Swim advisory issued for Dog River, Fowl River and areas of Mobile Bay
19 Baldwin County restaurants claiming imported shrimp is locally sourced: report
The release said the quality of swimming water on Dog River near the Alba Fishing and Hunting Club and on Fowl River near Highway 193 at the Pelican Reef Marina is poor.
Additionally, Mobile Bay at MayDay Park, Volanta Avenue, Fairhope Public Beach and Orange Street Pier and Weeks Bay at Camp Beckwith were deemed to have poor swimming water quality.
'Swimming in these areas might lead to an increased risk of illness,' the release said.
The Alabama Department of Public Health and the Alabama Department of Environmental Management are responsible for monitoring water quality and notifying residents through the bacteriological water quality monitoring and notification program, the release said.
'This program involves the routine collection of water samples from a total of 25 coastal recreational sites in Mobile and Baldwin counties,' the release said.
Unaccompanied 9-year-old found in Baldwin County home with 3 Guatemalan citizens: FBI
During the summer, when use of those areas is higher, water samples are taken twice a week at the most visited sites and biweekly at the other sites, the release said. During cooler months, all sites are tested monthly, the release said.
According to the release, water is analyzed for enterococci bacteria, a bacteria found in the intestines of humans and other warm-blooded animals. 'High counts (of the bacteria) indicate the possibility that other disease-causing germs could be present in the water,' the release said.
'Bacterial concentrations in recreational waters can increase during and immediately following rainstorms due to overflowing sewage collection and treatment facilities, stormwater run-off, malfunctioning septic systems and agricultural run-off. No known sewage spills have occurred,' the release said.
The release said when monitoring results exceed EPA standards, the affected site is immediately retested. If the second test also shows higher amounts of the bacteria, then an advisory is issued, the release said.
2 endangered North Atlantic Right Whales spotted off of Navarre Pier
The locations will be tested again in the coming days, the release said. According to the release, the areas will continue to be monitored and the advisory will be lifted once bacteria values fall below the EPA's threshold of 104 enterococcus organisms per 100 milliliters of marine water.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
12 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
JTWNI, GARD join EarthJustice, other groups in legal action against EPA
Two Northwest Indiana community groups have joined EarthJustice to challenge the Environmental Protection Agency's actions to delay air pollution compliance in steel mills. 'The 2024 air standards — hard-won safeguards for fenceline communities — are being stripped away, as the agency grants emissions exemptions to steel mills and eliminates public input,' Lisa Vallee, organizing director of Just Transition Northwest Indiana, said in a Wednesday news release. 'This is environmental injustice: they are sacrificing our communities, gutting our social safety nets, and taking away our future. We will not stay silent.' Earlier this month, the EPA issued a final rule delaying air pollution protections for communities near steel mills, according to the Federal Register. Current rules have required steel mills to reduce emissions since last April, but the agency's new action delays compliance until April 2027, allowing pollution to continue at current levels. According to EarthJustice, the EPA published the final rule without notice, which did not allow the public to object to the extension before it went into effect. EarthJustice is a San Francisco-based nonprofit public interest environmental law organization that works with community groups nationwide. EarthJustice Senior Attorney Adrienne Lee said in a Wednesday news release that it's alarming for the EPA to delay protections without first accepting public input. The action is also inconsistent with the agency's responsibility to human health and the environment, Lee said. 'Communities living near steel mills in states such as Indiana and Pennsylvania deserve better,' she said. 'Each year, steel mills expose these communities to hundreds of tons of toxic air pollution which places them at increased risk of developing cancer and a variety of chronic health conditions.' An October report from Industrious Labs found that most residents in Gary are in the top 10% nationally for being most at-risk for developing asthma and at-risk of low life expectancy. In 2020, Indiana had a lung cancer rate of 72.5 per 100,000 people, with Lake County as one of the state's counties with the highest cancer mortality rates, according to the American Lung Association. A 2016 JAMA Network report also found Gary as one of the top five U.S. cities with the lowest life expectancy at one point. The EPA declined to comment on the legal action, saying in an email that it's longstanding practice not to comment on current or pending litigation. Dorreen Carey, president of Gary Advocates for Responsible Development, said in the news release that EPA's actions fail to protect Gary and surrounding Northwest Indiana communities' residents. Carey called out U.S. Steel's Gary Works facility specifically, saying pollutants have led to increased health issues in the city. 