Prince Harry condemns Sentebale charity boss for acting in the 'poorest taste' by referencing Princess Diana after she won control of duke's 'life's work' that royal fears will 'go down in flames'
The Duke of Sussex is said to have been left 'devastated' by the boardroom battle that saw him leave the organisation after 19 years, which he fears will now go 'down in flames'.
Harry, who co-founded Sentebale in 2006, is said to consider it a 'hostile takeover' of the charity by chairwoman Dr Sophie Chandauka who he claims has destroyed his 'life's work'.
'She's allowing it to go down in flames because of her own pride and hubris… he has for the last 19 years established this charity from nothing', a source close to Harry claimed.
A dispute earlier this year prompted Harry to step down as patron in support of trustees who resigned in opposition to Dr Chandauka, who then accused him of 'harassment and bullying at scale' - a claim that is vehemently denied.
On Tuesday, the Charity Commission published a report criticising all sides for making the fallout public with interviews and statements, but the war of words continues.
Dr Chandauka then vowed to honour the founding mission of Sentebale in memory of the Duke's late mother after the watchdog ruled she could stay in her position.
But sources close to Harry, who co-founded Sentebale in 2006, have criticised the chair, saying her 'hostile takeover' of the charity had destroyed his 'life's work'.
The Charity Commission yesterday revealed it had found 'no evidence of widespread or systematic bullying or harassment including misogyny or misogynoir' following a bitter boardroom battle at Sentebale.
Neither side was satisfied with the final adjudication, which criticised all parties involved, and, although the regulator urged all to be 'mindful to channel their belief in the charity's mission in a constructive and collaborative way', there seems little hope of the row going away.
Dr Chandauka said: 'Despite the recent turbulence, we will always be inspired by the vision of our founders, Prince Harry and Prince Seeiso, who established Sentebale in memory of their precious mothers, Princess Diana and Queen Mamohato.'
But a source close to Harry said in response: 'For Sophie Chandauka to have invoked Princess Diana's memory in her own defence was in the poorest possible taste.
'She's got what she wants, which is control of the charity, but unfortunately the people who suffer most out of all of this… are the children of Lesotho and Botswana.'
Speaking to the Telegraph, the source added: 'The most devastating thing for Prince Harry in all of this is that his life's work and all the money he was able to pump into Lesotho and Botswana through his work has gone down in flames.'
Sentebale meanwhile has appeared to suggest allegations made by Dr Chandauka of bullying, harassment and misogyny at the charity - which the commission found no evidence of - may be pursued against individuals through 'avenues more appropriate'.
Another source said: 'This has been emotionally absolutely devastating for Prince Harry and (Sentebale co-founder) Prince Seeiso (of Lesotho). What's been perpetrated over the last few months is nothing short of a hostile takeover.'
Seeiso also stepped down as patron of the charity which works in Botswana and Lesotho supporting the health and wellbeing of young people, especially those with HIV and Aids.
The source added: 'You have to remember Prince Seeiso and Prince Harry started this charity nearly two decades ago to honour the work and continue the legacy of their mothers Queen Mamohato and Princess Diana, and the work that they had done in southern Africa to support those living with HIV and Aids.
'In the 19 years that they have worked with this charity, and a lot of the former board of trustee members, they have raised tens of millions of pounds and distributed tens of millions of pounds.'
The commission criticised all parties in the dispute for allowing it to play out publicly and described how all trustees contributed to a 'missed opportunity' to resolve the issues that led to the serious disagreement which risked undermining public trust in charities generally.
The regulator, which cannot investigate individual allegations of bullying, found no evidence of systemic bullying or harassment, including misogyny or misogynoir at the charity but acknowledged 'the strong perception of ill treatment' felt by some involved.
After conducting its regulatory compliance case the commission issued a Regulatory Action Plan with Sentebale saying it had complied with the steps, from implementing an internal dispute policy to improving the charity's complaints and whistle-blowing procedures.
The trustees who resigned said in a statement they were 'gravely concerned for the future of the charity' adding they were 'disheartened' by the way the regulator had 'chosen to ignore key concerns and irrefutable evidence raised with them regarding the leadership and oversight of Sentebale's chair'.
