Skewed editorial on Marikana Massacre
No sane person would deny that the police reaction on that day was disproportionately lethal, and that some form of compensation should have been made by the platinum mining industry. What has to be disputed is how the editorial in question has been framed.
In recent years, there has been a tendency among journalists to whitewash the events that led to the massacre.
Those of us who read about this tragedy thirteen years ago, reported by some respected journalists and editors, will recall that the police were provoked, and that the miners were not innocent protesters. Visuals that were published then showed the miners carrying crude weapons that could inflict death.
There were several people, including a police officer or two, killed in the days preceding the massacre. There were rituals performed on the koppie, probably some form of witchcraft to make the miners invulnerable in the event of a confrontation.
None of this is even hinted at in the editorial, which portrays the miners as hapless victims. Even the Farlam Commission was wary of finding anyone guilty.
Those not familiar with the events of August 16, 2012, would not have been served well by the skewed version in The Star's editorial. They would be better served by Wikipedia, even though academia may thumb its nose at this online 'encyclopedia'.
Harry Sewlall
Parkmore
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Parliamentary committees to engage Lamola, Motshekga on SANDF chief's remarks in Iran
Mayibongwe Maqhina | Published 2 days ago The parliamentary Committees on Defence and International Relations and Cooperation plans to engage with Minister Angie Motshekga and Ronald Lamola over comments made by SANDF Chief, General Rudzani Maphwanya during his recent visit to Iran. This will be after President Cyril Ramaphosa has scheduled a meeting with Maphwanya. Maphwanya caused a storm last week when it emerged that during a visit to Tehran he pledged 'common goals' with Iran and claimed his trip carried 'a political message'. His trip, sanctioned by Motshekga, took place amid tensions between South and the US with President Donald Trump imposing a 30% tariff on South African goods. The Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Defence and Military Veterans, Dakota Legoete, and the Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on International Relations, Supra Mahumapelo, noted with concern Maphwanya's remarks during his visit to Iran. Legoete and Mahumapelo also noted with alarm that the Department of International Relations and Cooperation has publicly distanced itself from the General's comments while the Presidency described the visit as 'ill advised'. They said the committees will have a joint meeting to engage with Lamola and Motshekga on the issue. Legoete said it was evident that there was a worrying lack of coordination between defence diplomacy and South Africa's official foreign policy. 'This disjuncture exposes potential misalignment and cohesion in the country's approach to international relations,' he said. Legoete added that the Department of Defence should draw long-term lessons from these events and ensure thorough alignment, going forward. He further stressed that the committee awaits the outcome of engagements between Ramaphosa in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief of the SANDF, Motshekga and SANDF leadership. 'These engagements must demonstrate unity, strength and synergy in how South Africa conducts itself on the international stage.' Legoete reiterated the committee's stance that 'the SANDF must remain a professional and apolitical institution, focusing squarely on its constitutional mandate to safeguard the Republic, while steering away from statements in the political domain'. Last Thursday, the Presidency said Ramaphosa was unaware about the 'ill advised' visit by Maphwanywa to Iran. Ramaphosa's spokesperson Vincent Magwenya stated that Ramaphosa did not sanction Maphwanya's visit as Motshekga approved the travel. 'As much as the president is the appointing authority and the commander in chief, he does not get involved in supervising the general's travel. That process sits with the minister. So the President did not know.' Both the Department of International Relations and Cooperation and Defence have distanced themselves from Maphwanya's remarks, citing that Ramaphosa and Dirco were custodians of foreign policy. Magwenya said Ramaphosa will meet Maphwanya within the next week regarding his 'ill-advised' trip. 'I can't say when that meeting will happen, but there will be an engagement between the President and the general. So it's still early to say what the outcome of that engagement will be.' He would not comment on the possible consequence for the defence chief amid calls by the DA for him to be hauled before a court martial. [email protected]
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
ActionSA files criminal complaint over failed Boipatong Old Age Home project
