WATCH: Mbalula warns of deepfake video falsely claiming he said Senzo Mchunu is guilty
Fikile Mbalula has warned people about fake video of him stating that Senzo Mchunu as guilty. Picture: @MbalulaFikile/X
ANC secretary-general Fikile Mbalula is the latest public figure to suffer a deepfake impersonation video, which falsely portrays his opinions
In the fake video, which appears and sounds normal at first glance, Mbalula states that suspended Police Minister Senzo Mchunu is guilty.
'No, let me explain this thing. Senzo is guilty. He will answer to whatever that he needs to answer to, I think, umm, let's allow the processes that have been defined to unfold,' Mbalula is heard saying in the manipulated video.
We live in a sensitive period where distortion has become the order of the day. pic.twitter.com/BhQuKSkxE3 — ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula (@MbalulaFikile) July 21, 2025
Deepfake content includes images, videos and audio edited or generated using artificial intelligence (AI) tools, which may depict real or non-existent people.
There are different types of deepfakes, and Mbalula was targeted with a 'lip-syncing and audio overlay' deepfake — sometimes referred to as 'puppeteering'— which replaces mouth movements to match synthetic or manipulated audio.
In the authentic video, Mbalula clearly says Mchunu is not guilty.
'Let me explain this thing; it's been exaggerated — deliberately so. I think umm…let's allow the processes that have been defined to unfold,' Mbalula says.
'Senzo is not guilty. He will answer to whatever that he needs to answer to; and therefore he has not been found guilty or been charged in any court of law to warrant any steps to be taken against him.'
ALSO READ: 'It's deception on another level' – Thami Ngubeni as deepfake video using her face makes the rounds on social media [VIDEO]
Rise of deepfakes in SA
About a week ago, a video purported to be of Springbok Captain Siya Kolisi circulated on social media. In it, the display shows what appears to be the rugby player encouraging viewers to participate in an investment scheme.
What gave it away was the deep Nigerian accent that came with the video. However, those who aren't cautious could easily fall for it being Kolisi.
If they had managed to get his actual voice, people would be running around in the streets claiming they've been scammed by Siya Kolisi 😭 https://t.co/tKzoD0fu4s
July 16, 2025
Late last year, South African broadcaster and actress Thami Ngubeni had to distance herself from a deepfake video purporting to be her encouraging people to invest in dodgy financial schemes.
Speaking to The Citizen, Ngubeni said she was first made aware of the video by a former colleague who had an interest in investing in what the video was selling.
'I hadn't seen the video at that point. The next day a journalist called me, her mother had seen the video and wanted to invest. She knew immediately it was false and sent the video to me,' she said.
Cybercrime Unit Specialist Investigator Mike Bolhuis previously told The Citizen that in recent years, there has been a significant rise in these types of cybercrimes in South Africa.
Warning & Disclaimer: I categorically distance myself from any video currently circulating that encourages individuals to invest in specific financial schemes. This broadcast never happened. It's deepfake. It's a scam. Please exercise caution with any video featuring my likeness… pic.twitter.com/c0LM7BI75o — Thami Ngubeni (@LifeWithThami) November 28, 2024
'This surge can be attributed to several factors, including the increasing number of techniques and tools available, the growing popularity of social media platforms, and the public's heightened trust in celebrities.
'It goes without saying that people often fall for 'get-rich-quick' schemes, especially when a 'celebrity' is encouraging them to get involved,' he said.