'The current outmoded and insufficient methods of hazardous air emission monitoring and control at Gary Works are not protective of human health and the environment,' Carey said. 'Residents must have a voice in EPA decisions and rulemaking and EPA must do its job to protect the residents and the natural resources of Gary…' A U.S. Steel spokesperson responded to the action in a statement Thursday. 'Environmental stewardship is a core value at U.S. Steel, and we remain committed to the safety of our communities as do our more than 3,400 Gary Works employees,' the statement said. JTNWI and GARD have previously expressed concerns with U.S. Steel's application for two-year exemptions from hazardous air pollutant rules for integrated iron and steel, coke and taconite iron ore process, according to Post-Tribune archives. U.S. Steel previously told the Post-Tribune in a statement that it challenged all three rules because they were not supported by science or law and would impose significant costs while setting technically unachievable standards. Seeking these exemptions doesn't mean U.S. Steel isn't 'supportive of revisions to regulations that are within (the EPA's) statutory authority, based on sound science and are technically feasible,' according to Post-Tribune archives. In March, the EPA announced corporations could apply for presidential exemptions to sections of the Clean Air Act. Exemption applications were due March 31, and if approved, can be extended for up to two additional years. 'Northwest Indiana is already home to some of the worst air pollution in this country,' a previous JTNWI statement said. 'In this region, we suffer from a cumulative, generational impact of exposure to industrial toxins in communities like Lake County, Indiana. These exemptions are a free pass for these polluters at the continued cost of our health and safety. We're adamantly opposed to this astonishing reversal of environmental law in no uncertain terms. Our communities and region are not expendable sacrifice zones for this administration or corporations.'
Wall Street Journal
15 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Climate Skeptics Are Tapped by Trump Administration to Justify Regulatory Rollback
WASHINGTON—To make its case that climate regulations should be tossed out, the Trump administration asked a group of five researchers who are skeptical of established climate science to write a report for the Energy Department. The report challenges decades of scientific findings that emissions from cars, power plants and factories are warming the planet and posing risks to human health. The Environmental Protection Agency is using the report as the scientific basis to roll back its so-called endangerment finding, a legal tool that allows the agency to regulate industries and automakers under the Clean Air Act.
Washington Post
16 hours ago
- Washington Post
As EPA weakens rules on ‘forever chemicals,' states are moving forward
State water officials are worried about how to protect residents from drinking water contaminated with 'forever chemicals' — and how shifting federal regulations will affect their responsibilities. During a meeting this week with the Environmental Protection Agency on its plan to rescind and reconsider President Joe Biden's landmark drinking water standard on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), state officials and industry representatives complained that regulatory uncertainty was placing communities in a bind. Despite the lack of clarity on what the EPA will do with the standard, states are still on the hook for implementing it. That creates difficulties if the rule is weakened, said Steven Elmore, chair of the National Drinking Water Advisory Council. 'Certain states have state laws that say their drinking water standard can't be more stringent than the federal law,' Elmore said. More state laws are probably on the way. At least 250 bills have been introduced in about 36 states this year to address PFAS by banning the chemicals in products, setting maximum levels in drinking water and allocating funding to clean up contamination. Dozens of states have passed regulatory standards for at least one forever chemical in drinking water. The legislative push at the state level comes on the heels of the Trump administration's mixed messaging on regulations and research for PFAS. In May, the EPA announced plans to rescind and reconsider limits on four of the chemicals and to delay the rules for two others. In July, the administration slashed nearly $15 million in grant funding for research to reduce the effects of PFAS in sewage sludge and related contamination on farmlands. The agency said it has outlined ways to address water contamination, including the new PFAS OUT initiative in which it will share tools, funding, resources and technical assistance with public water utilities to limit at the source the contamination by PFAS. In March, the White House released the 'National Strategy to End the Use of Paper Straws,' detailing the dangers of PFAS, which some paper straws contain. 