logo
No civility, no democracy? These writers say it's vital we talk to each other

No civility, no democracy? These writers say it's vital we talk to each other

USA Today2 days ago

No civility, no democracy? These writers say it's vital we talk to each other | Opinion The growing inability – or even desire – to engage with people who hold opposing views is leading to fractures that aren't harmful only to personal relationships. They're hurting our country.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
These writers say it's vital we talk to each other
Two veteran journalists fear the nearly 250-year-old American experiment is at risk if we can't get back to talking to each other in meaningful ways.
If it weren't for bourbon, veteran Detroit journalists Nolan Finley and Stephen Henderson would not be friends.
Frequent sparring partners? Sure. But not friends.
When they discovered a shared love of the famed Kentucky beverage, however, they started meeting at Motor City bars and really talking to each other.
And even though they are about as far apart on the political spectrum as you can get, they realized they had more in common than they thought. Mutual respect then evolved into friendship.
Finley, a conservative, and Henderson, a liberal, have appeared frequently together on Detroit TV shows, debating the news of the day. Yet, people would be surprised when they discovered they were more than competitors in the world of ideas. They were friends, too.
So Finley, the editorial page editor of The Detroit News, and Henderson, a Pulitzer Prize winner who has worked across journalism mediums, decided to start bringing together diverse groups of their friends and acquaintances at 'bourbon nights.' At these events, a cross section of Detroiters who would have probably never hung out otherwise realized they enjoyed the conversations.
Those events later morphed into The Civility Project, with Finley and Henderson holding workshops about how to cross ideological divides.
Now, Finley and Henderson, along with author and writing coach Lynne Golodner, have turned what they've learned into 'The Civility Book,' which will be released in early June.
(Full disclosure: Finley was my boss when I worked at The Detroit News and is one of my closest friends. I consider Henderson a friend as well.)
I recently spoke with them about their book and why civility is more important than ever in our deeply divided country.
There's value in getting out of our own echo chambers
Finley and Henderson say the driving principle of their book is the value in engaging with those who hold different views and come from different backgrounds. As they write, 'Embracing empathy and respect for 'the other side' doesn't mean abandoning your own convictions.'
Opinion: Is it me or ChatGPT? As AI grows smarter, I have a down-to-earth worry ‒ my job.
'All good people come to their opinions in the same way,' Finley says. 'They take the information available, run it through the filter of their own experiences, and they come up with an opinion.'
And it's OK if the opinion is different from your own, Finley says.
'It doesn't make them evil and it doesn't mean they're out to destroy you. It just means they've lived different life experiences.'
Simply hearing out someone else is not the same thing as 'giving in.'
After all, changing someone's mind is close to impossible. Trust me, I know from experience after years as an opinion columnist. Yet, I consider it a victory when I hear from a reader who will say they're on the opposite side of the political spectrum but still respect my views and take time to read my column.
After years of battling out their ideas without really changing the other's mind, Henderson and Finley say there's still value in having the debate.
'While it's true that we don't change each other's minds and we don't find each other on the same side of most issues, when we talk about those things, I think we both would say that we're learning from the other person,' Henderson says.
'Maybe one of us has come across some information about something that the other hadn't seen. That happens a lot. And there is value in understanding the perspective of people who disagree. It strengthens your argument.'
What's on the line if we can't be civil with one another? A lot.
The growing inability – or even desire – to engage with people who hold opposing views is leading to fractures that aren't harmful only to personal relationships. They're hurting our country.
After the contentious 2024 presidential election, many of us know of family, friends or coworkers who no longer talk because of their political differences. Members of Congress scream at each other instead of working together. And we live in our own social media and cable TV silos, where we can have our views confirmed and never challenged.
Opinion: Salman Rushdie canceled? Pro-Palestinian groups hamper speech for everyone else.
Finley and Henderson are concerned about what Americans' unwillingness to engage constructively with others portends.
'There's something fundamental about the exchange of ideas in a democracy,' Henderson says. 'That may seem like an obvious observation, but right now I'm not sure it is. The democratic experiment that this country represents depends on the honest exchange of ideas.'
Henderson fears the nearly 250-year-old American experiment is at risk if we can't get back to talking to each other in a meaningful way.
'Do we want to keep trying to perfect democracy in this country, or are we just kind of done with it?' he asks.
Finley and Henderson hope their book can serve as a guide to healing this coming apart. And it starts one conversation at a time.
'Civility means learning to engage without the hatred and learning to disagree with someone without devaluing that person,' Finley says. 'And I guess that would be it in a nutshell for me.'
Ingrid Jacques is a columnist at USA TODAY. Contact her at ijacques@usatoday.com or on X: @Ingrid_Jacques

