
Exploring the Untapped Power of Marine Current Turbines
Energy companies worldwide are pursuing innovative renewable energy solutions in support of a green transition as more and more governments are introducing strict decarbonisation policies and offering tax breaks and other financial incentives for developing green energy projects. One nascent technology that is gaining traction is underwater turbines, also known as tidal or marine current turbines, with new projects popping up in various countries.
Scientists have long been optimistic about the potential for underwater turbines to produce vast amounts of clean energy, however, to date, the technology has been little used, compared to conventional renewable energy operations such as wind and solar farms. The power of underwater currents is vast and untapped but harnessing it can be complicated.
Underwater turbines are designed to harness the kinetic energy produced by currents or tidal flows and convert it into electricity. The water passes through the turbine blades making them rotate, which drives a generator to produce electricity throughout the day and night. They work similarly to traditional wind turbines, only underwater. There are two main types of tidal turbines, tidal stream systems that require a fast flow of water and tidal range systems, which capture the potential energy difference between high and low tides.
In 2022, the U.S. Department of Energy (DoE) announced plans to explore the potential of underwater turbines, aiming to make them more efficient and cost-effective. The DoE highlighted the lack of understanding about how the technology would interact with the underwater environment. Further, the high cost of hydrokinetic turbines had long deterred developers from rolling out the technology at the commercial level.
The DoE's Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) previously provided funding for 11 projects with $38 million in grants in 2020, to develop cost-effective underwater turbine technologies. The technology was known as Submarine Hydrokinetic and Riverine Kilo-megawatt Systems – or SHARKS. The projects were targeted at producing marine technologies capable of generating electricity at an end cost of under $0.05 per kilowatt-hour, which was around one-sixth of the cost of existing underwater turbines.
The SHARKS projects developed two types of underwater turbines – Tidal Power Tug and Manta. The Tidal Power Tug, created by Aquantis, is a second-generation floating tidal energy converter. It was deemed ideal for gulf stream currents along the U.S. East Coast, which create multiple circular flows called gyres. Manta was developed by the California-based SRI International Research Institute. It used a lightweight foam and fibreglass kite with a small generator moored to the seabed. It is equipped with a motor to redirect and deflate the machine to avoid a collision with ships and storms. It is better suited for powering small and isolated communities.
Over the last five years, there has been a larger rollout of underwater turbines in several locations around the globe. In January, U.K.-based tidal energy company Proteus Marine Renewables (PMR) launched a tidal turbine project in the Naru Strait, Japan, which made it 'the first to operate such devices in two countries', according to the company. PMR's AR1100 turbine is expected to produce 1.1 MW of power, helping to decarbonise the electricity supply on the Goto Islands.
Philip Archer, the Managing Director of PMR Operations Japan, stated, 'Deploying the AR1100 in Japan is a testament to the dedication and expertise of our team working in collaboration with local professionals.' Archer added, 'The result reinforces tidal energy's potential as a dependable renewable source in Japan. Our next immediate focus is the commissioning of the turbine, Japan's first-ever MW-scale grid-connected tidal system, and the subsequent testing and accreditation phase.'
In March, Normandie Hydroliennes (NH) began developing a commercial-scale tidal energy pilot project called NH1, off the coast of Normandy, which is expected to supply thousands of households with clean electricity if successful. The project will use four turbines to turn the Raz Blanchard tidal flow, the strongest tidal stream in Europe. The company was awarded funding from the EU's Innovation Fund, which provides financing for research and development into innovative clean technologies. The company hopes to begin producing clean electricity from the project starting in 2028.
There is significant potential to develop more projects within the Raz Blanchard tidal flow, and NH1 may be the first of many. The Channel Sea current is one of the world's most powerful, with a development potential of around 5 GW to 6 GW, meaning it could produce between 15 and 18 terawatt hours and supply electricity to 8 million people, according to NH. Katia Gautier, the director of the company, stated, 'Being selected by the Innovation Fund is a major recognition of our work and the impact that our technological system, the innovative Proteus AR3000 horizontal axis turbine, can have on decarbonisation and the energy mix.'
