
SSC Chairman Rules Out Exam Cancellation, Retest Exam Possible For ‘Disrupted' Centres
The body has also written to exam vendor Eduquity Career Technologies, asking the firm to address all issues reported during the July 24-August 1 test window.
"We are analysing the data. If we find even one candidate who has been wronged, we will conduct the exam again for them," the Chairman said.
The SSC is a statutory body that conducts recruitment exams for various posts in ministries, departments, and other government organisations.
The Phase 13 exam, conducted between July 24 and August 1 across 194 centres in 142 cities, was plagued by abrupt cancellations, software crashes, biometric verification failures, and erroneous centre allotments. During the test window, around 5 lakh candidates appeared for the examination.
These disruptions triggered a wave of protests across Delhi last week, bringing thousands of aspirants to the streets and also resulting in a strong backlash on social media.
Speaking to ANI, the Chairman admitted to mismanagement, including technical glitches and far-off centres being assigned to candidates. He assured that all issues would be resolved in the coming months. "We will correct and plan in the coming months," he added.
To address the immediate concern of candidates, additional tests were held on August 2 in three shifts.
Two centres, one in Delhi (Pawan Ganga) and another in Uttar Pradesh (Educasa), saw complete cancellations, affecting around 2,500 students.
On August 2, about 16,600 candidates were scheduled for the retest, but only 8,048 turned up, marking a 60 per cent attendance rate.
The Chairman said the SSC would conduct another re-test for affected candidates, if necessary.
Chairman Gopalakrishnan admitted to "teething problems" with the new vendor and said penalties would be imposed for lapses such as system hangs and mouse malfunctions.
However, he rejected calls by candidates and educators to remove the vendor.
"Based on one test, I cannot remove them. How will I conduct examinations in the coming weeks? I will have to float a new tender, and it will take until December for a company to be finalised. Till then, what will I do?" he asked.
"We have seen an improvement in the company's functioning over one week. There were issues on the first few days, and then they resolved them," he added.
Responding to concerns over the use of Artificial Intelligence in question selection, the SSC clarified that only a rudimentary AI system is used to avoid repetition, with each question tagged with metadata.
Students alleged that the use of AI led to the repetition of questions. The SSC said it relies on logs, CCTV footage, and electronic data analysis to ensure the integrity of exams, with network systems opened to the commission and monitored with the help of the Centre for Development of Advanced Computing (CDAC). The SSC is hopeful that the upcoming examinations will be smooth and without disruptions. "In this exam, we have seen what issues can arise. The upcoming exams on August 6-8 will be much less disruptive. There will be 3.5 lakh candidates in the upcoming exams," he said. (ANI)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
11 hours ago
- Time of India
Call for action against Adoor
T'puram: Women's organizations, including Women's Collective in Cinema, Disha and Anweshi have filed a complaint with state women's commission against filmmaker Adoor Gopalakrishnan for his controversial remarks at the film conclave. In the complaint, the organizations have demanded that Gopalakrishnan be summoned for an explanation. They also requested that Gopalakrishnan be excluded from govt events, stating that his remarks were anti-women and insulting especially to singer Pushpavathi. Gopalakrishnan made the controversial remark during the closing session of the film conclave. As the comment became controversial, minister V N Vasavan and musician Sreekumaran Thampy came to Gopalakrishnan's defence. The minister said that he did not believe Gopalakrishnan's comment was made with ill intent and that it was twisted into a controversy. Vasavan also mentioned that the govt stands with women and SC-ST communities. However, minister R Bindu responded by rejecting Gopalakrishnan's remark. She said that govt has a responsibility to ensure justice for those who are denied it. "There is nothing wrong with govt providing necessary funds for women and marginalized communities to express their creative talents. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Susan Boyle Is Now so Thin and Looks Beautiful! Undo Making films is an expensive process and there is no issue in providing funds for first-time filmmakers. This is one of the best projects of the cultural department. The gaze of the camera is always a male one and there needs to be an alternative perspective. We need to create space for that," Bindu said. CPM state secretary M V Govindan also came down heavily against Gopalakrishnan stating that the filmmaker still had a feudal mindset.


Time of India
12 hours ago
- Time of India
Sexual abuse plaint: IT firm owner seeks pre-arrest bail
Kochi: Venu Gopalakrishnan of Kakkanad, the owner of an IT company, and his employees, Jacob P Thampy, Eby Paul and Bimalraj Haridas, have approached high court seeking anticipatory bail in a sexual abuse case filed by a former woman employee of the company, who was earlier arrested in connection with a honey trap case based on a complaint lodged by Gopalakrishnan. Considering the petition, the bench of Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas sought instructions from the state and adjourned the matter to Aug 13. The court also directed that Thampy, Paul and Haridas shall not be arrested until then. According to the prosecution, Gopalakrishnan had allegedly subjected the woman to sexual exploitation, and the other accused had threatened her over the phone, stating that she would be implicated in a honey trap case and, if she lodged a complaint against him, they would kill her, thereby committing the offences alleged. Meanwhile, the petitioners contended that the woman and her husband were previously arrested on July 29 in connection with an alleged attempt by the husband to extort Rs 30 crore from Gopalakrishnan, accusing him of having an illicit relationship with his wife. Both were released on bail the following day. The petition further alleged that, in an apparent attempt to settle scores, the woman subsequently lodged a complaint with police, accusing Gopalakrishnan and his employees of sexual harassment and intimidation.


The Hindu
14 hours ago
- The Hindu
‘No ground' for case against Adoor, Kerala Police get legal opinion
The Kerala Police have received a legal opinion that film director Adoor Gopalakrishnan's assertion that aspiring filmmakers hailing from marginalised sections of society and women should undergo intensive training as a prerequisite for availing themselves of State funds earmarked for creating movies and documentaries with artistic and social value. The police had sought the district public prosecutor's opinion after social activist Dinu Veyil registered a complaint at the Musuem police station accusing Mr. Gopalakrishnan of articulating a deeply discriminatory caste prejudice against aspiring filmmakers from the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (SC/ST) at a cinema conclave organised by the State government here recently. Mr. Veyil demanded that the police book Mr. Gopalakrishnan on the charge of violating the provisions of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Deputy Commissioner of Police (Law and Order), Thiruvananthapuram City, Nakul Rajendra Deshmukh confirmed to The Hindu that the government lawyer had opined that there was no 'legal ground [for the registration of] a case' against Mr. Gopalakrishnan. Another officer privy to the process said the prosecutor said Mr. Gopalakrishnan's remarks did not target any specific individual or a community. The prosecutor opined that Mr. Gopalakrishnan's viewpoint on training novices in filmmaking before providing them with public funding did not meet the legal criterion of a casteist slur. The prosecutor said a close examination of Mr. Veyil's complaint did not prima facie reveal any evidence that warranted a registration of a case against Mr. Gopalakrishnan. However, Mr. Gopalakrishnan's legal jeopardy seemed far from over. Several activists have signalled that they would file criminal miscellaneous petitions in magistrate's court demanding the filmmakers' prosecution. Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Welfare Minister O.R. Kelu said the department has received several complaints and is examining the matter with the necessary seriousness. The Kerala State Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Welfare Commission has requested a report from the Museum police. Furthermore, several women activists have petitioned the Kerala Women's Commission accusing Mr. Gopalakrishnan of misogyny. The controversy showed scarce signs of abating on Wednesday with more opinion leaders and politicians, including CPI State secretary Binoy Viswam, CPI leader Annie Raja, and CPI(M) leaders K Radhakrishnan, MP, and former Culture Minister A K Balan chiming in.