FreshDirect opens its first-ever retail location in New York today
Designed to mimic your favorite farmers market, the pop-up shop is stocked with curated collections of local products on wooden crates and pallets. Find farm-fresh produce, small-batch cheeses from nearby creameries, high-quality olive oils, and seasonal fruits and vegetables from regional farms like Wells Homestead Acres and Deer Run Farms.
A dedicated coffee counter will sling local legend Jack's Stir Brew Coffee alongside FreshDirect's baked breakfast items (think buttery, flaky croissants) and more specialty prepared foods.
For today's grand opening, guests will receive a complimentary mini loaf of banana bread, while the first 100 customers will each receive a $100 gift card to use toward their next online purchase. Visitors of the new shop will also receive limited-edition Hamptons-inspired FreshDirect totes for all their future market runs.
Later this season, expect in-store experiences such as ice cream socials, wine and cheese tastings, and even pizza-making classes. In June, FreshDirect will takeover an East Hampton house for a 'Tiny Tastemakers' event series for kids, giving families a chance to meet the local farmers and artisans who grow and make the food they love.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Out
19 hours ago
- Time Out
The next time you grab a Citi Bike, you'll need to do an extra step before you ride
If your Citi Bike routine goes 'unlock, adjust seat, pedal like a maniac,' soon there'll be a new step in the choreography: proving you're old enough to be on the bike in the first place. City Hall has told Lyft, the operator of Citi Bike, to finally enforce the program's longstanding 16-and-up rule by adding an age verification process, according to amNew York. First Deputy Mayor Randy Mastro made the demand in an Aug. 12 letter and Lyft has agreed to roll it out within the next three months. The exact how is still TBD. A driver's license upload? Learner's permit? A mysterious, futuristic eyeball scan? (OK, probably not the last one.) Lyft exec Michael Brous called the process 'complex,' pointing to vendor negotiations, privacy protections, and tech integrations, but stressed that safety is 'our top priority.' The move comes amid mounting concern about underage teens zipping around on Citi Bike's e-bikes. Just two months ago, the Adams administration forced the service to cap its e-bike speeds at 15 mph, down from 18, after city officials cited safety risks. 'Mayor Adams will always protect New Yorkers' safety, especially the safety of our children,' Mastro said, calling underage riders both a safety hazard and a quality-of-life headache. His letter even warned that if Lyft didn't act quickly, the city might pursue 'appropriate steps' to fix the problem itself. Supporters say the new step could save lives. Venture capitalist (and dad) Bradley Tusk published an op-ed in the New York Daily News last week, urging the city to crack down, writing, 'As a parent, I know how much I worry and I know how important this is.' Citi Bike insists it will make the extra hoop as painless as possible. 'We'll work with the First Deputy Mayor's office to implement an age verification option that minimizes friction for riders,' said General Manager Patrick Knoth. Still, the numbers tell a story: While total bike collisions have stayed steady—around 2,500 so far this year—e-bike crashes are up 30 percent compared to last year, with 480 already logged by the NYPD.
Metro
a day ago
- Metro
Calls for spy-style alliance to eliminate crime in the UK
A spy-style alliance is needed to eliminate organised crime groups that have grown so sophisticated they now threaten Britain's national security, according to new research. The UK should lead the formation of a Five Eyes-inspired group of trusted states that share intelligence and jointly tackle the networks, according to the Tony Blair Institute (TBI). Among the recommendations being put forward by the TBI today is greater use of the latest technology including AI and honetrap operations in dismantling entire transnational operations such as drug and people trafficking, illegal arms sales and fraud. Ruthless mob bosses have been replaced by encrypted networks and 'crime for hire', while law enforcement in the UK has not kept pace, according to the think-tank. Alexander Iosad, the TBI's director of government innovation policy, told Metro: 'The mafia-style, hierarchical model of organised crime is long gone; organised crime groups (OCGs) are networks with a reach far beyond the borders of any one country. 'Trafficking gangs are a good example because we are talking about flows of people and money across borders. They are also a good illustration of how these new criminal organisations work. 'Along with the physical activity of smuggling they are tech savvy, such as through marketing activity across TikTok and other social media. 'The OCGs are much more networked with cybercrime or money laundering for hire; crime is a service industry where groups outsource different activities. 'This type of crime is ultimately a national security threat as it overlaps with the nexus of geopolitical conflict and can cross over into terrorist activity in some cases. For example. some terrorist organisations sell drugs to finance their activities.' Under the plan, the UK would lead the formation of an International Serious and Organised Crime Alliance inspired by the Five Eyes intelligence alliance between Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK and US. Unlike existing international structures such as INTERPOL, the alliance would focus on entire groups rather than individuals. The Five Eyes is the world's 'oldest and most significant intelligence alliance', according to MI5 Director General Ken McCallum. Comprised of Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK and the US, the alliance evolved from the latter two nations working together to break cyphers and codes during World War Two. Today, it involves the five members sharing intelligence, information and threat assessments across a range of issues. 