AP's new liquor policy dents TG border sales
A 'case' in point in the Telugu states is Andhra Pradesh's newly revamped liquor policy, which has begun to make its presence felt in Telangana's border districts, with sales in several wine and liquor shops witnessing a steep decline—particularly in the erstwhile Mahabubnagar district, which shares borders with Kurnool and Guntur districts of AP.
Until recently, vends in the border areas of Alampur and Macherla were the go-to spots for customers from Andhra Pradesh. Shops here were bustling with heavy footfall, thanks to the stark difference in liquor policies between the two states. Under former chief minister YS Jagan Mohan Reddy's government, liquor was sold exclusively through government-run outlets across the state. The choice of brands was limited, quality often questionable, and the prices hefty; driving many AP customers across the border to embrace sellers in Telangana, where most popular brands were readily available at relatively affordable prices. With the change in government, Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu has overhauled the old liquor policy, granting licences to over 3,000 private and retail vendors. Liquor is now sold openly across AP, with greater availability of choices and at lower prices than before; yet slightly, costlier than in Telangana. This shift has resulted in nearly a 50% drop in liquor sales in Telangana's border towns to customers from AP.
Narender, a resident of Kurnool living in the Alampur border area, observed that while prices in AP have reduced under the new policy, quality concerns persist. 'Even though the new policy has been implemented, people in border areas still prefer liquor from Telangana. As per my estimate, sales here have dropped only by 3–5% because of AP customers switching over. Many are still crossing the border due to quality differences. In AP, some brands cost at least Rs 10 more than in Telangana, and people are not happy with what's available,' he told 'The Hans India'.
Laxmikanth Reddy of Alampur recalled the bustling scene at the Pullur toll plaza, which was once thronged by customers from AP before 2024. 'Now, the crowds are gone. The new policy has cut sales in border shops by almost half. Only a small fraction—maybe 2–5%—of AP customers still come here, mainly for better quality,' he observed.
For shop owners in Mahabubnagar's border areas, the change has been swift and sharp. What was once a lucrative market, fuelled largely by AP-origin customers, has now declined; with only loyal, quality-conscious buyers making the rounds. While Telangana still retains an edge in brand variety and perceived quality, Andhra Pradesh's more competitive pricing and increased accessibility are shifting the balance. If the trend continues, the once-bustling liquor hubs along the Telangana-AP border may have to rethink their strategies—or risk toasting to the end of an era in cross-border wine sales.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
10 minutes ago
- Hans India
PM Modi once again praises leadership of Haryana CM Saini
Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Sunday once again praised the leadership of Haryana Chief Minister Nayab Singh Saini, saying under his leadership, government jobs are being provided to the youth purely on the basis of merit and with complete transparency. The Prime Minister was addressing a programme in New Delhi on the occasion of the inauguration of the Dwarka Expressway and UER-II National Highway projects connecting Delhi and Haryana at a cost of about Rs 11,000 crore. He said there was a time when Congress governments ruled Haryana, and during that period, it was almost impossible for the youth to secure government appointments without 'parchi and kharchi'. However, the BJP government has completely transformed this system. The Prime Minister said the BJP government has so far provided government jobs to lakhs of youth in Haryana on the basis of merit and transparency, and that Chief Minister Saini is carrying this tradition forward with commitment. He said the constant endeavour of the government is to simplify people's lives, which is clearly reflected in its policies and decisions. Expressing gratitude to the Prime Minister, CM Saini said the Prime Minister's guidance and encouragement serve as the biggest strength for the state government. He said providing transparent and merit-based opportunities to the youth is the government's top priority, and Haryana is setting a new benchmark in this direction across the country. The Chief Minister expressed confidence that with the blessings of the Prime Minister, Haryana will continue to move swiftly on the path of development and good governance. Prime Minister Modi inaugurated and dedicated to the people two major development projects worth Rs 2,000 crore that will directly benefit Haryana. These projects include the construction of two four-lane connectivity roads to Sonipat and Bahadurgarh under the Urban Extension Road-II project. The Chief Minister said Haryana, being the industrial and agricultural hub of north India, would be the biggest beneficiary of these projects. He said these key projects will not only boost exports, imports and investments by ensuring direct connectivity from Kundli, Sonipat, Bahadurgarh, Gurugram and Manesar to Delhi Airport, but will also provide long-awaited relief from traffic congestion in the region.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
10 minutes ago
- First Post
What are the challenges of a new Palestine state?
