Russia, Ukraine ramp up drone attacks overnight despite truce talks
Russian bombardments in eastern Ukraine ramped up overnight, killing two people, as Ukraine hit Russia's Engels military airfield in the country's southwest region of Saratov with drones.
Both Russia and Ukraine stepped up aerial attacks in the early hours of Thursday as United States President Donald Trump pushes both sides to agree to a ceasefire after more than three years of fighting.
Ukrainian officials in the northeastern Sumy and Kharkiv regions said two people were killed and several others injured after Russia dropped more than three dozen glide bombs on the towns in the border regions.
Russian drone attacks on the town of Kropyvnytskyi, hundreds of kilometres from the front line, wounded 14 people and damaged rail infrastructure.
'Kropyvnytskyi underwent the most massive enemy attack. Peaceful residential buildings were destroyed,' regional governor Andriy Raikovych said.
The Ukrainian Air Force said that the Russian barrage, including on Kropyvnytskyi, consisted of 171 drones, of which 75 were shot down. Another 63 were downed by electronic jamming systems or were lost.
Elsewhere, Ukraine struck Russia's Engels airbase in the Saratov region with attack drones overnight, causing a fire and explosions in the area, the Ukrainian military said on Thursday.
The airbase hosts Russian strategic bombers that are used to attack Ukraine and also has a warehouse holding cruise missiles and glide bombs, an official at the Security Service of Ukraine said.
'It is significant because … the city is home to Russia's strategic bomber fleet,' said Al Jazeera's Dorsa Jabbari, reporting from Moscow. 'This is not the first time this area has been targeted, but this is the biggest attack seen so far [since the start of the war in February 2022]. A state of emergency has been declared.'
Regional authorities said 10 people were injured in the attack. Jabbari also noted that 30 civilian homes and the city's main hospital sustained damage.
'According to Russia's defence ministry, this is another sign that Ukraine is not serious about a peace settlement,' she said.
commitment to a 30-day halt of strikes on Ukrainian energy infrastructure. He did not, however, agree to a full ceasefire.
'It's only a partial ceasefire, concerning the energy infrastructure of each country. And it hasn't yet been implemented. The details will be fleshed out when negotiations take place in Saudi Arabia [in the coming days],' said Al Jazeera's Assed Baig, reporting from Kyiv.
'For now, fighting continues,' he added. 'The red line for Ukraine is that they will not recognise occupied Ukrainian territories as part of the Russian Federation. So, we are still some way off until the end of the war.'
Peace talks expected soon
On Thursday, the Kremlin said that more US-Russia talks could take place on Sunday or early next week, as Washington is also due to hold talks with Kyiv in Saudi Arabia in the coming days.
Meanwhile, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said that Europe must continue to give strong backing to Ukraine regardless of any talks between Washington and Moscow.
'We must continue our support with a clear position that a just peace must be possible for Ukraine,' the outgoing chancellor said as he headed to a summit of European Union leaders on Thursday.
Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov, in turn, accused European countries of planning to 'militarise' themselves rather than seeking a resolution to the conflict.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump announces travel ban on people from 12 countries
United States President Donald Trump has signed a proclamation imposing a full travel ban on people from 12 countries and restricting the citizens of seven other countries, The Associated Press news agency reports. The banned countries include Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. In addition to the ban, which takes effect on Monday, there will be heightened restrictions on people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. 'I must act to protect the national security and national interest of the United States and its people,' Trump said in his proclamation. This is a breaking news story. More to follow shortly.
Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
White House makes misleading claims about Democratic opposition to tax bill
In a news statement this week, the White House cherry-picked personal income tax-related elements in the 'big, beautiful bill', the wide-ranging tax and spending bill being pushed by United States President Donald Trump, and claimed that, in opposing the legislation as a whole, the Democratic Party was opposed to every individual item contained within it. Such a tactic is misleading, particularly since the White House cited measures in the bill that have been championed by Democrats to improve the lives of Americans and are not the reasons the Democrats have given for opposing the 'big beautiful bill'. Here's a fact-check of what the White House claims Democrats oppose: 'They're opposing the largest tax cut in history, which will put an extra $5,000 in their pockets with a double-digit percent decrease to their tax bills. In fact, Americans earning between $30,000 and $80,000 will pay around 15% less in taxes.' The specifics of the tax bill have not been finalised. In its current form, it would cut taxes by an average of 2.4 percent, for middle-income households, according to analysis by the Tax Policy Center. While it is a significant tax cut, it is not the biggest in history. That was under Ronald Reagan in 1981 at 2.9 percent. It is accurate that there will be a double-digit percentage decrease in tax bills, at least in the immediate term, at a little more than 11 percent across all tax brackets. It is also true that people earning between $30,000 and $80,000 will pay 15 percent less, according to the Non-Partisan Joint Committee on Taxation. 'They're opposing NO TAX ON TIPS for the millions of Americans who work in the service industry and NO TAX ON OVERTIME for law enforcement, nurses, and more.' This is true only in their opposition to Trump's tax and spending bill. Democrats and Republicans have supported the concept of no tax on tips. Both Donald Trump and the Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris pledged to do so on the campaign trail. Senate Democrats backed the No Tax on Tips Act, passed by the US Senate on May 20. The bill, authored by Republican Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, was co-sponsored by notable Democrats, including Jacky Rosen of Nevada and passed unanimously. 'They're opposing historic tax cuts for senior citizens' Outside of the 'big beautiful bill', Democrats have generally not opposed tax cuts for seniors. Many Democrats have championed legislation that would expand tax cuts for seniors. California Democrat Jimmy Panetta co-sponsored a Republican led bill that would increase the standard deduction for adults over the age of 65 by $4,000. In 2024, House Democrats introduced the 'You Earned It, You Keep It Act', which would effectively eliminate taxes on social security benefits. The bill, however, has never made it past committee. 'They're opposing a boost to the child tax credit.' Again, they are opposing Trump's 'big beautiful bill', not objecting to the child tax credit. In fact, Democrats have long pushed to expand the child tax credit. In April, Senate Democrats, including Georgia's Raphael Warnock and Colorado's Michael Bennett, introduced legislation that would expand the child tax credit. The bill would increase the tax credit, from $2,000 where it currently stands, to $6,360 for newborns, $4,320 for children ages one to six and $3,600 for children six to 17, permanently. While the 'big beautiful bill' would also increase the child tax credit, it would do so only by $500, and that would kick in in 2028. 'They're opposing new savings accounts for newborns and the chance for children across America to experience the miracle of compounded growth.' In the 'big beautiful bill', House Republicans introduced new savings accounts for children. The accounts would include a $1,000 handout for every child born between January 1, 2025 and January 1, 2029. Democrats have not only been supporters of the idea for savings accounts for newborns, but prominent Democrats actually championed it. In 2018, Cory Booker of New Jersey introduced the American Opportunity Accounts Act, which would also give $1,000 to newborns and up to $2000 in annual contributions. He reintroduced the bill again in 2023. 'They're opposing expanded access to childcare for hardworking American families.' This appears to be false. The White House link refers to the Paid Family and Medical Leave Credit, not child care access. Trump's bill offers up to 12 weeks of paid leave for employees who have worked a year and earn $57,600 or less. While that gives parents more time at home, Democrats have focused on expanding access to child care, including universal pre-K. In 2023, Republicans opposed a Democratic plan to keep child care centres open that struggled in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. 'They're opposing historic border security to keep their communities safe.' Last year, Trump pressured Republicans to vote against a bipartisan border security bill, a move that reportedly helped Trump's chances of winning in November 2024. Democrats have opposed Republican plans to use US military bases for migrant detention, arguing that it misuses Department of Defense resources. Democrats have long opposed border wall funding, including during Trump's first term. A 2018 Stanford University analysis estimated that a border wall would reduce migration by just 0.6 percent. Despite this, the 'big beautiful bill' allocates more than $50bn to complete the wall and maritime crossings, $45bn for building and maintaining detention centres, and $14bn for transportation. 'They're opposing expanded health savings accounts that give Americans greater choice and flexibility in how they spend their money.' This is sort of true. Democrats have not been huge proponents of health savings accounts. The belief is that healthcare savings accounts do not help the socioeconomically disadvantaged, who may not have the financial resources to contribute to the accounts. Democrats have also objected to other cuts to healthcare in the bill, including the potential $880bn that could be cut from essential government programmes like Medicaid. 'They're opposing scholarships that empower Americans to choose the education that best fits the needs of their families.' In the bill, the White House is conflating the longstanding debate on school choice with scholarships. Under school choice, funds otherwise allocated to the public school system can be re-allocated to private institutions, which Republicans argue will allow students to have potential access to a higher quality education. Democrats have opposed school choice because it diverts funds from public school systems, many of which are already drastically underfunded. In Texas, Senator Ted Cruz, for example, pushed legislation that would expand school choice, even as three out of four school districts in the state are underfunded, according to a Kinder Institute analysis.