Sentebale said in statement: 'The Charity Commission is explicitly clear, including in its public guidance, that it is not the commission's responsibility to adjudicate or mediate internal disputes. This would include individual allegations of bullying, harassment, misogyny, misogynoir etc.
'As a result, the commission has not investigated any individual allegations and therefore has not made any findings in relation to individuals, including Prince Harry.
'The issues not investigated by the commission can and may be dealt with through avenues more appropriate than the commission.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Barking up the wrong trees: RHS visitors left howling over trial that lets in dogs to garden
Royal Horticultural Society chiefs have been hounded by members – over opening its gardens to dogs for the first time. Visitors of RHS Rosemoor in Torrington, Devon, are now able to walk their pet on short leads three days a week. But at the annual general meeting held at Rosemoor, top brass were dogged by complaints about the trial being a stepping stone to introducing the same policy across other RHS gardens. Members' misgivings included accounts of children being licked by dogs and wildlife such as dormice being killed. An outraged member said: 'I am not against people having dogs but... we have a lot of vulnerable people and children who come here.' She added that providing bags and scoopers for dog poo would 'change the atmosphere'. Another member said: 'I have unfortunately come across dead dormice where I have actually seen the dog ahead of me kill it. 'We are guardians of these grounds and every plant, animal, insect and that's why I am concerned about these dog days.' One member has also threatened to cancel her membership if dog days are made permanent at the end of the trial. RHS president Keith Weed told the AGM the trial would be closely monitored until September before any decision is made. He said: 'The great thing about a trial is to learn from it. We had this debate at the last AGM and it was a bit noisier from those in favour of dogs.' Dogs are not currently allowed in most RHS gardens, except for at planned 'walkie' events. Under the trial at Rosemoor, dogs under the control of owners on a short lead are permitted on Mondays, Tuesdays and Wednesdays in specific areas. But there is a strict 'paws on paths' policy and restricted zones such as the children's play area and the vegetable gardens. The six-month trial comes after the RHS commissioned Monty Don to create a dog-friendly garden for the Chelsea Flower Show – the first time the BBC Gardeners' World presenter had designed a space at the event. Don took his beloved golden retriever Ned to try out his garden's features for dogs, including a lawn, water to wallow in and trees to cast shade. It also followed a National Trust plan to install 'wee poles' to prevent dogs from urinating on trees and historic buildings at some sites. High amounts of dog urine can increase the acidity of the soil and affect plants and the surrounding environment, the Trust said.
The Sun
29 minutes ago
- The Sun
Sex I had with my brother haunts me and I'm so worried history will repeat itself I can't leave my own kids together
DEAR DEIDRE: THE inappropriately close relationship I had with my brother is now ruining my experience of motherhood. I'm so scared that history will repeat itself that I can't leave my young children alone together, and I panic when they touch each other. When I was 17 and my brother was 18, we had a secret relationship — which I instigated. What started as naive, teenage experimentation turned into an incestuously sexual relationship, which lasted until I left home. I've never told a soul about it, and neither has he. It wasn't abusive but we are both aware it was socially unacceptable and against the law, and feel ashamed of what happened. I can't explain it, except to say that we were brought up in a strictly religious household where sex was considered to be a sin. Neither of us was allowed to date or go out to parties and the like. We were also exceptionally close, perhaps because we were so near to each other in age, without many friends. I'm now 39 and married with two young children — a boy and a girl who are six and four. He's still single. We're still in touch but we don't talk about the past. I didn't dwell on it until my daughter became a toddler, and began to interact with her brother. Spotting the signs your partner is cheating Suddenly, I felt terrified of what might occur if I didn't prevent it. I started keeping my kids apart, making them play alone in their rooms. If I see them play-fighting, I pull them apart. My husband is starting to notice. I know this isn't normal, and I worry it's harming their development. Please help. All I want is for my children to have a happy, ordinary childhood. DEIDRE SAYS: You're brave to admit what happened and to ask for help. You're not a bad person. Clearly you love your children and don't want to damage them. But, as you're aware, it's important they are allowed to interact