Crypto payments for Thailand tourists: US, UAE, Japan and other countries that let you pay with Bitcoin, Ether, more
In a recently proposed initiative, the country announced intentions of launching a crypto sandbox for its tourists, who can convert their Bitcoin into real money and purchase goods and services.
While the move is aimed to woo more tourists, Thailand is not the only country that accepts crypto payments. Here are six others.
El Salvador was the first country to accept Bitcoin as a legal tender in 2021, allowing citizens and tourists alike to use the crypto coin for everyday life shopping, food and travel. However, the country agreed to roll back some aspects of Bitcoin usage following intervention from the IMF.
One of Eurpoe's most crypto-forward nations, Malta is often called the 'Blockchain Island'. Retailers and restaurants across the country began accepting Bitcoin as early as 2016. Tourists can also use their digital assets to book flights and accommodations in Malta.
Malta's Virtual Financial Assets Act (VFAA), which was introduced in 2018, streamlines licensing for crypto companies.
The United Arab Emirates, especially Dubai, has witnessed a rapid growth of cryptocurrency adoption across sectors including retail, real estate, and hospitality.
Top developers like DAMAC and Emaar accept Bitcoin and Ether payments to purchase properties. Expanding the opportunity, Emirates Airlines earlier this month signed an MoU with Crypto.com to accept crypto payments for booking flights. The airlines will by 2026 accept Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other digital currencies for flight bookings and in-flight services.
Portugal, another crypto-friendly nation in Europe, encourages adoption of cryptocurrencies via tax policies and relaxed regulations. While it is not yet a legal tender in the country, many businesses accept Bitcoin payments.
Japan recognised Bitcoin as a legal payment method as early as 2017, becoming one of the first countries to do so. While most transactions in Japan are cash-reliant, some retailers, electronics stores, as well as travel agencies now accept Bitcoin for tourists and residents.
With Donald Trump's crypto push, the United States is adopting digital assets more than ever, though it is not yet a uniform system yet. However, tourists can leverage digital assets while travelling within the country.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
India, US seek to futureproof trade agreement amid tax and tariff concerns
Starting April 1, India abolished the 6 per cent equalisation levy on online advertising services provided by non-resident entities, also known as Google tax premium Asit Ranjan Mishra Listen to This Article The US is pressing India to commit to not reintroducing the so-called 'Google tax', while New Delhi is seeking protection from potential future tariffs on pharmaceutical exports as part of the ongoing trade-deal negotiations. Starting April 1, India abolished the 6 per cent equalisation levy on online advertising services provided by non-resident entities, also known as Google tax. The move, announced in March, was aimed at sending a positive signal to US President Donald Trump, who had threatened reciprocal tariffs on high-tariff nations. Apart from Google, the decision also benefited other US-based tech majors, such as Meta and X (formerly
Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
India must enhance its potential as trade and tech partner, and look beyond US
Aap up and away, kya? What is the nature of India's current foreign policy problem, or at least predicament? Donald Trump's episodic statements and social media posts are attention-grabbing. His inner circle's pay-as-you-go diplomacy is alarming. The endless, but unavoidable, wait for tranche 1A of the bilateral trade deal is exasperating. Yet, tactical responses (or non-responses) to any or all of these should not detain us from a strategic re-appraisal. The US' retrenchment from global commitments is creating gaps in three areas - the world's trade and economic system; security frameworks; and provision of international public goods. There is far from a total withdrawal, but the 800-pound gorilla is slimming down to a 700-pound gorilla. What's more, the fat is not being reduced evenly across sectors, regions and geographies. As such, there is the 'known unknown' of the quantum of decline - the notional 100 pounds - but also an 'unknown unknown' of the consistency of American retrenchment: the where, when and for how long. No one nation, partnership or coalition can fill the gap America leaves. This is as true for consumer demand as it is for security architecture. To be sure, different groupings can address some of the gaps in different regions and domains. Read along with fitful, but still inexorable, US-China great power competition, this is leading to two parallel processes of hedging for countries such as India: Tech & security: There's straightforward hedging between the US and China in the digital and strategic technology spheres, as well as security and security-adjacent domains. Here, the space for hedging is like many others, is making its choices. These choices are systemic choices. They have a greater resilience and buy-in in US government agencies, and tech and business constituencies. They will advance with or without the White House's outright support. Sometimes they could even do so in spite of it. Of course, pace and visibility will be modulated. US plus one: Then, a second process involves hedging between the US and like-minded, non-China partners. Here, the space for hedging is actually expanding. Actors such as India seek, if not alternatives, then at least complements and supplements to their export and trade, supply chains, defence and security, and tech relationships with the US. Skewed dependencies are sought to be mitigated to the degree possible. There are attempts to diversify. India and Europe looking to do more together in trade, defence supply chains and innovation is one example. India-Australia cooperation in rare earths is another. Increasing partnerships involving non-US Quad countries, as well as non-Quad countries, in the Indo-Pacific is a said that, in some domains, even a partial withdrawal of the US footprint is so substantial that no new arrangement can entirely fill it. Nevertheless, it is what it is. Volatility and unpredictability are now a way of then, does India navigate the Trumpian age? Revisit the basics. In 1991 (liberalisation), 2000 (Y2K), 2014 (Modi mandate), or 2020-21 (post-Covid), excitement about India was rooted in its potential as a trade and tech partner, as a market for key countries, and as a possible sourcing and supply chains hub for many more. Everything else - cultural and civilisational wealth, democratic and transparency credentials - was, and remains, a useful add-on. Minus economic leverage, India is not a vishwa guru, or even a vishwa mitra; it is a vishwa also-ran. In a time of tariffs and turbulence, with global trade rules being upended and the whole notion of most favoured nation being hollowed out, India once more needs to make its economy and trade attributes the headline of its external strategy. It is not enough to conclude free trade agreements - more accurately, feasible trade agreements - with, depending on who in the government is describing it, 'complementary economies', 'partners to our West' or 'rich countries'. The game is much more gritty, granular and painstaking. India offering a meaningful trade relationship, an economic stake or a supply chain must-have to as many countries as possible is the hard, slow and relentless mechanism to building foreign policy leverage. In such a reckoning, they are simply no non-partners - no countries one can afford to ignore. There will be limitations to what India can do with China and Pakistan, but aside from that, India will need to strive to make itself indispensable to some economic imperative or the other with about every will include individual Asean countries, neighbouring countries - in some of which reckless application of Indian quality control orders (QCOs) has caused legitimate pushback - as well as problem countries such as Turkiye. In the end, what unique economic stake and proposition India offers another nation is the best metric of its foreign policy influence. An aggregation of such stakes and propositions will make for composite national relevance in a smash-and-grab world Minister Narendra Modi's two visits this week - to the UK to conclude a trade deal that, among other things, could give Scotch a market advantage over bourbon, and to the Maldives, where bloody-minded economic engagement has outlasted political acerbity - offer a glimpse of what could be. There'll still be about 200 countries to go. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. From near bankruptcy to blockbuster drug: How Khorakiwala turned around Wockhardt Paid less than plumbers? The real story of freshers' salaries at Infy, TCS. What if Tata Motors buys Iveco's truck unit? Will it propel or drag like JLR? As deposit ground slips under PSU banks' feet, they chase the wealthy If data is the new oil, are data centres the smokestacks of the digital age? Stock Radar: M&M likely to break out from 1-year consolidation range; time to buy? Will consumer stocks see a comeback this festive season? 12 stocks to keep an eye on even when analysts are not bullish Don't fear volatility, focus on businesses: 5 mid-cap stocks from different sectors with upside potential of up to 27% Best way to deal with volatility, just ' Hold' for wealth creation: 7 large-cap stocks with an upside potential of up to 41%
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
US Stablecoin Law Sends Ripples To India: How New Dollar-Backed Era Challenges Financial Sovereignty
New Delhi: A signature in Washington has stirred up serious questions in New Delhi. When US President Donald Trump signed the GENIUS Act into law, it kicked off a shift that could redraw the global financial map in addition to giving a greenlight to dollar-backed stablecoins. What looks like a domestic crypto law is now reverberating in central banks, fintech firms and policy circles around the world, especially in emerging economies like India. The Act, at its core, gives formal structure to stablecoins that are pegged to the US dollar. It demands full reserve backing, regular audits, KYC checks and anti-money laundering protocols. All the ingredients of traditional finance now wrapped around a digital asset. With this one move, the United States has set the tone for a new generation of money – which is private, programmable, borderless and unmistakably dollar-based. Stablecoins like USDC (a regulated digital currency) and USDT (a blockchain-enabled platform) were already popular. Now they have the seal of legitimacy. It is no longer a crypto trading tool but emerging as real-world instruments of exchange. Payment platforms, remittance services, e-commerce firms and even small traders could begin using them as alternatives to banks. What is being built is a parallel channel as well as a potential competitor to traditional money systems. India is paying attention. Officials at the Reserve Bank of India know what this means. The efficiency of stablecoins is attractive. Instant cross-border payments, cheaper remittances and faster settlements are something that the traditional banking network has struggled to deliver. India's vast fintech ecosystem, from UPI to Paytm, is built for scale. But scale may not be enough. Dollar-based stablecoins could sneak into India's economy in invisible ways. Exporters and importers could begin settling trades using them. Freelancers and tech workers might accept payments in digital dollars. And slowly, the rupee could lose its grip in corners of the economy where the RBI once ruled without question. Behind the scenes, policymakers are nervous. Stablecoins can be hard to track. Their mobility makes them hard to tax. And when demand for digital dollars rises, local currencies can take a hit. What the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) calls 'cryptoisation' is not merely a theory anymore, it is a warning. If this parallel system gains traction, India's central bank tools, which are interest rates, liquidity controls and capital flow regulations, might not be enough. The RBI has its pilot projects for the e-rupee. They are promising. But the competition is not waiting. The United States is moving fast. It may not have a digital dollar yet, but it has something just as powerful. For India, the road ahead is foggy. One option is to create a strong rupee-backed stablecoin that can compete on global platforms. Another is to impose strict controls on foreign stablecoins before they embed themselves too deeply. And third is to find a middle ground that supports innovation while protecting the core of monetary policy. The stakes are economic and geopolitical. The GENIUS Act is about control. If the old world was built on petrodollars and treasury bonds, the new one may run on digital tokens that carry the stars and stripes. Every stablecoin minted under U.S. regulation is another extension of its soft power. Meanwhile, Europe is working on a digital euro. China is expanding the e-CNY. And in parts of Africa and Southeast Asia, gold-backed and commodity-tied tokens are being tested. The world is preparing for the next phase of money. But the United States has already made its first big move. India must decide soon. Will it shape its own path, or will it play by rules written elsewhere? One thing is certain – the dollar is not retreating. It is evolving. And it is not knocking on the door anymore. It is already inside the house.
