logo
Drought followed by wet autumn leaves farmers with 'hard decisions' on feed

Drought followed by wet autumn leaves farmers with 'hard decisions' on feed

RNZ News03-06-2025
Farmers in regions hit by summer drought are heading into winter with mixed feelings after a wet autumn, Federated Farmers says.
File photo.
Photo:
RNZ/Sally Round
Drought conditions marked the end of summer for Northland,
Taranaki
, Waikato, Horizons and Marlborough-Tasman.
As a result many farmers used additional supplementary feed to keep cows in milk.
Federated Farmers Waikato president Keith Holmes said "some hard decisions" were made in autumn, with many local farmers using feed allocated for winter cover, and then having to start the dry-off process in April - about four weeks earlier than usual.
He said that was a "particularly tough call" with the $10 dairy payout.
The whole Waikato was now green, he said, "but not all of that is grass, so some farmers remain in drought mode. The majority of people are heaving a sigh of relief but there are still some who are desperately waiting for a bit more warm weather and a bit more rain, to get the cover before we go into winter."
Northland president Colin Hannah said the region had had a "mixed bag of extremes" over the past few months, but too much rain was now causing problems for some.
He said one Northland farm had been under water five times in the past few weeks.
"Other farmers say the rain came at the right time and they're set up for winter. Not all farmers will be impacted. Those that used up some of their winter feed because of the drought, at the point with a bit of urea, probably most of them will get by. But it could bite us in about August, is my basic gut feeling."
But he said, warm temperatures meant things should come up "pretty quickly" and farmers should have enough winter feed.
"They're going to have a bit of a blip, but I think they'll get through it in the north. If we don't, we'll just have to resort to palm kernel, PK, that dreaded thing!"
But he said one silver lining was that palm kernel was relatively cheap and plentiful right now.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Resource Management Act changes will allow power plants to be built faster
Resource Management Act changes will allow power plants to be built faster

RNZ News

timean hour ago

  • RNZ News

Resource Management Act changes will allow power plants to be built faster

Energy Resources Aotearoa chief executive John Carnegie. Photo: Supplied / Rob Tucker A group representing big energy producers said changes to the Resource Management Act (RMA) will allow power plants to be built faster, and reduce price volatility in the electricity market. Parliament passed the amendment yesterday, which means councils will now need to grant consents for certain energy infrastructure within a year. Energy Resources Aotearoa's chief executive, John Carnegie, told Morning Report that it's great news for electricity consumers - big and small. He said the slow consenting processes previously had added to costs and uncertainty. Carnegie said more he's now expecting faster and more certain consenting processes for both fossil fuel and renewable power generation. It has potential to take price volatility out of the electricity market, and deliver a more resilient system that can better handle unexpected weather he events, he said. Carnegie said while renewables remain the backbone of the electricity system, New Zealand needs more fossil fuel and gas generating plants to "fill the gaps" when hydro, solar and wind outputs are low. He said the country needs to build capacity and not be responding in crisis mode. The tight supply of gas meant more demand for back up power, said Carnegie. When asked about the carbon and environmental costs the changes may bring, Carnegie said New Zealand would otherwise be facing energy scarcity and skyrocketing prices. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

ASB joins other major banks on 4.79% mortgage interest rate
ASB joins other major banks on 4.79% mortgage interest rate

RNZ News

time3 hours ago

  • RNZ News

ASB joins other major banks on 4.79% mortgage interest rate

ASB joins the list of major banks who have dropped their one-year fixed mortgage interest rate to 4.79 percent. Photo: Unsplash/ Li Rezaei All the main banks have now dropped their rates, ahead of an expected 25 basis point cut in the official cash rate next week. ASB said on Friday it was joining Westpac, ANZ, BNZ and Kiwibank with a one-year rate of 4.79 percent. It will drop its one-year and 18-month rates to 4.79 percent, its six-month rate to 5.12 percent and its two-year rate to 4.89 percent. ASB's executive general manager of personal banking Adam Boyd said tens of thousands of customers were due to refix on to lower rates in 2025. "By Christmas, around 90 percent of customers holding a fixed home loan are likely to be on a rate less than 6 percent." ASB also reduced some term deposit rates by between 5 and 15 basis points. Its economists are forecasting a 25bp cut to the OCR next week, to 3 percent. They said the central bank was likely to maintain a bias toward more easing but would make this conditional on medium-term inflation looking as though it would remain in the target band. There was extra uncertainty at play, they said. But they said with few other catalysts that would kickstart a domestic economic recovery, it was likely that the OCR would drop below 3 percent by the end of the year. ANZ economists agreed the big focus next week would be on the OCR forecast and hints about where it would go from here. "The big quarterly data (CPI, GDP, unemployment) since the last OCR review in July have been much as the RBNZ expected (or stronger) but the timelier growth indicators have been very soft. "We've also seen some mixed inflation data. All up, a ready reckoner approach justifies perhaps 10-15bp off the OCR track, with a trough of 2.7 percent to 2.75 percent implying one more 25bp cut. "Like in May, we expect the RBNZ will publish a track that is non-committal about the timing of that. "Our big-picture view is that we expect the RBNZ to pivot more dovish and ultimately cut the OCR to 2.5 percent as the soft high-frequency data increasingly shows up in the hard data. "But next week is likely too soon for a lurch in that direction." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Three of New Zealand's biggest emitters no longer have to reveal their climate impact
Three of New Zealand's biggest emitters no longer have to reveal their climate impact

