logo
Activists stopped in Libya and Egypt ahead of planned march on Gaza

Activists stopped in Libya and Egypt ahead of planned march on Gaza

CTV News17 hours ago

Members of a humanitarian convoy, including activists from Algeria and Tunisia, wave Palestinian flags from a bus in Zawiya, Libya en route to Gaza on June 10, 2025. (Yousef Murad / AP Photo)
RABAT, Morocco — Egyptian authorities detained additional activists planning to march to Gaza in protest of restrictions on aid reaching the territory while security forces in eastern Libya blocked a convoy of activists en route to meet them.
Demonstrators from 80 countries planned to march to Egypt's border with Gaza to spotlight the deepening humanitarian crises facing Palestinians since Israel began blocking aid trucks from entering the coastal enclave in March. It slightly eased restrictions last month, allowing limited aid in, but experts warn the measures fall far short.
The Global March on Gaza was slated to be among the largest demonstrations of its kind in recent years, coinciding with other efforts including a boat carrying activists and aid that was intercepted by Israel's military en route to Gaza earlier this week.
Activists detained in Egypt
Organizers on Friday said authorities confiscated passports of 40 people planning to march at a checkpoint outside Cairo, where they're being held in the heat. Others are being detained at hotels. They urged officials from the activists' home countries to push Egypt to release their citizens.
Friday's detentions come after hundreds arriving in Cairo were earlier detained and deported to their home countries in Europe and North Africa. Before authorities confiscated their passports, the activists said they planned to gather at a campsite on the road to the Sinai to prepare for Sunday's march. They said authorities had not yet granted them authorization to travel through the Sinai, which Egypt considers a highly sensitive area.
'We continue to urge the Egyptian government to permit this peaceful march, which aligns with Egypt's own stated commitment to restoring stability at its border and addressing the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza,' the activists said in a statement.
Hicham El-Ghaoui, one of the group's spokespeople, said they would refrain from demonstrating until receiving clarity on whether Egypt will authorize their protest.
The planned demonstrations cast an uncomfortable spotlight on Egypt, one of the Arab countries that has cracked down on pro-Palestinian activists even as it publicly condemns aid restrictions and calls for an end to the war.
The government, a major recipient of U.S. military aid that maintains ties with Israel, has arrested and charged 186 activists with threatening state security since the war began, according to a June tally by the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights. Many of them said they were protesting peacefully and collecting donations for Gaza.
Still, the severity of the crackdown surprised European activists. Antonietta Chiodo, who traveled to Cairo from Italy, said those awaiting further instruction had been detained, interrogated, treated harshly by Egyptian authorities or deported.
Alexis Deswaef, a Belgian human rights lawyer, said he woke up on Friday to dozens of security vehicles packed with uniformed officers surrounding Talat Harb Square, where he and other activists had found hotels. Members of his group snuck out of the lobby as security entered, holding up a guidebook and asking an officer for assistance booking taxis to the Pyramids of Giza, where they've been since.
'I am so surprised to see the Egyptians doing the dirty work of Israel,' he said from the Pyramids. He hoped there would be too many activists at the new meeting point outside Cairo for Egyptian authorities to arrest en masse.
In a divided Libya, Egypt-backed authorities stop a convoy
Meanwhile, an aid convoy traveling overland from Algeria picked up new participants along the route in Tunisia and Libya yet was stopped in the city of Sirte, about 940 kilometers (585 miles) from the Libya-Egypt border.
Organizers of the overland convoy said late Thursday night that they had been stopped by authorities governing eastern Libya, which has for years been divided between dueling factions. The convoy was allowed to cross from Tunisia to Libya but halted near the front line where territory shifts to a rival administration whose backers include Egypt.
The Benghazi-based government in a statement urged activists to 'engage in proper coordination with the official Libyan authorities through legal and diplomatic channels to ensure the safety of all participants and uphold the principles of solidarity with the Palestinian people.'
It said they should return to their home countries and cited Egypt's public statements that marchers had not been granted authorization.
Organizers leading the overland convoy said authorities had allowed them to camp in Sirte and await further approval. Their group, which includes thousands of participants, had already traversed parts of Algeria, Tunisia and the western Libyan cities of Tripoli and Misrata.
Jawaher Shana, one of the convoy's Tunisia-based organizers, said the convoy would eventually continue. 'We are peaceful civilians who are known in our countries,' she told a crowd at Sirte Gate.
The efforts — the activist flotilla, the overland convoy and the planned march — come as international outcry grows over conditions in Gaza.
As part of a campaign to pressure Hamas to disarm and release hostages, Israel has continued to pummel the territory with airstrikes while limiting the flow of trucks carrying food, water and medication that can enter.
The U.N. has said the vast majority of the population relies on humanitarian aid to survive and experts have warned the coastal enclave will likely fall into famine if Israel doesn't lift its blockade and stop its military campaign.
Over U.N. objections, a U.S.-backed group has taken control of the limited aid entering Gaza. But as desperate Palestinians crowd its distribution sites, chaos has erupted and almost 200 people have been killed near aid sites.
Nearly half a million Palestinians are on the brink of possible starvation, and 1 million others can barely get enough food, according to findings by the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, a leading international authority. Israel has rejected the findings, saying the IPC's previous forecasts had proven unfounded.
Sam Metz and Sam Mcneil, The Associated Press
McNeil reported from Barcelona. Associated Press journalist Youssef Murad in Tripoli, Libya, contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel's attack on Iran puts a leader addicted to war in the spotlight
Israel's attack on Iran puts a leader addicted to war in the spotlight