'The strength of our partnership saves lives in our countries and around the world,' McCallum has said. Stings including honetraps, delivery interceptions, AI bots posing as victims or giving incorrect information are among the operations that the TBI says could be used to tackle the OCGs. 'One of our recommendations is for countries that are aligned in values and have a history of intelligence sharing and suffer from these types of crime to put their resources together and really go after these groups and the intersection of organised crime,' Iosad said. 'For example, with people trafficking, you have people being smuggled out of one country and being put into modern slavery to run fraudulent activity in another, such as text messaging scams targeted at people in the UK. 'The model that we propose would be more targeted and focused in understanding the connections between the different types of crime.' Iosad cited figures showing that an estimated $3.1 trillion in illicit funds moved through the global financial system in 2023, with drug trafficking and human exploitation among the most lucrative markets. Tackling the colossal scale of international crime would involve taskforces between the countries and private sector expertise, he said. The alliance would also throw its combined weight behind internationalised sanctions to freeze assets and block access to financial, education and residency systems. Iosad told Metro that while the landscape of international crime is highly complex, the consequences are being felt on British streets. 'Information can be shared around connections between different types of crime so people better understand why, for example, to stop fraud in the UK you might need to go after people smuggling in south-east Asia,' he said. 'Crime on our streets has its roots outside the UK; this is not neighbourhood policing any more. 'Our polling last year showed that 84% of the public see organised crime as a national threat that should be put on a par with terrorism. 'If we don't tackle the roots of organised crime it will continue to make our streets less safe, and this can only be done through an international approach.' Sir Stephen Kavanagh, former executive director of police services at INTERPOL warns in a paper released by the TBI today that the current approach to organised crime is 'linear, dated and fragmented'. More Trending He said 'My time at INTERPOL fundamentally changed not just the way I see crime but the way I see the business models behind that crime. 'Whether it was the fallout of the Afghan government's collapse on drug flows and human trafficking, or the levels of sophistication, reach and ruthlessness of West African organised crime groups, the conclusion was the same: the criminal threats have moved on, and we haven't. 'It is time for a new mindset: one that treats data and computing power as strategic assets, accepts disruption as vital tools, and one that is willing to experiment with new institutional models that break with convention.' Do you have a story you feel we should look into? Contact MORE: Facebook is worst place for scams after Brits lose £214,000,000 in social media rip-offs MORE: The UK fugitives who feature on global most wanted list MORE: Intelligence expert's ominous warning over West's shadow war with Russia
Times
3 days ago
- Times
Which generation had the worst property deal? Our charts tell the story
Much debate rages around which generation actually had it worse when it came to getting onto the property ladder. Many baby boomers, those born between 1946 and 1964, remember the painful days of mortgage rates as high as 17 per cent, while today's first-time buyers are contending with comparatively higher house prices. The estate agency Hamptons looked at the data to try to work out which generation had the worst deal. Here is what it found. Despite an overall rise in house prices those Generation Z first-time buyers who got on the ladder in 2020 would be the first to have experienced real-terms property values fall during their first five years of ownership. Average prices have dropped 3 per cent when adjusted for inflation, accordiong to Hamptons. A typical millennial (those born between 1981 and 1995) who bought their first home in 2011 in their mid-twenties made an average real-terms gain of 13 per cent over five years. Whereas a Generation Xer (born between 1966-1980) who bought their first home in 1996 enjoyed 44 per cent growth in real terms over the first five years. Hamptons said that a baby boomer first-time buyer in 1979 benefited from average real-terms house price growth of 35 per cent in the first five years. Someone of the so-called silent generation (born between 1928-1945) who bought a first home in 1968 saw the value of their home rise 106 per cent in real terms in the first five years. Having struggled to get on the property ladder, the youngest homeowners now face being stuck on the first rung. In April 1968 the average house price was 4.29 times the typical annual salary, according to the Office for National Statistics. This, apart from two spikes in the early 1970s and late 1980s to early 1990s, remained largely constant for the rest of the 20th century. An average home in April 1979 was 4.29 times the average wage, and 3.8 times in April 1996. But a period of sustained house price growth followed, with the average property rising 173 per cent between 1995 and 2007 in real terms, causing the gap between wages and property values to widen. In April 2011 the average home was 6.58 times the average salary. In April 2020, this had increased to more than 7.69, hitting a peak of 8.23 in September 2022. David Fell, an analyst at Hamptons, said: 'House prices have risen much faster than wages over the last couple of decades mostly thanks to falling mortgage rates. Since interest rates were reduced to rock bottom levels in response to the 2007 house market crash, buyers could generally borrow