
John Major urges misconduct crackdown, warning of falling political standards
Sir John led the Conservative government between 1990 and 1997, which was mired in accusations of 'sleaze' following a series of parliamentary scandals.
In response, he set out the Nolan Principles, a code of conduct which all politicians and officials must abide by, and the Committee on Standards in Public Life to advise the prime minister on ethical standards.
A majority of those in public life still follow the principles, he said, but the minority who do not should face consequences.
'Too often, there are none,' Sir John said, speaking at the Institute for Government think tank's one-day conference to mark the 30th anniversary of the Nolan Principles.
Pointing to the Partygate scandal which rocked Boris Johnson's government, as well as scandals facing the police, the Church of England, and public services such as the Post Office, Sir John warned of slipping public standards, and insisted 'a re-set is essential'.
He added: 'Today, scepticism does not fairly describe the public mood: a more accurate description would be a mixture of cynicism and disillusion that stretches across most of our public institutions ‒ the Church, Parliament, police, public service and press among them. That is not healthy in our public life.
'The Committee on Standards in Public Life has reported that social and political trends have coarsened standards. That is true, but put too gently.
'Standards have been undermined by being ignored, by being broken, by public figures who put personal or political interest before public virtue.'
Many of the watchdogs put in place to prevent abuses of power are unable enforce their edicts, Sir John suggested.
'It has been our past practice to offer guidance on good conduct – and trust it will be delivered. That was the Nolan approach.
'But experience has taught us that no rules can deal with individuals prepared to ignore them and, sometimes, sanctions are required,' he said.
He welcomed moves to bolster oversight of ministers with an independent adviser on ministerial standards, and the parliamentary commissioner for standards to oversee MPs.
But Sir John said the Advisory Committee on Public Appointments (Acoba) stood in 'stark contrast'.
The watchdog, which gives politicians, their advisers and chief civil servants advice on whether or not jobs they take up after leaving public life are appropriate, should be 'put on a statutory basis, and given deterrent powers', he said.
He also called for a thinning of the number of special advisers who act on behalf of ministers, and warned that House of Lords appointments in recent years had not passed the 'smell test'.
'There should be no free pass to becoming a legislator,' Sir John said, saying the upper chamber should not contain legislators unable or unwilling to take part in scrutinising law changes.
The former prime minister also suggested reports American businessman Elon Musk had planned to give a multimillion-pound donation to Nigel Farage's Reform UK political party would have left it a 'wholly-owned subsidiary of foreign money', as he criticised the dangers of political donations.
'We need to refresh protections, and close off this pipeline before it becomes a serious political problem,' he added.
Sir John closed his speech by warning that Britain's 'widely envied reputation for being free of corruption and bad practice' was at risk.
He added: 'I regret the slow erosion of that reputation – which we would once have thought indestructible. It is time for us to reverse this trend before the damage becomes beyond salvage.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Is mass surveillance the way forward to police society?
Most sources suggest that Britain, in terms of CCTV cameras and coverage per head in cities, is one of the most surveilled nations in the world, albeit coming some way behind China, where it seems to be even more routine. The trend towards 'snooping' on British folk seems to be accelerating. More live facial recognition vans are to be deployed across seven police forces in England in a mass-surveillance trial. The aim is to identify and locate suspects in some of the crimes that most worry the public, such as sexual offences, violent assaults and murder. Ticket touts are also targets. Crime is a major concern among voters, but so are their civil liberties... How will it work? Quite passively, as has been the case for some years. Just like in films, the police can place vans in crowded places such as high streets and automatically scan the faces of people walking past, checking them against a databank of images of wanted people. If it relies on busy officers spooling through hours of footage, it might not always be worth the effort; they have enough trouble at present trying to find shoplifters. Does it work? Yes. There have been many successes over the years, though it obviously works best in the big cities, where it operates like a fishing boat trawling for a catch. Ministers say that in London over the past year, facial recognition technology has helped to secure 580 arrests, including the detention of 52 registered sex offenders who breached their conditions. At a time of shrivelled police budgets, a shortage of officers and concerns about 'lawless Britain' (it isn't, by the way), facial recognition harnessed to AI could transform police productivity – and cut crime. It could quite conceivably lower the risk of mass murder through terrorism, for example, which tends to take place in urban centres. Win-win? Not quite. There are practical problems. The software can make mistakes, leading to embarrassment for innocent parties. Twins don't like it, for obvious reasons. The system can't work if people change their appearance or wear a face-covering, and if villains steer clear of the big cities. People wearing face-coverings for religious or health reasons could be stigmatised as 'camera dodgers'. What about the human right to a private life? Quite. One glaring issue is that there is no legislation covering this area of police work, and no national debate has taken place about the creeping ubiquity of various types of surveillance – online as well as on the streets. Parliament does need to create some kind of framework, and one that is consistent with existing laws and international commitments on human rights. So are we becoming a 'big brother' society? With 5 million CCTV cameras, plus an unknown number in offices, plus dashcams in cars and doorbell cameras, the British can hardly cough without it being captured in high definition. Civil liberties groups claim that the UK is becoming a 'big brother society', a 'surveillance state' where privacy is at risk. There's certainly the possibility of a 'Coldplay moment', where someone having an affair is caught on camera and the evidence finds its way into the public domain. Former health secretary Matt Hancock springs to mind. Plenty more risks like that... What does the government say? Dame Diana Johnson, the minister responsible, pleads that it is 'a powerful tool for policing' and will only be used in 'a very measured, proportionate way' to find individuals suspected of serious offences. But there's dissent. Shami Chakrabarti, who served as shadow attorney general under Jeremy Corbyn, says the technology is 'incredibly intrusive', remarking: 'Some would say this is yet another move towards a total surveillance society.' Some would indeed. And the opposition? Well, the present shadow home secretary, Chris Philp, in his role as a Home Office minister a few years ago, oversaw a substantial increase in CCTV use. In October 2023, for example, he suggested that police force leaders in England and Wales should aim to exceed 200,000 searches of still images against the police national database. Predictably, Nigel Farage, despite his summer crime campaign (to clarify, a campaign against crime), simply declared that he 'doesn't want to live in China'.


The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
JD Vance arrives in Scotland for family holiday
US Vice-President JD Vance has arrived in Scotland as part of a family holiday to the UK. The Republican's stay is expected to require a considerable policing operation. It follows a visit by his boss, US President Donald Trump, who recently spent five days in Scotland split between his golf courses in South Ayrshire and Aberdeenshire and during which time he met the First Minister and Prime Minister. Mr Vance arrived at Prestwick Airport on Wednesday evening and is expected to head to the luxury Carnell Estate in East Ayrshire. Airspace restrictions are in place around the estate until Sunday. A Police Scotland spokesperson previously said: 'Planning is under way for a potential visit to Scotland by the vice-president of the United States. 'Details of any visit would be for the White House to comment on, however it is important that we prepare in advance for what would be a significant policing operation.' Mr Vance had been holidaying in the Cotswolds but travelled to the Foreign Secretary's Chevening House retreat in Kent on Friday, and he joined David Lammy carp fishing at the countryside estate. Earlier on Wednesday, JD Vance described the UK and US' relationship as 'a beautiful alliance', during a speech at RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire. The group Mothers Against Genocide have signalled they will stage a protest against Mr Vance's visit to Scotland.


Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Water pistol attackers who sprayed Jews let off with ‘slap on wrist'
Police have been urged not to turn a blind eye to anti-Semitism after two men who targeted Orthodox Jews with water pistols were let off with a 'slap on the wrist'. The pair, who filmed themselves driving around Greater Manchester spraying pedestrians dressed in Orthodox clothing with an unidentified liquid, were arrested on suspicion of racially aggravated assault last week. But Greater Manchester Police have now imposed community resolution orders – the most lenient option available – after the pair apologised for their actions. Community resolutions, which carry no criminal record, can only be issued for hate crimes in exceptional circumstances should the offender admit the offence, the victim not wish to press charges and an inspector sign off on disposing the case. But the leniency shown to the men, who sprayed adults and children before posting the footage to Instagram accompanied by the Jewish folk song Hava Nagila, has provoked outrage. 'Public humiliation for profit' Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, urged police to look at the case again and take 'the most robust action'. He said: 'Spraying members of the Jewish community with water pistols while jeering from the safety of a car is cowardice. It is public humiliation for profit, fuelling online hate, and encourages others to join in. 'This is happening against the backdrop of over 1,500 anti-Semitic incidents in just the first half of this year, one of the highest totals ever recorded. Jewish communities are being harassed, spat at, and attacked, and now filmed. This is not something Britain can turn a blind eye to. 'The police should look again at this case and take the most robust action where possible. We cannot allow a Britain where Jewish families feel unsafe on their own streets simply because of their faith.'