logo
Europe Is Escaping Reliance on American Science

Europe Is Escaping Reliance on American Science

BRUSSELS/WASHINGTON/BERLIN (Reuters) — European governments are taking steps to break their dependence on critical scientific data the United States historically made freely available to the world, and are ramping up their own data collection systems to monitor climate change and weather extremes, according to Reuters interviews.
The effort — which has not been previously reported — marks the most concrete response from the European Union and other European governments so far to the U.S. government's retreat from scientific research under U.S. President Donald Trump's administration.
Since his return to the White House, Trump has initiated sweeping budget cuts to the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration, the National Institutes of Health, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Centers for Disease Control and other agencies, dismantling programs conducting climate, weather, geospatial and health research, and taking some public databases offline.
As those cuts take effect, European officials have expressed increasing alarm that — without continued access to U.S.-supported weather and climate data — governments and businesses will face challenges in planning for extreme weather events and long-term infrastructure investment, according to Reuters interviews. In March, more than a dozen European countries urged the EU Commission to move fast to recruit American scientists who lose their jobs to those cuts.
Asked for comment on NOAA cuts and the EU's moves to expand its own collection of scientific data, the White House Office of Management and Budget said Trump's proposed cuts to the agency's 2026 budget were aimed at programs that spread 'fake Green New Scam 'science,'' a reference to climate change research and policy.
'Under President Trump's leadership, the U.S. is funding real science again,' Rachel Cauley, an OMB spokesperson, said via email.
European officials told Reuters that — beyond the risk of losing access to data that is bedrock to the world's understanding of climate change and marine systems — they were concerned by the general U.S. pullback from research.
'The current situation is much worse than we could have expected,' Sweden's State Secretary for Education and Research Maria Nilsson, told Reuters. 'My reaction is, quite frankly, shock.'
The Danish Meteorological Institute described the U.S. government data as 'absolutely vital' — and said it relied on several data sets to measure sea ice in the Arctic and sea surface temperatures. 'This isn't just a technical issue, reliable data underpins extreme weather warnings, climate projections, protecting communities and ultimately saves lives,' said Adrian Lema, director of the DMI's National Center for Climate Research.
Reuters interviewed officials from eight European countries who said their governments were undertaking reviews of their reliance on U.S. marine, climate and weather data. Officials from seven countries — Denmark, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain and Sweden — described joint efforts now in the early stages to safeguard key health and climate data and research programs.
Leaning on U.S.
As a priority, the EU is expanding its access to ocean observation data, a senior European Commission official told Reuters. Those data sets are seen as critical to the shipping and energy industries as well as early storm warning systems.
Over the next two years, the senior official said, the EU plans to expand its own European Marine Observation and Data Network, which collects and hosts data on shipping routes, seabed habitats, marine litter and other concerns.
The initiative was aimed at 'mirroring and possibly replacing U.S.-based services,' the senior European Commission official told Reuters.
Europe is particularly concerned about its vulnerability to U.S. funding cuts to NOAA's research arm that would affect the Global Ocean Observing System, a network of ocean observation programs that supports navigation services, shipping routes and storm forecasting, a second EU official told Reuters.
The insurance industry relies on the Global Ocean Observing System's disaster records for risk modeling. Coastal planners use shoreline, sea-level and hazard data to guide infrastructure investments. The energy industry uses oceanic and seismic datasets to assess offshore drilling or wind farm viability.
In addition, the senior EU Commission official said, the EU is considering increasing its funding of the Argo program, a part of the Global Ocean Observing System which operates a global system of floats to monitor the world's oceans and track global warming, extreme weather events and sea-level rise.
NOAA last year described the program, in operation for over 25 years, as the 'crown jewel' of ocean science. It makes its data freely available to the oil and gas industry, marine tourism and other industries.
The United States funds 57% of Argo's $40 million annual operating expenses, while the EU funds 23%.
The European moves to establish independent data collection and play a bigger role in Argo represent a historic break with decades of U.S. leadership in ocean science, said Craig McLean, who retired in 2022 after four decades at the agency. He said U.S. leadership of weather, climate and marine data collection was unmatched, and that through NOAA the U.S. has paid for more than half of the world's ocean measurements.
European scientists acknowledge the outsized role the U.S. government has played in global scientific research and data collection — and that European countries have grown overly dependent on that work.
'It's a bit like defense: we rely heavily on the U.S. in that area, too. They're trailblazers and role models — but that also makes us dependent on them,' Katrin Boehning-Gaese, scientific director of Germany's Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, told Reuters.
'Guerrilla archivists'
A number of European governments are now taking measures to reduce that dependence. Nordic countries met to coordinate data storage efforts in the spring, Norwegian Minister of Research and Higher Education Sigrun Aasland told Reuters. European science ministers also discussed the U.S. science budget cuts at a meeting in Paris in May.
Aasland said Norway was setting aside $2 million to back up and store U.S. data to ensure stable access.
The Danish Meteorological Institute in February started downloading historical U.S. climate data in case it is deleted by the U.S. It is also preparing to switch from American observations to alternatives, Christina Egelund, Minister of Higher Education and Science of Denmark, said in an interview.
'The potentially critical issue is when new observations data stop coming in,' the institute's Lema said. While weather models could continue to operate without U.S. data, he said the quality would suffer.
Meanwhile, the German government has commissioned scientific organizations, including the center, to review its reliance on U.S. databases.
Since Trump returned to the White House, scientists and citizens worldwide have been downloading U.S. databases related to climate, public health or the environment that are slated for decommissioning — calling it 'guerrilla archiving.'
'We actually received requests — or let's say emergency calls — from our colleagues in the U.S., who said, 'We have a problem here … and we will have to abandon some datasets,' said Frank Oliver Gloeckner, head of the digital archive PANGAEA, which is operated by publicly funded German research institutions.
About 800 of NOAA's 12,000-strong workforce have been terminated or taken financial incentives to resign as part of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency cuts.
The White House 2026 budget plan seeks to shrink NOAA even further, proposing a $1.8 billion cut, or 27% of the agency's budget, and a near-20% reduction in staffing, bringing down the NOAA workforce to 10,000.
The budget proposal would eliminate the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, NOAA's main research arm, which is responsible for ocean observatory systems including Argo, coastal observing networks, satellite sensors and climate model labs.
It is also reducing its data products. Between April and June, NOAA announced on its website the decommissioning of 20 datasets or products related to earthquakes and marine science.
Gloeckner said there were no legal hurdles to storing the U.S. government data as it was already in the public domain.
But without significant funds and infrastructure, there are limits to what private scientists can save, said Denice Ross, a senior fellow at the Federation of American Scientists, a nonprofit science policy group and the U.S. government's chief data officer during Joe Biden's administration.
Databases need regular updating — which requires the funding and infrastructure that only governments can provide, Ross said.
Over the last few months, the Federation and EU officials have held a series of talks with European researchers, U.S. philanthropies and health and environment advocacy groups to discuss how to prioritize what data to save.
'There is an opportunity for other nations and institutions and philanthropies to fill in the gaps if U.S. quality starts to falter,' she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

