"Fear Of Death": Why Maoist Basavaraju's Trusted Aide Surrendered
Quick Read
Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed.
Babu Kawasi, once a trusted gunman for Maoist Basavaraju, has surrendered due to fears of death as anti-Naxal operations intensify. He said he has urged the remaining members to leave the jungle before it is too late.
Bhopal:
Once a trusted gunman of Maoist chief Basavaraju, Babu Kawasi has laid down his arms. In an exclusive conversation with NDTV, Babu Kawasi opened up about the inner workings of India's most secretive insurgent network and the final days of Basavaraju - the top leader of the CPI (Maoist), who was gunned down in a massive encounter in Maad's Kilakot hills on May 21.
Fear of a similar fate led Babu and his wife to walk away from the jungle and surrender in Dantewada.
For more than a decade, Babu had served as a personal guard to the most wanted Naxalite leaders including Ganapati and later Basavaraju, operating deep inside the dense, unforgiving forests of Bastar and Abujhmad.
Now, as the red corridors shrink under pressure from relentless anti-Naxal operations, the former guerrilla soldier has a message for those still holding on: "Come out before it is too late."
Q: You were with Basavaraju until the end. What made you surrender now?
Babu Kawasi: The fear of death. The government is not stopping. The jungle is no longer safe. Encounters are happening almost every week. I had appealed to a few comrades to surrender - they didn't, and they were among those killed with Basavaraju on May 21. That could have been me. So I left on April 29 and surrendered with my wife.
Q: Tell us about your role in the Naxal organization.
Babu: I was in Company No. 7 of the People's Liberation Guerrilla Army. I guarded Central Committee members from 2012 onwards. I was first assigned to Ganapati, then to Basavaraju from 2016 to December 2024. I used to carry automatic weapons. I was trained to ambush police and plant booby traps.
Q: What kind of leader was Basavaraju?
Babu: He was sharp, spoke clear Telugu, some Gondi, and broken Hindi. He focused a lot on tactical ambushes and taught us how to use terrain and traps against the forces, especially the DRG.
Q: Why is the Naxal group afraid of the DRG (District Reserve Guard)?
Babu: Because they are our own. Many DRG soldiers are former Naxals. They know our tricks, our routes, our strategies. The organization has no answer to them. Even Basavaraju used to say - "Yeh DRG sabse badi samasya hai (These DRGs are the biggest problems)." That's why we were trying to prepare new fighters with new strategies, but that didn't work.
Q: What is the situation inside the Naxal organization now?
Babu: It's breaking. People are scared. The people are not supporting us anymore. Villagers don't come forward like before. And the ideology has changed-what started as revolution has become about survival now.
Q: Do you regret your time in the movement?
Babu: Yes. If Basavaraju had surrendered, he would have been alive. I wish we had understood earlier. I've appealed to those still inside to come out, for their families, for their own future. There is nothing left in the jungle.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- Indian Express
PK Sreenivasan's Midnight Knock is an ode to newsrooms of a bygone era
One of the punchiest scenes in PK Sreenivasan's Midnight Knock comes early, when a young political science graduate walks into a newsroom on the advice of his college teacher and asks the editor for a job. The editor is a close friend of the teacher, who writes a column for the newspaper, and encourages the graduate to write stories for young people in Kerala — nobody gets what a real revolution is like, fumes the editor, and young people only romanticise it these days. What he wants from this new employee is real stories about the nitty-gritties of a political movement, all the heady ambition, daily sacrifices and moral conflicts involved. He wants particular attention paid to Communist and Naxalite figures from the past like Charu Majumdar, Kanu Sanyal, Jangal Santhal and Arikkad Varghese. The romance is real. Newsrooms today struggle to pull strings, enter guarded territories, conduct interviews and publish stories that matter. Reading Sreenivasan's thinly fictionalised account of the 1975-1977 Emergency years, is a breath of fresh air, particularly because of the newsroom's attempts to resist censorship. Indignance is often the first step to revolution. Sreenivasan draws from his time as a reporter to reflect on the many figures — activists, journalists, academics like Narendra Dabholkar, Govind Pansare, MM Kalburgi and Gauri Lankesh — who were assassinated in their pursuit for justice. The book is framed as a letter to a friend and mourns the romantics, revolutionaries and idealists in university classrooms, bureaucratic corridors and, of course, chattering newsrooms, who have been claimed by the system, either due to age-induced complacency or fear-induced sycophancy. The narrator's attempts to challenge that inertia, perhaps in the reader herself, is inspiring, even if it reads propagandist at times. The narrator, his teacher and editor often talk like they're reciting textbooks but if they're the only kind of characters that get the privilege of speech, it can get a bit exhausting. LK Advani famously said of the Emergency's censorship policies, 'The media was asked to bend, but it chose to crawl,' and Karl Marx supplied, a century earlier, 'History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce.' What runs through this book is a cautious hope that this farce will shortly breathe its last.