significantly more money than someone earning the same salary 20 or 30 years ago, pushing prices up.' Between the mid-1970s and early 1990s the Bank of England base rate, which influences mortgage rates, was often in double figures, hitting a high of 17 per cent between November 1979 and July 1980. In response to the 2007-08 financial crisis it was cut to 1 per cent in February 2009 and remained at this rate or lower until June 2022, when the Bank began raising it in an attempt to tackle inflation. It hit a high of 5.25 per cent in August 2023 and is on the way down again now — this month it was cut from 4.25 per cent to 4 per cent. The average mortgage rate offered across the market is 5 per cent, according to the analytics firm Moneyfacts. • Did right-to-buy cause Britain's housing crisis? But Neal Hudson from the property market researcher Residential Analysts said that lower mortgage rates only tell part of the story. 'Yes the rates were higher in the 1970s and 1980s, but these people were borrowing much lower multiples of their income,' he said. 'Buyers are now borrowing nearly double what they were back then, so it takes a much lower mortgage rate to create the same level of pain.' Someone paying the average house price of £213,000 in January 2020 would have paid £73,900 in mortgage payments on the average rate of 3 per cent. Hamptons based its calculations on someone with a 10 per cent deposit and a 25-year mortgage term. A homeowner who bought in 2011 — when the average house price was £234,000 and the base rate was 0.5 per cent — would have spent £48,700 on their mortgage in the first five years, assuming they had the average mortgage rate of 1.7 per cent. Yet someone who bought at the start of 1979, when the average house price was £13,800 and the base rate was 14 per cent, would have spent £41,500 on their mortgage in the first five years of homeownership, assuming the average 9.6 per cent mortgage rate and adjusting for 2025 prices. The 1979 average house price would be £55,100 in real terms today. Fell said: 'Millennials faced higher purchase prices than the previous two generations but much lower interest rates, while the boomers and Gen X paid higher interest rates but the prices were lower. 'Gen Zers, however, are being hit with relatively high prices and relatively high interest rates now as well.' Sluggish house prices combined with higher borrowing costs will also make it more difficult for those looking to move because they will struggle to build up enough equity to fund a switch to a bigger home. Hudson said: 'Previous generations have benefited from house-price growth to allow them to move into larger properties, whereas these days, it's much harder and so you're seeing people moving much less frequently.' Using Bank of England data that predicts mortgage rates up to 40 years in the future, Hamptons estimates that the average homeowner who bought in 2020 would pay about £191,000 across the first half of a 25-year mortgage term. Over the second half of their term, they would pay £208,000. • Detached houses — are they worth 22 per cent more? It is a far cry from the experience of older generations. The typical baby boomer first-time buyer paid £93,900 in real terms in the first half of their 25-year mortgage, dropping to £64,700 in the second half. Those belonging to Generation X paid an average of £112,294 in the first half, falling to £75,697 in the second. Recent increases in mortgage rates have also caught out millennials. Hamptons forecasts that this generation will have to pay £185,600 on average in mortgage payments across the second half of their mortgage, well above the £117,500 they paid the first half. 'In previous generations, homeowners would have climbed up the career ladder and inflation would have made the second half of their mortgage easier financially,' Fell said. 'With millennials and Gen Z likely to see their mortgage payments rise, it will erode that feeling that their loans are getting more manageable.' He said this was likely to mean fewer members of those generations paying off their mortgage early — a key milestone for anyone wanting to retire early. • Bellway repeats call for return of Help to Buy Those waiting to buy their first home generally need to either live with their parents or navigate the rental market, where costs have never been higher. The average monthly rent in July 2025 was £1,373 a month — 47 per cent higher than ten years ago. It cost more than three times as much in real terms to rent in the last five years than it did for someone who started a five-year tenancy in 1979. Someone who started renting in January 2020 would have paid an average of £86,750 over five years, having been caught up in the post-pandemic boom in rents. Someone who started a tenancy in 2011 would have paid £74,283 over five years in real terms, while someone who started renting 1979 would have paid £23,740 in today's prices. Higher rental costs make it more difficult to build up enough savings for a house deposit, exacerbating the challenges of getting on the property ladder amid inflated house prices. For boomers and those in the silent generation, renting was cheaper than paying a mortgage. the average tenant who started renting in 1968 would have paid £6,500 over the first five years in real terms, compared with £7,990 in mortgage payments. Rental costs for someone who started a tenancy in 1979 were £23,740 for the first five years, compared with £41,470 in mortgage payments. But the pendulum swung the other way for the first time in October 1992, the month after Black Wednesday, when the pound crashed and Bank rate was cut. Since then, monthly rental payments have mostly remained higher than mortgage costs, according to Hamptons. The average buyer who bought in 2020 and paid mortgage payments for five years would have paid £12,900 less than the average renter. 'This has created a bit of a financial cliff edge between those who bought and those who didn't, in a way which didn't exist for older generations,' Fell said.