Globe and Mail

time9 hours ago

  • Globe and Mail

Israel's attack on Iran puts a leader addicted to war in the spotlight

For more than 600 days now, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has waged war. First on Hamas, then on Hezbollah and the Houthis, now on Iran, with occasional airstrikes targeting the new government in Syria carried out seemingly at whim. Many of the military operations Mr. Netanyahu has ordered since the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack on southern Israel were understandable to many at the outset, even as the act of launching a war is and should be the most serious order a commander-in-chief can give. Hamas knew retribution was coming when its fighters marauded across southern Israel, killing more than 1,200 people and taking 251 others back to Gaza as hostages. Hezbollah and the Houthis similarly earned Israel's wrath by repeatedly launching rockets and drones at Israel in the chaotic aftermath of Oct. 7. Iran's nuclear program, and the possibility that it could one day develop weapons of mass destruction, was a concern far beyond the Middle East. And yet, taken together – and put in the context of Mr. Netanyahu's political and legal troubles – they paint an unflattering picture of a leader addicted to war. Doug Saunders: How Trump's weakness and Netanyahu's self-interest exploded in Iran If the wars stop, Mr. Netanyahu's right-wing nationalist coalition likely falls apart. A deeply divisive figure after 15 years in power, his re-election prospects look bleak, even as he has repeatedly defied past predictions of political doom. If Mr. Netanyahu is not in the prime minister's chair, he would almost certainly be back in court facing corruption allegations that could see him jailed for up to 10 years. There's also an International Criminal Court warrant for his arrest, in connection with alleged war crimes the Israeli military has committed in Gaza, not to mention questions about what he knew about Hamas's plans – and what actions he did and didn't take – in advance of the Oct. 7 attack. And so, the wars go on. Neither mass protests in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, nor mounting pressure from nearly all of Israel's increasingly unsettled allies (Donald Trump's White House being the giant exception), has convinced Mr. Netanyahu to accept the deal that's been on the table for months: end the war in Gaza in exchange for Hamas releasing all its remaining hostages. Freeing the hostages, remember, was the reason Israel launched its war on Gaza more than 20 months ago. Instead, Mr. Netanyahu keeps resorting to war – a tool that has thus far failed to bring home the 53 Israelis still missing in Gaza, many of whom are believed to already be dead. Instead of a ceasefire that would allow the Palestinians to properly count their own casualties (the estimated death toll compiled by Gaza's Ministry of Health is an appalling 55,000 people), Mr. Netanyahu has ordered a broadening of Israel's war aims. Rather than handing over Gaza to some kind of Arab or international force, as has been repeatedly proposed since very early in the war, Mr. Netanyahu wants Israel to once more take control of the strip, which it withdrew its soldiers and settlers from in 2005. The fate of Gaza's 2.1 million inhabitants seems to be of little concern to Mr. Netanyahu, who has gleefully seized on Mr. Trump's unworkable suggestion that the Gazans could be given new homes elsewhere. That's called forced displacement, a war crime. Opinion: Canada's decision to sanction two far-right Israeli ministers sends a signal: enough is enough Anyone who criticizes Mr. Netanyahu and his wars is slapped with the allegation that they're somehow anti-Semitic or supporting Hamas. When Canada, Britain and France warned last month that they would be forced to take unspecified actions – which we now see includes Canadian and British sanctions against far-right members of Mr. Netanyahu's cabinet, and potential French recognition of a Palestinian state – if Israel didn't change course in Gaza, Mr. Netanyahu turned his rhetorical fire on some of his country's staunchest allies, accusing them of 'emboldening Hamas to continue fighting forever.' And now, Iran. Friday's attack on the Natanz uranium enrichment facility, and the assassinations of many of Iran's top generals and scientists, had clearly been meticulously plotted for years by Israel's military and its Mossad intelligence service. The timing of the strike also had the helpful cover of an International Atomic Energy Agency report, published Thursday, that found Tehran was no longer in compliance with its non-proliferation obligations. But there remains no evidence suggesting Iran was on the verge of developing a nuclear weapon – let alone threatening anyone with it – next week, next month or next year. Indeed, Mr. Netanyahu's order to attack came one day after it was announced that Mr. Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, would hold face-to-face talks in Oman on Sunday with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. In other words, the door to a negotiated solution to the Iran nuclear issue (another one, after Mr. Netanyahu encouraged Mr. Trump to walk away from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action back in 2018) was very much still in play. But a negotiated solution that kept the peace and saw sanctions lifted off the Iranian economy was never what Mr. Netanyahu wanted. Speaking on a stage in Paris to a conference of civil society groups hoping to breathe life into the long-dormant Israeli-Palestinian peace process, former Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert said Mr. Netanyahu was acting out 'his lifelong desire … to show how strong and powerful and Churchillian he is in fighting against Iran and destroying their nuclear program.' Mr. Olmert – who, unlike Mr. Netanyahu, resigned as prime minister when he was charged with corruption back in 2009 – has a special disdain for the man who succeeded him, and who has held on to the prime minister's post for 15 of the past 16 years. Mr. Olmert was in Paris this week trying to revive the two-state peace plan that he and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas were largely in agreement on before Mr. Olmert was forced from office. It's a plan to end Israel's occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip that Mr. Netanyahu has never shown serious interest in pursuing. Instead, he has expanded Israel's illegal settlement blocks as life has gotten steadily worse, and more violent, for Palestinians living in the occupied areas. Nobody at the hopeful talks in Paris – which were overshadowed by Mr. Netanyahu's decision to launch another war of unpredictable length – could envision any kind of peace process so long as Hamas holds sway in Gaza and Mr. Netanyahu remains in his office in Jerusalem. 'It's very hard for non-Israelis to understand,' said Eran Etzion, a former deputy head of Israel's National Security Council who was also in Paris for the two-state peace conference. 'But you need to think about Israel now – about Netanyahu and Netanyahu's regime – like you think about Putin and Putin's regime.' Mr. Etzion's comparison was carefully chosen. Russian President Vladimir Putin is a ruler who fears what might happen to him if and when he leaves office – and who has proven willing to drag his population into one war after another to avoid having that day come to pass.

