Durban drug bust reveals new trend in illicit drug market
On Sunday the Durban Metro Police Drug Team, working in collaboration with the Counter Narcotics Unit under KKwaZulu-Natal Crime Intelligence, intercepted an alleged drug distributor at Petroport Northbound.
The suspect, a former nightclub owner now allegedly supplying drugs across greater Durban, was caught while reportedly attempting to deliver heroin.
Police seized approximately 5,013 heroin capsules (pending final forensic count), a CZ 75 pistol with its serial number filed off, 17 live 9mm rounds, a magazine, and other drugs valued at R160,390.
Durban Metro Police spokesperson Boysie Zungu said while heroin remains dangerous and profitable for syndicates, demand for the drug has been decreasing in KwaZulu-Natal due to a shift toward cheaper, more potent alternatives.
'Heroin demand has decreased in KZN due to the increased popularity of crack cocaine (rock), which is now cheaper and more potent,' Zungu said. 'However, drug abuse continues to be a challenge within our communities.'
Zungu explained that market dynamics have shifted sharply. 'Previously, a heroin capsule cost R10. With a drastic increase in price due to export problems from supplying countries, heroin prices have shot up to R35 a capsule,' he said.
'This has made heroin capsules more scarce making this bust all the more significant.
'Removing over 5,000 capsules from the street is not just a disruption to supply, but a statement to communities and traffickers that police are taking action,' he said.
The suspect faces charges of dealing in and possession of heroin, illegal possession of a firearm, and unlawful possession of ammunition. Police said intelligence gathered during the arrest would assist in further operations.
Zungu added: 'While it is difficult to stop drug dealing completely with limited resources, we remain committed to targeting dealers head-on. Community partnerships are key to disrupting the changing drug landscape.'
THE MERCURY
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
3 days ago
- IOL News
Lehae allegations are a political witch hunt
Sithembiso Zungu Zungu insists the accusations lack credible evidence and are politically driven. Image: Facebook LEHAE Phase 3 — Sithembiso Zungu, newly appointed MMC for Group Corporate and Shared Services, has firmly rejected corruption allegations related to his tenure as Ward 12 Councillor and his association with Citydev Construction. Presenting a detailed rebuttal, Zungu insists the accusations lack credible evidence and are politically driven. Responding to claims that he received illegal payments, Zungu stated unequivocally: 'There is no credible, publicly available evidence that confirms I never received any payments from Citydev Construction during my tenure as Ward 12 Councillor in Lehae Phase 3.' He emphasised that official records, including those from the Department of Correctional Services, 'have no record of me being held at their facility in relation to the Lehae community housing project case'. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ On accusations of demanding facilitation fees from contractors involved in community housing projects and school refurbishments, Zungu said: 'Why would I do that? I have consistently and strongly dismissed these claims via credible media platforms and through direct statements to journalists.' He highlighted his role as a mediator: 'My primary aim was mediation between contractors and communities, not financial gain or extortion.' He also pointed out an absence of any audit reports, financial documents, or other proof linking him to illicit payments, describing the charges as 'a witch hunt aimed at tarnishing my name and abusing media narratives for political gain'. Regarding his cooperation with law enforcement, Zungu affirmed full transparency and compliance. 'The Hawks have completed their investigation and submitted the findings to the Director of Public Prosecutions for a decision,' he noted. 'I have no judicial reprimands, contempt findings, or adverse procedural rulings against me in relation to document provision.' Addressing concerns about his recent MMC appointment in the context of these longstanding allegations and purported association with a 'Construction Mafia,' Zungu stated: 'My appointment as MMC for Group Corporate and Shared Services was made by the Executive Mayor, following internal council deliberations. The Office of the Executive Mayor would be better placed to comment on this.' Providing context to his involvement with Citydev Construction, Zungu gave a nuanced account: 'In 2017, we were introduced to this private company by the then Ward Councillor of Ward 122, as they were undertaking bond housing in Lehae. I was the chairperson of the business forum at the time. Initially, I supplied materials for them and was later appointed as a social facilitator.' Zungu explained: 'We worked very well until I was elected Ward Councillor of 122 after the previous councillor passed away. I then resigned from the business forum to focus on my councillorship. Politics within the ANC then kicked in.' He concluded with a warning about internal party conflict: 'In short, all this has been a fabrication and is meant to tarnish my name from members within the ANC.' While the Hawks investigation has been handed to the Director of Public Prosecutions, no charges have been filed to date, and Zungu's legal status remains unchanged. His comprehensive denial and claims of political targeting prompt questions about the motivations behind the allegations, suggesting a wider context of factional battles within local politics. Zungu's insistence on transparency and cooperation stands in contrast to the persistent, yet unsubstantiated claims — underscoring the need for the process to run its course before drawing conclusions about his conduct. Get the real story on the go: Follow the Sunday Independent on WhatsApp.
