logo
How the Edmonton Oilers are diminishing criticism that they lack a rugged edge

How the Edmonton Oilers are diminishing criticism that they lack a rugged edge

New York Times19-05-2025

For several years running, there have been whispers (some louder than others) suggesting the Edmonton Oilers can be distracted from winning games with rugged play and heavy hits. It's a criticism that arises specifically when discussing defensive retrievals and outlets after opponents dump the puck in and race for possession.
Advertisement
How rampant is the belief that Edmonton can be intimidated in this area? Last spring, an anonymous scout informed Harman Dayal and Chris Johnston at The Athletic about a key area his team could exploit: 'The easiest way to shut down the Oilers is preventing McDavid from picking up steam in the neutral zone. The way you prevent McDavid from picking up steam is to mess with the way they do their breakouts and (defensive zone) exits. That starts with their retrievals. Ekholm, good f—-ing player, but he can't make plays on his backhand and Bouchard won't retrieve the puck (in the corners).'
That quote is over a year old. Does it still apply?
The organization addressed the need for puck movers during the winter. General manager Stan Bowman added a veteran defenceman, John Klingberg, via free agency in mid-January and traded for another, Jake Walman, at the deadline in early March. Both men are solid at retrieval and outlets.
The Oilers are improved in this area, with Evan Bouchard's recent performance in the series versus the Vegas Golden Knights suggesting the offence-first defender is maturing into a more complete player. He's making good decisions and using the time available to settle things down. It's helping the Oilers stay organized and means less running about in panic mode.
Bouchard is improving in coverage. That includes winning battles along the wall. A recent example came during overtime of Game 2 against Vegas. Bouchard made an exceptional defensive play that involved a rugged physical exchange (ending Mark Stone's progress down right wing and into the Oilers' zone). He separated player from puck and rang it around the boards; Corey Perry retrieved, sent a deft pass to Connor McDavid, and the winner in overtime came seconds later.
That kind of play, using physicality and skill long before the Oilers have to defend the net, is more common this spring with Bouchard. It's an emerging story, and if Bouchard delivers another quality series in this part of the game, he will be something close to complete as a player.
Advertisement
Another quote from the Dayal and Johnston article, from the same scout: 'We had a good meeting about that before we played Edmonton. We executed that strategy perfectly and we just abused them. If I'm going up against the Oilers and I identify that vulnerability, that is what I'm going after.'
In this year's playoffs, the defensive tandems are showing impressive ability to retrieve pucks, get a quick pass to safety and then outlet through the neutral zone for offensive opportunities at the other end.
Years ago, then-Los Angeles Kings coach Daryl Sutter said, 'The big thing in today's game is you have to be able to forecheck and backcheck, and you have to have the puck. You can't give the puck up. We don't play in our zone, so there's not much defending. I've coached in three decades now and this stuff where they said Marian had to play in Jacques's system is a bunch of bull-crap. The game's changed. They think there's defending in today's game. Nah, it's how much you have the puck. Teams that play around in their own zone think they're defending but they're generally getting scored on or taking faceoffs and they need a goalie to stand on his head if that's the way they play.'
That's the template for these Oilers, with Bouchard and his partner making that retrieval/outlet sequence consistently. The second pair of Walman and Klingberg has also been an effective tandem in moving the puck quickly.
As has been the case forever, when the Oilers defend, out come the snow angels, the trips to the penalty box and fishing the puck out of the back of the net. This Oilers team is doing less of it, and those battles won, followed by expert passing, are a big part of team success.
Using expected goals-against per 60 at five-on-five, we can compare Edmonton's defence from a year ago (the defence that inspired the quotes above) to this year's team. Here are the numbers year over year. Notice the marked improvement for Darnell Nurse:
All numbers five-on-five, via Natural Stat Trick
These are the numbers for the first two rounds (12 games) from one year ago, and all of this year.
Looking at 2024, it's easy to spot the top pairing (Ekholm-Bouchard) as it delivered strong GA-60 and expected numbers. The second pairing (Nurse with Cody Ceci) had some troubles in the postseason one year ago, with Nurse's actual GA-60 (4.35) an outlier compared to the rest of the group. Brett Kulak played well and ran some luck, as evidenced by the difference between expected and actual goals surrendered. Vincent Desharnais earned a better fate than the hockey Gods allowed in the first two rounds last spring.
Advertisement
Looking back at last year, coach Kris Knoblauch and his staff had a clear first-, second- and third-pairing rotation, but it's worth noting even the fifth and sixth defencemen played a significant amount last season.
This season, the coaching staff has been less democratic in ice time usage, with Ty Emberson being faded far more than anyone in the top six one year ago.
The overall impact of the puck retrieval/winning battles model employed currently by Edmonton is an improvement in the expected goals number defensively. Part of the new structure involves the centre coming down deeper into the defensive end to offer an attractive outlet, and these tweaks are working.
Expected goals (all numbers five-on-five) give us some idea about where things are trending. Oilers defencemen delivered solid expected GA-60 versus Los Angeles, but the actual GA-60 was much higher for several feature defenders. Bouchard's GA-60 (5.44) in that series was miles past expected (2.11 GA-60); Nurse's GA-60 in the series against the Kings (4.33) also ran out of time with expected (2.55) results.
In the series against the Golden Knights, Bouchard's gap (1.17 GA-60 compared to 2.03 expected) showed regression (the good kind) as the young puck mover showed calm feet and good decisions. Nurse's totals against Vegas (2.25 GA-60 to 2.31 expected) were close enough to perfect as a match.
The second pairing this spring (Walman and Klingberg) owns a 1.98 expected GA-60 and a 1.27 actual GA-60. If that continues, the Oilers will be a load in the conference final at five-on-five.
The Oilers are moving the puck quickly, winning more battles and spending less energy chasing. Management added a completely new pairing (Walman-Klingberg), and it has helped Bouchard find his way in recent games. If those calm feet and renewed maturity are real enough to last the spring, Bouchard will receive Conn Smythe Trophy consideration at the end of the day.
Advertisement
The Dallas Stars offer a new challenge. These Oilers have adjusted from one year ago, and the team's most recent series is a shining example of a team adjusting by playing less defence. It's an important improvement for the Oilers.
Can these defencemen sustain the effective performance in puck retrieval? The 'Bouchard won't retrieve the puck in the corners' verbal is giving way to talk of Bouchard's impressive elusiveness in getting pucks out without taking the big hit.
Narratives are fashioned to support evidence. As long as Bouchard continues his impressive play with and without the puck, the storyline will be about progress, maturity and impact in all areas of the game.
(Photo of Mark Stone and Evan Bouchard: Ethan Miller / Getty Images)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Soroka shines as Nationals blank Rangers in brisk 2-0 win
Soroka shines as Nationals blank Rangers in brisk 2-0 win