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Opinion - Trump's ‘return to office' crusade smothers its pronatalist promise
Opinion - Trump's ‘return to office' crusade smothers its pronatalist promise

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion - Trump's ‘return to office' crusade smothers its pronatalist promise

The White House trumpets a 'baby bonus' — $5,000 wired days after delivery — to reverse America's record-low 1.6 fertility rate, documented by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Vital Statistics Reports. In the same breath, it orders every federal employee back to the office five days a week. But Stanford's new 'Working from Home in 2025' survey of 16,422 professionals upends that logic: women with children desire 2.66 remote days each week, higher than any other demographic. The administration vows to grow families while vaporizing the flexibility that makes new children feasible, creating a collision that risks empty cribs and hollow offices alike. Time rules parenthood. The average American commute consumes 55 minutes round-trip, meaning a traditional five-day schedule eats up almost another five hours of free time each week. Those hours fuel bedtime routines, homework patrol and marriage maintenance; without them, parental stress spikes. Stanford's survey shows parents steer toward hybrid work precisely because several home days help restore that bandwidth. Parents still collaborate on site yet dodge traffic's cortisol surge. The federal badge doctrine yanks that option, forcing caregivers back into rush-hour gridlock and shredding the very capacity the 'baby bonus' seeks to reward. The White House defends the order as a downtown-revitalization plan, yet empty playgrounds undermine long-term urban vitality far more than shuttered salad bars. The response has been swift — over 260,000 civil-service resignations, buyouts or early retirements since the mandate, a wave led by mid-career women. These departures bleed institutional knowledge, spike contractor costs and prove that rigid schedules push out precisely the workers the baby-bonus scheme aims to empower. Direct payments headline well, yet history shows money alone seldom moves fertility. France, Hungary and South Korea all dangled cash but saw sustained birth-rate gains only after they paired subsidies with affordable childcare and generous leave. We've seen the same skepticism here, with women calling the $5,000 proposal 'meager' without schedule support. In fact, policymakers still debate whether a bonus would move the needle at all. Child-care tuition already tops mortgage payments in many metro areas, and the gas, parking and wardrobe costs tied to full-time commutes burn up the bonus long before a first birthday. Rigid attendance therefore turns the 'baby bonus' into a consolation prize for exhaustion. The persistent declines in births stem from soaring childcare costs, student debt and delayed milestones such as homeownership — all problems amplified by longer daily commutes. When the administration mandates five badge scans a week, it inflates every hidden parenting expense the subsidy intends to ease. The result is policy whiplash: a check in one envelope, a time audit in the next. The Stanford survey reinforces that economic calculus: women with children value schedule control more than any other employment perk, ranking it higher than pay or promotion prospects. Force them back, and many abandon growth plans — at work and at home. The administration's own ranks testify. Treasury's internal return-to-office guidance, issued in February, acknowledges 'heightened retention risk' among caregivers, yet it still enforces five days on-site. Pronatalism that ignores workplace physics turns into press-release theater. One pivot resolves the clash: Replace the blanket five-day decree with a disciplined three-day anchor model for roles that do not handle classified hardware or wet-lab equipment. Stanford's Steven Davis and Nicholas Bloom show firms keep productivity steady — or lift it — under such hybrid rules, while recruitment costs fall because talent pools widen geographically. Eighty percent of Fortune 500 companies now run some version of this model, proof that flexibility and performance coexist. Hybrid schedules also cut vehicle miles, handing the administration an unwritten climate victory without another regulation, as remote-work research from Hoover Institution scholars confirms. Congress can hard-wire the alignment. Tie the enlarged Child Tax Credit now under debate to employer certification of at least two voluntary home days per week, nudging private firms toward family-friendly norms. House negotiators already weigh credit expansion as part of a broader pronatalist push. Add lease subsidies for offices that include on-site childcare and stroller storage, and the commute becomes a support node, not a hurdle. Stanford's evidence stands clear: caregivers who will deliver tomorrow's taxpayers want 2.66 remote days each week, yet the badge order throttles that desire and drains the very talent the government hopes to retain. Align workplace structure with family aspirations, and the baby bonus transforms from political gimmick to demographic catalyst. Ignore the contradiction, and America exchanges rattles for resignation letters — a trade no nation can afford. Flexibility, not fiat, is the linchpin that lets families, careers and the country thrive together. Gleb Tsipursky, Ph.D., serves as the CEO of the hybrid work consultancy Disaster Avoidance Experts and authored the best-seller Returning to the Office and Leading Hybrid and Remote Teams. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

After Trump cuts, National Weather Service is hiring. What about Florida?
After Trump cuts, National Weather Service is hiring. What about Florida?