normally. What occurred between you and your brother was unusual – though not unheard of – and it's very unlikely history will repeat itself, especially if your children aren't brought up in the strictly religious way you were. It sounds like you may be more traumatised by what happened – and more guilty about it – than you'd allowed yourself to believe. Speaking about this to people who understand and won't judge will help you. You can talk in confidence to (0808 800 5000). You would also benefit from counselling. Read my support pack, How Counselling Can Help. PAL HAS CROSSED THE LINE DEAR DEIDRE: MY boyfriend never liked how close I was to my male mate, but I told him it was platonic. Now I'm worried his fear was well-founded, after my friend crossed a line. I'm 29, my partner is 30 and we've been together two years. My pal and I have known each other since uni. We'd meet for drinks or text about music and life – nothing flirty. My boyfriend didn't love it but I told him there he had nothing to fear. Yet a few nights ago, when my friend walked me home after a gig, without warning he grabbed me and kissed me on the mouth. I pushed him away and told him he was out of order. He just shrugged and said he 'had to try'. I told my boyfriend immediately – but instead of supporting me, he called me a cheat and stormed out. I'm upset at how they've both behaved. How can I get life back on track? You can contact (0808 168 9111), who can offer free, confidential help. You did the right thing by being honest with your boyfriend, but his reaction isn't fair or helpful. Jealousy can be painful, but it shouldn't lead to unfair accusations. Consider having a calm conversation when he's ready, explaining how his response to this situation has made you feel. PORN AND BISEXUAL CONFUSION DEAR DEIDRE: MY addiction to inter-racial porn is stopping me from developing relationships. I think I need help but I don't know what sort. I am a 25-year-old man. I have dated women but I have never had a sex life. The first few times I attempted sex were a complete failure and an embarrassment so I stopped trying. I then discovered porn and I find it suits me best to watch it. I am a white guy but I especially like watching white women with black men. It literally makes me stop in my tracks if I am out in the street and I see a white woman and a black man together. I know full well that my addiction is preventing me from developing relationships. I am worried that I might be bisexual too, as I can be turned on by both men and women. I am so confused. DEIDRE SAYS: Online porn is designed to be addictive and it is brave of you to admit to having a problem. My support packs Internet Pornography Worry? and Addicted To Sex have lots of information about this and on where you can turn for help. The best way to try to understand more about your sexuality is to talk through your feelings with someone who understands. Contact (0300 330 0630) for confidential advice and my support pack, Bisexual Questions, will help you, too. WIFE'S DOGS ARE RUINING MY LIFE DEAR DEIDRE: MY wife has just bought another dog after we had to have two rehomed a year ago because the neighbours complained about the noise they made. They wouldn't stop barking if we left them on their own and were still pretty noisy even when one of us was there. I am 44 and my wife is 39. We have been together for ten years. We both work full time and are often out in the evening, so the dogs were left alone for quite long periods on our work days. One of our neighbours became very aggressive when he complained about the noise. He swore at me and my wife and threatened us. It was a very stressful time and in the end it really got to me – the constant barking of the dogs, the rows I was having with my wife about it and then this neighbour having a go at me every time I went outside. One day I ended up in a fight with this guy when he saw me in the nearby pub – all because of the dogs. The police were called to break it up. After that, the only option I could see was that the dogs had to be rehomed. My wife was very much against it and still resents me for making it happen. I thought that was the end of it, but she has now spent money which we can't afford on a puppy. She didn't even ask my opinion. I arrived home one evening to find the dog in our kitchen. Worse still, even though it cries all night she is talking about getting another one. I wish she could see what it's doing to me. DEIDRE SAYS: She is disregarding your feelings. You need to talk to her and explain how hurtful her behaviour is. Things can be different this time but your wife needs to understand the puppy needs proper training. You can talk to the vet for advice on classes. Your puppy also needs plenty of exercise once it is old enough. The result will be a happier, more settled dog and your neighbours will benefit, too.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Wales' papers: Rugby player's machete attack and 20mph to stay
Copyright 2025 BBC. All rights reserved. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.