CBS News

time17 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Soroka shines as Nationals blank Rangers in brisk 2-0 win

Michael Soroka struck out seven in six sparkling innings, and the Washington Nationals beat Patrick Corbin and the Texas Rangers 2-0 on Friday night. Soroka (3-3) allowed two hits and walked one. Brad Lord and Jose A. Ferrer each got three outs before Kyle Finnegan finished the two-hitter for his 18th save. WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 06: Michael Soroka #34 of the Washington Nationals pitches in the first inning against the Texas Rangers at Nationals Park on June 06, 2025 in Washington, DC. / Getty Images The speedy game was over in 1 hour, 50 minutes. Adolis García singled with two outs in the fifth for Texas' first hit. Josh Smith added a one-out single in the sixth for the Rangers in their fourth consecutive loss. Washington took a 1-0 lead in the second when Nathaniel Lowe and Alex Call opened with back-to-back singles. Lowe went to third on a flyout and scored on a groundout by Robert Hassell III. Call led off the seventh with his first homer of the season. Corbin (3-5) allowed five hits in eight innings in his longest start of the season. He struck out two and walked none against his former team. The 35-year-old Corbin, who signed with the Rangers in March, went 47-77 with a 5.11 ERA over the past six seasons with the Nationals. In 2019 he was 14-7 with a 3.25 ERA and threw three scoreless innings in relief to pick up the win in Game 7 of the World Series against the Astros. The Rangers put two runners on in the sixth, but Soroka escaped the jam when Marcus Semien flied out. Texas has lost nine of its past 10 road games overall. It has dropped six straight road series openers. Rangers right-hander Jacob deGrom (5-2, 2.34 ERA), who has allowed two runs or fewer in nine consecutive starts, opposes left-hander Mitchell Parker (4-5, 4.71 ERA) in the middle game of the series on Saturday.