U.S. says pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil will remain in detention despite judge's ruling
U.S. says pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil will remain in detention despite judge's ruling

Globe and Mail

time11 hours ago

  • Globe and Mail

U.S. says pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil will remain in detention despite judge's ruling

The U.S. government said on Friday pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil would remain in detention after a U.S. judge ruled foreign policy interests could not be used to justify confinement of the Columbia University student and pro-Palestinian activist. Khalil's lawyers had called for his immediate release but U.S. attorneys said in a letter to the judge that they would keep holding him on other charges such as immigration fraud that were not addressed in the decision. The government has been trying to deport Khalil and has been holding him in Louisiana. Newark, New Jersey-based U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz had given the government until 1:30 p.m. ET on Friday to appeal his Wednesday ruling on Khalil, 30, a Palestinian who came to the U.S. lawfully on a student visa and later obtained lawful permanent residency. Judge says government must release Columbia University protester Mahmoud Khalil Urback:The chilling case of Mahmoud Khalil should enrage anyone who purports to support freedom President Donald Trump has pledged to deport foreign students who participated in pro-Palestinian demonstrations that swept Columbia and other U.S. universities in the wake of Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel and Israel's subsequent military campaign in Gaza. Khalil, a prominent figure in pro-Palestinian protests against Israel's war on Gaza, was detained by immigration agents in the lobby of his university residence in Manhattan on March 8. He has since been held in immigration detention in Louisiana. He is fighting for his release. Kilmar Abrego Garcia, another immigrant targeted by the Trump administration, was set to enter a plea to criminal charges. The administration says it revoked Khalil's green card under a little-used provision of U.S. immigration law allowing the deportation of any non-citizen whose presence in the country is deemed by the Secretary of State to be adverse to U.S. foreign policy interests. Khalil's lawyers said his arrest and attempted deportation violated his right to free speech under the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment. Farbiarz had previously blocked the administration from deporting Khalil while his challenge to the constitutionality of his arrest played out. On May 28, the judge ruled that the foreign policy provision cited by the Trump administration was so vague that it was likely unconstitutional, and on Wednesday he ruled that the administration could not use that provision to justify Khalil's detention. The U.S. government also has said Khalil should be deported because he withheld information from his application for a green card, which he has denied. Farbiarz wrote that lawful permanent residents are rarely detained on that basis. Khalil's U.S. citizen wife, Dr. Noor Abdalla, gave birth to the couple's first child while Khalil was detained in April.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store