
Parents SHOULD be fined for taking children on holiday during term time says LEE BOYCE - here's three ideas to help families have a cheaper break
For a while, there has been a war brewing at the school gates. It involves parents who feel they can only afford a holiday with children if they do it during term time and the Government and councils, which can fine them for doing just that.
Last year, nearly half a million school holiday fines were dished out in England, according to the Department for Education. That was up 24 per cent on the previous year and has tripled within a decade.
Last August, these fines became even stronger. The minimum fine for parents who take their children out of school in term time without permission went up to £80 per parent and failure to pay within 21 days doubled to £160.
With the increase in numbers fined and the cost comes angst from parents, who let's face it, do deserve a break. Now, the situation is set to be debated in Parliament.
That's because a petition urging the right for parents to remove kids from school for 10 days has amassed nearly 200,000 signatures.
The petition reads: 'We're seeking reform to the punitive policy for term time leave that disproportionately impacts families that are already under immense pressure and criminalises parents that we think are making choices in the best interests of their families. No family should face criminal convictions.'
It then adds: 'We are calling for reform of legislation on taking children out of school urgently.'
That amount of time, in my opinion, is extreme. It'll also fail to garner sympathy from the generation above who will say: we never had this problem in our day.
Although ask many of today's parents and they will definitely remember their own parents taking them out of school on the odd occasion.
But growing numbers of families say the cost of a holiday during the summer peak is a problem.
I know the pain. With a daughter in year one of primary school, I was braced for pricier holidays – but have been taken aback by just how much more expensive trips are.
As someone, who before children would push for a March break and a September one, the difference in cost is astonishing. However, it is a simple case of supply and demand – that's how the world of money and services work.
Bridget Phillipson, the Education Secretary, has previously vowed to tackle the 'epidemic of school absence'.
Some of the problem involves persistent absence, child mental health issues, unofficial home schooling, but a large chunk is linked to holidays.
This in turn is connected to schools being shut during the Covid pandemic, with teacher strikes soon after.
The former head of Ofsted, Amanda Spielman, saying the social contract between parents and schools was broken.
And in its response to the petition, the Government said: 'We are determined to break down barriers to opportunity by supporting every child to achieve and thrive at school, working with parents and protecting children's right to education. On holidays in particular, we understand that some parents wish to avoid peak periods.
'However, the school year is structured in such a way as to provide plenty of time throughout the year for holidays outside of term-time, and schools also have considerable flexibility to plan term dates themselves, and hold inset days and other occasional days at less busy times of the year.'
A recent survey suggested more than half of families are prepared to take child out of school during term time to save money, despite the risk of a fine.
Many just absorb any potential fine to the cost of the trip, and still argue they save money. That's certainly the vibe I get from many parents at my daughter's school and from family members and friends.
My personal viewpoint is that holidays are vitally important for families to properly bond, have quality time together and also, typically, children learn from them. Not everything is taught in a classroom.
That might be picking up some of the local lingo, getting confident in the swimming pool, visiting historical sites, making friendships with other children and even playing games like Uno with plenty of laughter and happiness with parents, who are often juggling work commitments, and don't always give their children every oodle of attention required.
So then you might be surprised to learn I refuse to take my daughter out of school during term time.
That's because ultimately, I don't think it sets a good example for life; that you can simply take time off when you want.
It's also not great for teachers who are then responsible for your child to play catch-up.
I do understand though the need for a holiday and not paying over the odds. But there is also an element where parents should take responsibility and plan.
For example, we're heading to Centre Parcs this Friday for a long weekend. Have we had to remortgage? No.
We saw there were two inset days in the school calendar more than a year ago, and booked at a very good price well in advance at a place where our children can try new experiences and activities.
We also set a reminder for when flights to Barbados were available for the October 2025 half-term, booked a hotel on Booking.com with free cancellation and managed to get the entire trip for the week, in a 4* hotel with interconnecting rooms for £4,000 for four of us a year in advance. That would be nearly double if booked now.
Three ideas to fix school holidays
It's clear something needs to change to help appease parents, keep headteachers calm and stop the truancy - and I fully understand not all families can afford a £4,000 holiday.
Here's three potential options:
1. Give each child two sabbaticals during their primary school life, and two in secondary school.
Parents must book it with at least three months' notice and take with them any learning materials from the teacher to keep children them on track.
2. Reduce the summer holidays by a week and let parents bolt it on to October, February or May half-term dates as they see fit.