Australia is set to recognise the Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly this year, joining the UK, Canada and France. While recognising a Palestinian state is symbolic, the formation of a future Palestinian state consisting of the West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem is far more difficult to achieve. Here's why Palestinians see East Jerusalem as an indispensable part of any future state. File image/AP Australia will recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly meeting in September, joining the United Kingdom, Canada and France in taking the historic step. Recognising a Palestinian state is, at one level, symbolic – it signals a growing global consensus behind the rights of Palestinians to have their own state. In the short term, it won't impact the situation on the ground in Gaza. Practically speaking, the formation of a future Palestinian state consisting of the West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem is far more difficult to achieve. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Israeli government has ruled out a two-state solution and reacted with fury to the moves by the four G20 members to recognise Palestine. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the decision ' shameful'. So, what are the political issues that need to be resolved before a Palestinian state becomes a reality? And what is the point of recognition if it doesn't overcome these seemingly intractable obstacles? Settlements have exploded The first problem is what to do about Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, which the International Court of Justice has declared are illegal. Since 1967, Israel has constructed these settlements with two goals in mind: to prevent any future division of Jerusalem and expropriate sufficient territory to make a Palestinian state impossible. There are now more than 500,000 settlers in the West Bank and 233,000 in East Jerusalem. Palestinians see East Jerusalem as an indispensable part of any future state. They will never countenance a state without it as their capital. In May, the Israeli government announced it would also build 22 new settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem – the largest settler expansion in decades. Defence Minister Israel Katz described this as a 'strategic move that prevents the establishment of a Palestinian state that would endanger Israel'. The Israeli government has also moved closer to fully annexing the West Bank in recent months. Geographical complexities of a future state Second is the issue of a future border between a Palestinian state and Israel. The demarcations of the Gaza Strip, West Bank and East Jerusalem are not internationally recognised borders. Rather, they are the ceasefire lines, known as the 'Green Line', from the 1948 War that saw the creation of Israel. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, in the Six-Day War of 1967, Israel captured and occupied the West Bank, Gaza, East Jerusalem, Egypt's Sinai Peninsula (since returned), and Syria's Golan Heights. And successive Israeli governments have used the construction of settlements in the occupied territories, alongside expansive infrastructure, to create new 'facts on the ground'. Israel solidifies its hold on this territory by designating it as ' state land', meaning it no longer recognises Palestinian ownership, further inhibiting the possibility of a future Palestinian state. For example, according to research by Israeli professor Neve Gordon, Jerusalem's municipal boundaries covered approximately seven square kilometres before 1967. Since then, Israeli settlement construction has expanded its eastern boundaries, so it now covers about 70 square km. Israel also uses its Separation Wall or Barrier, which runs for around 700km through the West Bank and East Jerusalem, to further expropriate Palestinian territory. According to a 2013 book by researchers Ariella Azoulay and Adi Ophir, the wall is part of the Israeli government's policy of cleansing Israeli space of any Palestinian presence. It breaks up contiguous Palestinian urban and rural spaces, cutting off some 150 Palestinian communities from their farmland and pastureland. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The barrier is reinforced by other methods of separation, such as checkpoints, earth mounds, roadblocks, trenches, road gates and barriers, and earth walls. Then there is the complex geography of Israel's occupation in the West Bank. Under the Oslo Accords of the 1990s, the West Bank was divided into three areas, labelled Area A, Area B and Area C. In Area A, which consists of 18 per cent of the West Bank, the Palestinian Authority exercises majority control. Area B is under joint Israeli-Palestinian authority. Area C, which comprises 60 per cent of the West Bank, is under full Israeli control. Administrative control was meant to be gradually transferred to Palestinian control under the Oslo Accords, but this never happened. Areas A and B are today separated into many small divisions that remain isolated from one another due to Israeli control over Area C. This deliberate ghettoisation creates separate rules, laws and norms in the West Bank that are intended to prevent freedom of movement between the Palestinian zones and inhibit the realisation of a Palestinian state. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Who will govern a future state? Finally, there are the conditions that Western governments have placed on recognition of a Palestinian state, which rob Palestinians of their agency. Chief among these is the stipulation that Hamas will not play a role in the governance of a future Palestinian state. This has been backed by the Arab League, which has also called for Hamas to disarm and relinquish power in Gaza. Fatah and Hamas are currently the only two movements in Palestinian politics capable of forming a government. In a May poll, 32 per cent of respondents in both Gaza and the West Bank said they preferred Hamas, compared with 21 per cent support for Fatah. One-third did not support either or had no opinion. Mahmoud Abbas, leader of the Palestinian Authority, is deeply unpopular, with 80 per cent of Palestinians wanting him to resign. A 'reformed' Palestinian Authority is the West's preferred option to govern a future Palestinian state. But if Western powers deny Palestinians the opportunity to elect a government of their choosing by dictating who can participate, the new government would likely be seen as illegitimate. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This risks repeating the mistakes of Western attempts to install governments of their choosing in Iraq and Afghanistan. It also plays into the hands of Hamas hardliners, who mistrust democracy and see it as a tool to impose puppet governments in Palestine, as well as Israel's narrative that Palestinians are incapable of governing themselves. Redressing these issues and the myriad others will take time, money and considerable effort. The question is, how much political capital are the leaders of France, the UK, Canada and Australia (and others) willing to expend to ensure their recognition of Palestine results in an actual state? What if Israel refuses to dismantle its settlements and the Separation Wall, and moves ahead with annexing the West Bank? What are these Western leaders willing or able to do? In the past, they have been unwilling to do more than issue strongly worded statements in the face of Israeli refusals to advance the two-state solution. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Given these doubts around the political will and actual power of Western states to compel Israel to agree to the two-state solution, it begs the question: what and who is recognition for? Martin Kear, Sessional Lecturer, Department of Government and International Relations, University of Sydney This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Hindustan Times
10 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
From Macron to Meloni: European leaders to join Zelensky for Washington meet with Donald Trump
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky will not be alone while meeting US President Donald Trump in Washington DC, on Monday for talks aimed at ending the conflict with Russia. Several leaders from all across Europe and even NATO will be joining the meeting, keeping in mind the showdown that happened between Trump and Zelensky the last time the Ukrainian leader was in the US capital.(AP File) Several leaders from all across Europe and even NATO will be joining the meeting, keeping in mind the showdown that happened between Trump and Zelensky the last time the Ukrainian leader was in the US capital. The meeting comes days after Trump met Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska for summit talks, where the latter reportedly put a demand that Ukraine hand over the eastern region of Donbas to end the war. The list of leaders joining the Donald Trump-Volodymyr Zelensky talks in Washington A long list of leaders from across Europe has confirmed their attendance at the talks between Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelensky in Washington, DC, on Monday. These include several Presidents and Prime Ministers of European nations and even NATO officials. Here is a list of confirmed attendees: European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen German Chancellor Friedrich Merz Finnish President Alexander Stubb French President Emmanuel Macron NATO Secretary-General, Mark Rutte Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer Earlier on Sunday, Emmanuel Macron and Friedrich Merz also hosted the France-led 'Coalition of the Willing' meeting, where European allies met over video call to discuss the Trump-Putin meeting in Alaska on Friday. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer joined the call and praised Trump's efforts, Reuters reported. He said the US President had 'brought us closer than ever before to ending Russia's illegal war in Ukraine'. He reiterated Europe's 'unwavering" support for Ukraine. 'While progress has been made, the next step must be further talks involving President Zelensky,' Starmer said in a statement issued by his office later. He added that Putin must stop 'his barbaric assault'. "We will keep tightening the screws on his war machine with even more sanctions, which have already had a punishing impact on the Russian economy and its people,' Starmer said. The coalition meeting came after Saturday's joint statement, in which Macron, Merz, Starmer, and other European Union (EU) leaders welcomed Trump's meeting with Putin, which ended without a ceasefire agreement for now. 'As President Trump said, 'there's no deal until there's a deal'. As envisioned by President Trump, the next step must now be further talks, including President Zelensky, whom he will meet soon," it said. 'No limitations should be placed on Ukraine's armed forces or on its cooperation with third countries. Russia cannot have a veto against Ukraine's pathway to the EU and NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organisation). It will be up to Ukraine to make decisions on its territory. International borders must not be changed by force,' the statement added. The statement came after some media reports indicated that Putin expects Ukraine to withdraw from the Donbas region, parts of which Russia has attempted to occupy during the conflict. The Financial Times reported that the Russian President told Trump he would 'freeze the conflict' if his demands were met. Zelensky, however, has said he won't agree to give away any territory or 'land swap,' as Trump suggested.
