Expert warns against quick-fix online fire safety training years after Grenfell
The chairwoman of a group reviewing building control in England in the wake of the Grenfell Tower blaze has vowed she is determined to bring about a 'culture change', as she warned against 'dubious' online training courses on fire safety.
Dame Judith Hackitt criticised 'quick fixes' which she said will not work towards rebuilding public confidence in an industry which has been heavily criticised since Grenfell, and urged businesses to see proper training as an investment rather than a cost.
She will chair the first formal meeting of the Building Control Independent Panel this month, set up to look at whether changes are needed to the current system across England.
The Grenfell Tower Inquiry found an issue with building control bodies tending to co-operate with companies who wanted their proposals to be approved, instead of enforcing building regulations 'rigorously'.
The inquiry recommended an independent panel look at whether it is in the public interest for building control functions to be performed by those with a commercial interest in the process, or whether all such functions should be carried out by a national authority.
The panel is due to present a report to the Government in autumn and Dame Judith suggested it will be as 'hard-hitting' as her 2018 one.
That report identified 'deep flaws' within the building regulations system, as she argued ignorance and indifference had created a 'race to the bottom', where there was a desire to do things 'as quickly and cheaply as possible rather than to deliver quality homes which are safe for people to live in'.
Asked what might be expected from her report this year, Dame Judith told the PA news agency: 'I think my track record speaks for itself, doesn't it? I'm unlikely to change my approach.
'I was honest and hard-hitting in my report seven years ago. I've continued to keep the pressure on government and on industry for the last seven years. I see no reason to change.
'I am determined to drive through this culture change that is needed across the whole of the built environment.'
Next month will see bereaved and survivors mark eight years since the fire in west London in June 2017, which resulted in 72 people losing their lives.
Asked what her message is to the many who say they have still not seen justice delivered or enough wholesale change in the system so many years on, Dame Judith said: 'I share their frustration that it's taking so long, but that's no reason to give up.
'We will get there. We will drive this change. We owe it to the people who lost their lives to do that.'
Dame Judith said she is 'absolutely confident that things are better now than they were in 2017' after building control came under the Building Safety Regulator which launched in 2023.
She added: 'We have moved from where we were. Is that enough? Is there more we need to do?
'I'm not going to speculate until we have looked at the evidence, but we will do that at pace, and we will deliver our report before the end of the year.'
Dame Judith urged 'more people to take personal responsibility and leadership in different parts of this built environment sector' after recently visiting a fire door safety centre which she praised for its efforts.
She said businesses must understand that proper training is essential as 'money spent on cheap training and substandard training is money wasted'.
Dame Judith added: 'Spending it on this sort of training is an investment in your people. It's not a cost.'
She praised Fire Door Maintenance Training and Development, which describes itself as the largest such practical training centre in the UK, saying she saw a 'real sense of purpose' in the people training there.
Dame Judith said that despite the sector-wide knowledge of the need for thorough training in aspects such as ensuring fire doors are properly maintained, the take-up of such training has been 'very mixed, very variable, and some of the training courses that have sprung up, I think, are of dubious quality to say the least, particularly online ones'.
She referenced one-hour online video training which might promise someone competency once they had completed it but added: 'That's not the case.'
Dame Judith added: 'Let's be clear, there's a place for online training and familiarisation.
'But to get people to the level of competence that they need to be on things that are safety critical, like fire doors, that practical training with someone assessing whether you are doing the job properly and are competent to do the job properly, is crucial.
'We're trying to rebuild public confidence here in an industry, and quick fixes aren't going to do it.
'You know, a quick training session online in many cases, is just not enough.'
She highlighted Fire Door Maintenance as 'what good looks like' in an industry where many others have been slow to act and change.
Nicola John, managing director at the firm which sees people training in realistic settings with doors and corridors, said they wanted to offer a 'practical training facility for practical people doing a practical job' in contrast to online courses alone.