This will help smooth out demand and give parents the option to go away, cheaper, without the guilt and need to manipulate the system.
3. The Government starts a scheme where families are given a free return train ticket to use in any of the breaks from school to anywhere they choose in Britain once a year.
This would help boost the UK economy with more people choosing to holiday at home, be greener and give our children more of a flavour of the beautiful spots that are on our doorstep, but have been overlooked for somewhere more exotic because of price.
How would you solve the problem of children being taken out of school during term time? Get in touch: editor@thisismoney.co.uk
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
37 minutes ago
- The Independent
John Major urges misconduct crackdown, warning of falling political standards
Former prime minister Sir John Major has lambasted politicians for increasingly breaking rules they should follow and putting 'political interest before public virtue', as he warned of slipping standards in public life. Sir John led the Conservative government between 1990 and 1997, which was mired in accusations of 'sleaze' following a series of parliamentary scandals. In response, he set out the Nolan Principles, a code of conduct which all politicians and officials must abide by, and the Committee on Standards in Public Life to advise the prime minister on ethical standards. A majority of those in public life still follow the principles, he said, but the minority who do not should face consequences. 'Too often, there are none,' Sir John said, speaking at the Institute for Government think tank's one-day conference to mark the 30th anniversary of the Nolan Principles. Pointing to the Partygate scandal which rocked Boris Johnson's government, as well as scandals facing the police, the Church of England, and public services such as the Post Office, Sir John warned of slipping public standards, and insisted 'a re-set is essential'. He added: 'Today, scepticism does not fairly describe the public mood: a more accurate description would be a mixture of cynicism and disillusion that stretches across most of our public institutions ‒ the Church, Parliament, police, public service and press among them. That is not healthy in our public life. 'The Committee on Standards in Public Life has reported that social and political trends have coarsened standards. That is true, but put too gently. 'Standards have been undermined by being ignored, by being broken, by public figures who put personal or political interest before public virtue.' Many of the watchdogs put in place to prevent abuses of power are unable enforce their edicts, Sir John suggested. 'It has been our past practice to offer guidance on good conduct – and trust it will be delivered. That was the Nolan approach. 'But experience has taught us that no rules can deal with individuals prepared to ignore them and, sometimes, sanctions are required,' he said. He welcomed moves to bolster oversight of ministers with an independent adviser on ministerial standards, and the parliamentary commissioner for standards to oversee MPs. But Sir John said the Advisory Committee on Public Appointments (Acoba) stood in 'stark contrast'. The watchdog, which gives politicians, their advisers and chief civil servants advice on whether or not jobs they take up after leaving public life are appropriate, should be 'put on a statutory basis, and given deterrent powers', he said. He also called for a thinning of the number of special advisers who act on behalf of ministers, and warned that House of Lords appointments in recent years had not passed the 'smell test'. 'There should be no free pass to becoming a legislator,' Sir John said, saying the upper chamber should not contain legislators unable or unwilling to take part in scrutinising law changes. The former prime minister also suggested reports American businessman Elon Musk had planned to give a multimillion-pound donation to Nigel Farage's Reform UK political party would have left it a 'wholly-owned subsidiary of foreign money', as he criticised the dangers of political donations. 'We need to refresh protections, and close off this pipeline before it becomes a serious political problem,' he added. Sir John closed his speech by warning that Britain's 'widely envied reputation for being free of corruption and bad practice' was at risk. He added: 'I regret the slow erosion of that reputation – which we would once have thought indestructible. It is time for us to reverse this trend before the damage becomes beyond salvage.'


