Utah lawmakers look to dissolve, replace State Records Committee. Here's why that matters
Utah's media organizations — including Utah News Dispatch — are joining arms to stand against a newly-unveiled bill being considered by the Utah Legislature that would dismantle a long-standing committee that decides whether government records should be released to the public.
Since it was created in 1992, the seven-member State Records Committee has heard appeals from journalists and other Utahns when governments deny access to records. But with SB277, Senate Majority Assistant Whip Mike McKell, R-Spanish Fork, wants to not only replace that committee with one decision-maker, but also change the standard that determines whether Utahns should have access to the record — or not.
If SB277 becomes law, it would create a new office within the Division of Archives and Records Service called the Government Records Office, and it would entirely replace the State Records Committee with the director of that new office. The bill would require the governor to appoint a director who is an attorney that's 'knowledgeable regarding state law and practices relating to records management.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Importantly, the bill would also strip what's known as the 'balancing test' from Utah law. It's a provision that has long required officials to release protected records if it's determined that the public interest in the record is greater than or equal to reasons for keeping it secret.
The Utah Media Coalition — which includes Utah News Dispatch, The Salt Lake Tribune, the Deseret News, KSL-TV, KSL NewsRadio, KUTV 2 News, KTVX ABC4, FOX13, the Utah Press Association, the Utah Headliners Chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists, and the Utah Investigative Journalism Project — issued a statement Thursday opposing the bill.
Utah's existing Government Records Access & Management Act (GRAMA) protects the public's right to know how their government conducts business so Utahns can hold their elected officials and government agencies accountable, the coalition said.
'SB277 will weaken GRAMA and increase government secrecy by abolishing the State Records
Committee and prohibiting government officials, appeals boards, and the courts from ordering the release of records even when there is no good reason to keep them secret,' the Utah Media Coalition said.
The media coalition also urged lawmakers to preserve the 'balancing test,' calling it the 'beating heart of GRAMA.'
'Without it, government could withhold records even if the public interest in disclosure was compelling and the interests favoring secrecy were non-existent or minimal,' the Utah Media Coalition said. 'The public interest balancing test has been part of GRAMA since the very beginning, and for good reason – it is an essential check on government secrecy, malfeasance, and misconduct. Public transparency laws should serve the public interest, not discard it in favor of categorical secrecy, which is what SB277 does.'
McKell, in a media availability with reporters on Friday, defended his bill, saying it's meant to address 'inefficiencies' and replace the State Records Committee with someone with more 'legal experience.'
McKell pointed to a recent legislative audit that found in 2023 it took an average of 156 days for the State Records Committee to issue decisions.
'I think 156 days is way too long,' McKell said. 'I want my constituents to have an opportunity to go through that appeals process and get some finality quicker, and that's the concern for me.'
In recent years, the number of appeals heard by the State Records Committee has increased. In 2024 — even though the body faced delays due to several vacancies — the committee issued 85 decisions and orders, the most orders the committee had issued in a year. In 2023, the committee issued 63 orders, 53 in 2022, 74 in 2021 and 55 in 2020.
McKell said the number of cases being sent to the State Records Committee is 'climbing' — and he's also worried about whether the volunteers serving on the committee have the right amount of legal experience.
The committee is currently comprised of the director of the Division of Archives and Records Services or his designee, a Utah League of Cities and Towns representative, two citizen representatives, a media representative, a private sector records manager, and an individual with expertise in electronic records and databases.
'Not one person on that list is, in my view, has training to issue subpoenas, compel testimony or evidence, impose fines and make legally binding decisions,' McKell said. 'I just think we can do better.'
The Utah Media Coalition pushed back on that claim, arguing the committee has 'served Utah well by providing members of the public an informal, speedy, and inexpensive forum to exercise their right of access to public records.'
'The Committee should be retained and strengthened, not abolished,' the coalition statement said. 'The fact the Committee is made up of volunteers from diverse public and private employment backgrounds is a strength, not a weakness. The Committee has deep expertise on GRAMA issues — and gets the law right.'
The media coalition added that the committee's decisions are affirmed by the courts 'a whopping 98% of the time, so clearly law-trained judges think the Committee is getting it right.'
As for his reasoning for eliminating the balancing test, McKell said 'we need objectivity instead of subjectivity.'