Ms John added: 'The issue that we have is that it's not currently mandated, so we only attract the people who have the same mindset currently.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'Two weeks of paternity leave is just too little for the 21st Century'
As a new report describes the UK's paternity leave policy as "one of the worst in the developed world", we speak to a new father, a campaigner and a business group to see just what the problem is. "When my son was born there's a lot of happiness and joy, you have a newborn but this a huge change in your life," says Luis Palacio. "You find yourself being tired, sleep deprivation and I also like taking care of the newborn, but you're still expected to do eight hours at work," the technical manager, who lives in Leeds, explains. Introduced in 2003, statutory paternity leave, allows most new fathers and second parents in the UK to take up to two weeks off work. Luis says although welcome, a fortnight is not enough time "to adapt" to the huge changes fatherhood imposes. "Not only tangible changes in your daily life and routines, but the changes in your mental health. "Two weeks seems too little for the 21st Century," he adds. Fathers who are eligible receive £187.18 a week or 90% of their average earnings, whichever is lower. If a father is self-employed or earns less than £123 a week then he is not entitled to paternity leave. Some businesses may offer more generous policies as part of their benefits for employees. The statutory offer is the "worst in Europe," according to Alex Lloyd Hunter, the co-founder of campaign group The Dad Shift. Hundreds of fathers are expected to picket outside the Department for Business and Trade in London later calling for an overhaul of the UK's parental leave policies. Mr Lloyd Hunter says the average paternity leave across Europe is eight weeks on full pay. The most generous offer is Spain, which gives dads 16 weeks on full pay, while further north Sweden offers parents 90 days each and an extra 300 days they can share between them. "There are loads of examples of how to do this well," he says. Luke Charters, Labour MP for York Outer, agrees the system needs changing and has been advocating for a more generous policy. "Those few weeks at the start of a child's life are just so important and form that bond and connections," he ssays. That is something Mr Palacio is also aware of. "There are studies showing that if fathers don't get this bonding with their children from the beginning it can create a long term disengagement," he says. A report published on Tuesday by the Women and Equalities Committee says paternity leave rules "entrench outdated gender stereotypes" and that "bold" action is needed - albeit at a steep financial cost. The Sheffield Chamber of Commerce, which represents businesses across the area, says the "growing national conversation around parental leave" is welcome. Chief executive Louisa Harrison-Walker believes proposals to support working parents could "offer long-term benefits" to both individuals and businesses. "However, any changes to statutory entitlements must also carefully consider the financial and operational realities that employers – particularly small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) – are currently facing," she adds. Mr Lloyd Hunter says 90% of fathers want to be involved more in their children's lives and the system needs to "catch up". "Fathers recognise how important it is to be more involved in their chidren's lives. "As a society we are blocking that by not updating a system that was built for an era that no longer exists," he adds A Department for Business and Trade spokesperson said the government was carrying out a review to see how it best can support working families. "This government is committed to making sure parents receive the best possible support to balance their work and home lives," they said. A spokesperson added it was already in the process of ensuring dads no longer need to be employed for 26 weeks to be entitled to paternity leave. The Dad Shift Sheffield Chamber of Commerce Department for Business and Trade Give new dads six weeks off work at nearly full pay, MPs say Shared parental leave skewed against lower earning families, analysis shows
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Sizewell C will be 'colossal for job opportunities'
Young people will benefit from a "colossal" jobs boom during and beyond the construction of Sizewell C nuclear power station, local educators believe. On Tuesday, the government announced it would be investing a further £14.2bn into the energy project on the Suffolk coast, which Chancellor Rachel Reeves said would "kickstart" economic growth. Bosses say Sizewell C will support up to 70,000 jobs across the UK once completed and 1,500 apprenticeships have been pledged - designed to provide the skills needed for a career in nuclear engineering. East Coast College student Skye Dorward credited Sizewell with "increasing the number of opportunities and pathways" into the industry for young people. Engineering student Ms Dorward, 19, has secured a nuclear engineering degree apprenticeship with EDF, the French state-owned firm that will build the third Sizewell plant, which she hopes will lead to a job there. "The work and educational prospects it offers to young people is so great," she said. "The challenges and opportunities Sizewell C is presenting are outstanding, so coming back to Suffolk to work on Sizewell C would be really good. "I would love the chance to