logo
Mediator reportedly proposes $20m settlement in Trump suit against CBS

Mediator reportedly proposes $20m settlement in Trump suit against CBS

The Guardian6 hours ago

Donald Trump and CBS could settle their legal battle over a contested interview with Kamala Harris for $20m, as the dispute continues to shadow a major media merger.
A mediator has proposed the settlement figure to resolve Trump's lawsuit against CBS News over alleged deceptive editing of a 60 Minutes interview with Harris during last year's presidential campaign, the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday.
The lawsuit, filed in October and later amended to seek $20bn in damages, accused CBS of election interference through selective editing that allegedly made Harris appear more coherent in her responses about the Israel-Gaza conflict.
CBS has consistently denied wrongdoing, saying it simply aired a more concise version of Harris's answer rather than doctoring her comments.
The proposed deal would see $17m donated to Trump's presidential foundation or museum, with additional millions covering legal costs and funding public service announcements against antisemitism on Paramount-owned networks.
However, negotiations remain stuck on Trump's demand for an apology from CBS – something the network has refused to provide, sources familiar with the talks tell the WSJ.
The dispute also complicates Paramount's $8.4bn merger with Skydance Media, as Federal Communications Commission chair Brendan Carr indicated that the controversy could influence regulatory approval of the deal.
According to the reporting, settlement discussions began in mediation this spring after Paramount initially offered $15m – less than Trump's team demanded. The proposed $20m figure aligns with recent settlements between Trump and other major media companies.
Disney paid $15m to the Trump presidential foundation and another $1m for his lawyer fees to resolve a defamation case involving ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos in December, while Meta agreed to a $25m settlement over Trump's social media account suspension following the 6 January riot at the Capitol.
The legal pressure has contributed to mass upheaval at CBS News, with both longtime 60 Minutes producer Bill Owens and news division chief Wendy McMahon announcing their departures earlier this year amid tensions over the network's response to the lawsuit.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump meets Zelensky and says higher Nato spending may deter future aggression
Trump meets Zelensky and says higher Nato spending may deter future aggression

Leader Live

time20 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

Trump meets Zelensky and says higher Nato spending may deter future aggression

Nato members agreed to raise their spending targets by 2035 to 5% of gross domestic product (GDP) annually on core defence requirements as well as defence- and security-related spending. That target had been 2% of GDP. 'Europe stepping up to take more responsibility for security will help prevent future disasters like the horrible situation with Russia and Ukraine,' Mr Trump said at the summit-ending news conference shortly after meeting with Mr Zelensky. 'And hopefully we're going to get that solved.' The US president also reiterated his belief that Russian President Vladimir Putin wants to end the war in Ukraine that began with Moscow's invasion in February 2022. 'He'd like to get out of this thing. It's a mess for him,' Mr Trump said. 'He called the other day, and he said, 'Can I help you with Iran?' I said, 'No, you can help me with Russia'.' Mr Trump's meeting with Mr Zelensky was their first face-to-face session since April when they met at St Peter's Basilica during Pope Francis's funeral. Mr Trump also had a major confrontation with Mr Zelensky earlier this year at the White House. Mr Zelensky, in a social media post, said The Hague talks were substantive and he thanked Mr Trump for the US assistance. 'We discussed how to achieve a ceasefire and a real peace. We spoke about how to protect our people. We appreciate the attention and the readiness to help bring peace closer,' Mr Zelensky added. Mr Trump left open the possibility of sending Kyiv more US-made Patriot air defence missile systems. Asked by a Ukrainian reporter, who said that her husband was a Ukrainian soldier, Mr Trump acknowledged that sending more Patriots would help the Ukrainian cause. 'They do want to have the antimissile missiles, OK, as they call them, the Patriots,' Mr Trump said. 'And we're going to see if we can make some available. We need them, too. We're supplying them to Israel, and, they're very effective, 100% effective. Hard to believe how effective. They do want that more than any other thing.' Over the course of the war, the US has routinely pressed for allies to provide air defence systems to Ukraine. But many are reluctant to give up the high-tech systems, particularly countries in Eastern Europe that also feel threatened by Russia. Mr Trump laid into the US media throughout his news conference but showed unusual warmth towards the Ukrainian reporter. 'That's a very good question,' Mr Trump said about the query about Patriots. 'And I wish you a lot of luck. I mean, I can see it's very upsetting to you. So say hello to your husband.' Ukraine has been front and centre at recent Nato summits. But as the alliance's latest annual meeting of leaders opened in the Netherlands, Mr Zelensky was not in the room. The Trump administration has blocked Ukraine's bid to join Nato. The conflict with Russia has laid waste to Ukrainian towns and killed thousands of civilians. Just last week, Russia launched one of the biggest drone attacks of the war. During Mr Trump's 2024 campaign for the White House, the Republican pledged a quick end to the war. He saw it as a costly conflict that, he claimed, would not have happened had he won re-election in 2020. Since taking office in January, he has struggled to find a resolution to the conflict and has shown frustration with both Mr Putin and Mr Zelensky. Mr Zelensky spent Tuesday in The Hague shuttling from meeting to meeting. He got a pledge from summit host the Netherlands for military aid, including new drones and radars to help knock out Russian drones. British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer announced that the United Kingdom will provide 350 air defence missiles to Ukraine, funded by £70 million raised from the interest on seized Russian assets.

