GB CM expresses solidarity with Kashmiris amid Indian aggression
Listen to article
Terming Pahalgam incident a false flag operation orchestrated by India, Gilgit-Baltistan (GB) Chief Minister Haji Gulbar Khan expressed solidarity with Kashmiris.
A delegation of Kashmiri leaders, including Raja Fahim Kayani, President of Tehreek-e-Kashmir UK and the All Parties Kashmir Alliance UK and Altaf Ahmed Bhat, leader of the All Parties Hurriyat Conference and Chairman of the Jammu and Kashmir Salvation Movement met the GB chief minister.
Talking to Kashmiri leaders, the GB CM said, "We stand shoulder to shoulder with our Kashmiri brethren," adding, "What happened in Pahalgam was not a tragic mishap but a calculated scheme to isolate Pakistan on the world stage."
He urged that the United Nations must uphold its resolutions on Kashmir, halt the demolition of civilian homes, and stop all human rights violations in IIOJ&K.
The delegation termed the Pahalgam attack as a 'false flag operation' engineered to tarnish Pakistan's reputation and drape the Kashmiris' struggle for self-determination in a cloak of violence.
They underlined that such orchestrated events only deepen the trauma endured by ordinary families living under persistent threat.
"Our people have already borne the heaviest burdens," said Kayani. "Attempts to paint us as aggressors will never mute the cries of mothers mourning their children. This was no isolated incident. It is part of a broader strategy to distract from the daily injustices in IIOJ&K. We must unite our voices and demand accountability what has been doing with people in IIoJK," said Bhat.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
5 hours ago
- Express Tribune
PTI tears into 'elite-driven' budget
The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) rejected the federal budget 2025-26 both inside and outside the National Assembly on Tuesday, calling it an "IMF-dictated budget" that lacks public legitimacy and launching a two-pronged attack: an aggressive protest on the assembly floor and a pointed press conference soon after. The finance minister's second consecutive budget speech kicked off under fire, with the opposition benches erupting into noisy protest from the get-go. As Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb began unveiling the budget, PTI lawmakers rose to their feet, banged budget books on their desks, blew whistles, and held up posters calling for the release of former prime minister Imran Khan. Throughout the presentation, they chanted slogans against the government, branding the budget illegitimate and anti-people. Undeterred by the uproar, the finance minister pressed on, while treasury members donned headphones to tune out the opposition's noise. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who entered the house amid the commotion, remained seated and unflinching, as ruling party lawmakers formed a protective cordon around him to avoid any direct clash with the protesting members. Opposition Leader in the National Assembly Omar Ayub Khan led from the front, setting the tone for a coordinated protest and ensuring every PTI lawmaker played their part. Remaining on his feet throughout the session, he repeatedly slammed the budget book on his desk and signalled to fellow members to stay engaged. Lawmakers tore papers and flung them into the air at intervals. After the initial outburst, opposition members moved en masse toward the area between the speaker's desk and the prime minister's seat, continuing their chorus of slogans without letting up. The disruption echoed the tense scenes from last year's budget session, when the finance minister's maiden speech faced an equally turbulent reception from PTI-turned-Sunni Ittehad Council lawmakers. Then as now, the protests included loud chanting, desk-slamming, paper-tearing and close proximity to the PM's seat, prompting treasury members to act as a human shield. Shortly after the session, senior PTI leaders, including NA opposition leader Omar Ayub, PTI Central Information Secretary Sheikh Waqas Akram, PTI Secretary General Salman Akram Raja and Leader of Opposition in Senate Shibli Faraz, addressed a joint press conference, reiterating their categorical rejection of the budget. "This is not a people's budget; it's an IMF budget designed to serve elite interests," the opposition leader said. Ayub questioned the government's economic claims, particularly the projected GDP growth of 2.7%, and sarcastically asked: "Who counted the donkeys and did they differentiate between the four-legged and two-legged ones?" He dismissed the budget as detached from reality, pointing to deepening inequality, inflation and declining industrial output. PTI information secretary was more scathing, calling the budget "economic gallows" for the people, saying it was not a budget for the nation rather a public execution plan. He further said that PTI considers this a "Leela budget" - implying the budget is a farce that ultimately sacrifices common people like goats at slaughter while the elite's interests are protected. He questioned the logic behind token relief for the salaried class and warned that the development allocations were unrealistic and insincere. Opposition leader in the Senate, Shibli Faraz, added that the government had broken all previous records of elitist budgeting. The opposition leader in the Senate said that budgets have been made for the ruling class for decades, but this year's budget has broken all previous records of elite budgeting. Criticising the government, Faraz said: "When such legislation and budget-making takes place in Parliament, it is not just undemocratic but hostile to the country's interest." Faraz also noted that the Afghan currency had appreciated more than the Pakistani rupee, calling it an indicator of the government's failure. "When a government comes to power through Form-47s, it lacks the trust needed for serious reform," he said, warning that economic manipulation without legitimacy would not bring progress. Addressing the media, Faraz condemned the government's handling of inflation and taxation, particularly for salaried individuals. He remarked that the salaried class was being relentlessly squeezed, stating, "as much blood as can be drawn from them is being drawn." He questioned how a country could progress while functioning on what he described as "IMF crutches". Faraz also criticised the state's response to peaceful demands from government employees, noting that when government workers began protesting for their rights, the entire Red Zone of Islamabad was sealed off. "Those who ask for their lawful rights are treated as if they are doing something wrong," he said. PTI secretary general Salman Akram Raja described the document as one that "makes the rich richer and the poor poorer," saying the salaried class and poor people were burdened further. All leaders also reiterated their demand for the release of PTI founder Imran Khan and his wife, describing their incarceration as illegal and politically motivated. They called the ongoing legislative process illegitimate and demanded the restoration of constitutional order, public mandate and rule of law. Earlier, the protest in the assembly followed a detailed strategy discussion in PTI's parliamentary party meeting, held hours before the session. The party rejected the 2025-26 budget outright, terming it a continuation of policies dictated by the IMF. Lawmakers reiterated their stance that the current government had no mandate to present the budget, arguing that it was formed through manipulated election results and did not reflect the will of the people. In its official statement, the PTI parliamentary party declared that the government had no legal or moral authority to legislate on behalf of the public. "This is an IMF budget, not a people's budget," the party said, vowing to resist its passage at every forum, including both the National Assembly and Senate. It condemned the economic hardships faced by ordinary citizens, stating that while the poor were crushed under inflation, the ruling elite continued their lavish lifestyles unchecked. The party also expressed strong disapproval of NA Speaker Sardar Ayaz Sadiq's conduct, accusing him of acting as a partisan figure rather than a neutral custodian of the House. Lawmakers demanded that the speaker act according to his constitutional role rather than serving party interests. It was also decided in the meeting that a privileged motion would be moved if opposition speeches continued to be censored on national broadcasts. PTI lawmakers further resolved to raise the issue of media blackout on their speeches in the assembly and to protest outside if necessary.
Business Recorder
7 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Indus River indeed an ‘ever-flowing' river
To divert or stop the waters of the 'Sarnash', the name of the Indus in Hindu mythology means the 'ever flowing' will not be easy. The Hindu gods were more knowledgeable than the current Prime Minister of India, they were certainly more benign. What they knew and perhaps the Government of India does not is that rivers flow according to the topography of the land, the principles of geography and not as per the whims of the rulers of the time. They are 'ever flowing.' Their water flows not just on the surface of the land but subterraneously as well. In many districts of the Punjab and Sindh through which the Sarnash and its tributaries flow most of the irrigation needs of the farmers are met from wells and not through canals and the water channels. As per Dr Daanish Mustafa, a professor of Geography at King's College, 80% of the water flowing into Tarbela dam on the Indus is from within the territory under Pakistani control. I have been to the Indus at Raana Dheri 10 km downstream of Tarbela when the spillways were totally closed, and the water from the generators was fed to the channels joining the river at Kalabagh. To me the river felt huge and was flowing with considerable water. It appears that there is enough seepage and the subterranean flows fill up the river again below the spillways. Any damming above the ground will not be able to stop the flow of subterranean flows. So to talk of stopping the waters of the Indus is impossible. As regards the waters of the Jhelum, the river flows through the center of Srinagar through the Uri gorge and any dam there will submerge the whole valley. Anyways, the Kashmiris do take some water from it to irrigate adjoining crops or domestic usage. The Kashmir valley is already aflush with enough rainfall not to require any additional irrigation. To divert the water across the Kashmiri valleys to East Punjab is an impossible task. We have had our own experience with the Neelum hydroelectric project. The tunnels made to cross just one ridge for the waters of the Neelam river has been a very difficult job taking decades and costing billions. Within two years the tunnels were damaged and then blocked by the debris that comes down with the water. The Indians will have no easier time with the much bigger flows of the Chenab and the Jhelum. They have to cross multiple ridges and higher ground to take the water to Haryana or Rajasthan. The river probably at some risk is possibly the Chenab. I have travelled from Chandigarh to Kullu Manali, high valleys close to Laddakh, by road. The road runs along the riverbed of the Chenab. On three different occasions I saw the water disappears to re-appear a few kilometers upstream. The water is diverted to generate hydro power and then goes back to the natural river bed. Where the river Chenab flows out of the Himalayas onto the plains the land is already aflush with the