FO cautions against India's escalatory actions
ISLAMABAD: Foreign Secretary Amna Baloch has cautioned against India's escalatory actions and reaffirmed Pakistan's resolve to respond firmly to any aggressive moves.
As part of ongoing diplomatic engagement, the Foreign Secretary briefed Heads of Missions and diplomats based in Islamabad on the latest developments following the Pahalgam attack in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK), the Foreign Office said in a statement on Friday.
This was the foreign secretary's second consecutive briefing to foreign diplomats in as many days.
She outlined the key takeaways from the National Security Committee (NSC) meeting, categorically rejecting India's baseless allegations linking Pakistan to the attack. The foreign secretary warned that India's attempts to weaponise terrorism for political gains threaten regional peace and security.
On Thursday, the foreign secretary briefed a group of Islamabad-based Heads of Missions and diplomats on the evolving situation following Pahalgam attack in IIOJK and shared the outcomes of NSC's key decisions.
She rejected Indian misinformation campaign against Pakistan and said that such tactics would obstruct the path to peace and stability in the region.
The foreign secretary underscored that Pakistan has always rejected terrorism in all its forms and manifestations. She also warned against Indian attempts to escalate tensions and reaffirmed Pakistan's readiness to counter any misadventure.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Bilawal warns Pakistan-India war threshold at ‘historic low'
Listen to article Former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari on Monday warned that the threshold for war between nuclear-armed neighbours India and Pakistan had "never been lower" following last month's military standoff. In an interview with Sky News in London, he expressed concern that tensions between the two rivals remain dangerously high, despite a US-brokered ceasefire announced by President Donald Trump on May 10. 'At the moment, the threshold for conflict between India and Pakistan is the lowest than it's ever been in our history,' he said. 'We've achieved the ceasefire, but we have not achieved peace as it stands today.' The confrontation was sparked by a deadly terrorist attack in Indian Illegal Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK) that killed 26 tourists. India blamed the assault on Pakistan-based groups, a claim Islamabad strongly denied, calling for an impartial international investigation. Over four days, the two sides exchanged missile strikes, drone attacks and engaged in air combat, raising fears of a full-scale war under a nuclear overhang. The crisis eventually prompted international intervention aimed at de-escalation. Bilawal cautioned that another attack—regardless of proof—could immediately trigger war. 'If there's a terrorist attack anywhere in India or IIOJK, proof or no proof, that means war,' he said. 'That's not a tenable situation.' He reiterated Pakistan's call for dialogue and diplomacy to address all outstanding issues, including terrorism, Kashmir, and water disputes. He also criticised India's stance on the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), saying that delayed water releases by New Delhi could harm Pakistan's agriculture. Any attempt to build new infrastructure on Pakistan-allocated rivers would be viewed as aggression. 'Even a week's delay in water supply can destroy crops,' he said. 'That would be war.' Dismissing Indian accusations of Pakistani complicity in the Kashmir attack, Bilawal said no credible evidence had been presented. 'They went to war with a nuclear power and still cannot name a single terrorist involved,' he said. He defended Pakistan's counterterrorism record, highlighting the country's removal from the FATF grey list under his tenure as proof of progress. Bilawal is currently leading a diplomatic mission across several world capitals to present Pakistan's stance following the conflict. The delegation has held meetings with United Nations representatives, member states, and US officials, and is continuing engagements in London.