NOW READ: WATCH: 'A scammer trying to scam me as me' – Fake Connie Ferguson calls the real one
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
24 minutes ago
- IOL News
Parks Tau faces scrutiny over IDC board appointments
Trade, Industry and Competition Minister Parks Tau says he will reply to specific questions from MPs at the meeting of the portfolio committee in connection with the appointment of the Industrial Development Corporation board members. Image: GCIS Trade, Industry and Competition Minister Parks Tau is resisting calls for clarity regarding the appointment of the Industrial Development Corporation (IDC) board members. He informed DA MP Toby Chance and EFF MP Sinawo Thambo that he would address their specific questions during the upcoming Portfolio Committee meeting on Trade, Industry and Competition. He stated that he had been invited to brief the portfolio committee on the appointment of the IDC board on July 22, but the meeting was postponed. 'Upon the rescheduling of the meeting, specific questions will be directly responded to during the meeting or after if there is still a need,' he said in his standard response. Chance on Thursday accused Tau of being evasive and deviating from his usual detailed responses. 'He has provided no information at all; ministers are obligated to respond in writing to written questions, which is unsatisfactory,' said Chance. 'We normally get detailed responses from him. This time, he seems very evasive in not providing answers,' he added. Last month, the Cabinet announced a new eight-member board for the IDC, which included ANC-aligned members such as former ministers Sydney Mufamadi and Ayanda Dlodlo, and former KwaZulu-Natal premier and now Higher Education Deputy Minister Nomusa Dube-Ncube. The Cabinet had also appointed Sam Bhembe, who is reportedly involved in a court battle with the finance institution over a R70 million debt. The IDC board appointments happened at a time when there was a public outcry over the appointment of chairpersons for the boards of Sector and Education Training Authorities, which have since been cancelled. At the time, Thambo requested an urgent committee meeting, and committee chairperson Mzwandile Masina wrote to Tau indicating it was prudent that they receive a briefing on the process followed in the IDC board appointments. Thambo also sent questions to Tau, wanting to know the process followed and the measures his department implemented to safeguard the IDC from undue political influence, among other things. He had expressed concern about a pattern of compromised appointments that was a direct consequence of politically motivated deployments. 'The IDC must not be reduced to a retirement destination for politically connected individuals,' read Thambo's letter to Tau. Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel. Cape Argus
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Time for liberation movements to rebuild trust, rethink strategy
Liberation movement leaders at the summit hosted by the African National Congress on July 25-27 in Ekurhuleni, Gauteng. Image: ANC/X Dr. Reneva Fourie Many South Africans failed to appreciate the relevance of the Liberation Movements Summit, held in Johannesburg from 25 to 28 July. In an era marked by widespread public disappointment and growing criticism, the very premise of such a gathering appeared, they argued, outdated if not entirely obsolete. Movements such as South Africa's ANC, Mozambique's FRELIMO, Namibia's SWAPO, Angola's MPLA and others are not conventional political parties. Their legitimacy was not conferred solely through elections. It was earned through generations of collective resistance, sacrifice and clarity of purpose in the face of colonialism and apartheid. They were forged in the trenches of anti-colonial struggle and shaped by the convictions of those who believed in dignity, equality and justice. However, in the years since the dawn of democracy, these once-powerful connections to the people have frayed. The post-liberation period has, for many citizens, become associated less with freedom and opportunity, and more with corruption, inequality and governance failures. In the wake of immense sacrifice and hard-won liberation, the urgent and deeply complex question confronting Southern Africa's former liberation movements is whether they have eroded their moral authority through complacency, self-enrichment and detachment from the aspirations of the people. The Liberation Movement Summit sought to confront these realities directly. It did not offer a platform for nostalgic celebration but one for critical reflection and collaborative renewal. Its central assertion was that historical legitimacy cannot excuse present failures. Rather, it is only through meaningful action, grounded in principle and delivered with urgency, that these movements can continue to play a relevant role in shaping their societies. The summit occurred within an increasingly unstable global environment. The declining coherence of the neoliberal project, further unravelling through the ongoing genocide in Gaza, the war in Ukraine and destabilisation across West Asia, has disrupted many of the ideological assumptions that underpinned global governance for the past three decades. Added to this is the rise of narrow nationalism, a retreat into bilateralism and the erosion of respect for international law, particularly by powerful Western states. This evolving landscape has profound implications for the continent. African states face increased vulnerability to external manipulation, regime-change agendas and exploitative economic arrangements. The summit, therefore, was necessary to provide a space for shared analysis, introspection and strategic coordination to enhance sovereignty and to assert a