logo
89 Percent: Activating the climate's ‘silent' majority could supercharge action, experts say

89 Percent: Activating the climate's ‘silent' majority could supercharge action, experts say

Yahoo22-04-2025

This story is part of The 89 Percent Project, an initiative of the global journalism collaboration Covering Climate Now, which includes ICT.
Damian CarringtonThe Guardian
A huge 89 percent majority among the world's people want stronger action to fight the climate crisis but they are trapped in a self-fulfilling 'spiral of silence' because they mistakenly believe they are in a minority, research has shown.
Making people aware that their pro-climate view is, in fact, the majority could unlock a social tipping point and push leaders into the climate action so urgently needed, experts say.
The key data comes from a global survey that interviewed 130,000 people across 125 nations and found 89 percent think their national government 'should do more to fight global warming.'
It also asked people if they would 'contribute 1 percent of their household income every month to fight global warming' and what proportion of their fellow citizens they thought would do the same. In almost all countries, people believed only a minority of their fellow citizens would be willing to contribute. In reality, the opposite was true: more than 50 percent of citizens were willing to contribute in all but a few nations.
The global average of those willing to contribute was 69 percent, a clear majority. But the percentage that people thought would be willing was 43 percent, a minority. The gap between perception and reality was as high as 40 percentage points in some countries, from Greece to Gabon.
Further analysis of the survey data for the Guardian showed that public backing for climate action was as strong in the crucial G20 member nations as in the rest of the world. These nations, including the US, China, Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom and Australia, are responsible for 77 percent of global carbon emissions.
'One of the most powerful forms of climate communication is just telling people that a majority of other people think climate change is happening, human-caused, a serious problem and a priority for action,' said Professor Anthony Leiserowitz at Yale University.
Professor Cynthia Frantz at Oberlin College in the U.S., said, 'Currently, worrying about climate change is something people are largely doing in the privacy of their own minds – we are locked in a self-fulfilling spiral of silence.'
Dr. Niall McLoughlin, at the Climate Barometer research group in Great Britain, said, 'If you were to unlock the perception gaps, that could move us closer to a social tipping point amongst the public on climate issues.'
The existence of a silent climate majority across the planet is supported by multiple separate analyses. Other studies demonstrate a clear global appetite for action, from citizens of rich nations strongly supporting financial support for poorer vulnerable countries and even those in petrostates backing a phas- out of coal, oil and gas. A decades-long campaign of misinformation by the fossil fuel industry is a key reason the climate majority has been suppressed, researchers said.
Professor Teodora Boneva, at the University of Bonn in Germany, and part of the team behind the 125-nation survey, said, 'The world is united in its judgment about climate change and the need to act. Our results suggest a concerted effort to correct these misperceptions could be powerful intervention, yielding large, positive effects.'
The 125 countries in the survey account for 96 percent of the world's carbon emissions, and the results were published in the journal, Nature Climate Change. People in China, the world's biggest polluter, were among the most concerned, with 97 percent saying its government should do more to fight climate change and four out of five willing to give 1 percent of their income. Brazil, Portugal, and Sri Lanka also ranked high.
The world's second biggest polluter, the U.S., was near the bottom, but still had 74 percent of its citizens saying its government should do more and 48 percent willing to contribute. New Zealand, Norway and Russia were also relatively low-scoring.
Research has also found that politicians suffer from serious misperceptions. In the UK, Members of Parliament vastly underestimated public support for onshore wind farms. In the United States, people's support for limits on carbon emissions was underestimated by almost 80 percent by Congressional staffers, sometimes by more than 50 percentage points.
'Perception gaps can have real consequences – they could mean that climate policies are not as ambitious as the public sentiment,' said McLoughlin.
Substantial evidence exists that correcting mistaken beliefs about the views of others can change people's views on many subjects, from opinions on immigrants and violence against women, to environmental topics such as saving energy. This is because people are instinctively drawn to majority views and are also more likely to do something if they think others are doing it, too.
'People deeply understand we are in a climate emergency,' said Cassie Flynn, at the UN Development Programme, whose People's Climate Vote in 2024 found 80 percent of people wanted stronger climate action from their countries.
'They want world leaders to be bold, because they are living it day-to-day. World leaders should look at this data as a resounding call for them to rise to the challenge.'
Damian Carrington is an environment editor at The Guardian.
This story is part of The 89 Percent Project, an initiative of the global journalism collaboration Covering Climate Now, which includes ICT.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

