Driving in these popular shoes this summer could result in a £5K fine
Motorists are being warned to be cautious when driving in certain footwear.
With summer fast approaching and temperatures continuing to soar, many people are opting for easy footwear that is comfortable to wear in the heat, so it's no surprise that Crocs are the must-have summer shoe for 2025.
Demand for the popular footwear has skyrocketed in recent years, with 1.3 million Google searches for Crocs in the past month alone. However, experts are now warning that wearing Crocs when driving is not as convenient as many motorists may believe.
Being caught wearing the clogs when behind the wheel could actually cost drivers £5000.
Rule 97 of the Highway Code states that drivers must have 'footwear and clothing which does not prevent you from using the controls in the correct manner'.
Whilst it's not illegal to drive in Crocs and sandals, drivers should err on the side of caution as if an accident occurs, the police can issue a fine of up to £5,000 if they find your footwear to be inappropriate.
On top of that, drivers can be issued nine points on their license, which can lead to higher insurance prices and further consequences if caught by the police again in the future.
Shoes that are not securely fastened to your feet may also be at risk of slipping, which could cause severe safety problems when reaching for the pedals.
Keith Hawes, Director of Nationwide Vehicle Contracts, said: 'While it is not illegal to drive shoeless or in improper footwear, drivers should hold off on wearing footwear that doesn't allow them to operate their car properly.
'Anyone who is driving has the responsibility to operate their car and pedals correctly.
"So even with the warm weather, it may seem easy to slip on your Crocs and other sandals, however, this can have a large impact on your ability to drive and safely operate your car.
'Drivers should consider having an extra pair of shoes in their car, but they should make sure they are not too wide or too thick to avoid pressing two pedals at once.
Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community!
Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today.
You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland.
No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team.
All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in!
If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'.
We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like.
To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.
If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
"Ultimately, an extra pair of shoes will mean drivers can avoid fines and prioritise safety on the roads by ensuring they have the correct footwear for their vehicle."
High heels can also significantly reduce your ability to operate pedals when driving.
"Again, if your footwear affects your control of the vehicle, motorists could be hit with a £100 fine and three points on your licence.
The same applies for flip flops and backless sandals.
John Wilmot, CEO and founder of car leasing deals site LeaseLoco.com said: 'It's easy to overlook how your choice of clothing or footwear can affect your driving, especially in hot weather, but even something as simple as a pair of flip-flops or a long skirt can reduce your control of a vehicle.
'If this leads to an accident or you're stopped by police, you could face serious consequences.
'So we're urging all drivers to think practically before getting behind the wheel this spring and summer - your outfit shouldn't compromise your safety or anyone else's.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
43 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Highway Code: Drivers face £2,500 fine for wearing sunglasses
Summer has finally arrived, and the roads are bound to be getting busier as more of us load up the cars for daytrips and holidays over the next few months. Motoring experts have warned that while they sun may be a great excuse to get out for the day, it could also lead to many falling foul of fines worth up to £2,500. That is the case if you reach for the sunglasses while driving this summer, as experts warn doing so while driving at night could be breaking the law, with drivers risking three points on their licence and a hefty fine. Julie Daniels from the car insurance team at Compare the Market said: 'For drivers, maintaining good eyesight is an essential part of following the Highway Code and ensuring safety on the road. 'The recommended frequency for eye tests is once every two years, though more might be necessary if advised by a medical professional. 'Keep clear vision by wearing your glasses or contacts if needed while driving and consider keeping a spare pair of these in your car for emergencies. 'Maintaining your vision is the key when taking to the roads as this is an essential tool for the safety of you and other road users.' With this in mind, these are some of the potential driving penalties caused by impaired vision to help people avoid a hefty fine — and even prison time. Failing to have a full view of the road ahead can leave drivers with a fine of £1,000 to £2,500. It's crucial for those who need glasses to wear them while driving to ensure safety. Drivers need to be mindful of items of clothing, including sunglasses, to operate the car safely. Wearing sunglasses outside of daylight hours can limit the view of the road, leading to fines ranging from £1,000 to £2,500 and possible driving disqualification. Road users are warned to keep prescriptions and eye health up to date to avoid potential prison time for dangerous driving. Neglecting eye health or prescriptions could lead to up to two years in prison if road users are unfortunate enough to be involved in an accident.