Simone Biles And Riley Gaines Clash Over Transgender Athletes In Women's Sports
Simone Biles And Riley Gaines Clash Over Transgender Athletes In Women's Sports

Forbes

time21 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Simone Biles And Riley Gaines Clash Over Transgender Athletes In Women's Sports

Simone Biles took aim at conservative pundit and former NCAA swimmer Riley Gaines Friday. Biles, the most successful gymnast of all time, called out the former swimmer for her recent comments advocating for the exclusion of transgender athletes in women's sports. Since tying for fifth place with transgender female swimmer Lia Thomas at the 2022 NCAA Swimming Championships, Gaines has transitioned from athlete to conservative activist, with her views staunchly focused on the opposition of transgender inclusion in women's sports. Lately, Gaines' commentary has included spotlighting and vilifying transgender children and teens for their involvement in women's and girls' sports. On Friday, Gaines spouted off at a children's softball team on X, mocking the team's moderators for turning off the post comments. 'Comments off lol,' Gaines commented in a quote tweet. "To be expected when your star player is a boy,' she added. Biles quickly vilified Gaines' comment, putting the conservative commentator on blast in front of Biles' nearly 2 million followers. 'You're truly sick, all of this campaigning because you lost a race,' Biles said, referencing Gaines' fifth-place finish. 'Straight up sore loser. You should be uplifting the trans community and perhaps finding a way to make sports inclusive or creating a new avenue where trans feel safe in sports,' she continued. ' bully them. One things for sure is no one in sports is safe with you around!' Gaines was quick to fight back and diminish Biles' years of advocacy for mental health and safety in the sport, labeling Biles 'a male-apologist at the expense of young girls' dreams." The former swimmer then attempted to deflect and insert transphobic talking points, insinuating that Biles should partake in men's gymnastics due to the gymnast's viewpoints. 'Maybe she could compete in pommel horse and rings in 2028," Gaines said. Gaines gained notoriety for her fervent anti-trans views following a 5th-place finish at the NCAA Swimming and Diving Championships. Since the disappointing result, the former Kentucky Wildcat has become fully immersed in her chosen cause: preventing transgender women athletes from competing in women's sports. She has testified before Congress, joined a lawsuit against the NCAA, and founded an advocacy center focused on what Gaines believes is 'fairness in women's sports.' The 25-year-old frequently aligns with conservative political figures, including current U.S. President Donald Trump. Ultimately, Gaines has achieved media success as a sports figure despite minimal success within her sport. Conversely, Simone Biles has staunchly advocated for athlete well-being throughout her historic career. Biles champions mental health awareness and changed the narrative following her withdrawal due to 'The Twisties' during the 2021 Tokyo Olympics. Additionally, as one of the most prominent survivors in the U.S.A Gymnastics Larry Nassar sexual abuse scandal, Biles used her platform to advocate for accountability and the establishment of safe environments in women's sports. Together, the two figures could not be more at odds – both in terms of success within their sports and in their treatment of others.

Historic House v. NCAA settlement gets final approval, allowing schools to pay college athletes
Historic House v. NCAA settlement gets final approval, allowing schools to pay college athletes

New York Times

time25 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Historic House v. NCAA settlement gets final approval, allowing schools to pay college athletes