IOL News
4 days ago
- IOL News
Twins denied bail in Durban court for the murder of Prasa manager Jacob Khoaele
The Durban Magistrate's Court has refused bail for twins accused of killing a Prasa boss. Image: File Twin brothers, who are accused of killing Jacob Khoaele, the regional manager of Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (Prasa), over a tender, had their bail application denied by the Durban Magistrate's Court on Friday afternoon. The court found that the twins failed to provide exceptional circumstances warranting their release. Khoaele was shot dead on January 22, 2025, at La Lucia, while returning from his grandchild's school meeting. Vukani Mchunu, Vukile Mchunu, Sandile Sakhile Ngcobo, and Mthandeni Cele are charged with his murder. On Friday, the twins, Vukani and Vukile, applied for bail while Ngcobo and Cele decided to abandon it. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading In their application, the twins from Ngonyameni in Mlazi said they are 35 years old and co-own a company, Masoloma Trading. Their lawyer, Musawenkosi Mkhize, said the twins are married, with Vukani having six children and Vukile having five. He said they also co-own a property worth R700,000 and cars, which include a Ford Ranger bakkie and a Mercedes-Benz. They both stated that they are breadwinners who earn approximately R35,000 a month. He said their employees were not paid their salaries due to their incarceration, and that is why they should get bail. Mkhize said it was an exceptional circumstance that his clients were running a company. Additionally, he said his clients were traditional healers who also ran a church. Mkhize said his clients should get bail because the State has a weak case against them. 'How are the two applicants linked? The incident occurred around January this year. The number of months has lapsed, arrests were only made in July,' he said. Mkhize said, judging by what the investigating officer is saying in his affidavit, the State relied on one witness, Shange. As he was arguing, Magistrate Siyanda Mlaba asked Mkhize to tell him about the exceptional circumstances of his clients. Senior State prosecutor, Calvin Govender, said it is the onus of the applicants to prove that they have exceptional circumstances, and they have failed to do so. He reminded the court that this was a bail application and that all evidence would be led during the trial. Govender said the police wanted to get their ducks in a row before making an arrest. 'That is why there was a delay,' he explained. He submitted that the State is of the view that there would be interference with the witnesses should the twins get bail. He said the previous manager from Prasa had to resign because of the twins, who wanted to be paid for work that Prasa was not satisfied with. He said Khoale paid with his life because he also refused to pay the twins for work that Prasa was not satisfied with. 'Everyone at Prasa is afraid of the applicants due to the known fact that they threatened their colleague and killed the other,' Govender added. Delivering his ruling, Magistrate Mlaba reminded that the bail was under Schedule 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. He said the accused were facing serious allegations, and further emphasised that this was not a trial but a bail application. Mlaba criticised Mkhize, saying that he said a lot of things but failed to tell the court why his clients should get bail. 'I remember asking him to hit the nail in the hand. I even asked him the definition of exceptional circumstances. But the attorney was not giving what I was expecting. I ended up just keeping quiet,' he said. He said the worst part was that there was no alternative address for the twins should they receive bail. He said the defence failed to tell the court those exceptional circumstances. The matter has been postponed to September 29 for further investigation.