While underwater tidal turbine technology is in its infancy, the influx of investment seen in the industry in recent years has given hope to many energy companies looking to roll out the technology on a commercial scale. If various pilot projects show promise, it could encourage greater investment in the sector, which could lead to a widescale deployment of the turbines in tidal streams worldwide, to produce vast amounts of clean electricity.
By Felicity Bradstock for Oilprice.com
More Top Reads From Oilprice.comRead this article on OilPrice.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
30 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Manhattan Renters Already Paying Record Prices Face More Hikes
Manhattan apartment rents reached yet another all-time high last month and are expected to keep rising as the market's most competitive season collides with the city's new broker-fee law. The median rent on new leases signed in May was $4,571, according to appraiser Miller Samuel Inc. and brokerage Douglas Elliman. It was the third record price reached in the past four months and exceeded the previous peak by $71.


Digital Trends
30 minutes ago
- Digital Trends
SpaceX Starlink rivalry grows as next Kuiper deployment nears
Amazon is about to send another batch of Project Kuiper internet satellites to orbit as it seeks to take on SpaceX's Starlink service to provide broadband internet to customers around the world. The tech giant has a long way to go before it has any hope of effectively challenging Starlink, but with its second launch set for next week, progress is being made toward its goal. Recommended Videos Project Kuiper is currently targeting Monday, June 16, for the launch of 27 internet satellites aboard a United Launch Alliance (ULA) Atlas V rocket from Cape Canaveral in Florida. The KA-02 mission comes seven weeks after the first Project Kuiper launch, which also deployed 27 internet satellites. Commenting after the inaugural launch, Rajeev Badyal, vice president of Project Kuiper, said: 'We've designed some of the most advanced communications satellites ever built, and every launch is an opportunity to add more capacity and coverage to our network.' SpaceX began deploying its Starlink internet satellites six years ago and now has more than 7,000 of them in low-Earth orbit, bringing broadband connectivity to more than 5 million customers globally. Project Kuiper says its initial constellation will be made up of more than 3,200 satellites, with more than 80 missions needed to reach that goal. To that end, Amazon has put together a busy launch schedule, with six additional satellite deployments planned for ULA's Atlas V rocket, at least 38 on ULA's Vulcan Centaur rocket, and dozens more with Arianespace and Blue Origin. SpaceX's workhorse Falcon 9 rocket may even help out. Amazon is targeting as early as the end of this year for the launch of a high-speed, low-latency satellite-powered internet service, with as few as 1,000 satellites needed for global coverage. Building out the constellation to the targeted 3,200 satellites will help to boost network performance and reliability for paying customers.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
House Republicans draft competing budget as Senate nears deal with Hobbs
Photo by Jerod MacDonald-Evoy | Arizona Mirror Arizona lawmakers are at odds again, but this time it's the Republicans in the House of Representatives and Senate who can't agree on how to forge the state budget. Creating the state budget — deciding how much to allocate to departments, projects and initiatives or whether to fund them at all — is the most important job that legislators do each year, and the only thing they are constitutionally required to complete. Before the group of bills that will become the state budget becomes law, it must be approved by a majority in both the Arizona Senate and House — which are both controlled by Republicans — and garner a signature from Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs. In recent history, budget negotiations in Arizona have occurred behind closed doors among the governor and legislative leaders in the House and Senate. But this year is different, with Hobbs and Republican leaders in the Senate nearing a deal after weeks of negotiations. GOP leaders in the House, who haven't been involved in those talks, have responded by drafting their own budget, which was introduced late Wednesday afternoon. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX 'This is a sound, disciplined budget that delivers safe communities, strong families, and a government that lives within its means,' House Speaker Steve Montenegro said in a Wednesday evening statement. 'We're raising pay for our state law enforcement officers, reducing tuition at public universities, fully funding school choice, fixing critical infrastructure and roads, and protecting taxpayers. Our budget reins in government and puts it back to work for the people it serves.' But the spending package, which is chock-full of proposals that are unlikely to pass muster with Hobbs, will never become law. Instead, it is better viewed as a way for House Republicans to lay down a marker in order to force Hobbs and the Senate to move closer to the House's proposal. Republican political consultant Barrett Marson said House GOP leaders are hoping to demonstrate that the chamber can pass a spending plan in order to get leverage in the negotiations. 