All civil servants in England and Wales to get AI training
All civil servants in England and Wales to get AI training

Yahoo

time17 hours ago

  • Yahoo

All civil servants in England and Wales to get AI training

All civil servants in England and Wales will get practical training in how to use artificial intelligence to speed up their work from this autumn, the Guardian has learned. More than 400,000 civil servants will be informed of the training on Monday afternoon, which is part of a drive by the chancellor of the duchy of Lancaster, Pat McFadden, to overhaul the civil service and improve its productivity. At the same time, the size of the civil service is being reduced by tens of thousands of roles through voluntary redundancy and not replacing leavers. The government said officials would be tasked with figuring how they could use AI technology to streamline their own work wherever possible. Officials are already piloting a package of AI tools called Humphrey – named after the senior civil servant Sir Humphrey Appleby from the 1980s TV sitcom Yes, Minister. Related: Revealed: bias found in AI system used to detect UK benefits fraud In March, it was announced that officials would be told to abide by a mantra that says: 'No person's substantive time should be spent on a task where digital or AI can do it better, quicker and to the same high quality and standard.' The practical training, set to roll out this autumn, will give all civil servants a working-level knowledge of AI and show how it is already being used to cut the time spent on everyday tasks. A recent pilot of AI by the Scottish government used a Humphrey tool to sift consultation responses about regulating cosmetic surgery such as lip filler procedures and found its results were similar to those produced by humans but it was quicker. No decision has yet been taken on its wider rollout but the government said across 500 annual consultations the tool could help spare officials from as much as 75,000 days of analysis every year, which costs the government £20m in staffing costs. The Department for Work and Pensions is also using AI to understand high volumes of correspondence, which used to take weeks. This allows benefits or pensions recipients to be identified as potentially vulnerable and in need of urgent support. In a message to all staff, Sir Chris Wormald, the cabinet secretary, said he was 'proud' of the civil service's 'ability to continuously adapt to new challenges' as he urged them to consider how it 'needs to evolve and reform'. He said: 'The prime minister has set us an important task in building a productive and agile state, which will involve us preserving and championing everything that is great about the civil service while changing to meet the challenges of an uncertain world.' He added: 'We need to seize the opportunities of artificial intelligence and other technological developments to continually modernise everything that we do.' The training will be provided through the One Big Thing project, which focuses on a different key skill each year. While the government is rapidly embracing AI in Whitehall, some are sounding the alarm about its potential to introduce or reinforce errors and bias without adequate human oversight. The Guardian revealed in December that an artificial intelligence system used by the UK government to detect welfare fraud had been showing bias according to people's age, disability, marital status and nationality.

US to put four prisoners to death this week as Trump pushes for executions
US to put four prisoners to death this week as Trump pushes for executions

