Sydney builder banned by corporate watchdog after being involved in collapse of three construction companies resulting in $93m debt
ASIC announced on Friday construction director Anthony Azizi, based in NSW, would be disqualified from managing corporations until July 14, 2030.
The decision comes after a trio of construction company collapses, which Mr Azizi was involved in.
He worked as the director of Trinity Constructions and Regal Consulting Services and as a shadow director of Trinco between January 2001 and September 2021.
All three companies have since collapsed, taking with them a total of $93,708,563 racked up in debt to more than 300 unsecured creditors.
This included statutory debts owed to Australian Taxation Office, NSW Office of State Revenue, Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer, Department of Employment and Workplace Relations in relation to the Fair Entitlements Guarantee, and the NSW Self Insurance Corporation.
Several small businesses are also owed money.
ASIC's decision said it found Mr Azizi to have "acted improperly and failed to meet his obligations as director" through a number of ways.
These included failure "to exercise due care and diligence to ensure that the companies met their statutory requirements," how he "failed to take reasonable steps to ensure the companies kept written financial records" and that he "improperly used his position to cause detriment to the companies".
ASIC also said Mr Azizi had failed to ensure companies did not trade while insolvent.
It also found he failed to lodge a report on company activities and property with the liquidator of Regal within 10 days of finishing up and failed to provide "reasonable assistance" to the liquidator of Regal as he did not deliver all the books "as soon as practicable after winding up".
Supplementary reports from the liquidator of Trinity, Graeme Beattie of Worrells, and the liquidator of Trinco, Henry McKenna of Vincents, assisted ASIC in its decision to disqualify Mr Azizi.
Mr Azizi has the right to seek a review of ASIC's decision by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
ASIC calls on CBA to refund unfair bank fees
ASIC commissioner Alan Kirkland says the Commonwealth Bank's response to refunding customers, who were charged unnecessary bank fees, has not been in line with the practice of other banks. He says CBA needs to do better by its customers.

Sky News AU
4 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Major banks to repay $60 million to low-income Australians after corporate watchdog ASIC investigated excessive fees
Three major banks will repay almost $60m to low-income Australians after the corporate watchdog conducted its latest bank-fee review. Excessive fees that banks charged to low-earning Australians came under the microscope in a fresh report from the Australian Securities and Exchange Commission (ASIC). It follows a 2024 report from the corporate watchdog that demonstrated low-income customers, many of whom are Indigenous Australians, copped excessive fees - forcing major banks to repay $33m. ASIC said an additional $60m will be refunded to more than 770,000 customers across the nation. Westpac, ANZ and Bendigo and Adelaide Bank have agreed to repay the low-income customers who were in high-fee accounts. ANZ is returning almost $48m to low-income customers in high-fee accounts while Westpac is repaying almost $10m, and Bendigo Bank customers will receive about $150,000. Commonwealth Bank of Australia, which was also named in the 2024 report, will not make repayments of about $270m it charged low-income customers. The bank, however, has agreed to move 1.5 million customers to a new 'nominal fee account'. At least seven banks have improved processes, and an additional nine banks have made it easier to access low-fee accounts. This includes removing requirements to present a Commonwealth Seniors Health Care Card, Health Care Card or Pensioner Concession Card when opening an account. ASIC chair Joe Longo said despite the improvements Australian banks have made since the corporate watchdog launched its investigation, 'there is clearly work to be done'. 'It should not take an ASIC review to force $93m in refunds or make banks assess their processes to ensure the trust and expectations placed in them are justified,' Mr Longo said. 'Banks need to truly hear the messages in this report - read it, review it, and ask themselves some difficult questions about what led to this situation. 'We expect banks to regularly assess product design and distribution to ensure customers have the most appropriate products and that they are given the support they need.' The corporate watchdog highlighted the real impact these refunds would have on many Australians that receive government payments or earn minimum wage. It said that Charlotte, an ANZ customer in Western Australia that receives JobSeeker, will be refunded more than $5200 by ANZ – equivalent to 13 weeks of JobSeeker payments. A single parent from Adelaide named Cassie will be repaid $2645 - equivalent to about 110 hours of minimum-wage work - in overdraw fees by Westpac. Meanwhile, Derek, a pensioner from Victoria, has been refunded $1236 – equivalent to one fortnightly age pension payment - for Bendigo Bank fees. ASIC commissioner Alan Kirkland said the report highlighted how excessive bank fees hurt Australia's most vulnerable. 'When you read in the report that refunds of $1,200, $2,600 and $5,200 were paid, it's important to understand what those amounts mean for people struggling to make ends meet,' Mr Kirkland said. 'Our intervention has forced many banks to take action, but more needs to be done to ensure financially vulnerable consumers are not put in this position again. 'We encourage consumers to challenge their banks to ensure that they are in the best account for their needs. 'More importantly, we encourage banks to do more to proactively identify low-income customers and move them to low-fee accounts.'


Perth Now
9 hours ago
- Perth Now
Banks to refund $60m to ripped-off customers
Thousands of Australians wrongly slugged with excessive bank charges will soon receive a refund, as the corporate regulator cracks down on these unfair practices. In a second round of payments announced on Tuesday, The Australian Securities and Investments Commission said a further 770,000 customers will be refunded $60m. These refunds will be paid to low-income customers of 21 financial institutions receiving government concession payments, who were placed in higher-fee bank accounts despite a lower fee option being available to them. This follows $33m in fees already refunded to 150,000 customers which was previously paid out. Three of the major banks featured in ASIC initial report have now committed to providing refunds of bank fees to a broader group of low-income customers who have been in high-fee accounts. ASIC shows the impact of getting the bank refund. Picture Supplied Credit: Supplied ANZ will be paying the most out of the big four banks. According to the report, ANZ will pay out an estimated $47.9m to almost 590,000 account holders for fees dating back until mid-2019 and Westpac $9.9m for fees incurred since 2013. Commonwealth Bank says it won't be paying any more after previously paying $25m to around 90,000 Indigenous concession customer accounts. National Australia Bank was not included in the probe as it stopped carrying dishonour, account-keeping or overdraw fees on transaction accounts in 2014. ASIC chair Joe Longo said, despite the improvements banks have made during our surveillance, there is clearly work to be done. 'It should not take an ASIC review to force $93 million in refunds or make banks assess their processes to ensure the trust and expectations placed in them are justified,' he said. 'Banks need to truly hear the messages in this report — read it, review it, and ask themselves some difficult questions about what led to this situation.' Australians are set to be paid $60m in the second round of payments. NewsWire / Nicholas Eagar Credit: NewsWire As part of the changes, ASIC also encouraged banks to consider introducing or improving First Nations service channels, with six more banks now collecting data to identify First Nations customers to inform appropriate and sensitive service delivery. ASIC commissioner Alan Kirkland said what started as an initiative focused on addressing avoidable bank fees for low-income customers in regional and remote locations, particularly First Nations consumers, revealed a much wider problem affecting customers nationwide. 'When you read in the report that refunds of $1,200, $2,600 and $5,200 were paid, it's important to understand what those amounts mean for people struggling to make ends meet,' Mr Kirkland said. 'A $1,200 refund was equivalent to one customer's fortnightly Age Pension. A $2,600 refund equalled around 110 hours of minimum-wage earnings for another customer, and a $5,200 refund matched 13 weeks of another customer's Jobseeker payment.' A spokesperson for ANZ said the bank had taken a 'deliberate decision to expand our remediation payments, leading to a larger cohort of customers being refunded fees and interest'.