Facing Islamist threats, Bangladesh girls forced to cancel football matches
Asha Roy, 17, was excited to take part in a women's football tournament, but her hopes were dashed as Islamists forced the organisers to cancel the match in northern Bangladesh.
Shortly before the game began earlier this month, the Islami Andolan Bangladesh group announced a protest rally against the event in Rangpur region, saying it was un-Islamic.
Fearing trouble, local police stepped in and the women's team members were asked to return to their home for their safety.
"I was frustrated and frightened. We had never faced such a situation before. It was disappointing that we came back without playing," Ms Roy told the BBC.
Bangladesh, a Muslim-majority nation, is currently undergoing a political transition after widespread protests ousted its authoritarian government last year.
An interim administration is currently in charge but there are concerns that Islamist groups, which had been pushed to the fringes, have become emboldened again.
The women's football match was the third to be cancelled in northern Bangladesh in less than two weeks due to the objections of religious hardliners.
In the Dinajpur area, roughly 70km (43 miles) west of Rangpur, Islamists protesting against a game clashed with locals who supported it, leaving four people injured.
Is once-in-a-generation chance lost for Bangladesh's women?
Sheikh Hasina: The pro-democracy icon who became an autocrat
For girls such as Asha Roy, who come from rural areas, football and other sports are a source of female empowerment and a way out of poverty. Those who shine can be selected to play for sponsored teams and some go on to represent Bangladesh internationally.
Many girls have been inspired to take up football thanks to the success of the national women's team, who are considered heroes after winning two consecutive South Asia Football Championships in recent years.
Ms Roy's teammate, Musammat Tara Moni, said she would not stop playing despite the threats.
"It's my dream to represent our national team. My family supports me, so I am not losing hope," the 16-year-old said.
For their coach Nurul Islam, the objections came as a surprise. "I have taken the team to many tournaments for the past seven years, but it's the first time we have faced a situation like this," he said.
The Islamists insist that the match they stopped was against their religious values and say that they are determined to prevent any future football games.
"If women want to play football, they should cover their entire body, and they can play only in front of female spectators. Men cannot watch them play," Maulana Ashraf Ali, the leader of the Islami Andolan Bangladesh in the Taraganj area of Rangpur, told the BBC.
Mr Ali also insisted that the group "definitely" want hard-line Islamic Sharia law in Bangladesh.
The cancellation of the women's football matches caused an uproar on social media, leading the authorities to reorganise one of them. They have also launched an investigation into the incidents but say the fear of radicalism is exaggerated.
"There is no truth in the allegations that the government is pandering to Islamists," Shafiqul Alam, press secretary to interim leader Muhammad Yunus, told the BBC.
Mr Alam pointed out that hundreds of women's sports matches were held as part of a national youth festival in January, and that they were played across the country without any trouble.
Some people are not reassured. Samina Luthfa, assistant professor of sociology in the University of Dhaka, told the BBC the cancellation of the women's football matches was "definitely alarming".
"The women of Bangladesh will not stop playing football and will not stop from going to work or doing their things," she said, adding that "everyone will fight" efforts to remove women from public spaces.
Other decisions made by the interim government since it assumed power in August in relation to Islamist extremism have also raised concerns.
They include revoking a ban on the country's largest Islamist party, Jamaat-e-Islami, which was introduced in the last days of former prime minister Sheikh Hasina's government.
Jashimuddin Rahmani, the leader of banned Islamist militant group Ansarullah Bangladesh (ABT) - now known as Ansar al Islam - was released in August after a court granted him bail. He was sentenced to five years in prison in connection with the killing of a secular blogger in 2013, but had been kept behind bars because of other pending cases.
According to local media reports, several other people accused of having links with extremist groups have also been given bail in the past few months.
"Though security forces say they will monitor those released, it will be difficult for them to put everybody under surveillance given the limitations," says Dr Tawohidul Haque, a crime analyst from the University of Dhaka.
While most Bangladeshis practise moderate Islam and secular values dominate society, Islamic extremism is not a new phenomenon in the country. A decade ago, religious zealots targeted secular bloggers, atheists, minorities, foreigners and others in a spate of attacks - killing dozens and sending others fleeing abroad.