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

After Trump cuts, National Weather Service is hiring. What about Florida?

As an active hurricane season looms for Florida, the National Weather Service is hiring. The Trump administration, through billionaire Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has slashed workforces in multiple federal agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which encompasses the NWS and the National Hurricane Center. With concerns rising over whether the stripped-down agencies will be enough to handle increasingly dangerous weather in the U.S., CNN has reported that the NWS has received permission to temporarily lift the hiring freeze and hire about 125 new meteorologists and specialists for its forecast offices around the country. The NWS is also hoping to continue hiring more people under a public safety exemption, CNN said. ➤ Weather alerts via text: Sign up to get updates about current storms and weather events by location As of June 3, any hiring is still in the planning stages. NWS spokesperson Erica Grow Cei told Newsweek that the agency is planning to hire additional staff members to "stabilize" the department to address people who took the voluntary early retirement option. In May, USA TODAY reported that the weather service was working to transfer meteorologists from well-staffed offices to fill 155 positions where they're needed. "Additionally, a targeted number of permanent, mission-critical field positions will soon be advertised under an exception to the department-wide hiring freeze to further stabilize front-line operations," Cei said. More than 550 of the 4,800 weather service employees have been dismissed, retired or accepted incentive offers to step down. Many of the country's 122 local weather service forecast offices, usually staffed 24 hours day, seven days a week, were left shorthanded with staff reductions from 20-40% and scrambling to cover staffing and maintain the usual quality and number of measurements. Several offices were forced to end or reduce weather balloon launches, which can reduce the agency's ability to predict weather, and CNN reported on May 2 that 30 NWS offices no longer had a lead meteorologist. NOAA, which studies Earth's atmosphere, oceans and climate, has also canceled events in a public awareness campaign on the importance of early preparation. 'This has never happened before. We've always been an agency that has provided 24/7 service to the American public,' Tom Fahy, legislative director for the National Weather Service Employees Organization, told ABC News. 'The risk is extremely high — if cuts like this continue to the National Weather Service, people will die.' The Trump administration laid off an estimated 650 NOAA employees in February in the name of cutting government spending, including two flight directors and an electronic engineer at NOAA's Office of Aircraft Operations, home of the NOAA Hurricane Hunters. That could affect the agency's ability to conduct the twice-daily flights necessary during a significant hurricane threat, according to former Hurricane Hunter and cofounder of Weather Underground Jeff Masters, especially if one or more becomes unavailable or sick. NOAA employees have been told to expect a further 50% reduction in its staff of almost 12,000. Hurricane season fears: Will federal cuts and state budget battle put Florida's hurricane readiness in peril? The 2025 Atlantic hurricane season began Sunday, June 1, and runs through Sunday, Nov. 30. However, storms can and do occur outside of those dates. AccuWeather is predicting the 2025 Atlantic hurricane season could bring: Named storms: 13 to 18 Hurricanes: 7-10 Major hurricanes: 3-5 Direct U.S. impacts: 3-6 NOAA is predicting a 60% chance of an above-normal season, a 30% chance of a near-normal season and a 10% chance for a below-normal season. Forecasters predict: Named storms: 13-19 Hurricanes: 6-10 Major hurricanes: 3-5 Colorado State University meteorologists predict: 17 named storms 9 hurricanes 4 major hurricanes Dr. Ryan Truchelut of WeatherTiger hedged his bets and predicted that the 2025 season has a 50-50 chance of landing in the ranges of: 16-21 tropical storms 7-9 hurricanes 3-4 major hurricanes Contributing: Dinah Voyles Pulver, USA TODAY, and Cheryl McCloud, USA TODAY NETWORK This article originally appeared on Fort Myers News-Press: National Weather Service to hire about 125 to replace DOGE losses

Houston rushing to fix up city before 2026 FIFA World Cup — but is the cost of hosting these events worth it?
Houston rushing to fix up city before 2026 FIFA World Cup — but is the cost of hosting these events worth it?

