logo
89 Percent: Activating the climate's ‘silent' majority could supercharge action, experts say

89 Percent: Activating the climate's ‘silent' majority could supercharge action, experts say

Yahoo22-04-2025

This story is part of The 89 Percent Project, an initiative of the global journalism collaboration Covering Climate Now, which includes ICT.
Damian CarringtonThe Guardian
A huge 89 percent majority among the world's people want stronger action to fight the climate crisis but they are trapped in a self-fulfilling 'spiral of silence' because they mistakenly believe they are in a minority, research has shown.
Making people aware that their pro-climate view is, in fact, the majority could unlock a social tipping point and push leaders into the climate action so urgently needed, experts say.
The key data comes from a global survey that interviewed 130,000 people across 125 nations and found 89 percent think their national government 'should do more to fight global warming.'
It also asked people if they would 'contribute 1 percent of their household income every month to fight global warming' and what proportion of their fellow citizens they thought would do the same. In almost all countries, people believed only a minority of their fellow citizens would be willing to contribute. In reality, the opposite was true: more than 50 percent of citizens were willing to contribute in all but a few nations.
The global average of those willing to contribute was 69 percent, a clear majority. But the percentage that people thought would be willing was 43 percent, a minority. The gap between perception and reality was as high as 40 percentage points in some countries, from Greece to Gabon.
Further analysis of the survey data for the Guardian showed that public backing for climate action was as strong in the crucial G20 member nations as in the rest of the world. These nations, including the US, China, Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom and Australia, are responsible for 77 percent of global carbon emissions.
'One of the most powerful forms of climate communication is just telling people that a majority of other people think climate change is happening, human-caused, a serious problem and a priority for action,' said Professor Anthony Leiserowitz at Yale University.
Professor Cynthia Frantz at Oberlin College in the U.S., said, 'Currently, worrying about climate change is something people are largely doing in the privacy of their own minds – we are locked in a self-fulfilling spiral of silence.'
Dr. Niall McLoughlin, at the Climate Barometer research group in Great Britain, said, 'If you were to unlock the perception gaps, that could move us closer to a social tipping point amongst the public on climate issues.'
The existence of a silent climate majority across the planet is supported by multiple separate analyses. Other studies demonstrate a clear global appetite for action, from citizens of rich nations strongly supporting financial support for poorer vulnerable countries and even those in petrostates backing a phas- out of coal, oil and gas. A decades-long campaign of misinformation by the fossil fuel industry is a key reason the climate majority has been suppressed, researchers said.
Professor Teodora Boneva, at the University of Bonn in Germany, and part of the team behind the 125-nation survey, said, 'The world is united in its judgment about climate change and the need to act. Our results suggest a concerted effort to correct these misperceptions could be powerful intervention, yielding large, positive effects.'
The 125 countries in the survey account for 96 percent of the world's carbon emissions, and the results were published in the journal, Nature Climate Change. People in China, the world's biggest polluter, were among the most concerned, with 97 percent saying its government should do more to fight climate change and four out of five willing to give 1 percent of their income. Brazil, Portugal, and Sri Lanka also ranked high.
The world's second biggest polluter, the U.S., was near the bottom, but still had 74 percent of its citizens saying its government should do more and 48 percent willing to contribute. New Zealand, Norway and Russia were also relatively low-scoring.
Research has also found that politicians suffer from serious misperceptions. In the UK, Members of Parliament vastly underestimated public support for onshore wind farms. In the United States, people's support for limits on carbon emissions was underestimated by almost 80 percent by Congressional staffers, sometimes by more than 50 percentage points.
'Perception gaps can have real consequences – they could mean that climate policies are not as ambitious as the public sentiment,' said McLoughlin.
Substantial evidence exists that correcting mistaken beliefs about the views of others can change people's views on many subjects, from opinions on immigrants and violence against women, to environmental topics such as saving energy. This is because people are instinctively drawn to majority views and are also more likely to do something if they think others are doing it, too.
'People deeply understand we are in a climate emergency,' said Cassie Flynn, at the UN Development Programme, whose People's Climate Vote in 2024 found 80 percent of people wanted stronger climate action from their countries.
'They want world leaders to be bold, because they are living it day-to-day. World leaders should look at this data as a resounding call for them to rise to the challenge.'
Damian Carrington is an environment editor at The Guardian.
This story is part of The 89 Percent Project, an initiative of the global journalism collaboration Covering Climate Now, which includes ICT.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US government sparks outrage with controversial decision on massive stretch of public land: 'We won't stay silent'
US government sparks outrage with controversial decision on massive stretch of public land: 'We won't stay silent'

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

US government sparks outrage with controversial decision on massive stretch of public land: 'We won't stay silent'