'Sometimes there's just gotta be movement to unstick a sticky situation,' he said. 'The House has an equal voice. And unlike previous years when one or both chambers had a go-it-alone ethos, the House isn't looking to be draconian or anything. They want something more responsible.' Marson said a major point of contention between the House and Senate is what to do with the budget surplus. While the Senate and Hobbs have settled on copying the novel process from 2023, in which each lawmaker was given a pot of money from the surplus that was used to fund whatever initiatives they wanted, the House wants to negotiate all of those details and not surrender control of that money to individual legislators. During a House Rules Committee meeting earlier Wednesday afternoon, House Minority Leader Oscar De Los Santos, of Laveen, said he was disappointed in the way the budgeting process was happening this year. 'We should not be moving forward with a House Republican-only budget that is destined to fail,' he said. 'This will not get signed by the governor. I don't even think it's going to pass out of the Senate.' De Los Santos even questioned whether the proposal would get enough votes to pass through the House, where Republicans hold 33 of the chamber's 60 seats. 'What we do know is that this is not a negotiated, bipartisan deal in good faith,' he said. 'House Democrats are at the table negotiating in a bipartisan way with the executive, with our (Senate) counterparts across the courtyard. That is the way to get things done in shared government.' But Republican Rep. Neal Carter, of San Tan Valley, replied that the work of governing should be done transparently, instead of in private — and that it should allow for input from the public. 'As a Republican, I stand for full transparency and not for back-room deals or negotiated budgets with parties that are somehow outside of this public process,' Carter said. The House Republican budget, introduced by House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Livingston, proposes significant changes in how federal money allocated to the state, but not restricted to specific uses, is controlled. The billions in unrestricted federal funds, currently controlled by the governor, would shift to legislative control and could only be spent on essential government services. The House GOP's budget proposal would also place new restrictions and monitoring requirements on entitlement programs, like the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System — the state's Medicaid program — and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, formerly called food stamps. Both programs would be monitored on at least a quarterly basis for participants who don't qualify, to be kicked off. And any participants who win $3,000 or more through gambling or playing the state lottery and don't report those winnings would become ineligible. It would also give the Arizona Department of Economic Security the authority to screen recipients of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families for illegal drug use and would ban anyone who tests positive for drugs not prescribed to them from the cash assistance program for a year. House Republicans also intend to increase the percentage of money spent in K-12 classrooms, as opposed to on administration; to decrease tuition for students attending the state's three public universities; and to ban those universities from using public or private money to give scholarships to students without legal immigration status. Hobbs introduced her budget proposal, which includes a much different list of priorities, back in January. Shortly after that, Livingston and Rep. Matt Gress, R-Phoenix, panned her proposal for leaving out projected cost increases for programs like AHCCCS. Hobbs spokesman Christian Slater told the Arizona Mirror on Wednesday that Livingston and Gress were to blame for the House's lack of collaboration on the budget. 'This is DDD all over again,' Slater said via email, referring to a fight earlier this year over funding for the Department of Developmental Disabilities. 'It's another circus led by the Speaker, David Livingston, and Matt Gress where they have refused to participate with any caucuses, including their Republican counterparts in the Senate, in a meaningful manner and are once again just trying to score some political points even though they know their plan is going absolutely nowhere.' Livingston and Gress, a former budget director for Republican Gov. Doug Ducey, were both key players in the fight over an extra $122 million in emergency funding for DDD that put vital services for the developmentally disabled in jeopardy. 'Rather than being productive, the House Republican leadership continues to show they are in over their head and unserious about governing,' Slater said. The House Appropriations Committee is set to discuss the proposal Thursday morning. The Senate Republicans have not introduced their budget proposal. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE