Admitted or submitted? Crucial technicality over Justice Varma motion in spotlight after Dhankar's exit
Rajya Sabha
Chairman
Jagdeep Dhankhar
's abrupt resignation on Monday has stirred a constitutional and political storm, particularly over his handling of a motion seeking the removal of
Allahabad High Court
judge Yashwant Varma.
At the centre of the controversy is a crucial legal distinction: was the notice filed by 63
Opposition MPs
merely
submitted
, or was it
admitted
by Dhankhar? That difference isn't just semantic—it could determine who gets to pick the three-member panel that will examine the charges against Justice Varma.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Please select course:
Select a Course Category
others
Management
Leadership
Digital Marketing
Public Policy
PGDM
Healthcare
Design Thinking
Operations Management
Finance
Artificial Intelligence
Cybersecurity
Product Management
Technology
MCA
Data Science
MBA
Project Management
Data Analytics
healthcare
CXO
Data Science
Others
Degree
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
16 Weeks
Indian School of Business
CERT - ISB Cybersecurity for Leaders Program India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
16 Weeks
Indian School of Business
CERT - ISB Cybersecurity for Leaders Program India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Mountain Gear for Extreme Conditions
Trek Kit India
Learn More
A move that upset the govt
According to TOI sources, Dhankhar earned the ire of the ruling establishment by taking cognisance of the Opposition's Rajya Sabha notice for initiating proceedings against Justice Varma.
This, despite the government having already signalled its preference to initiate the process in the Lok Sabha, backed by signatures from 145 MPs across party lines. That notice had been submitted earlier on Monday to Speaker Om Birla.
Live Events
While Dhankhar's move may have been procedurally valid—the Rajya Sabha notice had the required minimum of 50 signatories—it was seen by the government as undermining its broader strategy to build an all-party consensus on the judge's removal.
Notably, the Rajya Sabha motion was signed only by Opposition MPs.
The Legal Tangle: Submission vs Admission
In a statement made in the Upper House on Monday afternoon, Dhankhar referred to the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968, noting that when such notices are received in both Houses on the same day, no inquiry committee can be formed unless the motion is
admitted
by both.
If admitted in both Houses, the Speaker and the Chairman are to jointly form the committee.
Crucially, however, he stopped short of stating that he had formally admitted the motion, instead noting that it met the numerical requirement. He also argued that the Speaker or Chairman has no discretion to reject or admit such a motion if presented simultaneously in both Houses—a claim that legal experts say is not explicitly supported by the 1968 Act.
He directed the Rajya Sabha Secretary General to initiate further steps, a move that suggested at least partial procedural endorsement.
Who will decide now?
With Dhankhar's resignation accepted by President Droupadi Murmu, Deputy Chairman Harivansh has taken over as officiating Rajya Sabha Chairman.
His next steps will be closely watched.
'There's no guarantee he will back Dhankhar's reading of the situation,' a senior official told TOI. "In any case, he has no special interest in matters concerning judiciary and is unlikely to diverge drastically from the speaker in the choice of the members of the inquiry panel," the source further said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
36 minutes ago
- India Today
PM's Mann ki Baat radio programme earned over Rs 34 crore: Government
Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 'Mann ki Baat' programme has earned a revenue of Rs 34.13 crore since its inception, the government told the Rajya Sabha on a written reply, Minister of State for Information and Broadcasting L Murugan said the Mann ki Baat programme reaches the audience through multiple traditional and digital platforms."Mann Ki Baat programme is produced by Akashvani leveraging existing in-house resources without additional expenditure and has earned a revenue of Rs 34.13 crore since its inception," he Mann ki Baat was first broadcast on October 3, said a large segment of the audience engages by listening to the programme on Akashvani (All India Radio), which broadcasts it live across its national and regional networks. Regional language versions are also broadcast to reach vernacular the programme is telecast on various Doordarshan National and regional language channels, he said, adding that in addition to Doordarshan channels, DD Free Dish offers 48 Akashvani radio channels and 92 private television channels, making the programme accessible to viewers across the country, including those in rural and remote minister said the visual format of Mann Ki Baat enhances audience engagement by enabling shared viewing experiences, fostering collective reflection and said the programme is live-streamed and archived on YouTube channels such as PMO India, AIR, and on Prasar Bharati's OTT platform WAVES, as well as through the 'NewsOnAIR' mobile app which offers over 260 Akashvani channels."It is also made available on the news feed service of Prasar Bharati, PB SHABD, to facilitate wider dissemination across affiliated platforms and channels," Murugan programme is also widely accessed by audiences in India and globally, through social media platforms, including Facebook, X, and Instagram.- EndsTune InMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Narendra Modi
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
High Court issues notices to CCLA
Justice K. Lakshman of Telangana High Court has passed an interim direction suspending the State government's classification of two parcels of land admeasuring nearly 25 acres at Sulthanpally village of Shamshabad mandal on Hyderabad outskirts as government lands. The direction was issued after hearing a writ petition filed by A. Krishna Reddy and Thota Mounika Deepthi, both from Champapet, challenging the order passed by the Chief Commission of Land Administration declaring the two lands as government lands. The counsel for the petitioner informed the bench that his clients had furnished the latest passbooks and title deeds of the two lands which proved beyond all reasonable doubts that they were the land owners. The counsel also argued that the CCLA had no powers to declare suo motu any lands as government lands under Section 166-B of Telangana State (Land Revenue ) Act-1317 Fasli. The judge issued notices to the authorities, instructing them to file counter affidavits by August 26.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
BNP demands withdrawal of BBMP's unjust property tax notices
The Bengaluru NavaNirmana Party (BNP) has criticised the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) for issuing property tax notices to thousands of citizens and the glitch-caught e-Nyaya portal. The BNP has called the move to send property tax notices 'arbitrary' and 'legally flawed', pointing out that it contradicts the Supreme Court rulings and statutory provisions under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, (RERA). The BNP leaders argued that the BBMP is wrongly attempting to tax stilt and open parking areas as standalone units, even though these spaces are considered part of common areas. Citing the Supreme Court's ruling in Nahalchand Laloochand Pvt. Ltd. vs. Panchali Cooperative Housing Society, the BNP highlighted that parking areas cannot be sold or taxed separately, as they are part of the building's shared amenities and included in the super built-up area. 'Most sale deeds grant only the exclusive right to use a parking spot; they do not confer ownership. Residents already pay tax on the super built-up area, which includes these common spaces,' said Srikanth Narasimhan, BNP founder. The BNP also pointed out that many apartment owners have been served retrospective tax notices, placing financial burdens on them. Adding to the frustration, the BBMP's e-Nyaya portal, meant for citizens to respond to notices, has been non-functional. Additionally, some AROs are reportedly refusing to accept responses by hand, leaving citizens without a way to appeal. 'In Bengaluru, the process has become the punishment,' said H.L.N. Prasad, BNP leader for E-khata. 'This fiasco reflects the chronic mismanagement in BBMP's revenue systems. Instead of fixing its internal processes, the BBMP is shifting the burden to law-abiding citizens,' he said.
