Nuclear weapons increasing as Russia-Ukraine war, Israel-Iran conflict reignites the prospects of World War III
As Russia and Ukraine continue to engage in a bloody and bruising war and the Middle East teeters on the edge of a disastrous conflict with nuclear undertones, the world is rapidly spiralling towards a potential
World War III
. Russia is the world's most heavily nuclear armed power while Israel, which has opened multiple fronts in the Middle East with the latest target being Iran, is a covert nuke state.
Apart from Russia and Israel, there are seven other nuclear-armed countries - the United States, the United Kingdom, France, China, India, Pakistan, and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea). According to a Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (
SIPRI
) report, all the nine nations have gone ahead with modernization of their nuclear program in 2024. Some of the countries have added a large number of nukes including upgrading of the existing weapons along with developing newer and more lethal versions.
Nuclear warheads with each country
The report states that in January 2025, there were an estimated 12,241
nuclear war
heads in possession of the nine countries mentioned above with about 9,614 of them with the militaries for use. The nuclear armed countries had 3,912
nuclear weapons
deployed for immediate use on their missiles and combat aircraft, while the remaining were stored away.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
NVDA: What's Next After the Selloff?
Seeking Alpha
Read Now
Undo
Russia and the US have the maximum number of deployed nuclear weapons. The SIPRI report claims that a small number of the deployed warheads may also belong to China. A total of about 2,100 warheads are mounted on missiles for immediate firing.
While the world saw Russia and the US retiring and dismantling a large number of nuclear weapons since the end of the Cold War in 1991, the trend seems to be reversing with new weapons being developed and deployed at a rapid pace which is likely to quicken in the coming years.
Live Events
World nuclear forces, January 2025
Deployed
Stored
Military Stockpile
Retired
Total
USA
1 770
1 930
3 700
1 477
5 177
Russia
1 718
2 591
4 309
1 150
5 459
UK
120
105
225
-
225
France
280
10
290
-
290
China
24
576
600
-
600
India
-
180
180
-
180
Pakistan
-
170
170
-
170
North Korea
-
50
50
-
50
Israel
-
90
90
-
90
"The era of reductions in the number of nuclear weapons in the world, which had lasted since the end of the cold war, is coming to an end. Instead, we see a clear trend of growing nuclear arsenals, sharpened nuclear rhetoric and the abandonment of arms control agreements," noted Hans M. Kristensen, Associate Senior Fellow with SIPRI's Weapons of Mass Destruction Programme and Director of the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists (FAS).
Russia and the US had in 2010 entered into the Treaty on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms (New START) which expires in February 2026. As the former in involved in a conflict with Ukraine and the US tied up behind the scenes in both the Europe and Middle East wars, the prospects of the treaty getting an extension or a new deal is extremely bleak.
As part of their modernization program, both sides could rearm more missiles with multiple warheads as well as reactivate silos from which nukes were pulled out earlier. New non-strategic nuclear weapons by both and the development of new intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) like Sarmat by Russia could result in increase in the nukes.
China's nukes
China's rapid development of nuclear weapons could force the US to adopt a tit-for-tat approach bring the memories of the Cold War era back.
SIPRI estimates that China, the world's third largest nuclear power with 600 warheads, is growing its arsenal at rapid pace. . The country is estimated to have added 200 warheads since 2023. China has six major nuclear missile silos spread across the cold deserts in its north and mountains of the east with an estimated capacity of 350 ICBMs.
Its pace of ICBM deployment is accelerating, and China could match Russia and the US in deploying nuke-armed missiles before the end of 2030. Painting a rather alarming picture, SIPRI reports that China can have 1,500 warheads by 2035, still only about one third of each of the current Russian and US nuclear stockpiles.
Europe prepares for nuclear war
Even since the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine war, the United Kingdom and France have advocated for a larger nuclear weapon stockpile with the former also speaking about expanding its nuclear umbrella to the rest of Europe if the US decides to pull back as its President Donald Trump has said on multiple occasions.