work on that project." Sizewell C will be a two-reactor nuclear power station that could generate 3.2 gigawatts of electricity for 60 years. But it is not just nuclear engineering roles that will need to be filled. The wider Sizewell C project will require workers from several industries - including construction, catering,d digital marketing, IT and hospitality. The chancellor called it a "landmark decision" to invest £14.2bn, while Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said the investment was necessary to usher in a "golden age of clean energy". While it will take at least a decade to complete, Reeves said it would be the "biggest nuclear building programme in a generation". Sizewell C was originally estimated to cost £20bn. However, industry experts predicted that could double - a claim that was rejected by EDF, which is also building the new Hinkley Point plant in Somerset that has gone over budget. Investment into Sizewell C came in a series of announcements in the run-up to the government's Spending Review. Sizewell C nuclear plant gets £14bn go-ahead from government Updates: Local and national reaction to Tuesday's announcement of £14.2bn investment No blank cheque for Sizewell C says Starmer, as £14.2bn investment confirmed Emma Taylor, director of business development and major projects at Suffolk New College, said Sizewell C posed a "colossal opportunity for great new jobs". The college and Sizewell have long worked together to develop curricula that will give students the best chance of capitalising on the jobs the plant could generate. What is Sizewell C and what does it mean for Suffolk? "We have been really integral to their conversations about what are the key roles that are going to be needed to enable this project," Ms Taylor told the BBC. "A number of our students really see the opportunities [Sizewell C offers] and that is growing and we're absolutely passionate to enable [them to pursue] those opportunities. "There is a growth in the number of young people applying for construction courses and we are no exception – we've had real growth in that area, which is fantastic." Leiston was once a thriving manufacturing town but, in more recent years, many feel it has lacked the capacity to provide career opportunities. According to the ONS, 79.1% of people in East Suffolk, however, were already in paid work or had a job, with an average weekly wage of £604. Julia Pyke, managing director of Sizewell C, told the BBC she was "committed" to ensuring at least one third of the workforce was made of local people. "There will be a lot of high quality jobs in an area which is quite remote and where there isn't currently enough high quality employment," she said. Phil Stittle, executive director of business and skills at West Suffolk College, said he was determined to ensure anyone could benefit from the jobs boom. "As an educator, we need to ensure the next generation understands that [Sizewell C] is going to be a great option for people to go and work at," he told the BBC. "But we also work with a lot of different agencies that support adult retraining, those that come from the military and prison and even care leavers. "We are looking to make sure we are not leaving anybody behind by training everyone that we can to support that big need [for jobs]. "I think the positives of Sizewell C far outweigh the negatives." At the construction's height, the project will command the expertise and labour of 10,000 people – about 4,000 more than actually live in nearby Leiston. For locals, this has long proved a concern, with some worried about whether or not the town will be able to cope with such an influx of people. Some also fear the workforce demand at Sizewell C will dry up the employment pool available for local businesses. Jenny Kirtley, from Together Against Sizewell C, said: "I think it will have a huge impact on local businesses. "Whether it's building firms or in hospitality, people cannot match the Sizewell C money and the wages they are paying." But Sizewell C joint managing director, Ms Pyke, disagrees. "We are offering people progression and by investing in education and training we hope the amount of people wanting to work in East Suffolk increases so that all needs can be met," she said. "We are not going to be paying out of line wages to people for similar jobs or luring people from their current jobs." Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X. What is Sizewell C and what does it mean for Suffolk? Sizewell C boss 'optimistic' it will get go-ahead 'Greedy landlords are cashing in and forcing us out of town' Sizewell C pledged to lower bills but will take at least 10 years No blank cheque for Sizewell C says Starmer, as £14.2bn investment confirmed East Coast College West Suffolk College Suffolk New College Sizewell C Together Against Sizewell C
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
US, China reach deal to ease export curbs, keep tariff truce alive