India Gazette
37 minutes ago
- India Gazette
"India will not hesitate to use every method to root out terrorism," says Rajnath Singh
Panaji (Goa) [India], May 30 (ANI): Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, addressing officers and sailors onboard India's first indigenous aircraft carrier INS Vikrant off the Goa coast, declared that 'Operation Sindoor is not just a military action, but India's frontal assault against terrorism. 'Operation Sindoor is not just a military action, but India's frontal assault against terrorism, and if Pakistan resorts to anything evil or unethical, it will, this time, face the firepower and ire of the Indian Navy,' said the Defence Minister. Commending the Indian Navy's 'silent service' during Operation Sindoor, Rajnath Singh stated that the mighty Carrier Battle Group ensured that the Pakistani Navy did not venture out, or else it would have faced the consequences. He sent a clear message to Pakistan that if it tries to cast an evil eye, the opening of New Delhi's response will be at the hands of the Indian Navy. Rajnath Singh asserted that Pakistan needs to understand that the time is up for the dangerous game of terrorism it has been playing since its Independence. 'Now, if Pakistan instigates any terrorist act against India, it will have to bear the consequences and face defeat. India will not hesitate. It will use every method to root out the menace of terrorism,' he said. Defence Minister added that anti-India activities are being carried out openly from Pakistani soil, and India is completely free to carry out every kind of operation against terrorists on both sides of the border and the sea. Today, the whole world is acknowledging India's right to protect its citizens against terrorism, he said, emphasising that Pakistan must uproot the nursery of terrorism operating on its soil with its own hands. Rajnath Singh called for the handing over of terrorists like Hafiz Saeed and Masood Azhar to India. 'Both of them are not only in India's list of 'Most Wanted Terrorists', they are also UN Designated Terrorists. Tahawwur Rana, an accused in the Mumbai attacks, has been brought to India recently. Hafiz Saeed is also guilty of the Mumbai attacks, and justice must be done for his crime,' he said. On Pakistan's repeated offer of talks, Raksha Mantri again clarified: 'If there are talks, it will only be on terrorism and PoK. If Pakistan is serious about talks, it should hand over terrorists like Hafiz Saeed and Masood Azhar to India so that justice is served.' Describing the Indian Navy's role in the integrated operation as praiseworthy, Rajnath Singh stated that when the Indian Air Force destroyed the terror bases on Pakistani soil, the Navy's aggressive deployment in the Arabian Sea, its unmatched maritime domain awareness and supremacy confined the Pakistani Navy to its own shores. 'Our Western Fleet ships deployed at sea, within 96 hours of the Pahalgam terrorist attack, carried out successful firings of surface-to-surface & surface-to-air missiles and torpedoes on the western & eastern coast. It demonstrated the combat readiness of our platforms, systems & crew and our intent & readiness, forcing the enemy to come into a defensive posture,' he said. He added that the force projection of the Carrier Battle Group effectively indicated India's intent and capability. The tremendous power of the Indian Navy, its military acumen and destructive capabilities have broken the enemy's morale, he said. He urged the Navy to continue leaving no stone unturned in its preparations, reiterating Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi's clear message that if any terrorist attack takes place on Indian soil, it will be considered as an 'Act of War' and respond in the same way. Rajnath Singh reasserted that Operation Sindoor is not yet over; it is just a pause, a warning. He added that if Pakistan makes the same mistake again, India's answer will be harsher. Lauding the speed, depth and clarity of the Armed Forces during Operation Sindoor, the Defence Minister stated that the precision strikes displayed seamless synergy among the three Services as well as coordination among Ministries and Government agencies. He added that the operation sent a clear message to the terrorists & its patrons that India will no longer tolerate and give a befitting reply. 