united voice in shaping a more just and inclusive global order. However, it was not only external pressures that required attention. Internally, liberation movements face complex democratic terrains that demand new forms of engagement. Factors such as declining electoral support, shifting generational political identities, and the enduring impact of structural inequality, poverty, unemployment and insecurity required thoughtful responses. The situation in Sudan was referenced as a painful example of how internal contradictions, if unresolved, can be exploited by external actors and descend into devastating conflict. It served as a reminder that liberation is not a singular event, but an ongoing process that requires vigilance, renewal and integrity. The summit's focus on democratic sustainability, effective governance, economic transformation and international solidarity was not incidental. It signalled a clear understanding that liberation must be understood as a living project. One of the central issues raised was the growing gap between political rhetoric and implementation. Widespread dissatisfaction does not stem from a lack of vision. It stems from the failure to translate that vision into material change. Inadequate socio-economic development, deteriorating public services, and perceptions of systemic corruption have undermined the legitimacy of former liberation parties. Where liberation once promised dignity, many now experience marginalisation. Discontent is particularly acute among young people and women. These are not marginal constituencies. They were at the centre of liberation struggles and remain central to any democratic renewal. Yet they are often excluded from decision-making spaces. The summit emphasised that genuine empowerment must move beyond rhetoric. It requires shifts in institutional culture, the opening up of leadership opportunities and policy frameworks that respond to the realities and capabilities of young people and women. The summit also reaffirmed the enduring relevance of international solidarity. While formal colonialism has ended, other forms of domination persist through financial dependence, extractive corporate practices and systemic inequality in global institutions. Collective resistance remains necessary. Regional cooperation is essential not only for economic development but for protecting sovereignty and pursuing peace on the continent's terms. By revisiting the principle of Pan-Africanism and anchoring itself within a broader vision of progressive internationalism, the summit resisted the idea that liberation movements are simply relics of a past era. It positioned them as political institutions still capable of shaping the future, provided they act with courage, humility and commitment to the people they claim to serve. In this sense, the summit was not a retreat into history. It was an attempt to reframe the liberation narrative to meet current realities. It outlined a multidimensional approach, encompassing accountability in governance, inclusivity in political participation, innovation in economic policy, and coherence in international engagement. The chosen theme, 'Defending the liberation gains, advancing integrated socio-economic development, strengthening solidarity for a better Africa', was both affirmation and provocation. It affirmed the commitments that guided the anti-colonial struggle, while insisting that the defence of those gains cannot rely on slogans. It must be evidenced in action. The political renewal required is not superficial. It cannot be achieved through new slogans or minor adjustments. It requires deep institutional reform, alignment with democratic values and a reconnection to the needs and aspirations of the people. If this does not occur, these movements risk losing not only electoral support but also their historical legitimacy. Even so, the summit offered a timely opportunity to regroup and recommit. It provided a forum to rethink strategy, rebuild trust and begin crafting a credible future. If these movements can confront their shortcomings with honesty, implement their commitments with discipline and listen to their people with sincerity, they may yet remain relevant in the evolving story of African freedom. * Dr Reneva Fourie is a policy analyst specialising in governance, development and security. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Nigerian man who identified as a Zimbabwean national denied spousal permit
A Nigerian man who also identified as Zimbabwean was denied spousal permit by the High Court. A Nigerian man who also identified as a Zimbabwean national had his application for spousal permit dismissed in an unopposed matter. In an application at the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria, Valentine Ezihe submitted an affidavit under the name Marshall Banda. In the affidavit, he identified himself as a Zimbabwean man living in Centurion, possessing a Zimbabwean passport with an unverified number. According to the supporting affidavit, Ezihe's spousal application had been pending for two years without a response or decision from Home Affairs. In June 2025, he served a notice of motion on home affairs and the director general of home affairs. Ezihe asked the court to direct home affairs officials to issue a decision on the outcome of his application within 30 days. In May 2025, Banda's affidavit, which claimed to be from Ezihe, was deposed and commissioned to support the notice of motion. Later, Ezihe's supplementary affidavit, which supports Banda's affidavit, was deposed and commissioned in June 2025. This occurred without the prior leave of the court. Ezihe's legal representative argued that there were no legal provisions requiring the parties to obtain leave before supplementing their court submissions.
