the Palestinian state and its embodiment on the ground in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, with Jerusalem as its capital.' Al-Hayek made clear that Hamas should relinquish its governing role. 'We have requested Hamas to exit the governmental and administrative scene,' he told The Media Line. 'We have not asked Hamas members and their families to leave the Gaza Strip, as they remain an integral part of the Palestinian people. However, Hamas is now required to step back from this governing role.' He said Hamas 'currently finds itself in a difficult situation' and that 'all Palestinian factions desire nothing but to reach a clear and well-defined agreement' allowing the PA to take over governance in Gaza, as it already does in the West Bank. One reason Hamas must step aside, he argued, is that 'the situation after October 7 is entirely different from what it was before October 7.' The war, he said, has created 'complex security circumstances,' including the occupation of large parts of Gaza, demographic and geographic shifts, and 'the presence of occupying forces in the Strip.' 'To alleviate all the suffering and harsh pain endured by our people,' he said, 'Hamas must step aside and allow the Palestinian National Authority to assume responsibility.' Responding to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's remark that 'neither Fatahstan, nor Hamastan, nor the Palestinian Authority will exist in the Gaza Strip,' Al-Hayek cited international support for a PA role. He noted that when the European Union called for the PA's presence at the Rafah crossing, 'it meant the Palestinian Authority, regardless of the form or nature of its presence.' Turning to humanitarian concerns, Al-Hayek said Gaza will face an enormous task of rebuilding once the war ends. 'The Gaza Strip needs reconstruction. It needs the world to mobilize for food and reconstruction,' he said. But he added, 'this world will not mobilize, pay, or undertake reconstruction except through the legitimate body.' That legitimate body, he emphasized, is 'the Palestinian National Authority, which represents the Palestinians in the territories occupied in 1967.' He said there are ongoing contacts with 'the entire international community, the United Nations, and the European Union,' and added, 'There will certainly be contacts with the United States.' Speaking about Washington's role, Al-Hayek criticized the lack of American action so far. 'Unfortunately, up to this moment, the United States and the administration of President Trump—who personally spoke about extinguishing fires across the entire Middle East—have not yet acted regarding Gaza,' he said. 'We have not found any initiative from the United States to stop the war in Gaza.' He urged the US to recognize 'there was already a proposed solution on the table, which is the two-state solution.' Without it, he warned, 'hatred will persist within this generation that experienced the war of October 7. This generation will fully realize that if the Palestinian issue is not resolved, there will be neither security nor peace in the Middle East region, especially in Palestine.' 'Therefore,' he said, 'the United States is required to take a step forward—first to stop the war, then to assist the Palestinian people in obtaining their rights.' Those rights, he concluded, 'can only be achieved through the realization of a Palestinian state, with Jerusalem as its capital—this is for sure.' The Fatah spokesperson also emphasized the importance of regional and global backing. 'We have experienced a war in the Gaza Strip that targeted our people. The international community, our Arab brothers, our friends, and the European Union must stand by the Palestinian people.' Asked whether Gazans would be allowed to leave, Al-Hayek was unequivocal. 'The Palestinian people do not want to leave Gaza,' he told The Media Line. 'We repeat each time: We will remain in Gaza until Judgment Day. Here we were born, and here we shall die.' He acknowledged that some residents might travel temporarily 'for leisure, education, or medical treatment,' but rejected the idea of permanent departure. To abandon Gaza, he said, in the way envisioned by 'Netanyahu's extremist government, along with Smotrich and Ben-Gvir—that is an illusion. We emphasize clearly: this is an illusion. We will remain in Gaza until Judgment Day.' 'We are the rightful owners of this land; we will build it, develop it, live upon it, and be buried beneath its soil,' he said. 'Some of us might leave temporarily due to difficult living conditions, for education or medical treatment. But to leave and abandon our homes, houses, history, and lives—that certainly is an illusion.' No Palestinian, he added, 'would accept leaving their property, life, and memories behind simply because of a war.' Only the National Security Forces, Al-Hayek said, should be deployed 'to protect public properties and the properties of citizens.' Any administrative or support committees, he argued, must 'be part of the Palestinian Authority and the Palestinian government. We do not say 'coordinate' with the Authority, as 'coordination' is a vague term.' He called the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) 'the representative of the Palestinian people' and said it will determine Gaza's future. 'Whoever wishes to govern the Strip must go to the ballot box, because it is the Palestinian people who choose their future leadership,' he said. The spokesperson pointed to a 'clear plan proposed by Fatah' through Egypt that affirms 'on the day after, legitimacy belongs exclusively to the official body representing the Palestinian people.' He concluded by calling for a ceasefire 'at least during this phase' that would include 'the release of hostages from the Gaza Strip' and the release by Israel of prisoners who, he said, 'fought for freedom and independence.' 'Regarding pressure,' he finished, 'we have repeatedly demanded—and we demand once again for the thousandth time—that Hamas exit the governmental scene. Hamas must leave the Gaza Strip to the legitimate government, which represents Palestinian citizens in both the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.'
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Israel attacks displacement shelters to force Palestinians to southern Gaza
Since announcing plans to invade northern Gaza and expel Palestinians again to the south, Israel has attacked displacement shelters in the Gaza City neighbourhood of Zeitoun, according to an investigation by Sanad, Al Jazeera's verification unit. Since August 13, Sanad has found that Israel stepped up the bombardment and shelling of Zeitoun, and often directly hit displacement shelters. The siege and ongoing violence have compelled thousands of Palestinians to close their tents in the camps and flee further south, according to satellite imagery obtained by Sanad. The indiscriminate bombardment of civilian homes and displacement shelters is part of a broad pattern of Israeli war tactics that make no distinction between civilians and fighters. Human rights groups, United Nations experts and numerous legal scholars believe Israel's nearly two-year war on Gaza amounts to genocide. Israel's Western allies – who have long defended it from criticism by claiming it has the 'right to defend itself' – are becoming increasingly alarmed at the humanitarian crisis unfolding in the enclave. Many are calling on Israel to end the war and warning that its plan to seize northern Gaza could further exacerbate the suffering of civilians. The mass displacement and bombardment of Zeitoun encapsulate the atrocities resulting from Israel's invasion. Attacking shelters There are about 11 displacement shelters in Zeitoun, each sheltering 4,000 to 4,500 besieged and hungry Palestinians. Most live on just 3.2sq km (1.2sq miles), which makes up just 32 percent of the pre-war size of Zeitoun. At the start of the war, Israel dug trenches in and around the neighbourhood, claiming it was creating a 'buffer zone', and built the Netzarim Corridor, which has split Gaza into two zones. Israel's recent bombardment of the neighbourhood is terrifying civilians into fleeing south, leading to another cycle of forced displacement that may amount to ethnic cleansing due to Israel's attempt to destroy all livable facilities and structures. An Al Jazeera journalist on the ground recently captured footage of Israel firing a missile directly at a home in it is unclear whether anyone was inside, it is clear that all structures are being levelled, possibly to make it more difficult for any survivors to try to relocate to the area. According to Sanad, there is clear evidence that Israel is pursuing that policy in and around Zeitoun. Between August 11 and 16, sources documented Israel's attack on al-Falah School in Zeitoun and a tent camp on al-Lababidi Street. Both the Majida al-Wasila school in the Nassr neighbourhood and tents in the Sheikh Ajilin neighbourhood were also hit. This pattern of direct attacks on tents and school shelters – the last refuge for hundreds of thousands of Palestinians – may amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity, since these structures are protected under international humanitarian law.