RNZ News

time5 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Three of New Zealand's biggest emitters no longer have to reveal their climate impact

A plume of smoke rises out of an industrial chimney into the sky, in Copenhagen, Denmark. Photo: Supplied/ Unsplash - Mudit Agarwal Three of the country's biggest greenhouse gas emitters no longer have to reveal how much planet-heating gas they produce. For the first time, the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA)'s company-level emissions data doesn't include agriculture, after the government ended compulsory reporting for the farming sector. The change means companies responsible for around half the countries' greenhouse gases no longer have to supply information to the EPA every year giving a rough total of their methane emissions , unless they happen to be captured by other disclosure rules (for example climate disclosure rules covering stockmarket-listed companies). Meat processors Affco and Alliance no longer have to supply emissions data. Nor does Open Country Dairy, the country's second biggest milk exporter after Fonterra. All three were previously among the country's top ten emitters . RNZ asked Affco, Alliance and Open Country Dairy for their totals, but none had responded by deadline. The two biggest greenhouse gas producers in the farming sector - Fonterra and Silver Fern Farms - still disclose their emissions tallies in their own annual reports, as well as listing measures to reduce their impact. "It's critical that everyday people are able to find out who is responsible for New Zealand's climate pollution," said climate advocate Alex Johnston, of the Don't Subsidize Pollution campaign. "To not have big corporate from agriculture, the sector responsible for more than half of the country's emissions, required to report their emissions footprint is not responsible governing. "It's like closing the door on your kid's bedroom when they've left the heater on and then wondering why the power bill is so high." The change came about because the government removed farmers from the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). Agriculture was previously included in the scheme as a backstop in case voluntary discussions between farmers and government didn't result in an agreement to price methane. The backstop provision was removed and voluntary pricing talks were scrapped and re-started after the last election. Farming companies never had to pay for their methane emissions under the ETS the way petrol importers, coal miners and gas producers pay for their carbon dioxide emissions. However, until this year, they had to submit annual totals giving a rough estimate of their climate impact. ETS emissions reports were the only public information available for comparing individual companies, because some companies choose not to voluntarily disclose emissions. Climate Change Minister Simon Watts told Newsroom last year that officials had prepared an option to keep compulsory reporting while otherwise removing farming form the ETS. The government decided not to take it. He said the government was pursuing farm-level reporting instead. The change means reported emissions in the report have halved compared with last year, down from 65.7 million tonnes to 32.5 million tonnes. The difference is almost entirely because of the removal of the 33 million tonnes previously reported by the agriculture sector. When Fonterra is included, top 10 emitters collectively produce more than half the country's emissions, with Fonterra in the top spot followed by big petrol companies Z Energy, BP and Mobil. Farming companies - or their fossil fuel suppliers - still have to report and pay for any coal, gas or other fossil fuel they use in New Zealand under the ETS, for example coal used to dry milk or process meat. Affco reports its energy related emissions on its website, but not the larger total that comes from methane produced by farming the meat it processes. Alliance's website also discusses progress at reducing coal at its processing plants and said it completed a full lifecycle assessment of all its emissions last year, however doesn't appear to list the total. Open Country's website also discusses successful conversion of coal boilers to clean heat and said it is committed to reducing emissions from agriculture through the He Waka Eke Noa programme. He Waka Eke Noa was the programme scrapped by the coalition government after the election and replaced by direct engagement with farming groups through the government's Pastoral Sector Group. The new group is yet to announce a pricing plan or targets. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store