Yahoo

time18 hours ago

  • Yahoo

US to put four prisoners to death this week as Trump pushes for executions

Four executions are scheduled across the US this week, marking a sharp increase in killings as Donald Trump has pushed to revive the death penalty despite growing concerns about states' methods. Executions are set to take place in Alabama, Florida and South Carolina. A fourth, scheduled in Oklahoma, has been temporarily blocked by a judge, but the state's attorney general is challenging the ruling. The killings are being carried out by Republican-run states where civil rights lawyers say past executions have been botched and tortuous and included the killing of people who have said they were wrongfully convicted and subject to racially biased proceedings. Nineteen people have been executed in the US in 2025 so far, and if this week's four executions proceed, along with two more scheduled for later in June, the country will see 25 executions by the end of the month – the same number of killings carried out in all of 2024. In the first five months of 2025, the US has carried out the highest number of executions in a decade year-to-date, according to the Death Penalty Information Center, a nonprofit that tracks capital punishment. In Alabama on Tuesday, Gregory Hunt is set to become the fifth person executed by nitrogen suffocation in the state. Last year, the state's use of gas to kill Kenneth Smith took roughly 22 minutes, with witnesses saying his body violently shook during the procedure. Also on Tuesday, Florida is set to kill Anthony Wainwright by lethal injection, which would make him the sixth person put to death in the state this year. Florida is leading the US this year in executions as Republican governor Ron DeSantis has aggressively pursued capital punishment and as state legislators have sought to expand parameters of the death penalty in ways that experts say are unconstitutional. Florida is also the only state to use a controversial anesthetic called etomidate in its lethal injections despite the pharmaceutical inventors saying it should not be used for executions. One man killed by lethal injection in the state in 2018 screamed and thrashed on a gurney as he was put to death. John Hanson is scheduled to be executed by the state of Oklahoma on Thursday. Hanson had been in federal prison in Louisiana serving a life sentence, and in 2022, when Oklahoma sought for him to be transferred to the state for execution, the Biden administration denied the move. This year, Oklahoma's attorney general, citing Trump's order, pushed to have him transferred again, and attorney general Pam Bondi complied. On Monday, an Oklahoma district judge sided with Hanson's attorney and issued a stay halting the execution, which the state's attorney general immediately challenged to the Oklahoma court of criminal appeals. A department of corrections spokesperson told local outlets it was moving forward with plans for the Thursday execution, saying in an email to the Guardian: 'We are continuing our normal process for now.' The final execution is scheduled for Friday in South Carolina, where Stephen Stanko is set to be killed by lethal injection. The state has been rapidly killing people after reviving capital punishment last year and directs defendants to choose between firing squad, lethal injection and electrocution. Lawyers have argued that the lethal injections have led to a condition akin to suffocation and drowning and that the last death by firing squad was botched, causing prolonged suffering. States like South Carolina have been able to push forward with executions by passing secrecy laws that shield the identities of suppliers facilitating the killings. 'The death penalty remains unpopular and practiced by a very small number of states,' said Matt Wells, deputy director of Reprieve US, a human rights nonprofit. 'In those states, you see an increased willingness to do whatever it takes to carry out executions. The result is we're more likely to see executions go wrong.' In one of his final acts, Joe Biden commuted the death sentences of 37 people on federal death row, changing their punishments to life without parole. Following Trump's order, some local prosecutors have expressed interest in bringing state charges against commuted defendants in an effort to again sentence them to death, though they would face an uphill legal battle. Public support for the death penalty is at a five-decade low in the US, which has seen a decrease in new death sentences, said Robin Maher, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center. 'Elected officials are setting these executions, but it does not in any way equate to increased enthusiasm for the death penalty at large,' she said.

US government sparks outrage with controversial decision on massive stretch of public land: 'We won't stay silent'
US government sparks outrage with controversial decision on massive stretch of public land: 'We won't stay silent'

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

US government sparks outrage with controversial decision on massive stretch of public land: 'We won't stay silent'

A sweeping environmental decision is raising major concerns about the future of America's wild spaces. The federal government is moving to roll back protections on a massive stretch of public land in Alaska, potentially opening the door to more dirty energy development in one of the country's most sensitive ecosystems. The U.S. government has announced plans to reverse a major public land safeguard, opening up 23 million acres of the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska (NPR-A) to oil drilling and mining. The move would undo a December 2023 executive order from President Joe Biden that had blocked fossil fuel development in this remote Arctic region. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum announced the change on June 2, arguing that the earlier protections hindered energy independence, according to reporting by the Guardian. Burgum was joined by EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin and Energy Secretary Chris Wright, showing the administration's full-court press in favor of dirty energy expansion. But environmental groups say this shift prioritizes corporate profits over public health and natural heritage. "The Trump administration's move to roll back protections in the most ecologically important areas of the Western Arctic threatens wildlife, local communities, and our climate," Kristen Miller, executive director of the Alaska Wilderness League, explained in a statement. The NPR-A provides essential habitat for caribou, polar bears, and migratory birds, and it's been central to the food, culture, and way of life for Indigenous communities for generations. Opening up this much land to oil and gas drilling could add more pollution to our air and water and disrupt fragile ecosystems. The NPR-A is the largest single stretch of public land in the country and helps keep air clean, protect biodiversity, and support the cultural and economic traditions of local communities. Do you think America does a good job of protecting its natural beauty? Definitely Only in some areas No way I'm not sure Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. More fossil fuel development also adds to the heat-trapping pollution that's warming our planet and straining public health systems. We've already seen backlash to similar Arctic projects, like the Willow Project, a major drilling proposal approved in 2023, which sparked widespread opposition over its long-term risks. Conservation advocates are gearing up to fight back by preparing lawsuits, and grassroots campaigns are gaining traction. "The public fought hard for these protections," Miller said. "We won't stay silent while they're dismantled." At the local level, Utah's push to save the Great Salt Lake is showing what dedicated community action can achieve, and it's inspiring similar efforts nationwide. New York now requires all-electric new buildings, while California is phasing out gas-powered cars. These efforts cut harmful pollution and help speed the shift toward cleaner, healthier energy. You can take part by reducing home energy waste, switching to electric appliances, or choosing a clean electricity plan. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store