US-China trade deal: What transpired in two-day talks? Here's what to expect next
Following two days of trade negotiations in Switzerland, the lead US negotiator expressed optimism about resolving tensions between the world's two largest economies, praising the talks as 'a great deal of productivity.'
According to Reuters, this comes after US President Donald Trump's imposition of steep tariffs on China, which prompted Beijing to take retaliatory measures, Reuters reported.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated on Sunday that the discussions made 'substantial progress,' though he provided few details about the specific issues covered in the negotiations.
He said more details would come at a briefing Monday.
US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer suggested that an agreement had been reached but provided no details. He and Bessent briefly addressed reporters once talks had wrapped at the stately villa that serves as the residence of the Swiss ambassador to the United Nations in Geneva, but did not take questions., according to a report by Reuters.
'It's important to understand how quickly we were able to come to agreement, which reflects that perhaps the differences were not so large as far as maybe thought,' Greer said.
But he also stressed that a top Trump priority means closing the U.S. trade deficit with China, which came to a record $263 billion last year.
'We're confident that the deal we struck with our Chinese partners will help us to resolve, work towards resolving that national emergency,' Greer said.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt later clarified that the United States would not lower tariffs unilaterally. China would also need to make concessions, she said, as reported by AFP.
"It's definitely encouraging," Asia Society Policy Institute (ASPI) vice president Wendy Cutler told AFP on Sunday after the talks had concluded. "The two sides spent over 15 hours in discussions," she said. "That's a long time for two countries to be meeting, and I view that as positive."
But, she added, 'the devil will be in the details.'
The White House subsequently issued a statement titled, 'U.S. Announces China Trade Deal in Geneva' but offering only the same quotes by Bessent and Greer.
The Chinese delegation held a subsequent news conference where it described what occurred as 'candid, in-depth and constructive dialogue." Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng said both sides had agreed to 'establishing a consultation mechanism' for further discussions on trade and economic issues.
China's negotiators also said that they and the U.S. team would be releasing a joint statement on Monday — though the timing was still uncertain.
'I think, no matter when this statement is released, it's going to be good news for the world,' said Li Chenggang, the Chinese ambassador to the World Trade Organization.
Beijing, however, appeared largely more measured about the negotiations' overall direction, noting in a Saturday night editorial published before the second day of negotiations kicked off, that it would 'firmly reject any proposal that compromises core principles or undermines the broader cause of global equity.'
Negotiations could go a long way toward stabilizing world markets roiled by the US-China standoff that has ships in port with goods from China unwilling to unload until they get final word on tariffs.
Last month, US President Trump increased US tariffs on Chinese goods to a combined total of 145%, prompting China to respond with a 125% tariff on American imports.
These steep tariffs have essentially led both nations to stop trading many products with each other, disrupting a trade relationship that exceeded $660 billion last year.
Although the Trump administration has placed tariffs on multiple countries, the trade conflict with China has been the most severe.
It's important to understand how quickly we were able to come to agreement, which reflects that perhaps the differences were not so large as far as maybe thought.
Among the US tariffs on Chinese products is a 20% levy aimed at pressuring China to take stronger action against the export of the synthetic opioid fentanyl into the U.S.
We're confident that the deal we struck with our Chinese partners will help us to resolve, work towards resolving that national emergency.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trade deal lacks fine print, raising doubts over US-China truce: Shaun Rein
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel "You can have companies, the big automakers like Ford and GM are rumoured to say, we need to relocate our manufacturing to China, so we can get access to rare earths despite the heavy tariffs that they would then incur by going into the United States. But here is the thing, China's media has been a lot more circumspect with the details of this so-called trade agreement," says Shaun Rein, China Market Research is a great and big question. Trump is saying the deal has been signed and he has been talking about that the Chinese are going to send rare earths and magnets in advance to whatever the United States needs because what you have seen in the last month is the lack of rare earths that were exported to the United States has really crippled the American economy You can have companies, the big automakers like Ford and GM are rumoured to say, we need to relocate our manufacturing to China, so we can get access to rare earths despite the heavy tariffs that they would then incur by going into the United States. But here is the thing, China's media has been a lot more circumspect with the details of this so-called trade has said the rumour is that they will give maybe export licenses to rare earths on a six-month trial basis to American companies. So, basically Trump is exaggerating the win in his mind and China is being a lot more honest probably saying well we do not have all the details ironed out, we want to come to an agreement but quite frankly China has the upper hand in the trade war with the United States right that the United States makes except for semiconductors, the Chinese can buy elsewhere. So, instead of buying American beef, they are buying Australian beef; instead of buying American oil, they are buying Canadian oil; instead of buying American soybeans, they are buying Brazilian soybeans. So, what you have seen is that there is a total shift in trade patterns and a total shift in power and China is at the top of the triangle, the top of the pyramid right now in terms of buying goods and trading goods from other countries. We are seeing a shift in world order right I mean that that is not true. I mean, Chinese equity markets are up 15-16% since the start of the year while the S&P 500 is only up about 2%. So, it is quite clear that the Chinese Hong Kong equity markets are outperforming the United States right the equity markets also do not necessarily reflect the economy. So, what you are seeing right now is Abigail Johnson, who is the head of Fidelity , the rumour is today that her private investment house is going to be selling 40 Chinese tech companies that they have long held because they are worried about the regulatory and I have been talking with a lot of mutual funds, I have been talking with a lot of LPs like pension funds and endowments and they are getting huge pressure from not just Trump , but previously under the Biden regime to derisk by not investing in Chinese equities, so that does not mean the economy is bad, that just means more oppression and bullying from the United States because they are trying to really contain China's economic might have happened eight years ago and that might have worked eight years ago. But the big problem is the United States has gone after Europe. The United States has gone after Canada. You even hear Howard Lutnick, the Secretary of Commerce , criticised India last week and said, why is India buying Russian weapons, they should be buying American the reality is the United States under Trump and Biden has been bullying people all around the world. And I think at some point the global south or I prefer to call it the global majority is saying you know what, let us not deal with all the drama, let us not deal with weaponization of the US dollar, weaponization of technology and let us move closer towards China where we have a lot more stable relations with Australia for instance, Australian dollar has strengthened in the last couple weeks because basically Australia is a proxy for China. Australia's economy does well when China's economy does well, whether it be buying iron ore, whether it be buying tourists going to Australia to buy products, so that is why the Aussie has strengthened and the US dollar is weakened. Now when it comes to liquidity and volume going back towards China, we are still at a very initial of the global funds only have about 25% of their holdings exposed to China. I recommend retail investors to have 15% to 20% because of the volatility and the regulatory we are seeing in my conversations with institutional investors like hedge funds that they want to come back into China, but they have not come back yet. Now, that gives a great opportunity for speculators and people who have a high-risk appetite to trade in front of the institutional personally, I am getting more exposure to Hong Kong equities the last six months because I am trying to front run what the hedge funds are doing because they still have not quite gotten into the markets yet and they will in the next three to six months because they have to make the business case, China is outperforming the S&P the United States needs a deal. Frankly, China controls about 30-35% of global manufacturing. So, America might have the money, they might have the capital, but they need to buy the products from China. At the end of the day, China makes not just rare earths, about 90% of refined rare earths, but they also make most of the ibuprofen, most of the of the antibiotics in the world comes from China. So, at the end of the day, that is real leverage. So, for instance in 2017, 18% of Chinese exports went to the US, that number is down to 14%. China on the other hand has shifted and exports to Asean, has gone up to 16%.So, basically, it is a game of chicken right now. China's economy is hurting, do not get me wrong. There are about 15 million people who are involved in the export sector. You have seen that the CPI index has dropped about 0.1%. So, we are dealing with the D-word, the economy in China is not booming, but China is not going to blink. They have the resolve to push hard back against Trump and Scott Bessent and Howard Lutnick because at the end of the day, the Americans need to buy from China. They cannot buy antibiotics from any other country in the world except for a little bit from India.
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
EU crypto regulation hampered by national flaws
Live Events - Rapid approvals - - Economic sovereignty - (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel London, Jun 12, 2025 -The first EU-wide cryptocurrency regulation was meant to impose some harmony, but disparities in implementation by member countries has allowed companies to exploit a flaw in the in December, Markets in Crypto-Asset (MiCA) insists on service providers obtaining a licence to operate legally in the European is issued once specific criteria on anti-money laundering, prevention of terror group financing, IT security and financial soundness have been a framework aims to protect investors and provide credibility to a sector deemed to be poorly obtained, a licence grants access to the entire EU market, which encourages some companies to seek authorisation in the most "accommodating" member experts, speaking to AFP, do not question the integrity of regulatory authorities in, for example, Germany and the Netherlands -- two EU members which account for the majority of the roughly 30 MiCA licences issued so bloc nations, including Malta, are in the crosshairs, however, according to these same experts, who preferred to remain point to, for example, the Mediterranean island hastily issuing licences before the formal implementation of collective standards."From time to time we see arriving on our market, via the (MiCA) passport, products approved by some of our colleagues with, let's say, a rather quick signing off," lamented the president of the financial markets authority in France, Marie-Anne Barbat-Layani, as she addressed the country's Senate in noted that EU markets regulator ESMA had launched a "peer review" of an unnamed regulator that is potentially too contacted by AFP, the watchdog declined to comment. The Maltese regulator, MFSA, neither confirmed nor denied that it was official working under her, Stephane Pontoizeau, added: "There is always the risk of someone trying to find the least demanding entry point into Europe."Crypto platform OKX, which had planned to hire about 100 staff in France making the country its "anchor" in Europe, ultimately opted for Gemini followed the same strategy, having targeted Ireland before changing its mind, citing the "proactive engagement" of the Maltese authorities."Malta began welcoming applications several months earlier than other regulators, which meant that we could start the application process earlier, build the teams and infrastructure required to operate under MiCA," noted Gemini's head of Europe, Mark countries have been slow to grant approvals, with France having only just issued its first MiCA licence -- to French fintech firm Deblock -- amid accusations that its process is long and however, sees it as granting companies greater time to prepare their application, with the country implementing a transition period through to June insisted the French financial regulator is "determined not to add national requirements to European rules".According to lawyer Anne Marechal, former legal director at the regulator, there have been "cut-price approvals".She told AFP that "believing one can save a few weeks and a little money" puts companies' credibility at risk with the necessary certification can also require considerable outlay, whether for a MiCA or national Le Calvez, founder of the crypto investment firm GOin, has invested about one million euros on obtaining a French licence, which inspired believes that many players will not be able to complete all the necessary in 2017, EU member Estonia introduced its own mandatory licences for the crypto sector, which resulted in 75 percent of industry participants ceasing operations there, according to the Cointelegraph it remains to be seen if a similar outcome will occur in the wake of MiCA, Claire Balva, strategy director at Deblock, highlighted the risk of European crypto firms being replaced by rivals from places with more flexible rules, such as the United States and their financial resources, such non-European companies would have no difficulty complying with EU rules, she "a significant portion of cryptocurrencies held by Europeans" be hosted "on American infrastructure", this also raises "questions of economic sovereignty", added Balva.