A sweeping environmental decision is raising major concerns about the future of America's wild spaces. The federal government is moving to roll back protections on a massive stretch of public land in Alaska, potentially opening the door to more dirty energy development in one of the country's most sensitive ecosystems. The U.S. government has announced plans to reverse a major public land safeguard, opening up 23 million acres of the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska (NPR-A) to oil drilling and mining. The move would undo a December 2023 executive order from President Joe Biden that had blocked fossil fuel development in this remote Arctic region. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum announced the change on June 2, arguing that the earlier protections hindered energy independence, according to reporting by the Guardian. Burgum was joined by EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin and Energy Secretary Chris Wright, showing the administration's full-court press in favor of dirty energy expansion. But environmental groups say this shift prioritizes corporate profits over public health and natural heritage. "The Trump administration's move to roll back protections in the most ecologically important areas of the Western Arctic threatens wildlife, local communities, and our climate," Kristen Miller, executive director of the Alaska Wilderness League, explained in a statement. The NPR-A provides essential habitat for caribou, polar bears, and migratory birds, and it's been central to the food, culture, and way of life for Indigenous communities for generations. Opening up this much land to oil and gas drilling could add more pollution to our air and water and disrupt fragile ecosystems. The NPR-A is the largest single stretch of public land in the country and helps keep air clean, protect biodiversity, and support the cultural and economic traditions of local communities. Do you think America does a good job of protecting its natural beauty? Definitely Only in some areas No way I'm not sure Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. More fossil fuel development also adds to the heat-trapping pollution that's warming our planet and straining public health systems. We've already seen backlash to similar Arctic projects, like the Willow Project, a major drilling proposal approved in 2023, which sparked widespread opposition over its long-term risks. Conservation advocates are gearing up to fight back by preparing lawsuits, and grassroots campaigns are gaining traction. "The public fought hard for these protections," Miller said. "We won't stay silent while they're dismantled." At the local level, Utah's push to save the Great Salt Lake is showing what dedicated community action can achieve, and it's inspiring similar efforts nationwide. New York now requires all-electric new buildings, while California is phasing out gas-powered cars. These efforts cut harmful pollution and help speed the shift toward cleaner, healthier energy. You can take part by reducing home energy waste, switching to electric appliances, or choosing a clean electricity plan. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

Officials approve site for new Tesla factory despite vehement opposition: 'It's not going to be good for anyone'
Officials approve site for new Tesla factory despite vehement opposition: 'It's not going to be good for anyone'

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Officials approve site for new Tesla factory despite vehement opposition: 'It's not going to be good for anyone'

A South Australian city has approved the use of state-owned land by Tesla to build a factory, despite overwhelming public opposition to the project. According to the Guardian, the city council of Marion, Adelaide, voted to seek state approval to sell land to Tesla on which they plan to build a new factory. The approval came despite overwhelming public opposition to the proposed sale, as 95% of over 1,000 people who submitted statements to the council had objected to the proposal. Marion Mayor Kris Hanna addressed the decision after the vote was taken, saying that denying the project would have no impact on Musk, but would cost the city over 100 potential new jobs. "If we didn't proceed, it would have cost 100 jobs to local residents but it would have had no impact on Elon Musk," Hanna said. "Tesla would almost certainly find somewhere else in Australia to build their factory." The brand perception of Tesla is currently at an all-time low around the globe, and sales numbers have been in a tailspin for several months. In the case of Marion, the vast majority of the backlash centered around Tesla CEO Musk and his involvement in far-right political movements around the globe, but other environmental concerns were levied as well. "Please dear God," one wrote. "It's not going to be good for anyone." "I could not think of a worse developer to sell the land to," said another opponent. "Tesla sales have been plummetting [sic] … this is likely to attract protests and negative attention that the neighbourhood does not need or want." Musk's companies have come under fire before for dodging environmental regulations. In Memphis, his xAI facility has been accused of setting up gas-powered turbines that pump pollution directly out into the city without permits, directly violating the Clean Air Act. Opponents of the proposal note that while the site would be used to recycle batteries, it would only recycle Tesla batteries, and not those made by other companies, limiting its usefulness. "My understanding is Tesla only recycle Tesla batteries and we know most people in SA … have another brand," Sarah Luscombe, a Marion councillor who voted against the approval, said. What do you think of Tesla and Elon Musk? Elon is the man Love the company; hate the CEO I'm not a fan of either I don't have an opinion Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. The deal now advances to the next stage, where it needs approval from the state government of Adelaide. According to the Guardian, the state seems to be in favor of the deal. South Australia Premier Peter Malinauskas said he supported the deal, despite Musk's controversial political positions. "Any time we see any big, major industrial investment in our state, in my view, it is welcome," the premier said. "Mr. Musk's politics, while I violently disagree with them … that's his prerogative." Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

University of Michigan drops private security after reports of surveillance
University of Michigan drops private security after reports of surveillance

Chicago Tribune

time6 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

University of Michigan drops private security after reports of surveillance

ANN ARBOR, Mich. (AP) — The University of Michigan said it's cutting ties with a private security company that was accused of following pro-Palestinian activists on and off campus. The university said it found the actions of one security company employee 'disturbing, unacceptable and unethical.' It did not elaborate. 'Going forward, we are terminating all contracts with external vendors to provide plainclothes security on campus,' President Domenico Grasso said in a statement Sunday. In a Guardian story last week, students said they were surveilled around Ann Arbor. The news outlet posted video from a member of a Muslim group who decided to confront a man who was watching him from a car last summer. That man in turn yelled and accused him of trying to steal his wallet. Tensions have been high between the university and pro-Palestinian student groups. A student encampment stood for a month on campus last year before authorities shut it down citing safety issues. Seven people were charged with felonies related to the encampment's removal, though charges were dropped in May. The university, which has campus police, said it hired private security about a year ago to report suspicious activity in high-traffic areas, not to perform surveillance. 'No individual or group should ever be targeted for their beliefs or affiliations,' Grasso said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store