White House to review Smithsonian museums
White House to review Smithsonian museums

NHK

time36 minutes ago

  • NHK

White House to review Smithsonian museums

The White House says it will lead a review of Smithsonian museums and exhibitions in line with US President Donald Trump's executive order, "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History." The White House on Tuesday released a letter it sent to the Smithsonian Institution. It said the review comes as the administration prepares to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the country's founding next year. The review will initially focus on eight facilities in Washington DC and other places. These include the National Museum of American History, the National Museum of African American History and Culture and the National Air and Space Museum. The White House said exhibition text, digital and social media content and other materials will be reviewed to assess historical framing and alignment with American ideals. It said the initiative is intended to support the president's directive to remove divisive or partisan narratives. It also said the museums should begin implementing content corrections where necessary within 120 days. PEN America, a nonprofit organization advocating freedom of expression, said it was alarmed over the move. It criticized the action as "a deeply concerning effort to strip truth from the institutions that tell our national story." It also said, "The ideas and presentation of history cannot be subject to the whims of a single leader or administration."

Malaysia's top court clears way for Najib to seek house arrest
Malaysia's top court clears way for Najib to seek house arrest

Nikkei Asia

timean hour ago

  • Nikkei Asia

Malaysia's top court clears way for Najib to seek house arrest

A supporter of former Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak holds a fan printed with Najib's image outside the Federal Court, where his case is being heard, in Putrajaya, Malaysia, on Aug. 13. © Reuters NORMAN GOH August 14, 2025 17:58 JST PUTRAJAYA, Malaysia -- Former Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak has moved a step closer to making his case to serve out the remainder of his prison sentence under house arrest after the nation's top court ruled in his favor.

How a call from Trump ignited a frantic week of diplomacy by Ukraine
How a call from Trump ignited a frantic week of diplomacy by Ukraine