'Within a very short span of time, we destroyed Pakistan's terrorist base and its intentions. Our response was so strong that Pakistan pleaded to stop. We stopped our military actions on our own terms. Our forces had not even started showing their might,' he said. On his interactions with the Army and Air Force personnel and now the Naval warriors post-Operation Sindoor, Rajnath Singh expressed satisfaction that whether land, sky or sea, India is fully prepared to deal with any situation anywhere. He recalled the contribution of the older version of INS Vikrant during the Liberation of Goa, stating that the aircraft carrier had led the Indian Navy's fleet during the operation in 1961, and now, in its new indigenous avatar, it is spearheading India's resolve against terrorism. He further concluded his address by saying: 'Today, we are in an era where wars are not fought only with bullets and bombs, but also through cyberspace, data dominance and strategic deterrence. It is a matter of pride that the Navy is moving ahead in these areas.' He described the Indian Navy as not just the sentinel of the Indian Ocean, but a strategic force that strengthens India's presence in the region. It warns the enemy that India is no longer just a regional power, but is moving towards becoming a global power, he said. Onboard INS Vikrant, Rajnath Singh was accompanied by the Chief of the Naval Staff Admiral Dinesh K Tripathi; Flag Officer Commanding-in-Chief Western Naval Command Vice Admiral Sanjay J Singh and other senior officials of the Indian Navy. (ANI)
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
How Yunus's bowing to foreign powers, Islamist backers is destroying Bangladesh's future
Muhammad Yunus is at best a toothless figurehead, unable to quell the chaos, and at worst a pliable pawn in the hands of foreign powers; his government's failures—amnesty for rioters, media crackdowns, and delayed elections— are paving the way for a darker, divided Bangladesh read more Not long ago, Bangladesh was rocked by massive protests under the guise of student rights, demanding reform of a job quota system but spiralling into chaos that ousted Sheikh Hasina, branded a dictator, and unleashed vicious anti-Hindu violence. What began in July 2024 as university students challenging a 30 per cent job reservation for 1971 war veterans' descendants turned into a deadly anti-government uprising by August, forcing Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to flee to India. As law enforcement collapsed, mobs targeted the 8 per cent Hindu minority, seen as Awami League allies, with 2,010 attacks across 52 districts, including 157 Hindu homes looted or burnt, 69 temples vandalised, and at least five Hindus killed. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Muhammad Yunus, the Nobel laureate once celebrated as the 'banker to the poor', was thrust into Bangladesh's interim leadership on August 8, 2024, as the answer to Sheikh Hasina's authoritarian tenure, a saviour who would heal a nation torn by protests and restore faith in governance. Student leaders and activists saw the 84-year-old economist's global reputation and microfinance legacy as a ticket to stability and fair elections, a 'second Victory Day' in his own lofty words. Leaders may have also used Yunus as a symbolic mask to present a favourable image to the West. But to call Yunus a disappointment is far too generous—his tenure has been a masterclass in failure, letting anti-Hindu violence rage unchecked while rolling out repressive policies that have plunged Bangladesh into fresh chaos. For more than a week, Dhaka's streets have been choking under the weight of massive rallies led by the Bangladesh Nationalist Party's (BNP's) youth wings—Jatiyatabadi Chhatra Dal, Jubo Dal, and Swechchhasebak Dal—demanding political rights for the young and a clear path to elections. As Muhammad Yunus jetted off to Japan, lakhs of supporters, draped in green, yellow, and red, flooded Nayapaltan, waving flags and chanting for BNP's exiled leader Tarique Rahman, who railed against the interim government's failures via a virtual address. The air crackled with frustration—roads from Shahbagh to Motijheel were paralysed, commuters stranded for hours, as the youth vented their rage against Yunus's delays, accusing his regime of clinging to power while sidestepping the 'democratic' roadmap. This wasn't just a rally; it was a warning shot, a sea of voices shouting that Bangladesh's patience is wearing thin. The protests didn't stop at Nayapaltan—anger boiled over at Dhaka's heavily guarded secretariat, where government employees revolted against Yunus's draconian ordinance allowing swift dismissals for 'misconduct', a move reeking of Hasina's old playbook. Torch-lit marches and sit-ins erupted, with bureaucrats slamming the law as a gag on dissent, their shouts echoing through the capital's gridlocked streets. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD General Waker-Uz-Zaman, the army chief, piled on the pressure, publicly demanding December elections, while BNP leaders like Amir Khosru Mahmud Chowdhury warned of a deepening crisis without a vote. Caught between calls for reform and the clamour for polls, Yunus's government—despite planning adviser Wahiduddin Mahmud's insistence that he won't quit—looks increasingly like a ship adrift, its promises of stability drowned out by the growing roar of a nation fed up with waiting. Muhammad Yunus's interim government, despite its lofty promises of a democratic dawn, reveals a shaky commitment to those very values, casting doubt on the true motives behind the 2024 uprising that ousted Sheikh Hasina. The student protests, initially cloaked in the noble garb of reform, now seem a façade for something more sinister—a power grab dressed up as revolution. The so-called student protests that convulsed Bangladesh in July 2024, toppling Sheikh Hasina's government, were not the spontaneous outcry of a generation seeking justice but a meticulously orchestrated operation by the CIA, with Pakistan's ISI playing a willing accomplice. Hasina's refusal to grant the United States access to Saint Martin's Island in the Bay of Bengal for a military base—a strategic foothold to counter China's growing influence—had irked Washington. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Declassified cables from 2023 reveal US pressure on Dhaka for a naval facility, met with Hasina's firm stance to preserve Bangladesh's sovereignty, citing the island's ecological sensitivity and tourism value. Enter the CIA, adept at engineering unrest, and the ISI, Pakistan's seasoned hand at destabilising neighbours. The protests, sparked over a job quota system, were amplified by coordinated social media campaigns—fanning student anger into a full-blown uprising. Pakistan's defence minister Khawaja Asif's candid admission in an interview, 'We've been doing this dirty work for the United States for decades,' lays bare the playbook: just as Pakistan funnelled US funds to radicalise Afghanistan in the 1980s, it now bankrolled chaos in Bangladesh, training agitators in Chittagong camps and funnelling $10 million through NGOs to fuel the protests. The CIA emerged triumphant, neutralising a leader who defied its geopolitical ambitions, while Pakistan tightened its grip over Bangladesh, a nation it once ruled as East Pakistan. The real losers, however, were Bangladesh's youth, duped into believing Hasina was a Stalin-esque tyrant crushing their rights. They were pawns, their idealism weaponised by foreign hands promising progress but delivering ruin. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Post-Hasina, radical Islamic forces—emboldened by the power vacuum and ISI-backed networks like Jamaat-e-Islami—have surged, torching homes and temples while liberal Muslims face death threats for speaking out. Yunus's interim government, far from a democratic saviour, has ceded ground to these extremists, its amnesty for rioters and media crackdowns proving the revolution was never about reform. Bangladesh, once on a path to stability, now teeters on the edge of radicalisation, its youth betrayed by the very forces they thought would set them free, while the CIA and ISI watch their gambit unfold with cold satisfaction. India's principled decision to grant refuge to Sheikh Hasina in August 2024 stands as a testament to its commitment to regional stability and moral clarity, recognising her role in keeping Bangladesh's radical forces at bay while fiercely guarding its sovereignty against foreign encroachment. Hasina, for all her flaws, held the line against extremist groups like Jamaat-e-Islami, curbing their influence and fostering economic growth, while rejecting US demands for a military base on Saint Martin's Island. By forcing her out, protestors backed by the CIA and ISI have hurled Bangladesh into a vortex of perennial instability, with anti-Hindu violence surging and radical Islamists gaining ground. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Muhammad Yunus, the interim chief advisor, is at best a toothless figurehead, unable to quell the chaos, and at worst a pliable pawn in the hands of foreign powers, his government's failures—amnesty for rioters, media crackdowns, and delayed elections—are paving the way for a darker, divided Bangladesh, while India stands firm as a beacon of reason amid the region's self-inflicted wounds. The writer takes special interest in history, culture and geopolitics. The views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