waters of the Ravi and Sutlej irrigation systems. The upper valleys off Kullu already have enough rainfall as do most of our mountain valleys. The Indians have already exploited the rights given to them by the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) to the full. The rivers Ravi and Sutlej have had all their water siphoned off, yet they flow across the border with substantial water flows. All these dams, canals, hydro power stations have been made over 50 years of vast efforts and with heavy expenditures. Similar resources and time will be required to divert the waters of the Chenab. The dams made shall be clearly visible to all, thanks to satellite surveillance. These days the Google maps app can tell you if there is a traffic jam around the corner. Dams and canals are much more visible. While the Indians will have no easy time to divert waters flowing into Pakistan, we can very easily discomfort them easily. If you examine the chapter 4 of the IWT it states as under: 'Pakistan shall maintain in good order its portion of the drainages mentioned below with capacities as on the effective date: Hudiara drain, Kasur Nulla, Salimshah drain, Fazilka drain, So if the IWT is cancelled then we could prevent these nullahs from flowing into Pakistan from India. The Indians should keep their drains and sewage to themselves and do what they like with it. Thousands of acres can be flooded with sewage water and the crops destroyed and villages and towns be made unlivable. We have not even bothered to check the quantum of flows in these drains. I am sure the volumes going through have swelled since the IWT was signed in the 1960s. The Indians should have paid for them and for the treatment of their waste water. Subsoil water flows have still not been examined carefully. If the river flow is reduced then how does it affect the subterranean flows? The river Ravi when it passes through Lahore is now a shadow of its former self because of the water diverted by India. The city of Lahore has grown massively since the 1960s. Not only has the population multiplied but the gardens, parks and roads have been kept lush and green. The sub soil water level has fallen but not drastically. To get potable clean water you may have to go below 400 feet, but water is available at 150 feet. This is true not only in the city but also throughout the districts of Lahore and Kasur. It is clear that we need to study these geographic phenomena much more for our own future planning as well as to counter the threats from India with or without the IWT. It is also clear that Modi did not consult his gods before threatening us. For once the Indians have taken a step without much thought for its consequences. If they are to stop our waters then what's stopping China diverting the mighty Brahmaputra? Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
8 hours ago
- Business Recorder
NA erupts as PTI dismisses federal budget
ISLAMABAD: The National Assembly went into one of its wildest frenzy on Tuesday, as opposition Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) lawmakers unleashed a barrage of criticism, out-rightly dismissing the finance bill for the forthcoming year of fiscal prudence. As the government tried to roll out its financial blueprint, the PTI launched a loud protest, blasting the proposed budget before the finance minister could even catch his breath. Opposition Leader in National Assembly Omar Ayub Khan, Shahid Khattak, Zartaj Gul Wazir, Iqbal Afridi, Sanaullah Mastikhel and Jamshed Dasti led the protest. Barrister Gohar Ali Khan, Ali Muhammad Khan, Sheryar Afridi, and a handful of others; however, were completely missing in action. The protesting PTI legislators pounded their desks and raised loud slogans. They surged forward, practically overrunning the NA Speaker's dais mid-speech by Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb, turning the House into a fish market. At this, the government ministers had to rush in, forming a human shield around Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's chair, just to keep the PTI hotheads at bay. Later, talking to reporters, PTI leaders blasted the government, terming the federal budget as a 'disgusting' giveaway to the rich backed by the 'installed regime'. The opposition leader labelled the budget 'anti-poor,' 'pro-elite,' and a puppet show dictated by the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The budget, he declared, was the 'worst in the country's history.' Earlier in the day, during a meeting of the party's parliamentary committee, the PTI leaders were particularly incensed by the National Assembly speaker's pay hike, which they slammed as 'shameful.' The speaker's salary jumped from Rs250,000 to a 'whopping' Rs1.3 million, a move PTI called 'disgusting'. They accused the Sharif administration of leaving the 'poverty-stricken masses' at the mercy of God, while showering everything on the rich. However, in a message on X, PTI spokesman Sheikh Waqas Akram laid out the numbers, pointing to ballooning interest payments as proof of economic mismanagement. 'The difference in the government's interest payments from Rs3,182 billion to Rs8,633 billion, i.e., an additional burden of Rs5,500 billion, came from the PTI to the PDM government,' he wrote. 'They are absolutely right in saying that these are experimental people, not in work, but in fraud and deceit…!' Speaking to reporters, PTI leaders rejected the budget and accused the Sharif administration of 'completely ruining the economy' and piling on debt. They blamed a 'brain drain,' flawed economic policies, and political instability for wrecking the country. The PTI vowed to resist the budget 'tooth and nail,' promising a fight to the finish against what they see as a blatant power grab by the ruling elite. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