The UK's Integrated Review Refresh in 2023 speaks for increasing the number of warheads. The country may go for four more nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) along with maintaining the continuous at-sea nuclear deterrence, and delivering 'all the needed upgrades'.
Similarly, France is going ahead with developing a third-generation SSBN and a new air-launched cruise missile. It is also upgrading its existing arsenal and delivery systems.
India now has 180 nuclear warhead, at least 10 more than Pakistan. India is developing new canisterized missiles with Multiple Independently targetable Re-entry Vehicle (MIRV) capabilities. Pakistan, too, has been with China and North Korea's help modernizing its nuclear warheads.
'The combination of strikes on nuclear-related military infrastructure and third-party disinformation risked turning a conventional conflict into a nuclear crisis,' said Matt Korda, Associate Senior Researcher with SIPRI's Weapons of Mass Destruction Programme and Associate Director for the Nuclear Information Project at FAS. 'This should act as a stark warning for states seeking to increase their reliance on nuclear weapons.'
North Korea has been developing its nuclear warheads as well as missiles with longer range to target the US mainland. The country is estimated to have 50 warheads with SIPRI reporting enough fissile material to produce up to 40 more nukes as well as on course to develop a tactical nuclear weapon.
Israel has never admitted openly to having nuclear weapons but is likely to be in possession of 90 warheads. It is upgrading its plutonium production reactor site at Dimona while in 2024 the country also test-fired a missile propulsion system that could be related to its Jericho family of nuclear-capable ballistic missiles.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump family announces another venture, mobile phone company
The Trump family said it will launch a mobile phone company, the latest in a string of ventures that have been announced while Donald Trump is in the White House despite ethical concerns that the US president could mold public policy for personal gain. Eric Trump, one of President Donald Trump's sons who will run the business, said that the new company would build its own phones in the US, and maintain a call centre in the country as well. The announcement of the new mobile phone company and service follows several real estate deals for towers and resorts in the Middle East, including a golf development in Qatar announced in April. A USD 1.5 billion partnership to build golf courses, hotels and real estate projects in Vietnam was approved last month, but the deal was in the works before Trump was elected. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Many Are Watching Tariffs - Few Are Watching What Nvidia Just Launched Seeking Alpha Read Now Undo Discover the stories of your interest Blockchain 5 Stories Cyber-safety 7 Stories Fintech 9 Stories E-comm 9 Stories ML 8 Stories Edtech 6 Stories Trump criticised Apple last month because it planned to make most of its US iPhones in India, and threatened to slap a 25% tariff on the devices unless the tech giant starts building the product in its home country.
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Iran is no pushover: Israel is learning the hard way
By all accounts, Israel's recent attacks on Iran -- marked by airstrikes on nuclear installations and the targeted killing of high-ranking military officials -- represent its boldest offensive gambit. Yet as the conflict draws on, what is emerging is not the picture of a weakened Iran grovelling for a deal, but rather a portrait of Israeli overreach. The Israeli leadership, it now seems, may have significantly underestimated the depth of Iranian resilience, the robustness of its military infrastructure and the reach of its missiles. As there is no let-up in the Iran-Israel conflict, with casualties mounting on both sides as they exchange missile attacks, many think Israel might have made a strategic miscalculation, as it is becoming apparent that it may not be able to subdue Iran on its own. 'They (the Israelis) underestimated the Iranian ability to regroup after the Israelis very successfully targeted the top leadership of the Iranian military and managed to kill several of them,' Trita Parsi, vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, told CNN. Parsi said Israel believed they had 'disrupted Iranian command and control' but that idea was 'quickly restructured.' What we are seeing now is that 'Iranian missiles are successful in penetrating all layers of Israel's air defense systems,' Parsi said. Parsi was speaking to CNN as new waves of Iranian missiles rained down in the early hours of Monday morning and struck multiple locations. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Esse novo alarme com câmera é quase gratuito em Guarulhos (consulte o preço) Alarmes Undo Also Read | Blind radar, blistering speed: How Israeli jets crippled Iran's air defence in 48 hours, something Russia couldn't do in 3 years The limits of Israel's air power Israel's attack on Iran's Natanz nuclear facility was hailed in some quarters as a major tactical success. However, on closer examination, the limitations of the strike have become starkly apparent. While parts of the facility suffered damage, reports suggest that the most critical sections, especially the subterranean enrichment halls buried beneath layers of reinforced concrete, remained largely intact. The Fordow facility, located deep inside a mountain and even more heavily fortified than Natanz, remains untouched. Intelligence assessments indicate that it would require American-supplied bunker-busting ordnance, likely deployed from American B-2 stealth bombers, to inflict lasting damage on such hardened sites. Despite its advanced air force and deep-strike capabilities, Israel simply lacks the tools necessary to neutralize Iran's nuclear infrastructure completely. Live Events "While the US has B-2 stealth bombers with 30,000lb massive ordnance penetrators that are designed just for this type of strike, Israel's options are more limited — if it is operating by itself," says a report in the Financial Times. "Israeli F-15 fighter bombers can carry 4,000-5,000lb GBU-28 bunker-buster bombs, each capable of punching through 5-6m of concrete. Israel does have such bombs but their numbers are a closely guarded secret, and few analysts believe the country has enough on its own to do the job." Israel's forces 'don't have enough 5,000-pounders' to take out Fordow and Natanz, retired US Air Force General Charles Wald, who now works for the Jewish Institute for the National Security of America, had said in April. 'They can do considerable damage to Iran's nuclear programme,' Matthew Savill, the head of the military sciences department at the Royal United Services Institute in London, told FT. 'It's doubtful they can destroy it all on their own, but I think they are prepared to keep hitting it over time.' This operational limitation has cast a long shadow over the strategic calculus behind the attacks. If the principal objective was to delay or dismantle Iran's nuclear programme, the evidence suggests that the mission fell short. Iran has, in fact, accelerated its nuclear activities in response, sending a clear signal that deterrence through limited aerial bombardment may no longer be viable. One fallout of the Israeli attack is Iran preparing a bill that will push it towards exiting the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. The timing of this statement is also crucial, as Israel alleged that Iran is on the verge of building a nuclear bomb. Also Read | Sea shield activated: How Israel's navy used India-developed missile tech to stop Iran's drones Breach of Israeli air defences is a strategic shock Perhaps more disconcerting for Israeli defence planners is the revelation that Iranian missile forces managed to breach several layers of Israel's much-vaunted multi-tiered air defense systems, including the Iron Dome, David's Sling and Arrow systems. While Israel intercepted many incoming projectiles, a number of Iranian missiles penetrated these defences, causing damage and raising fundamental questions about the effectiveness of Israel's air defence in the face of a determined and technologically evolving adversary. Iran's Revolutionary Guards claimed to have employed a novel attack method that allegedly caused Israel's multi-layered defence systems to target each other. "The initiatives and capabilities used in this operation, despite the comprehensive support of the United States and Western powers and the possession of the most up-to-date and newest defence technology, led to the successful and maximum hitting of the missiles on the targets in the occupied territories," it said. Iran's ability to strike back is imposing an unpredictable cost on Israel as show the striking visuals of damage Iranian missiles have done in Israel. The command has regrouped Israel may also have underestimated the Islamic Republic's institutional resilience. The targeted assassinations of several top-ranking Iranian military commanders were expected to sow confusion within Tehran's defense establishment. Yet, contrary to Israeli expectations, Iran's military apparatus appears to have quickly regrouped. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps , long structured to withstand decapitation strikes, has shown an ability to reconstitute command hierarchies and maintain strategic continuity. This capacity for internal regeneration reveals the fundamental misapprehension at the heart of Israeli strategy: the belief that removing individuals would collapse operational effectiveness. In reality, the IRGC is deeply entrenched, ideologically driven and operationally compartmentalized, making it remarkably resistant to leadership attrition. Can Israel topple the Iranian regime? Although Israeli officials have been careful not to explicitly state that regime change in Iran is their endgame, the scale and nature of the recent strikes, especially the focus on top leadership targets, suggests that undermining the Islamic Republic's stability may well be a hidden objective. US President Donald Trump recently blocked an Israeli plan to assassinate Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, according to two US officials who spoke to Reuters. If Israel has regime change as one of its objectives, this would constitute a grave misjudgment. No regime in the Middle East has survived more pressure, sanctions, isolation and conflict than the Islamic Republic. From the Iran-Iraq War to decades of international sanctions, the regime has cultivated a political and military structure that is deeply entrenched. History suggests that air campaigns alone cannot produce regime change. From Serbia to Libya to Iraq, efforts to dislodge entrenched governments have typically required either massive ground invasions or internal revolutions, neither of which seems to be within Israel's grasp. If Israel's strategy hinges on triggering popular unrest or fractures in top command through airpower, it hasn't appeared to work so far. Israel is trying to drag the US into a war Perhaps the clearest indication of Israel's realisation that it can't go all alone against Iran is its apparent effort to draw the US into a broader conflict. With the realization that its military assets are insufficient to accomplish key strategic objectives, including neutralizing Fordow and toppling or significantly weakening the regime, Israel is lobbying, implicitly and explicitly, for deeper American involvement. This push, however, is fraught with risk. The US, while committed to Israeli security, is also acutely aware of the risks of escalation. A direct US-Iran war would destabilize global oil markets, risk American personnel stationed at military bases across the region, and potentially ignite a multi-front war involving other actors. It is far from certain that the US is willing to be drawn into such a scenario. Trump on Sunday called on Iran and Israel to "make a deal". However, he also suggested that fighting may continue before any agreement is reached. So far, it appears the US would prefer the conflict to end instead of jumping right into it. Israel has demonstrated tactical audacity by mounting bold attacks on Iran, but it may have misjudged Iran's depth, durability and capacity for calibrated retaliation. This has placed the region on a knife's edge as the conflict risks sliding into full-scale war, eventually drawing in the US as well as other actors.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Gifts from India: PM Modi visits Cyprus; gifts Kashmiri silk carpet, silver clutch purse to Cyprus President and First Lady
NEW DELHI: Prime Minister Narendra Modi, during his two-day official visit to Cyprus, presented two handcrafted gifts to the country's First Couple – a symbolic gesture underscoring India's rich artisanal traditions as the two nations signed several agreements to boost trade and economic cooperation. PM Modi gifted a luxurious Kashmiri silk carpet to Cyprus President Nikos Christodoulides. The deep red carpet, bordered with fawn and red motifs, features traditional vine and geometric patterns. It showcases a prized two-tone visual effect -- appearing to shift colours with changes in light and angle -- offering the illusion of two distinct carpets in one. To First Lady Philippa Karsera, PM Modi gifted a silver clutch purse handcrafted in Andhra Pradesh. The purse, made using the ancient repoussé technique, blends intricate temple-inspired floral designs with modern aesthetics. Its curved frame, ornate handle, and central semi-precious stone give it a regal elegance, symbolising India's capacity to contemporise its traditional metal crafts. The exchange came as PM Modi attended a business roundtable in Limassol with Cyprus President Christodoulides, where both sides hailed new avenues of cooperation in fintech, high-tech industries, renewable energy, and the film sector. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Multiple MoUs were signed between Indian and Cypriot companies, including a landmark pact between the NSE and the Cyprus Stock Exchange for dual listings and research collaboration. Another key agreement was reached between GIFT City in Gujarat and the Cyprus bourse, marking a major milestone for India's global financial outreach. Several business leaders from both countries voiced optimism about the expanding bilateral relationship. Evgeniou, Chairman of Invest Cyprus, said, 'PM Modi's visit will add momentum to economic, business, and investment ties between India, Cyprus, and the European Union.'