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Houston rushing to fix up city before 2026 FIFA World Cup — but is the cost of hosting these events worth it?

As the 2026 FIFA World Cup approaches, Houston is cleaning house and undertaking significant infrastructure improvements to prepare for the influx of international visitors that will descend on the city. The municipality is addressing issues such as non-functional freeway lighting, deteriorating buildings and outdated public amenities to ensure a welcoming environment for fans. But just how big is the scope of the event and the required improvements? Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10) The city is set to host seven "Super Bowl-size" matches during the tournament, which is expected to bring in millions of fans from over 100 countries across the globe. To prepare, Houston Public Works is prioritizing the repair of freeway lighting, particularly along Interstate 610 and U.S. Highway 59, where many lights are currently inoperative. In internal emails, a maintenance manager at Houston Public Works noted challenges such as wire theft, a qualified labour shortage, unreported damage by unknown contractors and knocked down electrical services. What's more, aging infrastructure and coordination with the Texas Department of Transportation for lane closures have complicated these efforts. The city is also focusing on demolishing "blighted" and "dangerous" buildings, including the old Greyhound station at 2121 Main Street and an old hotel at 801 St. Joseph's Parkway in order to improve public safety and aesthetics. In addition, the city is cleaning up graffiti, improving landscaping, restriping roads, fixing sidewalks and creating a new park for a month-long "fan fest" party. Of course, all these upgrades will come at a cost. Hosting a major world sporting event, like the FIFA World Cup, is a significant financial undertaking for any city. For instance, the 2018 World Cup in Russia cost more than $14 billion, while the 2014 tournament in Brazil totaled approximately $11.6 billion. More recently, Qatar spent $229 billion to host the World Cup in 2022, making it the most expensive such undertaking. These investments often cover stadium construction, transportation upgrades and other infrastructure projects. And while the 11 American host cities are requesting $625 million in federal funding to help finance the needed works, Houston's own cost is projected to be around $70-$80 million — on par with the projected costs for other cities. Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it The potential benefits for host cities include infrastructure development, increased tourism and job creation. For example, over the five years leading up to the 2018 World Cup in Russia, about 315,000 jobs were created annually. Workers' income increased by about $5.61 billion (450 billion rubles), and small business profits grew by nearly about $10 billion (800 billion rubles). The country also welcomed 4.2 million tourists in 2018 — 10% more than it did the previous year. In Brazil, World Cup-related investments helped finance rapid transit projects in three of the country's largest cities: Rio de Janeiro, Belo Horizonte and Recife. And hosting the 2026 FIFA World Cup could generate more than $5 billion in economic activity for North America. Additionally, host cities could see an estimated $160-$620 million in incremental economic activity, with 'a net benefit of approximately $90-$480 million per city after accounting for potential public costs.' Houston officials, specifically, are anticipating over $1 billion in revenue as a result of the event. Plus, the city could benefit from improved infrastructure and investment in the sport and its incoming athletes in the long run. However, there are also risks such as huge costs and budget overruns (Canadian host cities Vancouver and Toronto are already citing 'substantial' increases). Additionally, hosting such events can also lead to issues of displacement of residents (including lower-income communities), environmental concerns, questionable return on investment and underutilized facilities post-tournament. Brazil's 12 stadiums used in the 2014 World Cup cost 50% more than planned, and just six of the 35 planned transportation projects were completed on time. The Popular Committee for the World Cup and Olympics claimed more than 170,000 people were displaced from their Rio de Janeiro homes for games-related purposes, while Beijing was reported to clear 1.5 million people from their homes for the 2008 Olympics. Qatar is contending with an even darker legacy, standing accused in the deaths of migrant workers associated with hosting the event. In addition, a study by the Wesleyan Business Review highlights environmental concerns, noting that the extensive event preparations can lead to increased pollution and strain on local resources. In fact, some cities like Minneapolis, Chicago and Glendale, Arizona withdrew their bids to host in 2026. It's unclear what Houston's balance sheet will look like when the event has come and gone, but it's clear that it will require a lot of resources and massive upfront investments, impacting many Houstonians — whether or not they welcome the event in the first place. Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now This is how American car dealers use the '4-square method' to make big profits off you — and how you can ensure you pay a fair price for all your vehicle costs Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store