'Building on the historic actions to address PFAS during the first Trump Administration, EPA is tackling PFAS from all of our program offices, advancing research and testing, stopping PFAS from getting into drinking water systems, holding polluters accountable, and more,' EPA press secretary Brigit Hirsch said in a statement. But some officials said state legislation would serve as the last line of defense in protecting residents from contamination. In Maine, state Rep. Dan Shagoury (D) said he introduced the bill establishing a new maximum level for PFAS as a bookkeeping measure to ensure state law mirrored the federal standard. He now sees the measure as an important safeguard in the face of potential federal rollbacks. 'The thought after the election was, 'We really better make sure we do this because the feds may roll it back and those standards may not be there a year from now,'' Shagoury said. The law, which passed in June, requires local water utilities to reduce levels of PFOA, a known human carcinogen, and PFOS, a likely carcinogen, to four parts per trillion (ppt). The legislation sets a limit of 10 ppt for three other compounds — PFHxS, PFNA and GenX — and additional limits for mixtures of the compounds. Current federal regulation allows states to have stricter rules. 'It's going to be up to the states to set limits in the absence of federal standards,' Shagoury said. 'For the past few decades, we looked to the feds for our guidance on safe levels of things, and if they aren't going to do it, we will.' Lawmakers in Delaware started working on legislation on PFAS about a year ago in anticipation of rollbacks at the federal level, state Sen. Darius Brown (D) said. The state's new law, which goes into effect next year, will create a monitoring and reporting dashboard so residents can find out the concentrations of PFAS in their drinking water. The dashboard will be funded primarily by settlement money from litigation against chemical companies. The federal rule gives water utilities until 2027 to report the presence of the regulated chemicals but doesn't require compliance with maximum levels until 2029. 'We'll do the work here locally to protect residents in our state to make sure that we have the proper reporting and that residents are informed around forever chemicals,' Brown said. 'If that's something that is rolled back at the federal level, we will not be the only state, but we're happy to join other states in being leaders around this effort.' State regulatory actions could result in legal challenges down the line, Elmore said. States passing legislation to match the standard could expose themselves to litigation if the EPA changes it next year. And states that wait for a new standard could run into delays and compliance issues. States have historically moved faster on legislation on PFAS due to local contamination issues and have generally served as the 'testing ground and incubators for trying out policy,' said Jen Hensley, a state lobbying and advocacy director with the Sierra Club, an environmental advocacy group. States began passing such legislation before President Donald Trump's current term, and if the EPA rolls back the federal drinking water standard, additional states are likely to establish stricter rules, she said. 'We'll use this time under a hostile administration to regulate and move the ball wherever we can,' Hensley said. Water utilities and ratepayers will bear the brunt of the regulatory ambiguity, according to the Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies, a trade group that sued the EPA over the Biden rule. 'AMWA continues to advocate for sound federal regulation of contaminants that pose nationwide threats, but otherwise we believe states are well positioned to regulate contaminants that are of regional concern,' AMWA CEO Tom Dobbins said. The chemical industry warns against the creation of a patchwork system that will sow confusion about which standards to uphold. The American Chemistry Council, an industry trade group, said the group believes in a one-size-fits-all approach to regulating the class of chemicals. Without it, state regulations could conflict with each other, EPA policies and international standards. 'The consequences could be skyrocketing prices, products no longer available in certain states and business opportunities moving from one state to another or overseas,' said Erich Shea, ACC's director of product communications. Shagoury said a patchwork system is 'almost inevitable' in the absence of federal regulations. New Mexico state Rep. Christine Chandler (D) said there wouldn't be a patchwork system if the federal government created a national standard that states could rely on. 'Unfortunately, we're seeing a trend where the federal government is stepping away from that responsibility,' she said. 'Those of us who care about the environment and our residents are going to have to step up and do what we can to mitigate against these environmental threats,' Chandler added. New Mexico is embroiled in a lawsuit against the U.S. Air Force after firefighting foam from an air base caused a four-mile PFAS plume near Clovis, contaminating drinking water and crops and poisoning farm animals. Chandler said the state's new law classifying PFAS as hazardous waste will ensure that the state can seek remediation and protect the health of residents. 'It's really unfortunate and it's really sad that we have to pass laws to clarify that the federal government really needs to step up here and take responsibility,' Chandler said.