The Citizen
5 days ago
- The Citizen
CCMA orders municipality to pay workers' wages fired after one day
CCMA ruled that each worker receive their full annual salary of more than R160 000 as compensation. The Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) recently ordered Gamagara municipality in the Northern Cape to pay six workers 12 months' compensation each after unfairly dismissing them a day after they were employed. The women were hired as general assistants on 1 July 2025, but were dismissed the following day without a valid reason. CCMA ruled that each worker receive their full annual salary of more than R160 000 as compensation. Workers called for interviews in February The dispute began when the workers were called for interviews in February 2025 in Kathu. On 18 June 2025 they received calls for them to sign appointment letters. The appointment letters indicated they would commence work on 1 July. When the six workers arrived at the municipality on 1 July, they were told to wait for their personal protective equipment. They performed no actual work on their first day. 'At the end of the day, they were told to report the following morning at 7.30am for induction,' according to the Orange Farm Human Rights Advice Centre. ALSO READ: Here's why employers can't use NDAs to hide harassment in the workplace Immediate dismissal and positions re-advertised When the workers arrived on 2 July, they were served with letters withdrawing their appointment letters. The letters said that an error was made when the shortlisted names were printed, hence the withdrawal. Worker Itlotlo Tong testified that they did not agree with the assertion that an error was made. 'There was no hearing, they were just terminated with immediate effect,' she said in her testimony. The municipality's HR manager, Appie Kabelo, served them with both the original appointment and withdrawal letters. The workers were never told who were the correct names that were supposed to be appointed. On the same day as the dismissals, the municipality re-advertised the same positions. The only difference was that the positions were originally advertised as external positions but were now advertised as internal positions. CCMA default award The workers contacted the Orange Farm Human Rights Advice Centre for support in bringing their cases to the CCMA. According to the award, the municipality failed to appear at the hearing despite proper notification. Before proceeding with the default arbitration, commissioner Amogelang Shadrack Bacwadi contacted municipal manager Lebogang Seetile, who confirmed the CCMA had served the correct email address of the human resource manager. Seetile told the mediator that he did not know why HR did not attend the proceedings. ALSO READ: Clicks nurse says she was 'victimised for reporting sexual harassment' CCMA commissioner's scathing criticism Bacwadi delivered a harsh criticism of the municipality's actions in his award. 'The reason for withdrawal of the appointment letters as stipulated in the withdrawal letters is a lame excuse, for the mere fact that the same positions were re-advertised as internal positions,' he ruled. The commissioner noted that the workers were issued appointment letters on 19 June 2025 to start 1 July 2025 and these letters were issued by HR. During this time, the workers were never informed about any error in terms of their appointment. 'The reason for the withdrawal is therefore strange, improbable and unacceptable,' Bacwadi said. Impossible error claims rejected The commissioner rejected the municipality's explanation entirely. 'If it was indeed as claimed, this should have at least been picked up before the applicants could even report for work. The same person who issued the applicants with the appointment letters was the same person who issued them with the withdrawal letters (HR),' he noted. Bacwadi questioned when the HR manager became aware of the supposed error. He pointed out that when workers reported for work on 1 July this was never brought to their attention. Instead, they were told about their personal protective equipment and that they would be informed when to come for their induction. 'It is impossible that that there could have been an error,' the commissioner said. ALSO READ: Dead man's estate wins R800k from police minister for unlawful arrest and detention Legal precedent applied In his legal analysis, Bacwadi referenced the case of Wyeth SA (Pty) Ltd v Manqele, noting that the Labour Appeal Court found that a person becomes an employee the moment an employment contract is signed, even before commencing work. The commissioner applied section 192 of the Labour Relations Act, which places the burden of proof on employers to show dismissals were fair. 'The applicants established in their evidence they were dismissed. The onus rests with the employer to prove on a balance of probabilities that the dismissal of the applicants was procedurally and substantively fair,' he ruled. Government institution held to higher standard Bacwadi emphasised that municipalities must meet higher standards as government institutions. He noted that municipalities are responsible for providing local services, including employment and must have competent HR personnel. 'Considering that the employer is a government institution that is expected to have competent HR personnel who are well vested in the labour laws of this country and are expected to abide by them, I am of the view that the employer disregarded the labour laws of this country in dismissing the applicants in the manner that they did,' Bacwadi ruled. CCMA commissioner justifies year's worth wages The commissioner concluded that maximum compensation was warranted given the circumstances. He found that the municipality failed to comply with requirements that dismissals should be for fair reasons and follow fair procedures. 'There is no evidence that suggest that they contravened any rule when they were dismissed on 2 July 2025. I therefore find that the dismissal was not appropriate and it is unfair. Final CCMA award details 'I find that the dismissal of the applicants by the employer (Gamagara municipality) was procedurally and substantively unfair.' The award orders compensation of 12 months' salary for each worker, though the written award contains an apparent error stating 'six months' salary' in one paragraph while consistently referring to 12 months elsewhere and in the actual compensation amounts. The municipality must pay each of the workers R162 935 by August 30, 2025. If the municipality fails to pay by the deadline, interest will accrue at the prescribed rate for judgment debts as set out in the Prescribed Rate of Interest Act of 1975. Victory during women's month Patrick Mlaba from the Orange Farm Human Rights Advice Centre celebrated the victory. 'What is important is that at least during Women's Month, we did something to further and honour their celebration and this should be an achievement to all women out there,' Mlaba said. The Orange Farm Human Rights Advice Centre expressed satisfaction with the outcome, saying it was 'very pleased with this victory of the women workers'. READ NEXT: Man accused of eating 'smelly' lunch dismissed after taking company to court