The Independent
37 minutes ago
- The Independent
Welfare reform legislation to be debated next month, MPs told
Proposed legislation to reform the welfare system will be debated by MPs for the first time next month, Commons Leader Lucy Powell has announced. MPs are also expected to vote on the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill on July 1, when it receives its second reading in the Commons. The Government has faced backlash from some Labour MPs over the 'damaging disability benefit cuts', which it has said could save up to £5 billion a year. Ms Powell set the date for the Bill's second reading during business questions on Thursday. Labour MP Neil Duncan-Jordan has accused the Government of 'rushing through' the Bill, adding: 'This isn't something I'm prepared to support.' Ministers are likely to face a Commons stand-off with backbenchers over their plans, with dozens of Labour MPs last month saying the proposals were 'impossible to support'. The reforms – aimed at encouraging more people off sickness benefits and into work – are set to include the tightening of criteria for personal independence payment (Pip), which is the main disability benefit, as well as a cut to the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC) and delayed access to only those aged 22 and over. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said the legislation 'marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity'. She added: 'Our social security system is at a crossroads. Unless we reform it, more people will be denied opportunities, and it may not be there for those who need it.' In what could be seen as an attempt to head off some opposition, the legislation will give existing claimants a 13-week period of financial support. The Department for Work and Pensions said this will apply to those affected by changes to the Pip daily living component, including those who lose their eligibility to Carers Allowance and the carer's element of UC. But campaigners, including disability equality charity Scope, said the longer transition period, up from an originally expected four weeks, 'will only temporarily delay a cut and disabled people will continue to be living with extra costs when it comes to an end'. As the Bill was formally introduced to the Commons on Wednesday, and the question was asked as to what the next date for debate will be, former Labour MP John McDonnell, who now sits as an independent for Hayes and Harlington, could be heard to say 'Never'. Mr Duncan-Jordan, MP for Poole, is one of the members who has urged ministers to withdraw the cuts, which he has argued will 'make things worse' for disabled people. Speaking to the PA news agency, he said: 'It's clear the Government are rushing through this change before MPs have received all the necessary impact assessments that they need to make a decision. 'The Bill lays out how large numbers of disabled people are going to be made poorer. This isn't something I'm prepared to support.' Earlier this week, Mr Duncan-Jordan had said: 'The Government will only withdraw its damaging disability benefit cuts if Labour MPs make clear they will vote against them. 'The so-called concessions that have been suggested are nowhere near enough to undo the damage that is being proposed. The facts are undeniable: these cuts won't create jobs, they'll only push three million people deeper into hardship.' The latest data, published on Tuesday, showed that more than 3.7 million people in England and Wales are claiming Pip, with teenagers and young adults making up a growing proportion. Pip is a benefit aimed at helping with extra living costs if someone has a long-term physical or mental health condition or disability and difficulty doing certain everyday tasks or getting around because of their condition. Data for Pip claimants begins in January 2019, when the number stood at 2.05 million. An impact assessment published alongside Wednesday's Bill introduction confirmed previously published estimates that changes to Pip entitlement rules could see about 800,000 people lose out, with an average loss of £4,500 per year. Ms Kendall previously said there are 1,000 new Pip awards every day – 'the equivalent of adding a city the size of Leicester every single year'. The impact assessment also confirmed a previous estimate that some 250,000 more people, including 50,000 children, are likely to fall into relative poverty after housing costs in 2029/2030, although the Government repeated that this does not take into account the potentially positive impact of £1 billion annual funding by then for measures to support people into work. Changes to UC are expected to see an estimated 2.25 million current recipients of the health element impacted, with an average loss of £500 per year. But the Government said around 3.9 million households not on the UC health element are expected to have an average annual gain of £265 from the increase in the standard UC allowance. While all of the Bill applies to England and Wales, only the UC changes apply to Scotland. The Government said there are equivalent provisions to legislate for Northern Ireland included in the Bill.


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Plastic wet wipes to be banned in Wales from 2026
Plastic wet wipes will be banned in Wales to reduce environmental harm following a vote in the Senedd. From December 2026, it will be an offence to supply wet wipes containing plastic to customers.A motion was passed in a plenary session of all 60 members, with no will be an exemption for medical-grade wipes and the ban does not extend to business-to-business. Deputy First Minister Huw Irranca-Davies said the vote was another step towards reducing the environmental harm caused by plastic and microplastic pollution. The regulations add plastic wet wipes to a 2023 law prohibiting a list of single-use plastic said the impact of wet wipe pollution is tangible, and it is long-lasting. "Taking decisive action will encourage manufacturers, retailers and consumers of the need to continue our shift towards reusable and non-plastic products," he said. He told Senedd members the ban will not extend to business-to-business supply, only covering supply to consumers as with other single-use plastics. "Wet wipes for specific industrial use, where plastic-free alternatives are unsuitable or do not exist, are not included," he added."But we will encourage these sectors to innovate."He added there was an exemption for medical-grade wet wipes that do contain plastic which are designed or manufactured for use in medical care or treatment. There is an 18-month transition period that will allow manufacturers time to adapt their business, as he welcomed the cross-party support for the MS Janet Finch-Saunders welcomed the move and said wipes continue to contribute to a significant number of sewage blockages, causing overspills.