ActionSA has lodged a criminal complaint with the Boipatong South African Police Service (SAPS) over the collapse of the R28 million Boipatong Old Age Home project. The project, launched by the Emfuleni Local Municipality in 2015, has been plagued by delays, including contractor failures, poor administration, and community unrest. The Star previously revealed that the project came to a standstill nearly a decade later, after the late discovery of a gas pipeline running beneath the site, halting planning and construction. On August 20, ActionSA Gauteng Provincial Chairperson Funzi Ngobeni presented evidence at the Boipatong SAPS pointing to financial misconduct, fraudulent spending, and gross dereliction of duty by both contractors and government officials. 'This project is a textbook case of how corruption and incompetence rob communities of dignity. We will not allow public funds to disappear while our elderly continue to suffer without care or protection.' Ngobeni added that, given the seriousness and the amount involved, Boipatong SAPS has referred the case to the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI), commonly known as the Hawks. In his complaint, Ngobeni alleges that R25 million was paid to contractors despite the site being abandoned, with professional fees exceeding R3 million disbursed without any corresponding service. He claims no funds have been recovered, no disciplinary action has been taken against officials, and that the case may involve violations of the PFMA, MFMA, and anti-corruption laws. He added that ActionSA will urge the Gauteng Premier to use his executive authority to petition the President for a Proclamation under Section 2(1) of the Special Investigating Units and Special Tribunals Act, 74 of 1996. The party also calls on Premier Panyaza Lesufi to publicly release the full audit trail of the project, explain why no action has been taken against the companies and officials involved, and commit to recovering public funds while completing the facility for Boipatong's elderly. Previously, Gauteng MEC Jacob Mamabolo's spokesperson, Theo Nkonki, said the government is taking decisive steps to complete the Boipatong Old Age Home by 2026: 'We have launched a detailed planning process, including updated technical studies, revised project scopes, and active engagement with key stakeholders such as SASOL.' Nkonki added that safety considerations and redesign efforts are ongoing, and that new contracts will include penalties to ensure contractors are held accountable. The Star [email protected]
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
ActionSA files criminal complaint over failed Boipatong Old Age Home project
ActionSA has filed a criminal complaint regarding the R28 million Boipatong Old Age Home project, highlighting issues of alleged corruption and mismanagement that have delayed vital care for the elderly. ActionSA has lodged a criminal complaint with the Boipatong South African Police Service (SAPS) over the collapse of the R28 million Boipatong Old Age Home project. The project, launched by the Emfuleni Local Municipality in 2015, has been plagued by delays, including contractor failures, poor administration, and community unrest. The Star previously revealed that the project came to a standstill nearly a decade later, after the late discovery of a gas pipeline running beneath the site, halting planning and construction. On August 20, ActionSA Gauteng Provincial Chairperson Funzi Ngobeni presented evidence at the Boipatong SAPS pointing to financial misconduct, fraudulent spending, and gross dereliction of duty by both contractors and government officials. 'This project is a textbook case of how corruption and incompetence rob communities of dignity. We will not allow public funds to disappear while our elderly continue to suffer without care or protection.' Ngobeni added that, given the seriousness and the amount involved, Boipatong SAPS has referred the case to the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI), commonly known as the Hawks. In his complaint, Ngobeni alleges that R25 million was paid to contractors despite the site being abandoned, with professional fees exceeding R3 million disbursed without any corresponding service. He claims no funds have been recovered, no disciplinary action has been taken against officials, and that the case may involve violations of the PFMA, MFMA, and anti-corruption laws. He added that ActionSA will urge the Gauteng Premier to use his executive authority to petition the President for a Proclamation under Section 2(1) of the Special Investigating Units and Special Tribunals Act, 74 of 1996. The party also calls on Premier Panyaza Lesufi to publicly release the full audit trail of the project, explain why no action has been taken against the companies and officials involved, and commit to recovering public funds while completing the facility for Boipatong's elderly. Previously, Gauteng MEC Jacob Mamabolo's spokesperson, Theo Nkonki, said the government is taking decisive steps to complete the Boipatong Old Age Home by 2026: 'We have launched a detailed planning process, including updated technical studies, revised project scopes, and active engagement with key stakeholders such as SASOL.' Nkonki added that safety considerations and redesign efforts are ongoing, and that new contracts will include penalties to ensure contractors are held accountable. The Star