US Treasury's Bessent extends measures to avoid debt ceiling breach
US Treasury's Bessent extends measures to avoid debt ceiling breach

Reuters

time21 minutes ago

  • Reuters

US Treasury's Bessent extends measures to avoid debt ceiling breach

WASHINGTON, June 25 (Reuters) - U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Wednesday extended the department's authority to continue extraordinary cash management measures to keep from breaching the federal debt ceiling by nearly a month, until July 24. Bessent said in a letter to congressional leaders that he had determined that the "debt issuance suspension period" previously scheduled to expire on Friday needed to continue. The declaration allows the Treasury to suspend funding from government pension and retiree healthcare funds that are not needed to pay immediate benefits. Bessent has estimated that the Treasury would no longer be able to pay all of its obligations without an increase or suspension of the debt limit some time during the mid-to-late summer. His letter did not provide any specific updates to this timing, although he told reporters on Tuesday that the so-called debt ceiling "X-date" could change if courts interfered with President Donald Trump's tariffs, which pulled in a record $23 billion in customs revenue during May. But his extension to July 24 appeared partly aimed at keeping pressure on Congress to raise the debt ceiling as part of a massive tax-and-spending package before its traditional August recess. "Based on our current estimates, we continue to believe that Congress must act to increase or suspend the debt ceiling as soon as possible before its scheduled August recess to protect the full faith and credit of the United States," Bessent said in the letter.

The latest US foray into military action has a name: The Trump Doctrine
The latest US foray into military action has a name: The Trump Doctrine

Reuters

time22 minutes ago

  • Reuters

The latest US foray into military action has a name: The Trump Doctrine

WASHINGTON, June 25 (Reuters) - With his order for B-2 bombers to strike Iranian nuclear sites on Sunday, President Donald Trump swerved away from his usual reluctance to use military force, directly involving the U.S. in a foreign war and alarming many of his "America First" supporters. Now, the thinking behind his decision has a name, according to Vice President JD Vance: the Trump Doctrine. Vance laid out the elements in remarks on Tuesday: articulate a clear American interest, try to solve a problem with diplomacy and, if that fails, "use overwhelming military power to solve it and then you get the hell out of there before it ever becomes a protracted conflict." To some observers, however, the new doctrine sounds like an effort to offer a tidy framework to describe a foreign policy that often looks unpredictable and inconsistent. "It's hard for me to relate seriously to something called the 'Trump Doctrine,'" said Middle East analyst Aaron David Miller, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. "I don't think Trump has a doctrine. I think Trump has only held instincts." Trump's decision to get involved in the conflict between Israel and Iran came after Supreme Leader Ali Khamanei said Iran would not give up its ability to enrich uranium. Soon after the U.S. strikes, Trump announced a ceasefire, which has mostly held. On Wednesday, Trump vowed again that Iran would not be allowed to have a nuclear weapon and said talks with Tehran would resume next week. Iran has said its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only. 'President Trump and Vice President Vance are the perfect team because they share the same 'peace through strength' vision for U.S. foreign policy," said White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly in response to a request for comment. Trump faces pressure to explain his decision to intervene in the Israel-Iran conflict. Vance, who previously embraced isolationism, has been one of the administration's main messengers on the issue. Trump helped win over voters by arguing that the "stupid" U.S.-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had left the United States in a quagmire and that he would work to avoid foreign entanglements. He has mostly stuck to the pledge, with some exceptions: the use of American force against Houthi rebels launching attacks from Yemen this year, and his orders to kill ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi in 2019 and Iranian Revolutionary Guard commander Qasem Soleimani in January 2020. But the prospect of the United States getting dragged into an extended conflict with Iran angered many in the isolationist wing of the Republican Party, including prominent Trump supporters like strategist Steve Bannon and conservative media personality Tucker Carlson. Opinion polling also reflects deep concern among Americans about what might come next. Some 79% of Americans surveyed in a Reuters/Ipsos poll that closed on Monday said they worried "that Iran may target U.S. civilians in response to the U.S. airstrikes." Melanie Sisson, a senior foreign policy fellow at the Brookings Institution, said Vance appears to be trying to satisfy Trump's right flank by "trying to figure out how to explain how and why the administration can undertake a military action without it being a prelude to war." To some, Vance's Trump Doctrine rings true. "Vance has provided an accurate summary of President Trump's approach over recent days to the conflict in the Middle East," said Clifford May, founder and president of Washington's Foundation for Defense of Democracies think tank. "Most outside analysts, and certainly most historians, may think the term 'doctrine' is premature. But if President Trump builds on this successful use of U.S. force, it would be a tremendous doctrine for President Trump to boast," May added. Still, whether the new framework sticks will likely depend on how the current conflict ends. It is too soon to 'pronounce either that this was a brilliant success or that it was a massive strategic failure," said Rebecca Lissner, an expert at the Council on Foreign Relations. "We need to see how the diplomacy plays out and where we actually land in terms of constraint, visibility and survival of the Iranian nuclear program."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store