NBC News
a day ago
- NBC News
Why Waymo cars became sitting ducks during the LA protests
Engineers working on self-driving technology have given a lot of thought to difficult questions over the years, including how to keep pedestrians safe and how to avoid collisions with other vehicles. But last weekend's protests in Los Angeles threw a spotlight on one of the thorny problems that remain for autonomous vehicles: what to do about arson, vandalism or other physical attacks. Five vehicles owned by Google's self-driving spinoff Waymo were set ablaze last Sunday during protests against the Trump administration's immigration policies. Images and video of the flaming cars quickly went viral, illustrating for a global audience how vulnerable robotaxis can be in volatile situations. For all their advanced technology, including expensive cameras and sensors, the cars seemed to be defenseless. Waymo says the five cars were in downtown Los Angeles to serve passengers when they were attacked. There were no drivers to plead for mercy, and with crowds surrounding the vehicles, there was no escape path that didn't include threatening pedestrians — something Waymo vehicles are programmed not to do. 'They're very much sitting ducks,' said Jeff Fong, who has worked at tech companies including Lyft and Postmates and now writes a newsletter about cities and technology. And it wasn't the first time Waymo was a victim of arson. Last year, a Waymo in San Francisco's Chinatown was set on fire during Lunar New Year celebrations. Police later charged a juvenile with starting the blaze, saying they had thrown a lit firework into the vehicle. Waymos have been vandalized in other ways, too, including having their tires slashed, their windshields smashed, their doors torn off and their exteriors defaced with spray-paint. Local prosecutors have charged individuals in at least some cases. Part of what makes robotaxis vulnerable is their caution. While it's impossible to know if a human driver behind the steering wheel could have deterred or escaped vandalism in any specific case involving a robotaxi, driverless vehicles are generally designed to stay put if there's any risk that they'd hit a person while moving. 'There's been so much effort into making sure they can't hurt human beings,' Fong said. 'That's the problem Waymo has been solving for, rightfully so, but when you have the problem where a human wants to do harm, these cars have no countermeasures.' Autonomous technology companies, including Waymo, appear to be largely at a loss for ideas on how to deter vandalism over the long term. Their cameras may be a partial deterrent — Waymo says each of its cars has 29 cameras — and the company has cooperated with police to help find vandalism suspects after the fact. But Waymo's collection of street data through its cameras and sensors is also one of the sources of anger against the company and other startups like it. Some Uber and Lyft drivers have said that vandalism incidents bolster the importance of human drivers as a deterrent. A spokesperson for Waymo said that in response to the protests in Los Angeles and elsewhere, it was temporarily adjusting its service area. Waymo declined to make anyone available for an interview about the problems of arson and vandalism and how the company plans to deal with such incidents in the long term. The vandalism problem is mostly limited for now to Waymo, which is the biggest self-driving car company. It has about 1,500 vehicles operating in four regions, with additional cities scheduled to come online this year. But the market is set to become more competitive soon, with Tesla saying it plans to launch a robotaxi service this month in Austin, Texas, and Amazon-backed Zoox planning a service in Las Vegas and San Francisco. Representatives for Tesla and Zoox did not respond to requests for comment about how they plan to avoid incidents like last Sunday's attack on Waymo vehicles. The problem has been gnawing at robotaxi fans on message boards on Reddit. In one thread in January, users tossed around ideas like having dedicated security on motorcycles nearby or equipping Waymo vehicles with pepper spray. Adam Millard-Ball, director of the UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies, said that robotaxis are a symbolic target for some street demonstrators. 'They're attacked not because they're autonomous cars but because they're a symbol of inequality in cities and a symbol of the power of large technology companies,' he said. He noted that electric scooters are also sometimes targets. He also said it's hard to imagine what the companies, police or city officials could do to eliminate the threat entirely. 'I don't think any country in the world has eliminated vandalism in public spaces,' he said. The incidents are problematic for Waymo on multiple levels: not only the cost of repairing or replacing the vehicles, but also the reputational risk when images and videos spread widely online. There's also the possible danger to passengers. And although no passengers were harmed in either arson incident, some passengers have been delayed or reported feeling threatened when the cars they were riding in were vandalized from the outside. Last year, a San Francisco woman posted a video online after she said two men targeted her while riding in a Waymo. Then there's the lost business from what Waymo calls 'temporary service adjustments.' In Los Angeles and San Francisco this past week, Waymo stopped serving certain areas that are part of its normal service area. People using the company's app in recent days were greeted with a message, alluding to the street protests: 'Pickup times and routing may be affected by local events. Thank you for your patience.' In San Francisco, that meant Waymo refused to take customers through or to several neighborhoods, including parts of the Financial District, the Civic Center area near City Hall and the sprawling South of Market neighborhood. Waymo also limited service to the Mission District, a historically working-class and Latino neighborhood that's also home now to many tech workers and a vibrant nightlife scene. Thousands of people attended an anti-Trump protest in the Mission on Monday night, and the effects on Waymo reverberated for days: A post on X with an example of rerouting around the Mission went viral Wednesday, getting 1.2 million views. Searches of the Waymo app by NBC News showed the service continuing to refuse service to parts of the Mission throughout the week, including during relatively quiet morning hours and on Friday. The app labeled certain destinations as 'unreachable.' A Waymo spokesperson said: 'We're taking these heightened measures now out of an abundance of caution.' They said the situation was temporary and subject to change quickly in response to conditions on the ground. Waymo hasn't published a map of which areas are restricted. Mass anti-Trump protests advocating for 'No Kings' are scheduled for Saturday nationwide, providing another potential disruption for robotaxis. Though the service restrictions may be temporary, they struck some people as discriminatory against poorer neighborhoods, with some social media users on X calling the practice ' redlining ' on the part of Waymo. The term refers to the decades-long practice of refusing home loans to predominantly Black neighborhoods. In contrast, ride-hailing services Uber and Lyft, which use human drivers, still offered rides to the Mission in recent days, according to NBC News searches of their apps. San Francisco's Municipal Transportation Agency rerouted some buses during the height of anti-Trump administration protests but then resumed regular service. There have been no arrests for the attacks on Waymo vehicles in Los Angeles last Sunday. On Friday, the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) said it was taking the lead in investigating the Waymo attacks, making them the subject of a federal investigation. 'The cause of these fires is quite obvious,' ATF Special Agent in Charge Kenneth Cooper of the Los Angeles Field Division said in a statement. 'The task at hand now is to determine who is responsible. ATF's National Response Team is going to be a tremendous asset, and we look forward to the results of their efforts to hold the responsible parties accountable,' he said.
Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Daily Mirror
'I'm a used car salesman - there are three popular brands I would never buy'
While he acknowledges there are good examples of every car brand, the experienced motor trader warns against 'falling for a badge or bargain' because you could 'end up with a money pit' A veteran car dealer has revealed a trio of popular car brands he would never purchase second-hand - even if they're priced well. After almost two decades in the motor trade, Tom Kershaw is well versed in which models are most likely to leave their owners out of pocket - and which you can rely on. The salesman, from Bristol, warns even models from manufacturers that appear to be in good condition can quickly deteriorate into a costly nightmare to run. After conferring with experts from Number 1 Plates and drawing on average annual repair costs from Nationwide Vehicle Contracts, as well as his 18 years car-selling experience, the expert has identified which brands to avoid and explained his reasoning behind each one. "Some cars are beautifully made — until they start going wrong," the pro said. "And once they do, they don't stop. When you work in the business, you quickly learn which badges to walk away from." 3. Fiat Fiats, particularly the Fiat 500, are often seen as budget-friendly city cars, but Tom warns that their long-term ownership costs can be deceptively high. With an average annual repair bill of £413.21, common problems include electrical failures, clutch wear and suspension issues — especially on entry-level models. Tom's advice is to avoid any Fiat lacking a comprehensive maintenance record or showing large gaps between services. He added: "The Fiat 500 is everywhere, but they're often on their third clutch before they hit 70,000 miles. It's rarely worth the hassle. A Fiat without proof of regular maintenance? Walk away." 2. BMW BMW is another popular brand that Tom recommends approaching with caution. Although BMWs are celebrated for their driving experience, their maintenance costs can surprise unsuspecting buyers. With an average annual repair cost of £539.63, Beemers can become expensive to own once the manufacturer's warranty expires, especially diesel models with mileages between 70,000 and 100,000, with repairs 'easily exceeding' £1,000 if not addressed promptly. Tom stresses the importance of reviewing the car's full maintenance history, seeking invoices for significant work rather than just service stamps, and steering clear of vehicles with recurring MOT advisories. "BMWs are fantastic to drive, but once the warranty's gone, expect bills. Timing chains, EGR valves, DPF blockages — they all come knocking," he warned. 1. Land Rover Land Rover tops Tom's list of vehicle brands to avoid when buying used. With an average annual repair bill of £550.48, Land Rovers are among the most expensive vehicles to maintain. Tom has found that while these vehicles are visually appealing and feel high-end, their reliability can be found to be lacking. He frequently encountered repeat issues with certain models, including air suspension failures, electrical problems, oil leaks and gearbox problems, which he warned could often appear well before the vehicle reached 100,000 miles. Tom advises that buyers should only consider a used Land Rover if it comes with a complete dealer service history and documentation of major repairs. He concluded: "They look great and feel premium, but the reliability isn't there. I've had customers bring back Discoverys and Freelanders with the same issues again and again." Top tips for used car buyers Check the number plates for signs of multiple changes or Irish imports, which may indicate a history at auction or a previous write-off. Always request a full service history, including invoices for major repairs such as timing belts, brakes, and suspension. Use the MOT checker to spot repeat advisories, which can signal underlying issues. Trust your instincts — if something feels wrong, it likely is. Reliable vehicles rarely require a hard sell. So while Tom acknowledges there are good examples of every car brand, he he stands by his warnings: "People fall for a badge or a bargain. But if you end up with a money pit, it's no deal at all. Buy smart, not shiny." His final piece of advice: "Stick to brands with a reputation for reliability, and don't be afraid to walk away if the history doesn't stack up."