In one such incident, a group of Islamist gunmen stormed the Holey Artisan Bakery in Dhaka in 2016, killing 20 people.
It is not just women's football games that have been targeted recently either. Last week, dozens of Islamist students vandalised a book stall at Dhaka's famous Ekushey Book Fair.
The protesters were angry over the display a book by the exiled feminist author Taslima Nasrin, who has in the past received death threats from Islamist groups for what they say are her blasphemous writings.
Muhammad Yunus condemned the incident saying the attack "shows contempt for both the rights of Bangladeshi citizens and for the laws of our country." The police are investigating.
Meanwhile, one of the country's best-known actors, Pori Moni said she was stopped from inaugurating a department store in the northern town of Tangail after reported objections from religious groups.
"Now I'm really feeling helpless, as well as insecure. It's part of my job to take part in opening a showroom or a similar event. No one has stopped me all these years," Ms Moni told the BBC Bengali service.
Similar events involving two other actors, Apu Biswas and Mehazabien Chowdhury, have also been cancelled following threats by Islamists.
Minority groups like the Sufi Muslims say they are also witnessing increasing attacks on their places of worship. Islamist extremists view Sufism as heretical.
"About a hundred of our shrines [mazars] and centres have been attacked in the past six months," Anisur Rahman Jafri, Secretary General of the Sufism Universal Foundation, told the BBC.
"We have not seen this kind of sudden extremist attack on us since the country's independence in 1971," he added, warning that the country was at risk of "Talibanisation" if the situation continued.
Police said only 40 shrines were damaged and that they had stepped up security around religious sites.
The authorities have also been struggling to maintain law and order in the wake of Sheikh Hasina's departure. Earlier this month, thousands of protesters vandalised homes and buildings connected to Hasina and senior leaders of her Awami League party.
People from other groups and parties, including Islamists, joined in other demonstrations in the capital, Dhaka, and across the country.
The authorities have defended the security forces for not intervening, saying doing so would have cost lives.
Rights groups have expressed concern over the security situation.
"If the government fails to act, then Islamists are going to feel emboldened. There will be more self-censorship for women and girls, they will be more intimidated participating in public events," Shireen Huq, a prominent women's rights activist, told the BBC.
"I am still optimistic that this phenomenon will not sustain," she added.
Additional reporting from the BBC Bengali service in Dhaka
Crackdown on Bangladesh protesters may be crime against humanity, UN says
Bangladesh issues arrest warrant for ex-leader Hasina
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
BBC bosses in talks about how to win over Reform-voting viewers
BBC bosses are holding talks about how to win over Reform-voting viewers amid fears their views are under-represented by the broadcaster. Senior executives including director-general Tim Davie and chairman Samir Shah have discussed plans to overhaul the BBC's news and drama output to tackle 'low-trust issues' among Reform voters. At a meeting of the corporation's editorial guidelines and standards committee in March, Deborah Turness, BBC News boss, gave a presentation on how to ensure the views of Reform voters were being given enough airtime. Changes under consideration included altering which news stories the broadcaster covers, as well as potential changes to how it commissions other forms of programming including drama. The committee, which counts former GB News adviser Sir Robbie Gibb as a member, also discussed the importance of local BBC teams. The BBC is understood to be keen to ensure it represents all audiences and their concerns, suggesting the broadcaster may look to boost its coverage of issues such as immigration. Insiders said there was also a focus on making sure that all viewers, experiences and backgrounds are portrayed on screen in entertainment shows. The committee is expected to update on its progress in luring Reform voters at a future meeting. Minutes from the meeting, first reported by Byline Times, stated: 'The CEO, News and Current Affairs provided the Committee with a presentation on plans to address low-trust issues with Reform voters. 'The Committee discussed the presentation. Committee members recognised the importance of local BBC teams in the plan, given their closeness to audiences. 'Directors discussed how story selection and other types of output, such as drama, also had a role to play.' It comes amid concerns that an increasing number of Reform-voting viewers are switching off from the BBC. A recent YouGov poll found that Reform voters have significantly less trust in institutions than supporters of other parties. Just 13pc of Reform voters said they had a great deal or a fair amount of trust in the BBC, well below the average of 42pc. In contrast, 55pc of Reform supporters said they trusted GB News, which counts Nigel Farage as a presenter. Mr Farage has repeatedly attacked the BBC, describing it as 'institutionally biased' and 'out-of-touch'. In a manifesto last year, he vowed to scrap the licence fee should his party be elected. Despite this, he has been a regular contributor to the broadcaster. The Reform leader made his 38th appearance on Question Time at the end of last year, making him the show's most regular living guest. Only Charles Kennedy, the former Lib Dem leader, appeared on the programme more times. The shake-up comes at a turbulent time for Reform, which has seen its popularity surge in recent months and is now ahead of both the Labour and Conservative parties in polling. Over the weekend, Zia Yusuf announced he was returning as party chairman just two days after he quit in spectacular fashion. He insisted his decision to step down had been 'born of exhaustion'. The BBC has previously sought the view of audiences on what it should be covering. During last year's election it launched a feedback campaign dubbed 'Your Voice, Your Vote', which led to it covering stories such as electricity pylons and rural bus services. The discussions come as BBC bosses are locked in negotiations with ministers over the future of the licence fee funding model, which is up for debate ahead of the end of the current Charter period in 2027. A BBC spokesman said: 'Our Royal Charter requires us to reflect and represent all the communities of the UK, and our Editorial Guidelines require that we must take account of the different political parties with electoral support across the UK to achieve due impartiality.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Awami League Comments on UK Prime Minister's Potential Meeting With Unelected Bangladeshi Leader
Visit by Muhammad Yunus to be met with protests in London by displaced Bangladeshis and other Bangladeshi-origin demonstrators concerned by country's slide into authoritarianism "Chief Adviser's" visit to UK comes as Bangladesh's economy is downgraded, with violence reported to be on the rise DHAKA, Bangladesh, June 09, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Awami League has today expressed deep concern over UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's reportedly scheduled meeting this week with Muhammad Yunus, the self-declared Chief Adviser of Bangladesh - warning that any formal meeting lends legitimacy to an unelected and unconstitutional administration. A formal letter from the Awami League's UK branch has been sent to Downing Street, the Speaker of the House of Commons, the King's Foundation, and the Commonwealth Secretariat, urging British officials not to unwittingly launder Yunus's administration just as Bangladesh's crisis deepens. Yunus visits London this week. At a time when Bangladesh is experiencing economic decline, escalating political repression, and growing human rights abuses - particularly against women and girls - the UK Government's decision to engage with Mr Yunus threatens to send a damaging signal about the primacy of democracy and the rule of law. Upon arrival in the UK, Mr Yunus is expected to be greeted by demonstrators including Bangladeshis living in the UK who have been forced to flee since his accession to power ten months ago. Tensions have escalated due to the recent banning of the Awami League by the Yunus government, which represents a deeply alarming departure from democratic norms. The Awami League is one of Bangladesh's founding parties and is still supported by tens of millions of citizens and expatriates. Last week Yunus announced general elections in April 2026. Even if this promise is fulfilled, the Awami League's forced exclusion from political participation will render this election inherently undemocratic. Furthermore, freedom of the press in Bangladesh is under unprecedented attack. Journalists seen to support the Awami League have been arrested, and politically motivated charges have been brought against at least 140 others. Human Rights Watch has highlighted a disturbing practice by authorities of filing vague or mass criminal complaints, enabling the arbitrary arrest of thousands - mostly targeting Awami League supporters. In the wake of the student-led quota movement, the country has descended into violence and instability. In the three months following last summer's protests, over 2,000 attacks against Hindus and other minorities were recorded, and this figure has only risen. Women and girls are also being disproportionately affected: child rape cases rose significantly in early 2025, while a girls' football tournament was cancelled under pressure from Islamist factions. Civil unrest continues to grow. Most recently, public sector workers have taken to the streets to oppose unpopular reforms, adding to widespread discontent. The nation's once high-growth economy, credited with lifting millions out of