By Ralph D. Russo, Stewart Mandel and Justin Williams A federal judge Friday granted final approval of the House v. NCAA settlement, a watershed agreement in college sports that permits schools to directly pay college athletes for the first time. The settlement, which resolves a trio of antitrust cases against the NCAA and its most powerful conferences, establishes a new 10-year revenue sharing model in college sports, with athletic departments able to distribute roughly $20.5 million in name, image and likeness (NIL) revenue to athletes over the 2025-26 season. Previously, athletes could earn NIL compensation only with outside parties, including school-affiliated donor collectives that have become instrumental in teams' recruiting. Advertisement The NCAA and the power conferences (ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12 and SEC), as defendants in the settlement, also agree to pay nearly $2.8 billion in damages to Division I athletes who were not allowed to sign NIL deals, dating back to 2016. The damages will be paid out over 10 years, with most of the money expected to go to former power-conference football and men's basketball players. Universities can begin directly sharing revenue with college athletes starting July 1. Judge Claudia Wilken of the Northern District of California, who previously ruled against the NCAA in the O'Bannon and Alston cases, granted approval roughly a year after parties agreed to settlement terms and nearly two months after a final approval hearing on April 7, where Wilken heard testimony from more than a dozen objectors. Lawyers for both the plaintiffs and defendants noted that the number of objections and opt-outs in the settlement represent a tiny fraction of the nearly 400,000 athletes in the certified class. However, some of those objectors delayed approval, largely citing the settlement's new roster limits. These limits, which replace sport-by-sport scholarship limits, cap the maximum roster size per team while allowing for every roster spot to receive a scholarship. Schools can offer scholarship funds — partial or full — as they see fit, which creates more potential opportunities. But as schools preemptively prepared to comply with those new limits, they removed roster spots for thousands of walk-ons, particularly in football, and partial scholarship athletes in non-revenue sports. In late April, Wilken offered an ultimatum, instructing the settlement parties to revise the terms in a way that mitigated any lost roster spots as a result of schools preparing for the new roster limits, or she would deny the whole agreement. Settlement lawyers responded with an amendment that allows for voluntary 'grandfathering' of any athletes who lost roster spots as a result of the roster limits, a status that will follow those athletes through the remainder of their eligibility, whether they return to their original school or transfer elsewhere. Advertisement The initial House v. NCAA case — brought by plaintiffs Grant House, a former Arizona State swimmer, and Sedona Prince, then an Oregon women's basketball player — was filed in June 2020. It challenged NCAA policy at the time that prohibited athletes from being compensated for the commercial use of their NIL rights or from sharing in the revenue generated from NCAA and conference television contracts. The case was later consolidated with two similar suits, Carter v. NCAA and Hubbard v. NCAA. The cases had not gone to trial. The NCAA and Power 5 conferences, fearful a verdict might result in much higher damages, agreed to a settlement in May 2024. Wilken granted preliminary approval in October 2024. The NCAA's traditional amateurism model, in which athletes could not receive any compensation beyond a scholarship, began to crumble in 2014 when Wilken ruled against the NCAA in a suit brought by former UCLA star Ed O'Bannon, who objected to his image being used in an EA Sports video game without his permission. Wilken ruled for the plaintiffs, but after an appeals court struck part of her decision, the only tangible effect was that schools began offering cost-of-attendance stipends. The next major case, Alston v. NCAA, made it to the Supreme Court, where the justices ruled 9-0 against the NCAA. Often mischaracterized as a case about NIL, Alston's main impact was that it allowed schools to provide athletes $5,980 a year in academic expenses. However, the lopsided decision left the NCAA vulnerable to additional legal challenges regarding rules that limited compensation, and it was delivered on June 21, 2021, nine days before numerous state laws allowing NIL payments were set to go into effect. The NCAA quickly scrapped most of its intended restrictions on NIL. In the years since, many athletes have entered into deals with local companies and struck lucrative endorsement deals with national brands like Gatorade and New Balance, as intended. But a far more common practice involves boosters using purported NIL deals to lure recruits or players from the transfer portal to their favorite school. The NCAA's enforcement division initially sought to punish schools that used NIL as a form of 'pay for play' or recruiting inducement, but when the University of Tennessee came under fire in early 2024, the state's attorney general sued, and a judge issued an injunction prohibiting the NCAA from enforcing those rules. Advertisement The amount of money being spent in the NIL arena has skyrocketed since 2021. Last year, Ohio State athletic director Ross Bjork said the Buckeyes football team — which later won the national championship — was earning $20 million in NIL. CBS Sports recently reported that a number of men's basketball rosters have already topped $10 million for next season. To this point, collectives supporting specific schools have ruled the market, but administrators are hoping the House settlement will curtail that influence. In addition to schools being allowed to make NIL deals themselves, the new model also requires all outside NIL deals of more than $600 to go through a clearinghouse that will determine whether the payments are for a valid business purpose and reflect fair market value. Meanwhile, the settlement establishes an enforcement arm that will penalize schools that go over the $20.5 million cap. All of this will be overseen by the newly established regulatory body, called the College Sports Commission, which is in the process of shifting considerable oversight and control of college sports away from the NCAA and to the power conferences. The NCAA's Division I Board of Directors recently approved a series of proposals, pending settlement approval, that will strike 153 rules from the association's handbook and clear the way for the settlement terms to be implemented. The settlement represents a significant shift in college sports, but it will not mark the end of the NCAA's legal challenges. Among numerous ongoing cases, Johnson v. NCAA was filed in 2019 in Pennsylvania and seeks to have athletes classified as employees who are entitled to minimum wage compensation. The NCAA's efforts to dismiss the case have thus far been denied. Revenue sharing and third-party NIL constraints could also invite additional lawsuits on the basis of Title IX, antitrust violations and conflicts with state laws. NCAA and power conference stakeholders continue to pursue antitrust exemptions in the form of Congressional intervention, in hopes of codifying the settlement and its effectiveness moving forward. President Donald Trump has explored a new commission focused on the issues facing college sports, led by former Alabama head coach Nick Saban and billionaire Texas Tech board chair Cody Campbell, though it is paused as members of Congress pursue legislation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store