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
US vetoes UNSC ceasefire resolution as death, starvation consume Gaza
The United States has vetoed a United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolution that called for an immediate, unconditional, and permanent ceasefire in Gaza, as Israeli strikes across the enclave have killed nearly 100 Palestinians in the past 24 hours amid a crippling aid blockade. The US was the only country to vote against the measure on Wednesday while the 14 other members of the council voted in favour. The resolution also called for the release of Israeli captives held in Gaza, but Washington said it was a 'non-starter' because the ceasefire demand is not directly linked to the release of captives. In remarks before the start of the voting, Acting US Ambassador Dorothy Shea made her country's opposition to the resolution, put forward by 10 countries on the 15-member council, painfully clear, which she said 'should come as no surprise'. 'The United States has taken the very clear position since this conflict began that Israel has the right to defend itself, which includes defeating Hamas and ensuring they are never again in a position to threaten Israel,' she told the council. China's Ambassador Fu Cong said Israel's actions have 'crossed every red line' of international humanitarian law and seriously violated U.N. resolutions. 'Yet, due to the shielding by one country, these violations have not been stopped or held accountable.' Al Jazeera's senior political analyst Marwan Bishara noted that the US veto makes it 'so isolated'. 'Clearly there is a gathering storm … with so many countries' that are standing against the US at the UNSC. 'It's only the US that is trying to block this converging and rising current against Israel and what it's doing in Gaza … Israel is not defending itself in Gaza, Israel is defending its occupation and siege in Gaza,' Bishara added. Despite global demands for a truce, Israel has repeatedly rejected calls for an unconditional or permanent ceasefire, insisting Hamas cannot stay in power, nor in Gaza. It has expanded its military assault in Gaza, killing and wounding thousands more Palestinians and maintaining a brutal blockade on the enclave, only allowing a trickle of tightly-controlled aid in where a famine looms. At least 95 Palestinians have been killed on Wednesday and more than 440 injured, according to health officials in Gaza. Al Jazeera's Tareq Abu Azzoum, reporting from Deir el-Balah, said, 'There has been a clear surge of attacks.' He said there were relentless Israeli strikes there in central Gaza and throughout the territory. Meanwhile, Israel's military warned starving Palestinians against approaching roads to the US-backed aid distribution sites run by the controversial Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), saying the areas will be 'considered combat zones' while it halted aid for a whole day. That move came after Israeli forces opened fire at aid seekers several times, killing more than 100 Palestinians and injuring hundreds more since the GHF started operating on May 27. Witnesses said Israeli soldiers opened fire on crowds that massed before dawn to seek food on Tuesday. Images of starving Palestinians scrambling for paltry aid packages, herded in cage-like lines and then coming under fire have caused global outrage. The Israeli military admitted it shot at aid seekers on Tuesday, but claimed that they opened fire when 'suspects' deviated from a stipulated route. At a hospital in southern Gaza, the family of Reem al-Akhras, who was killed in Israel's mass shooting on Tuesday, mourned her death. 'She went to bring us some food, and this is what happened to her,' her son Zain Zidan said through tears. Her husband, Mohamed Zidan, said 'every day unarmed people' are being killed. 'This is not humanitarian aid – it's a trap.' The new aid distribution process – currently from just three sites – has been widely criticised by rights groups and the UN, who say it does not adhere to humanitarian principles. They also say the aid model, which uses private US security and logistics workers, militarises aid. Ahead of the UNSC vote, UN aid chief Tom Fletcher again appealed for the UN and aid groups to be allowed to assist people in Gaza, stressing that they have a plan, supplies and experience. 'Open the crossings – all of them. Let in lifesaving aid at scale, from all directions. Lift the restrictions on what and how much aid we can bring in. Ensure our convoys aren't held up by delays and denials,' Fletcher said in a statement. The UN has long blamed Israel and lawlessness in the enclave for hindering the delivery of aid and its distribution in Gaza. Israel accuses Hamas of stealing aid, which the group vehemently denies, and the World Food Programme says there is no evidence to support that allegation. UN Children's Fund (UNICEF) spokesman James Elder, currently in Gaza, described the 'horrors' he witnessed within just 24 hours. Speaking from al-Mawasi, Elder told Al Jazeera that Gaza's hospitals and streets are filled with malnourished children. 'I'm seeing teenage boys in tears, showing me their ribs,' he said, noting that children were pleading for food. The UNSC has voted on 14 Gaza-related resolutions and approved four since the war began in October 2023. Wednesday's vote was the first since November 2024. Hamas is still holding 58 captives, a third of them believed to be alive, after most of the rest were released in previous short-lived ceasefire agreements or other deals. Israel's offensive has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, according to Gaza's Health Ministry.