poverty, has been downgraded by the IMF, which warned GDP growth had fallen from 5.1% to 3.3% "reflecting economic disruptions caused by the popular uprising, a tighter policy mix, and heightened uncertainty that weighed on investment." The IMF also warned Yunus he needed to improve his regime's governance and transparency and that his legal reforms "should align with international standards". MOHAMMAD ARAFAT, SPOKESMAN FOR AWAMI LEAGUE, SAID: "It is ironic and extraordinary that an unelected leader is visiting the home of modern parliamentary democracy and expecting a warm welcome. This visit risks inflaming tensions in both Bangladesh and the UK, home to a large Bangladeshi diaspora. By offering credibility to such a government, Sir Keir Starmer would compromise the UK's reputation as a defender of democratic values. We urge the UK Government and His Majesty the King to press Mr Yunus to commit to elections that are free and fair, rather than rigged against his critics. He must lift the ban on the Awami League, enable multi-party participation, and respect the democratic will of the Bangladeshi people." NOTES TO EDITORS Demonstrations protesting against the Interim Government will be held at various locations in London during Dr Yunus's visit. These include a demonstration outside Chatham House from 1030 to 1230 UK time on Wednesday June 11, and an all-day demonstration outside Parliament on Thursday June 12. The UK Awami League's full letter to Downing Street, the Speaker of the House of Commons, the Commonwealth Secretariat and the King's Fund: I am writing on behalf of the Awami League to express our concerns about the UK Government meeting with Muhammad Yunus, the self-proclaimed Chief Adviser of Bangladesh. The recent ban on the Awami League, by an unelected and unconstitutional government, marks a deeply troubling shift away from democratic norms and sets an alarming precedent for the future of Bangladeshi politics. The Awami League played a key role in the country's founding and tens of millions of Bangladeshi nationals and expatriates still align with the party's core beliefs. With the ban in place, it is impossible to have free, fair and truly democratic elections in Bangladesh. The ban comes amid rising attacks on Awami League members, targeted political persecution and a growing repression of media freedom. Human Rights Watch has reported a litany of unjustified arrests of Awami League officials and supporters, and of journalists seen as friendly with the previous regime. Within weeks of the fall of the previous government, five journalists were arrested on dubious and politically motivated charges of murder and crimes against humanity, while at least 140 others faced similar charges. Human Rights Watch equally notes a concerning tactic deployed by security forces of filing criminal complaints against a mass amount of "unknown" people to allow the police to arrest and detain "almost anyone". In the Yunus administrations' first 100 days in power, more than 1,000 police cases were filed against tens of thousands of people, mostly Awami League members. In many of these cases, complainants said they were not aware of whom they were accusing. Awami League ministers and cabinet members, including Dipu Moni, Saber Choudhury, Anisul Huq and Arif Khan, are among those who have been arrested and denied due process. These former officials have faced physical violence and have been paraded into courts with no hope of a fair trial. Lawyers defending Awami League members have also been the target of threats and violence. This mockery of jurisprudence has been overseen by an unelected government that seeks to marginalise its political opponents. Like the recent ban on the Awami League, it directly contradicts Dr Yunus's promises to foster democracy, pluralism and the rule of law in Bangladesh. In the months since the student-led quota movement, Bangladesh has also descended into a state of lawlessness. Ordinary Bangladeshis are witnessing daily acts of violence, persecution and destruction. In the first three months of this year alone, the Human Rights Society reported at least 47 deaths and 2,475 injuries in over 300 incidents of political violence. Police in Bangladesh's cities are recording an unprecedented spike in muggings and robberies as demoralised and under resourced law enforcement agencies cede control of the streets to criminal gangs. Much of this violence has been targeted at women and girls. Since August last year, crime against women has risen exponentially, while the response from the authorities has been minimal. Between January and March this year, UNICEF reported an alarming 50 cases of child rape – a trend it considers is only worsening. In February, a girls' football tournament was cancelled following pressure from one Islamist group, and just recently, a professor was transferred out of her post following protests from another Islamist pressure group. These are just some examples of the violence and public harassment Bangladeshi women have been subject to for failing to conform