Category A nuclear incident reported at Faslane naval base this year, MoD confirms
Category A incidents are where there is judged to have been 'actual or high potential for radioactive release to the environment'.
The MoD said it is unable to release further detail about the event for security reasons, but stressed it posed 'no risk to the public and did not result in any radiological impact to the environment'.
Defence Secretary John Healey described it as being of 'low safety significance'.
Officially known as HMNB Clyde, Faslane in Argyll and Bute is home to the Royal Navy's flotilla of nuclear submarines.
Figures made public through a response to a written parliamentary question in May show the incident was one of 28 'nuclear site events' recorded at the facility between January 1 and April 22, 2025.
Of the other 27 incidents, two were graded category B, seven as category C, 13 as category D and 5 as 'below scale'.
Last year there were 119 incidents recorded at the base.
In her written answer, UK defence procurement minister Maria Eagle said nuclear site event reports were raised to 'foster a robust safety culture that learns from experience, whether that is of equipment failures, human error, procedural failings, documentation shortcomings or near-misses'.
A Ministry of Defence spokesperson said: 'We place the upmost importance on handling radioactive substances safely and securely.
'Nuclear site event reports demonstrate our robust safety culture and commitment to learn from experience.
'The incidents posed no risk to the public and did not result in any radiological impact to the environment. It is factually incorrect to suggest otherwise.
'Our Government backs our nuclear deterrent as the ultimate guarantor of our national security.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
30 minutes ago
- BBC News
Cambridgeshire WW2 veteran: 'We thought we were going home'
A World War Two veteran has described the disappointment he felt that successive victory celebrations did not mark the end of his Newman, 99, left home to serve with the Royal Navy in 1943 but would not return until 1947, two years after the end of the said he and his crew "thought we were going home" when Germany surrendered on 8 May 1945, but were instead sent to the Far East, where fighting would continue for a further three the 80th anniversary of VJ Day (Victory over Japan) at a flag-raising ceremony and remembrance service in Whittlesey, Cambridgeshire, he said it was important to remember those who never came home at all. "We're all sad that they never came back. For what they did out there, we truly thank them and I salute them all," he said. On VE Day, he was aboard his ship, near Malta."There was a buzz going round that something was going on, but we didn't know what, he said."We thought we were going home, but it didn't happen. We went out to the Far East. But you have to go where you're told."Mr Newman said he felt "disappointment" that he was not sent home, and "forgotten" while celebrations were under way in even the arrival of VJ Day on 15 August did not mean he and his crewmates could return home."Even when the war was over in 1945, it wasn't over for us," he said."We still had to go out minesweeping, and that took another couple of years."It was very dangerous, obviously. But the point is that the mines are there and they've got to be swept." Mr Newman, who served on HMS Moon, was stationed around the Mediterranean, North Africa and Asia in the years after VJ remembers helping restore British rule in Singapore in September 1945 in an operation led by Lord Louis Mountbatten. "That was quite thrilling. I think the main thing was that we were all going to meet Lord Mountbatten because he was in charge," he said."There was a march past and he gave a speech. He said, 'Well, come on lads, let's go and finish the job.'"Despite "fighting disease and the elements" while risking his life minesweeping, Mr Newman said he looked back fondly on his wartime service."I really liked being in the Royal Navy and I think most sailors did," he said."I don't know how the Army feels about it. Mealtimes were mealtimes and we got plenty to eat. I have memories I'll never forget." Follow Cambridgeshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
17.5 million salmon died prematurely in Scottish fish farms in a year. Here's what we need to do
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Scotland is one of the largest producers of farmed salmon in the world, exporting a product that is consumed globally and often marketed as a hallmark of quality. It is one I have enjoyed myself, many times. But behind this booming industry lies a reality that many find hard to stomach: the staggering scale of welfare issues and the lack of clear, enforceable welfare standards to prevent those issues. Think about this: in 2022 alone, an estimated 17.5 million farmed salmon died prematurely and they were not included in the total production figure of 37.7 million a year. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Undercover footage shows that on Scottish fish farms, these fish experience a whole host of welfare problems. For example, due to overcrowding in sea cages, the fish also experience aggression, fin damage, and increased susceptibility to diseases. Sea lice infestations are a major problem, causing painful lesions and requiring treatments which can themselves also negatively impact the fish. Scotland has long been famous for its salmon fishing and farmed salmon has become a major global export (Picture: Jeff J Mitchell) | Getty Images Deadly jellyfish blooms Many of these issues are not fixable. I have spoken to fish farmers who do everything they can within the current system to mitigate negative impacts and protect the animals they farm, but they can't stop a tide. Our changing climate results in destructive events and jellyfish blooms as the water warms, and unpredictable weather events are becoming more and more extreme. However, that does not mean that more can't be done to protect these animals. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Farmed fish do have some minimal protections under the Animal Health and Welfare (Scotland) Act 2006. This legislation protects them from unnecessary suffering and requires that their welfare needs are met, for example the need for a suitable environment in which to live. READ MORE: How Scottish businesses are crying out for better trade deal with EU These are the same protections that are applied to animals like pigs and chickens. I've seen these protections printed and hung on the walls of fish farm offices; but when I asked the workers what a suitable environment for a fish is, what implementing this act looks like in the context of a fish farm, and how to tell whether a fish is happy, they – understandably – can't say. Because, unlike pigs and chickens, fish do not benefit from formal government-issued guidance to help producers and regulators understand what the law means and what they should do to meet these obligations. Instead, the sector relies on the industry-authored code of good practice, a voluntary framework that – while it contains some useful standards – is neither legally enforceable nor comprehensive. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Fish can feel pain This is where the problem becomes a Catch-22. When campaigners raise concerns about fish welfare, the Scottish Government defers to the industry's code of good practice. But when asked to ensure that this code is enforced, it claims it can't – because it's not the government's code. Accountability is denied and millions of fish suffer as a result. This legal ambiguity benefits no one – not the farmers, who are left without clear rules; not you and me, who want assurance that the animals are treated humanely; and certainly not the fish, who – as scientific evidence shows – are capable of experiencing pain. As a member of the Scottish Parliament's Rural Affairs and Islands Committee, I recently took part in an inquiry into salmon farming in this country. One of the clearest conclusions we reached was that we are failing to uphold the welfare of farmed fish due to the absence of official government guidance. In fact, despite years of documented concerns, there has never been a single prosecution or formal notice issued relating to fish welfare on Scottish farms. This lack of enforcement speaks volumes. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The solution is simple and achievable. The Scottish Government must issue official guidance. This would provide the clarity needed to interpret the law, set a clear baseline for welfare standards, and ensure that they are properly enforced. It would also close the loophole that currently allows welfare breaches to go unpunished simply because no one understands them. Farmers committed to high standards The Scottish Government's "Vision for Sustainable Aquaculture' strategy has prompted the introduction of mandatory reporting on mortality and sea lice numbers, which is a useful start. However, the path forward is still murky. The Scottish Animal Welfare Commission, in its detailed report on fish sentience, specifically recommended that the government issue official guidance to make the law meaningful in practice. This is about more than just data collection: it is about creating a clear framework that supports everyone involved. I've spoken with farmers who are committed to high standards but find it challenging to know what is legally expected of them without this kind of guidance. Providing clear, government-backed standards would create a level playing field, ensuring that good practice is the norm, and not the exception. This is a chance for Scotland to lead on animal welfare, and official guidance is the crucial next step. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This view is shared by expert lawyers at the Animal Law Foundation, which continues to push for the law that protects fish to mean something in practice and sees official guidance as one of the key ways of achieving this. We cannot allow fish welfare to be compromised. Industry-led codes – regardless of how well-intentioned they are – are no substitute for government responsibility and legal clarity. Scotland must commit to and take pride in standing by high standards of animal welfare – and that includes fish. It's time to break the cycle. It's time to get farmed salmon out of this Catch-22.
Glasgow Times
15 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
10 pictures from Glasgow's VJ Day 80th anniversary service
The poignant service was attended by senior military personnel from the Royal Navy, Army and RAF and reserve units, and representatives from faith groups and organisations across the city. (Image: Colin Mearns) (Image: Colin Mearns) (Image: Colin Mearns) Lord Provost Jacqueline McLaren, who also attended the event, said: 'When Japan announced its surrender to the allied forces, the time was met with relief and celebration that after six long years the Second World War was finally over. 'People sometimes forget that after VE Day in May there was service personnel still actively engaged in combat, and today we remember them and their sacrifices, just as we did a few weeks ago. (Image: Colin Mearns) (Image: Colin Mearns) (Image: Colin Mearns) 'This is a time to reflect on their selflessness, the courage displayed, and the resilience of those brave people who put their lives on the line, on the ground, in the air, and on the oceans, to keep us safe and to build a better world for our children.' A parade remembering the Glasgow heroes who fought in the 'forgotten war' will be held in Knightswood on Saturday. (Image: Colin Mearns) (Image: Colin Mearns) (Image: Colin Mearns) Bailie Anne McTaggart will represent the Lord Provost and lay a wreath at the Veterans' Memorial Monument. She will also present a commemorative Glasgow 850 plate to the Knightswood veterans' organisation as acknowledgement and appreciation, from the city, of the organisation's work and support to city events and causes over the years.