By Kate Holton, Alistair Smout and Andrea Shalal LONDON (Reuters) -U.S. and Chinese officials said on Tuesday they had agreed on a framework to get their trade truce back on track and remove China's export restrictions on rare earths while offering little sign of a durable resolution to longstanding trade tensions. At the end of two days of intense negotiations in London, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters the framework deal puts "meat on the bones" of an agreement reached last month in Geneva to ease bilateral retaliatory tariffs that had reached crushing triple-digit levels. But the Geneva deal had faltered over China's continued curbs on critical minerals exports, prompting the Trump administration to respond with export controls of its own preventing shipments of semiconductor design software, aircraft and other goods to China. Lutnick said the agreement reached in London would remove restrictions on Chinese exports of rare earth minerals and magnets and some of the recent U.S. export restrictions "in a balanced way", but did not provide details after the talks concluded around midnight London time (2300 GMT). "We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus and the call between the two presidents," Lutnick said, adding that both sides will now return to present the framework to their respective presidents for approvals. "And if that is approved, we will then implement the framework," he said. In a separate briefing, China's Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang also said a trade framework had been reached in principle that would be taken back to U.S. and Chinese leaders. U.S. President Donald Trump's shifting tariff policies have roiled global markets, sparked congestion and confusion in major ports, and cost companies tens of billions of dollars in lost sales and higher costs. The World Bank on Tuesday slashed its global growth forecast for 2025 by four-tenths of a percentage point to 2.3%, saying higher tariffs and heightened uncertainty posed a "significant headwind" for nearly all economies. The deal may keep the Geneva agreement from unravelling over duelling export controls, but does little to resolve deep differences over Trump's unilateral tariffs and longstanding U.S. complaints about China's state-led, export-driven economic model. The two sides left Geneva with fundamentally different views of the terms of that agreement and needed to be more specific on required actions, said Josh Lipsky, senior director of the Atlantic Council's GeoEconomics Center in Washington. "They are back to square one but that's much better than square zero," Lipsky added. The two sides have until August 10 to negotiate a more comprehensive agreement to ease trade tensions, or tariff rates will snap back from about 30% to 145% on the U.S. side and from 10% to 125% on the Chinese side. MARKETS CAUTIOUS Global stocks have recovered their hefty losses after Trump's April "Liberation Day" tariff announcement and are now near record highs. Investors burned by earlier turmoil offered a cautious response to the deal and MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan rose 0.57%. "The devil will be in the details, but the lack of reaction suggests this outcome was fully expected," said Chris Weston, head of research at Pepperstone in Melbourne. "The details matter, especially around the degree of rare earths bound for the U.S., and the subsequent freedom for U.S.-produced chips to head east, but for now as long as the headlines of talks between the two parties remain constructive, risk assets should remain supported." Signs of the curbs loosening surfaced in China, as several Shenzhen-listed rare earth magnet firms, including JL MAG Rare-Earth Innuovo Technology and Beijing Zhong Ke San Huan said they have obtained export licenses from Chinese authorities. China holds a near-monopoly on rare earth magnets, a crucial component in electric vehicle motors, and its decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets upended global supply chains. In May, the U.S. responded by halting shipments of semiconductor design software and chemicals and aviation equipment, revoking export licences that had been previously issued. CHINA EXPORTS PLUNGED A resolution to the trade war may require policy adjustments from all countries to treat financial imbalances or otherwise greatly risk mutual economic damage, European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde said on a rare visit to Beijing on Wednesday. Customs data published on Monday showed that China's overall exports to the U.S. plunged 34.5% in May, the sharpest drop since the outbreak of the COVID pandemic. While the impact on U.S. inflation and its jobs market has so far been muted, tariffs have hammered U.S. business and household confidence and the dollar remains under pressure. Beijing-based lawyer Peter Wu, 28, saw the talks as "a good signal" even if details were not fully negotiated. "I feel that fighting a trade war in the context of global integration is a lose-lose situation for both sides. I naturally hope that my motherland will be better," he said. China, Mexico, the European Union, Japan, Canada and many airlines and aerospace companies worldwide urged the Trump administration not to impose new national security tariffs on imported commercial planes and parts, according to documents released Tuesday. Just after the framework deal was announced, a U.S. appeals court allowed Trump's most sweeping tariffs to stay in effect while it reviews a lower court decision blocking them on grounds that they exceeded Trump's legal authority by imposing them. The decision keeps alive a key pressure point on China, Trump's currently suspended 34% "reciprocal" duties that had prompted swift tariff escalation. (Additional reporting by David Milliken and William James in London and Sachin Ravikumar; Ethan Wang, Shi Bu, Yuhan Lin and Alessandro Diviggiano in Beijing; Writing by David Lawder, Kate Holton and Liz Lee; Editing by David Evans, Mark Potter, Nick Zieminski and Lincoln Feast.) Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
