AfDB cuts Africa's 2025 growth forecast on trade tariffs uncertainty
NAIROBI: Africa's economic output is expected to grow by 3.9% this year, the African Development Bank said in its annual African Economic Outlook report on Tuesday, quickening from last year's pace of 3.3%.
However, this year's forecast - which covers economies of all its 54 member states - represents a 0.2 percentage points downgrade from the bank's initial forecast, the development lender said during its annual meeting in Ivory Coast, mainly due to the shocks caused by new trade tariffs imposed by the united States.
The bank, which is Africa's biggest development lender with $318 billion in capital, also cut its initial 2026 growth forecast by 0.4 percentage points to 4.0%, citing the same uncertainty from trade tariffs.
'Since January 2025, the world has experienced additional shocks, exacerbating an already complex global macroeconomic landscape,' the AfDB said in the report.
'These shocks include a plethora of new tariffs imposed by the United States and retaliatory measures announced and implemented by its trading partners.'
African Development Bank to pick new head to confront US funding cuts
The turmoil is likely to curb global demand due to the resultant economic slowdown, curbing Africa's exports to the rest of the world, the AfDB said.
'The fluidity of the situation and evolving uncertainty means that the growth impact will depend on the decision of the 90-day pause of 'Liberation Day' tariffs announced by the United States,' the lender said.
Although the U.S. accounts for just 5% of Africa's annual global trade, the continent has already been impacted by a drop in prices of commodity and the downward revaluation of financial assets, the AfDB said.
The projected growth in the region for this year will be supported by a growth rate of more than 5% in 21 economies, the AfDB said, with Ethiopia, Niger, Rwanda, and Senegal growing by at least 7%, the lender said in the report.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Goldman Sachs pares risk after tariff move, braces for more uncertainty
NEW YORK: Goldman Sachs has moderated its risk-taking since U.S. President Donald Trump's April tariff announcement, and the Wall Street bank is braced for more uncertainty, a top executive said. 'We have moderated our risk positioning since April 2nd – I think that's a sensible thing for us to do,' Goldman President John Waldron said in a podcast released by the investment bank on Thursday. 'We're absorbing a lot of risk from our clients. We want to continue to do that, but we also, where we can, we (pare) our risk and stay a little bit closer to home.' Goldman is readying for continued uncertainty in the coming months, which means keeping a greater liquidity cushion, he said. Financial markets have been turbulent since Trump's so-called 'Liberation Day,' when he announced plans to increase tariffs on trading partners. Waldron, who is widely seen as the likely successor to Goldman CEO David Solomon, said the tariff move was 'very, very disruptive.' Goldman Sachs sees OPEC+ raising oil output by 0.41 mb/d in August Some companies are now starting to make business decisions based on assumptions that tariffs will be raised to a range of 10% to 15%, he said. 'We're moving into now an adjustment phase, and you'll see, I think, some more decision-making on capital spend, M&A transactions, capital return, stock buybacks,' Waldron said. The U.S. economy is still strong, backed by a solid labor market and consumer spending, he said. 'All those factors in the U.S. to me lead to a likely scenario where we don't have a recession,' he said. Meanwhile, Waldron warned investors were getting concerned about an unsustainable U.S. fiscal deficit. 'The bond market is starting to be heard, and I hope that gets some attention in the halls of Congress,' he said. Rating agency Moody's cut the pristine U.S. sovereign credit rating by one notch last month, the last of the major ratings agencies to downgrade the country, citing concerns about the nation's growing $36 trillion debt pile. The biggest question for markets is the path of interest rates, particularly in the long term, Waldron said. 'We're seeing a lot of increase in duration in the rate curves in the United States and Japan and many other countries - and I think that could be a brake on economic growth,' he said.
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
Pressure without clarity breeds market volatility
With the tariff reprieve deadline behind us and the long-promised Trump-Xi phone call still nowhere on the calendar, global markets are once again squinting at the smoke and worrying about another, bigger fire. President Trump, in a late-night Truth Social post, called Xi Jinping 'extremely hard to make a deal with' — not exactly the tone of a self-styled, delusionally confident dealmaker still expecting surrender. And it might not be just bluster this time. Behind the posturing, investor confidence is clearly slipping. Liberation Day tariffs are live again in the background, and no one really knows what comes next. The immediate question is what happens if that elusive Trump-Xi phone call never happens. Washington says it expects one this week. Beijing hasn't confirmed anything. And the market is left guessing. Meanwhile in Geneva, last month's tariff truce is already fraying. US officials claim China hasn't delivered on commitments related to rare earths. Beijing accuses the US of imposing new discriminatory restrictions, including fresh export controls on AI chip tools and revoking student visas. And round and round it goes all over again. In trade terms, the landscape is a minefield. The US is now actively blocking shipments of jet engine parts to China and tightening curbs on Huawei. And Trump's approval of Nippon Steel's $14 billion acquisition of US Steel has only inflamed domestic opposition, with American labour unions accusing the administration of selling out jobs and ignoring national security implications. Yet the bigger concern is what all this means for financial markets. With barely five weeks to go before the full slate of Trump's tariffs reactivates, safe-haven flows are already distorting capital allocations. Gold has surged again this week. Treasury yields are seesawing, and the dollar, while still dominant, is increasingly facing second-guessing in emerging market FX desks. If this impasse persists, wouldn't we be witnessing the first contours of a financial realignment? Emerging markets, in particular, are in the crosshairs. Trade-dependent economies that rely on stable commodity flows and predictable currency regimes are already jittery. Markets hate nothing more than uncertainty – not even bad news, which ultimately priced in – and with Trump's trade agenda now increasingly shaped more by timeline pressure than negotiation detail, who knows how all the chaos will be contained? Investors, meanwhile, are reacting with their feet. EM equities are posting net outflows week after week, and dollar debt spreads are widening despite relatively stable fundamentals in Asia and Latin America. Ultimately, it's Big Money's instinct for preservation, propagation and profit that dictates the direction of global markets – so, naturally, they start asking questions. For example, what if the Trump-Xi call doesn't happen? What if China, emboldened by its domestic stimulus and angry at Washington's hardening posture, chooses to escalate? Trump, for all his claims of being a master negotiator, has boxed himself into a timeline. Wednesday was the deadline for countries to submit alternate proposals to avoid tariffs, yet as of now, there is no grand deal, no summit, not even a scheduled call. And markets have noticed. The broader fear isn't just another round of US-China decoupling. It's that such fragmentation now coincides with other global flashpoints. Talks between the US and Iran have reportedly broken down. Israel is again talking of pre-emptive strikes on Iran. Ukraine is deepening shock strikes into Russia. Israel is again bombing Syria. The cruel death rattle in Gaza continues. The global risk map is lit up in more regions than at any point since the Cold War. Yet the cold calculus of financial markets means that its most frequently asked questions will not be about heartless murder of international law and innocent children in the Holy Land, but the fate of traditional safe havens that have protected the global financial elite's wealth for the last century. In this environment, can the dollar maintain its supremacy? On the one hand, geopolitical instability has always favoured the greenback. But on the other, the US now finds itself as a source of instability as much as a shelter from it. Japan has slowed its US debt purchases. Korea and Taiwan have been selling dollars to defend their currencies. Even the Hong Kong Monetary Authority is doing the unthinkable, diversifying away from Treasuries. The Trump administration might believe that pressure builds leverage. But from a macro-financial perspective, pressure without clarity breeds only volatility. Investors don't just fear tariffs. They fear that no one in the White House is sure what comes after them. The difference between a negotiating tactic and a policy vacuum matters deeply to markets, and guess which one we're dangerously close to right now? Meanwhile, domestic pressure is building. Labour unions are already speaking out against foreign takeovers. Congress is threatening oversight on national security grounds. The administration faces the risk of having overpromised on tariffs as a tool for reindustrialisation, and underdelivered on strategic clarity. In this moment, it is more about credibility than just trade. If Trump fails to get a substantive agreement with China, and the tariff regime reignites without a cohesive global response, then the damage won't be limited to commodities or manufacturing. It will be felt in bond markets, FX reserves, corporate risk models, and the very architecture of global trade planning. Can the world afford a tariff war in the middle of so many open geopolitical fronts? Can the US simultaneously confront Iran, contain China, support Ukraine, and reassure jittery investors? The question is no longer whether Trump will escalate. It is whether markets, allies, and adversaries are ready for the consequences. This week may provide an answer — or a prelude to a much more volatile second half of the year. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
TSX flat as tariff uncertainty lingers; BoC holds key rate steady
Canada's main stock index struggled for direction on Wednesday, as investors remained cautious on U.S. tariff negotiations with trading partners and assessed the Bank of Canada's decision to maintain the interest rate. The Toronto Stock Exchange's S&P/TSX composite index was flat at 26,426.98 points. The index notched a record peak in the previous two sessions. The U.S. doubled tariffs on imported steel and aluminum on Wednesday, the same day as the deadline for Washington's trading partners to make their best offers to avoid hefty 'Liberation Day' tariffs from taking effect in July. Europe's top trade negotiator said that trade talks between the European Union and the U.S. are going in the right direction. Also on Wednesday, Trump called China's Xi Jinping 'extremely hard to make a deal with', pointing to frictions after the White House raised expectations for a long-awaited phone call between the two leaders this week. Meanwhile, the Bank of Canada held its key benchmark rate at 2.75%, citing the need to assess the effects of U.S. trade policy, but indicated another cut might be necessary if tariffs weaken the economy. 'The market has become a little insensitive to all the trade headlines until we have something more concrete', said Angelo Kourkafas, senior global investment strategist at Edward Jones. 'The market is choosing to focus again on the fundamental factors…there's been a lot of reversals in these news headlines, while at the same time economic data have continued to come in pretty strong, which has allowed the markets to look a little bit past those headlines.' Data showed Canada's services economy downturn eased in May, as firms grew more hopeful that trade and political uncertainty would become less of a drag on activity over the coming 12 months. Canadian labor productivity rose by 0.2% in the first quarter. On TSX, metal miners' shares gained 0.7% tracking higher gold prices, while the healthcare subindex gained 0.6%.