to Islamist perceptions of modesty or for simply existing in the public eye. There is a clear correlation between the culture of impunity around gendered violence and the Yunus administration's decision to allows Islamic extremists to take senior positions in government. To be clear, since its independence in 1971 Bangladesh has maintained a proud tradition of secularism in politics. The abandonment of that tradition threatens our civil society and our hard-won social progress. There has been extensive reporting about a rapprochement between the interim government and organisations with known terrorist links, including Jamaat-e-Islami, Chatra Shibir, Harakat ul-Jihad-iIslami/Bangladesh, ISIS-Bangladesh and Hizb ut-Tahrir – a group recognised by the UK Government as a terrorist organisation. Meanwhile the persecution of religious minorities is widely reported to have increased. In the three months following the summer's protests, more than 2,000 attacks against Hindus and other minorities were recorded, and this figure has only risen. Vandalism of Hindu places of worship and statues continues to this day. Leading Hindu monk Chinmoy Krishna Das was also arrested and denied due process. Discontent with the current regime is disrupting daily life and causing chaos in civic and commercial life. Public sector workers have become the most recent group to protest the interim government's proposed reforms, taking to the streets this past week. Bangladesh's high-growth economy – the nation's greatest achievement over the past 20 years, lifting millions out of poverty – is now in peril. Since the current administration took power, the country's economy has been downgraded by the IMF twice, as politically-motivated factory closures, skittish decision-making, cronyism and corruption chill the investment climate and destroy jobs. Livelihoods are at risk, as well as the country's civil and religious freedoms – and, of course, its status as a reliable trading and security partner for the UK. With Bangladesh's future genuinely in the balance, I urge you to raise these issues with Muhammad Yunus when you meet him. Please encourage the interim government to protect those suffering from persecution and oppression. Yours sincerely, Sultan Mahmud Shariff Syed Shazidur Rahman Faruk President General Secretary View source version on Contacts Media enquiries: info@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump travel ban takes effect Monday. What we know
President Donald Trump's new ban on travel to the U.S. by citizens from 12 mainly African and Middle Eastern countries took effect Monday. Dig deeper The Associated Press reported that President Donald Trump's travel ban, which was signed last week, applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. It also imposes heightened restrictions on people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela who are outside the U.S. and don't hold a valid visa. Separately, the travel ban does make exceptions for Afghans on Special Immigrant Visas, typically individuals who worked most closely with the U.S. government during the two-decade-long war there. RELATED: Trump announces travel ban on a dozen countries: Here's what to know This new ban does not cancel visas previously issued to individuals from countries on the list, the AP noted, citing guidance issued last week to all U.S. diplomatic missions. But unless an applicant meets a requirement for an exemption to the travel ban, his or her application will be rejected beginning Monday. Travelers with previously issued visas should still be able to enter the U.S. even after the ban takes effect. The AP reported that Trump also connected the new ban to a terrorist attack in Boulder, Colorado, claiming it reinforced the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas. U.S. officials told the AP that the man charged in the attack overstayed a tourist visa. He is from Egypt, a country that is not on Trump's restricted list. The backstory During his first term in office, President Donald Trump issued an executive order in January 2017 banning travel to the U.S. by citizens of seven predominantly Muslim countries — Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia, and Yemen. Travelers from those countries were either banned from getting on their flights to the U.S. or detained at U.S. airports after they landed. They included students and faculty as well as businesspeople, tourists and people visiting friends and family. The order, often referred to as the "Muslim ban" or the "travel ban," was revised amid legal challenges, until a version was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018. The ban impacted multiple categories of travelers and immigrants from Iran, Somalia, Yemen, Syria, and Libya, plus North Koreans and some Venezuelan government officials and their families. The Source Information for this story was provided by previous LIVENOW from FOX reporting and the Associated Press, which offers background on the Trump travel ban. This story was reported from Washington, D.C.