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
US Supreme Court grants DOGE access to sensitive social security data
The U.S. Supreme Court building is seen the morning before justices are expected to issue opinions in pending cases, in Washington, U.S., June 14, 2024. Photo:REUTERS Listen to article The US Supreme Court granted on Friday the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a key player in President Donald Trump's drive to slash the federal workforce, broad access to personal information on millions of Americans in Social Security Administration data systems while a legal challenge plays out. On the request of the Justice Department, the judiciary had put on hold Maryland-based US District Judge Ellen Hollander's order that had largely blocked DOGE's access to "personally identifiable information" in data such as medical and financial records while litigation proceeds in a lower court. Hollander found that allowing DOGE unfettered access likely would violate a federal privacy law. The top court's brief, unsigned order did not provide a rationale for siding with DOGE. BREAKING: The Supreme Court grants DOGE affiliates access to Social Security Administration records. Justices Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson would deny the request. — SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 6, 2025 The court has a 6-3 conservative majority. Its three liberal justices dissented from the order. Liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in a dissent that was joined by fellow liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, criticized the court's majority for granting DOGE "unfettered data access" despite the administration's "failure to show any need or any interest in complying with existing privacy safeguards." In a separate order on Friday, the Supreme Court extended its block on judicial orders requiring DOGE to turn over records to a government watchdog group that sought details on the entity established by US President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk. DOGE swept through federal agencies as part of the Republican president's effort, spearheaded by Musk, to eliminate federal jobs, downsize and reshape the US government and root out what they see as wasteful spending. Musk formally ended his government work on May 30. Two labor unions and an advocacy group filed suits to prevent DOGE from accessing sensitive data at the Social Security Administration (SSA), including social security numbers, bank account data, tax information, earnings history and immigration records. The agency is a major provider of government benefits, sending checks each month to more than 70 million recipients including retirees and disabled Americans. Democracy Forward, a liberal legal group that represented the plaintiffs, said Friday's order would put millions of Americans' data at risk. "Elon Musk may have left Washington DC, but his impact continues to harm millions of people," the group said in a statement. "We will continue to use every legal tool at our disposal to keep unelected bureaucrats from misusing the public's most sensitive data as this case moves forward." In their lawsuit, the plaintiffs argued that SSA had been "ransacked" and that DOGE members had been installed without proper vetting or training. They demanded access to some of the agency's most sensitive data systems. Hollander in an April 17 ruling found that DOGE had failed to explain why its stated mission required "unprecedented, unfettered access to virtually SSA's entire data systems". "For some 90 years, SSA has been guided by the foundational principle of an expectation of privacy with respect to its records," Hollander wrote. "This case exposes a wide fissure in the foundation." Hollander issued a preliminary injunction that prohibited DOGE staffers and anyone working with them from accessing data containing personal information, with only narrow exceptions. The judge's ruling did allow DOGE affiliates to access data that had been stripped of private information as long as those seeking access had gone through the proper training and passed background checks. Hollander also ordered DOGE affiliates to "disgorge and delete" any personal information already in their possession. The Richmond, Virginia-based 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals in a 9-6 vote declined on April 30 to pause Hollander's block on DOGE's unlimited access to Social Security Administration records. Justice department lawyers in their Supreme Court filing characterized Hollander's order as judicial overreach. "The district court is forcing the executive branch to stop employees charged with modernizing government information systems from accessing the data in those systems because, in the court's judgment, those employees do not 'need' such access," they wrote. The six dissenting judges wrote that the case should have been treated the same as one in which 4th Circuit panel ruled 2-1 to allow DOGE to access data at the US Treasury and Education Departments and the Office of Personnel Management. In a concurring opinion, seven judges who ruled against DOGE wrote that the case involving Social Security data was "substantially stronger" with "vastly greater stakes," citing "detailed and profoundly sensitive Social Security records," such as family court and school records of children, mental health treatment records and credit card information.
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
North Korea hit by major internet outage, likely due to internal cause
SEOUL: North Korea's internet was hit by a major outage that lasted several hours on Saturday, knocking off connection to government web sites and official news services online and severing the reclusive country from cyberspace. It was not clear what caused the outage but it may have been internal rather than a cyberattack, as connections via China and Russia were affected, said researchers who monitor North Korea's internet and technology infrastructure. North Korea's main official news services, its Foreign Ministry, and the Air Koryo national airline were among websites inaccessible on Saturday, before they started coming back slowly around midday according to checks by Reuters. North Korea's entire internet infrastructure was not showing up on systems that can monitor internet activities, and email services were also affected, Junade Ali, a U.K.-based researcher who monitors the North Korean internet, said earlier. 'Hard to say if this is intentional or accidental - but seems like this is internal rather than an attack.' North Korea says military ties with Russia to ensure 'peace' Officials at South Korea's cyber terror response centre, a police division that monitors North Korea's cyber activities, could not be reached for comment. Martyn Williams, who specializes in North Korea's technology and infrastructure at the Washington-based Stimson Center, also said the cause appeared to be internal as the Chinese and Russian connections were not working. North Korea has one of the world's most strictly controlled internet systems, including access to any form of online communication. The general public has access only to an intranet set up by the government and that is not connected to the wider global network. An elite few in the government and leadership are allowed open internet access, and government and news websites often serve up propaganda for outside audiences. North Korea has in previous years experienced large internet outages suspected as being caused by cyberattacks. The country operates elite teams of hackers, including a group known as Lazarus run by the government intelligence apparatus, that are blamed for attacks against foreign institutions and companies and more recently for theft and the laundering of cryptocurrencies. North Korea denies involvement in hacking, crypto thefts and other cybercrime.