Japan Times

timean hour ago

  • Japan Times

How a call from Trump ignited a frantic week of diplomacy by Ukraine

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine was returning from the front line last week when he joined a pivotal call with U.S. President Donald Trump. Hours earlier, Zelenskyy had visited soldiers defending Ukraine's northeastern Sumy region against Russian ground assaults. Now, stopping in the small city of Romny, he listened on a secure line with other European leaders as Trump outlined Russia's proposal to end the war. Russia, Trump told them, was ready to halt hostilities under a deal involving a territorial exchange between Russia and Ukraine, according to a Kyiv-based European diplomat and a top Ukrainian official who were briefed on the call and spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive information. Seeing a chance to broker peace, Trump told those on the line that he would meet one on one with President Vladimir Putin of Russia to try to seal an agreement. Trump had just brought into play two of Ukraine's deepest fears: that it would be forced to cede land to Russia as part of a peace deal and that Putin would be given a way out of his diplomatic isolation. It was a direct challenge to Ukraine's core principles that territorial issues be addressed only after a ceasefire and that no deal be concluded without Kyiv. After Zelenskyy left the call, he recorded his usual evening address to Ukrainians, trying to project optimism. "I spoke with President Trump,' he said, speaking from a playground in Romny as the sun set behind him. "Russia now seems to be more inclined toward a ceasefire — the pressure is working.' But, he cautioned, "the key is to ensure they don't deceive anyone in the details — neither us, nor the United States.' What followed was a week of frantic diplomacy as Ukraine scrambled to avoid being sidelined in the negotiations and prevent Russia from dictating the terms of peace talks. Zelenskyy spoke with nearly 30 world leaders, while his top advisers met online and in person with senior European and American officials to press their case. In doing so, Ukraine turned to a tactic honed over more than three years of war: rallying partners through repeated behind-the-scenes calls and meetings to keep a seat at the negotiating table. Crucially, Ukraine leaned heavily on its European allies to form a united front and relay its message to the Trump administration. Debris in Kostyantynivka, a city in the Donetsk region of Ukraine, on June 20. | David Guttenfelder / The New York Times "The goal was to build a common position with the Europeans and a way to communicate it to Trump,' Oleksandr Kraiev, the director of the North America program at the Kyiv research group Ukrainian Prism, said in an interview. "The Europeans have been really useful in helping Ukraine get back to the table.' Ukraine's first task was to determine exactly what Russia had proposed to end the war. Trump had been vague on the call, the officials briefed on it said, leaving it unclear which territories might be swapped. Would it involve large areas such as the Ukrainian-controlled part of the eastern Donbas region for Russian-occupied land in the south, or smaller, strategic sites like the Russian-held Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant for a Ukrainian city? Zelenskyy instructed his top aides to clarify the situation. They got on a call last Thursday with European counterparts and Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy for peace missions, who had received Russia's proposal during a meeting with Putin in Moscow last week. But Witkoff's explanations were muddled, according to the Kyiv-based European diplomat, prompting another call the next day to clear up the confusion. After that second call, it became clear that Russia was not actually offering to relinquish any land, but only demanding that Ukraine give up the territory it holds in the Donbas in exchange for a ceasefire that would freeze the current front lines elsewhere. "Putin wants to achieve by diplomatic means what he failed to achieve by military means,' said Alyona Getmanchuk, the newly appointed head of Ukraine's mission to NATO. "Putin thinks he can use President Trump's mediation and determination to end the war as soon as possible to achieve his goals.' The Russian proposal was a nonstarter for Ukraine, and Kyiv moved to convince the Americans that it was a dangerous gambit. If Russia took all of the Donbas, Ukrainian officials argued, it would gain control of cities and fortifications forming Ukraine's main defensive belt in the area. That would put the Russian army in a much stronger position to attack nearby regions should it decide to resume the war. At first, Kyiv kept Russia's proposal under wraps, worried about how Ukrainians would react, Kraiev said. Most Ukrainians oppose giving up any territory not already under Russian control or formally recognizing Russia's occupation. "It's a classic diplomacy rule: If a possible peace treaty is not acceptable to your public, you limit your comments — you don't say anything,' Kraeiv said. But after Trump disclosed last Friday that a peace deal could include "some swapping of territories,' Zelenskyy had little choice but to push back. "Ukrainians will not gift their land to the occupier,' he said Saturday morning. U.S. President Donald Trump speaks at the Kennedy Center in Washington on Wednesday. | Bloomberg Zelenskyy, however, appears to have not entirely ruled out possible territorial exchanges, telling reporters this week that this is "a very complex issue that cannot be separated from security guarantees for Ukraine.' To bolster its stance with the Americans, Ukraine continued to enlist its European allies. Over the past week, Zelenskyy spoke by phone with more than 20 European leaders, including several times with President Emmanuel Macron of France, a close ally. That strategy echoed a familiar tactic first applied this spring, when European leaders repeatedly engaged with Trump to press Ukraine's case during early rounds of peace talks and acted as troubleshooter during moments of tension between Kyiv and Washington. On Saturday, senior European and Ukrainian officials met outside London with top American officials, including Vice President JD Vance, to try to dissuade the United States from cutting a peace deal with Russia behind their backs. The intense week of diplomacy culminated in a joint call between European leaders, Zelenskyy and Trump on Wednesday, exactly a week after Trump first revealed Russia's peace proposal. European leaders reiterated their key principles: that a ceasefire must come first; that the current front lines should be the starting point for any negotiations, including on territorial issues; and that any deal would have to be accompanied by security guarantees for Ukraine. The top Ukrainian official said the Americans had carefully listened to Ukraine's and Europe's arguments throughout the week, but he cautioned that no one really knew what they had in mind before Friday's meeting. Zelenskyy echoed that sentiment Tuesday. "I don't know what they will talk about without us,' he told reporters. But he stressed that "substantive and productive talks about us without us will not work.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times © 2025 The New York Times Company

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store