
How Trump helped Venezuela's Maduro bounce back
Maduro cast himself as a protector, bringing his people home from what he called 'concentration camps,' with the regime launching an investigation into alleged abuses. For Maduro, the deal was a political win – and one delivered by his longtime adversary. But this wasn't a one-off victory.
Despite Trump's bombastic rhetoric, the US president's policies – from hardline migration measures, deportation deals and even sanctions – have paradoxically given Maduro room to manoeuvre. They've breathed fresh political oxygen into a regime many thought was on the brink, helping him survive.
In the lead-up to the Venezuelan presidential election on July 28 2024, Maduro faced his toughest challenge yet. After years of economic crisis and corruption, the country was desperate for change. Jubilant crowds packed opposition rallies across Venezuela, cheering María Corina Machado and her stand-in, Edmundo González, after the regime banned her from running. But hours after polls closed, the regime-controlled electoral council declared Maduro the winner — without releasing results. Opposition tallies from voting machines, later verified by independent experts, suggested González had won by a landslide.
Although bruised by an election defeat – one he's never admitted – Maduro remained unbroken. He cracked down on protesters, journalists, politicians – seemingly anyone questioning his alleged 'win.' Masked agents entered homes or snatched people from the streets, accusing them of conspiracy and terrorism.
When Donald Trump won the 2024 US presidential election in November, many Venezuelans hoped for renewed pressure on Maduro to accelerate regime change. Trump's first term had seen harsh sanctions and an antagonistic relationship, with the men sometimes trading insults. Trump called Maduro a 'Cuban puppet,' while Maduro dubbed Trump a 'racist cowboy.'
Instead of adding salt to Maduro's electoral wounds, Trump's early policies have paradoxically helped soothe them. Over the past decade, around eight million Venezuelans have fled their country, driven largely by economic collapse. By the time Trump took office in 2025 there were 600,000 Venezuelans in the country – many who had risked crossing the treacherous Darien Gap gap jungle to get there – but some segments of the US population demanded stronger measures against incoming migrants.
Trump pledged to deliver voters exactly what they wanted. Cracking down on the influx of Venezuelans was key to his strategy. He ramped up immigration enforcement, conducting raids that targeted undocumented Venezuelans in major US cities — and often citing efforts to dismantle the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua. He also announced plans to roll back Joe Biden-era protection, Temporary Protected Status (TPS,) which has given some Venezuelans the right to live and work temporarily in the country.
Maduro has seized on Trump's crackdown and dealmaking to boost his regime. He's staged glossy propaganda around a visit to Venezuela by US envoy Richard Grenell and elaborate homecomings from those deported from the US – including the well-known case of a two-year-old girl separated from her parents at the US-Mexico border, later reunited with her mother at the presidential palace.
These carefully-orchestrated displays feed into Maduro's long-standing effort to present himself as the nation's protector. So much so that there's even an action figure and cartoon based on him – 'Super Bigote'– a mustachioed superhero who battles imperial enemies.
Maduro has been careful not to give up too many bargaining chips. While Maduro has just released ten Americans in the latest prisoner swap, as well as a reported 80 Venezuelans, within days, 20 new arrests of opposition figures were reported. More than 900 political prisoners remain behind bars. Human rights groups call it a 'revolving-door policy.' Maduro may have handed over a few playing pieces, but he's already replacing them.
It hasn't all been plain sailing since Trump's return. The White House has recognised Edmundo González's 2024 victory and sees Maduro's rule as illegitimate. But the biggest blow – economically and symbolically – came when Trump reverted to his first-term favourite: sanctions. As well as individual sanctions against some regime members, by pulling Chevron's Venezuela license and imposing a 25 per cent tariff on imports from countries buying Venezuelan oil, Trump tightened the economic noose again. Yet in a twist, in the last few days it was reported that the US will allowed Chevron to resume limited operations, giving Maduro yet another lifeline.
While some opposition figures and economists believe that sanctions are necessary to hasten Maduro's downfall, there are others who argue they have historically hit ordinary people harder than the regime. This has given him fresh ammunition for Maduro to bash the opposition with, portraying them as traitors to the nation for largely supporting sanctions. María Corina Machado recently called Trump 'an ally of democracy' and of the Venezuelan people. 'The measures he has recently taken, including increased sanctions, demonstrate this,' she said.
While Maduro courts diplomacy with one hand and deploys revolutionary rhetoric with the other, the opposition lacks that luxury. It can't criticise Trump too harshly without risking key support, leaving it open to accusations of cosiness with the US administration, who many blame for the suffering of Venezuelans abroad.
With Trump back on the scene, the road ahead remains anything but predictable. And while Maduro isn't thriving – he is surviving. Trump, his policies and his love of dealmaking are helping him do just that.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
7 minutes ago
- The Guardian
US to impose 15% tariffs on South Korea as part of trade deal, Donald Trump says
President Donald Trump has said the US will charge a 15% tariff on imports from South Korea as part of an agreement with the Asian trading partner that avoids even higher levies. 'I am pleased to announce that the United States of America has agreed to a Full and Complete Trade Deal with the Republic of Korea,' Trump said on Truth Social on Wednesday. The South Korean president, Lee Jae Myung, said on Thursday the deal would put South Korea on an equal or better footing compared with other countries. He also said the countries had agreed to set up a $350bn investment fund, out of which $150bn was aimed at a shipbuilding partnership. Trump had said that as part of the arrangement, South Korea would invest $350bn in the US in projects selected by him and purchase $100bn of liquefied natural gas and other energy products. It was not immediately clear how the investment deals would be structured or over what time frame. Trump said additional investments would be announced later. Lee would visit the White House 'within the next two weeks' for a meeting with Trump, the US president added. He also said South Korea would accept American products – including cars, trucks and agriculture – into its markets and impose no import duties on them.


Spectator
18 minutes ago
- Spectator
Make Trump Britain's prime minister
When I was a young man, the claim that Britain was in danger of becoming the 51st state was a political slur mainly thrown about by the left, particularly those who objected to the presence of US military bases. But there was some anti-American sentiment on the right, too – Enoch Powell, for instance, had a dislike of America's hostility to the Empire that dated back to his service in the second world war. I'm even guilty of some anti–American prejudice myself and wrote a memoir in which I tried to convey that my failure to take Manhattan in the mid-1990s was because I wasn't willing to sell my soul to Mammon. Well, I take it all back. Having watched Donald Trump's performance at the joint press conference with the Prime Minister on Monday, I wish he was our leader and not Sir Keir Starmer. On all the key topics the President touched on – immigration, net zero, the awfulness of Sadiq Khan – I am in violent agreement with him. I would now like nothing more than for Britain to be the 51st state. It's not just because I'm more closely politically aligned with Trump than Starmer. If Britain was part of the United States, Trump wouldn't hesitate to start deporting undocumented migrants, as he's done in the US, where (according to the White House) illegal immigration has fallen by 95 per cent since he became the 47th President. All those tedious legal obligations we have under the European Convention on Human Rights and the Refugee Convention would be swatted aside like so many pesky flies. If the price to pay is renaming the stretch of water between Britain and France the 'American Channel', so be it. When it comes to energy, I can think of no greater boon to the British economy than re-starting oil and gas exploration in the North Sea, lifting the fracking ban and exploiting our mineral rights in the South Atlantic. It's our insane net-zero policy and our resulting electricity prices that is partly responsible for our GDP per capita being lower than Mississippi's, the poorest state in the union. Incidentally, average GDP per capita was higher in the UK than the US as recently as 2007. We passed the Climate Change Act the following year, around the same time as our long, ignominious decline began. Above all, there's the First Amendment. Oh, how I wish the speech of British citizens enjoyed the same protections as that of Americans. All the fetters on freedom of expression that have sprung up like knotweed since the passing of the Race Relations Act in 1965 – buried in nasty little clauses in the Public Order Act 1986, the Malicious Communications Act 1988, the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, the Communications Act 2003 and the Online Safety Act 2023 – would not survive a First Amendment challenge. The moment we became the 51st state, they would all be placed in what Americans call 'the circular file', i.e. the bin. Of course, it won't ever happen – and I don't want this to read like a counsel of despair. I still hold out a sliver of hope that a future British government will do its best to implement all of these policies, although stopping the boats, scrapping net zero and restoring free speech would be a good deal easier if we were the 51st state. In the words of Paul Goodman, a Conservative colleague in the House of Lords, if a ministry led by Nigel Farage tried to do any of these things, it 'would be met on day one by an institutional intifada'. A radical, reforming government might have the intestinal fortitude to stand up to this onslaught, but, like Lord Goodman, I fear it would soon be seen off by the closed ranks of the Establishment, much like Liz Truss's was. But I have a solution. We all know Trump to be an ambitious man who will be reluctant to surrender power in 2028. So why shouldn't he become a British citizen and run against Sir Keir in 2029, either as the newly installed head of Reform UK or as the leader of a new political party? His mother was born in Scotland, so he's eligible, and unlike in the US, you don't have to be born in Britain to occupy our highest political office. I imagine the prospect of addressing the House of Commons as our prime minister will appeal to him as an act of sweet revenge after being denied the opportunity to address parliament during his forthcoming state visit. If anyone can take on the Blob, the Donald can. Kemi Badenoch can be deputy prime minister and Nigel our ambassador in Washington (after being given a hereditary peerage). Mr President, if you're reading this, I want you to know I stand ready to serve. Let's make Britain great again.


Spectator
18 minutes ago
- Spectator
The demise of South Park
President Trump has a very small willy. His boyfriend is Satan. He's a con man who will sue you for billions on the flimsiest of pretexts but will probably settle for a few hundred million. If this is your idea of cutting-edge satire then you are going to love the new season of South Park, which includes a number of scenes of Trump stripping off in his White House bedroom and trying to interest the devil in his minuscule appendage. But if I were Paramount+ and I'd just signed a $1.5 billion deal for the exclusive five-year rights to South Park, I think I'd be feeling a bit shortchanged by the première of the show's 27th season. Sure, you could argue that South Park was always this way: the first episode (in 1997) was, after all, titled 'Cartman Gets An Anal Probe'. But though I yield to few in my fondness for crass, puerile, broad-brush humour – my second-favourite moment being the gross-out scene far too disgusting to explain, where Randy blames the mess on his computer screen as 'ectoplasm' from a passing 'spooky ghost' – I fear that the once fearlessly outrageous show has long since lost its game. Obviously you're now wondering what my favourite moment is. This has to be the one where Randy is playing Wheel of Fortune and the category is 'People Who Annoy You'. After his letter guesses, the puzzle spells 'N_GGERS'. Unfortunately, Randy guesses the wrong answer. It is, of course, 'NAGGERS'. In fairness, part of South Park's problem is that it has become the victim of changing mores. When it began, political correctness – later to mutate into the even more nauseating, domineering and absurd cult of 'woke' – was in its pomp. The environment for the kind of satire displayed in the classic 'Death Camp of Tolerance' episode ('People of all colours and creeds holding hands beneath a rainbow') was correspondingly target-rich. But with the arrival of Trump's aggressive second term, those days are gone. Indeed, this is the running joke of season 27 so far, which begins with Cartman discovering that his favourite comedy show – National Public Radio (NPR), the one where you get to laugh at whiny liberals being liberal and whiny – has been terminated by presidential fiat. What is the point of being Cartman, he wonders, if no one finds his comments offensive any more? He puts on a T-shirt that says 'Woke is Dead' and plans to commit suicide in a pact with Butters – whether Butters likes it or not. Even South Park Elementary School's aggressively woke headteacher PC Principal has begun drinking the Trump Kool Aid. Much to the children's horror, he announces in assembly that his initials now stand for 'Power Christian' – and as affirmation of his new-found faith, he has decided to invite Jesus into the school. Any children who won't allow Jesus to join them on their lunch table will be severely punished. The Jesus scenes aren't interesting or funny. Having introduced the character mainly, I presume, to reaffirm its commitment to sacrilege, the episode can't quite decide what to do with him. Jesus just floats around the school with his beard, white robes and halo, being meek but not really saying much until the end where in a mystifying and ill-thought-through scene, he delivers a 'Sermon' to the South Park residents explaining that he's there under duress. This is ridiculous. He's the actual Son of God. Literally nothing is beyond his capability. He is brave, intelligent, well read, wise, charismatic, articulate, adored by women, totally cool and utterly based. There's no way someone like that is going to get trapped against his will, for however convoluted a reason, in South Park Elementary. Jesus presents a problem for satirists because, being flawless, he has no weak points that can be exaggerated for comedic effect. In the past, South Park has got round this by treating him as a superhero, deceptively mild but not to be messed with ('I'm packing,' he says in an early appearance, revealing the array of weaponry beneath his robes). Here it's as if the South Park team has lost its nerve: it dare not show Jesus being truly amazing because that might open them to the charge of being insufficiently irreverent. And if that's the case, they are right to worry, for the whole episode is like one giant punch pulled. There are few surer signs that you've sold out to the Establishment than when your edgy comedy series with the crass jokes and badly animated characters earns you $300 million a year. Trump and the Trump administration won't be offended by this satirical-target-missing homage masquerading as critique: they will adore it.