Economic Times
37 minutes ago
- Economic Times
EU crypto regulation hampered by national flaws
The EU's MiCA regulation, designed to harmonize cryptocurrency oversight, faces challenges due to varying implementation across member states. Some nations are perceived as offering rapid approvals, potentially undermining the regulation's integrity. This disparity prompts concerns about a 'race to the bottom' and the potential for economic sovereignty issues as non-EU firms may dominate the market. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Crypto TrackerPowered By TOP COINS TOP COIN SETS BNB 57,116 ( -0.2 %) Buy Ethereum 2,36,278 ( -0.83 %) Buy Bitcoin 92,20,368 ( -1.53 %) Buy XRP 192.81 ( -1.77 %) Buy Solana 13,628.35 ( -3.61 %) Buy - Rapid approvals - Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads - Economic sovereignty - London, Jun 12, 2025 -The first EU-wide cryptocurrency regulation was meant to impose some harmony, but disparities in implementation by member countries has allowed companies to exploit a flaw in the in December, Markets in Crypto-Asset (MiCA) insists on service providers obtaining a licence to operate legally in the European is issued once specific criteria on anti-money laundering, prevention of terror group financing, IT security and financial soundness have been a framework aims to protect investors and provide credibility to a sector deemed to be poorly obtained, a licence grants access to the entire EU market, which encourages some companies to seek authorisation in the most "accommodating" member experts, speaking to AFP, do not question the integrity of regulatory authorities in, for example, Germany and the Netherlands -- two EU members which account for the majority of the roughly 30 MiCA licences issued so bloc nations, including Malta, are in the crosshairs, however, according to these same experts, who preferred to remain point to, for example, the Mediterranean island hastily issuing licences before the formal implementation of collective standards."From time to time we see arriving on our market, via the (MiCA) passport, products approved by some of our colleagues with, let's say, a rather quick signing off," lamented the president of the financial markets authority in France, Marie-Anne Barbat-Layani, as she addressed the country's Senate in noted that EU markets regulator ESMA had launched a "peer review" of an unnamed regulator that is potentially too contacted by AFP, the watchdog declined to comment. The Maltese regulator, MFSA, neither confirmed nor denied that it was official working under her, Stephane Pontoizeau, added: "There is always the risk of someone trying to find the least demanding entry point into Europe."Crypto platform OKX, which had planned to hire about 100 staff in France making the country its "anchor" in Europe, ultimately opted for Gemini followed the same strategy, having targeted Ireland before changing its mind, citing the "proactive engagement" of the Maltese authorities."Malta began welcoming applications several months earlier than other regulators, which meant that we could start the application process earlier, build the teams and infrastructure required to operate under MiCA," noted Gemini's head of Europe, Mark countries have been slow to grant approvals, with France having only just issued its first MiCA licence -- to French fintech firm Deblock -- amid accusations that its process is long and however, sees it as granting companies greater time to prepare their application, with the country implementing a transition period through to June insisted the French financial regulator is "determined not to add national requirements to European rules".According to lawyer Anne Marechal, former legal director at the regulator, there have been "cut-price approvals".She told AFP that "believing one can save a few weeks and a little money" puts companies' credibility at risk with the necessary certification can also require considerable outlay, whether for a MiCA or national Le Calvez, founder of the crypto investment firm GOin, has invested about one million euros on obtaining a French licence, which inspired believes that many players will not be able to complete all the necessary in 2017, EU member Estonia introduced its own mandatory licences for the crypto sector, which resulted in 75 percent of industry participants ceasing operations there, according to the Cointelegraph it remains to be seen if a similar outcome will occur in the wake of MiCA, Claire Balva, strategy director at Deblock, highlighted the risk of European crypto firms being replaced by rivals from places with more flexible rules, such as the United States and their financial resources, such non-European companies would have no difficulty complying with EU rules, she "a significant portion of cryptocurrencies held by Europeans" be hosted "on American infrastructure", this also raises "questions of economic sovereignty", added Balva.