'We want to follow the law more than anything else,' he said, arguing the current balancing test allows for too much subjectivity when it comes to releasing sensitive records like those perhaps involving sexual abuse or sexual assault.
In a recent media availability, when pressed for examples of cases in which he believes the State Records Committee released records he thinks should have been protected, McKell declined to point to any specific examples.
Asked how it would help address 'inefficiencies' to hire one person to handle records appeals, McKell said he believes it's a matter of expertise.
'I think a lot of the backlog is, as I've reviewed it, is we have people who simply don't have the skill set today to run that office,' he said, calling the case backlog 'scary.' He said judges and attorneys know how to sort through a 'large volume of cases, and they find a way to get through it.'
'We need to clean up the system,' McKell said. 'It's been broken for a while.'
But Jeff Hunt, an attorney specializing in the First Amendment and media litigation, called SB277's impact to Utah's government transparency laws 'extremely problematic.' He said it could do permanent damage at a time of already deepening distrust in government and institutions.
'It's going to do irreparable harm to our open records statute, and it's going to further undermine trust and confidence in government,' Hunt said, 'because the public is not going to find out what its government is doing if they pass this bill. It's going to make it much harder to have any kind of transparency and accountability.'
Hunt called the balancing test 'so vital,' and said there's a 'long list of very important records' that would have not been released without it. They include:
Names of lobbyists and subcontractors who received more than $5 million in taxpayer money, in the case Big Game Forever v. Peterson.
Records relating to a criminal investigation in campaign finance violations by Ogden City Mayor and City Council candidates, in the case Schroeder v. Utah Attorney General's Office.
Records relating to public corruption charges against a Weber County Commissioner, in the case McKitrick v. Gibson.
Independent report of sexual harassment allegations concerning a Salt Lake County chief deputy clerk, in the case Deseret News Publishing Co. v. Salt Lake County.
Police interviews related to officer-involved shootings in the case West Jordan v. State Records Committee.
Contributing: Alixel Cabrera
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
6 days ago
- Axios
Homelessness climbs in Utah, especially for older adults
Homelessness in Utah is worsening, with sharp increases among older adults and veterans, according to a new state report. The big picture: An increasing share of Utah's senior population, many of whom depend on fixed incomes, is unable to keep up with rising housing costs, according to an annual report released Wednesday by the Utah Office of Homeless Services. By the numbers: The number of people experiencing homelessness in Utah rose 18% from the previous year, per a January point-in-time count. Among Utahns over age 64, homelessness grew by 42%, while veterans saw a 36% jump. Children lacking permanent housing increased by 12%. People encountering chronic homelessness saw a 36% rise. Meanwhile, first-time homelessness experienced a 5% uptick between 2023 and 2024, the report showed. What they're saying: "I am deeply concerned about the trajectory of homelessness in the state of Utah and in our capital city," Salt Lake City Mayor Erin Mendenhall said in response to the newly released figures during a Wednesday news conference outside city hall. Mendenhall lambasted state lawmakers for their "lack of forward momentum" to address the state's homelessness crisis. The other side: In a joint statement, Gov. Spencer Cox, Senate President Stuart Adams, House Speaker Mike Schultz said state leaders have stepped up to help local governments "find real solutions" to curb homelessness. "It's frustrating to continuously take one step forward and two steps back with Salt Lake City," per the statement that urged Mendenhall to "turn down the politics." Zoom out: The state's homeless rate is 13 per 100,000 people — below the 2024 national rate of 23 per 100,000 people, according to the data. Zoom in: The vast majority of people (95%) included in January's count were in shelters, compared with 18% in 2023, a milestone that state leaders attributed to the expansion of winter shelter capacity.
Yahoo
11-08-2025
- Yahoo
‘Utah needs you': National election commission urges Utahns to volunteer as poll workers
Election workers process ballots at the Davis County Administrative Building in Farmington on Election Day, Tuesday, Nov. 5, 2024. (Photo by Spenser Heaps for Utah News Dispatch) The U.S. Election Assistance Commission — an independent, bipartisan commission charged with ensuring secure, accurate and accessible elections — is launching a national effort to recruit poll workers, including in Utah. 'Utah needs you,' Commissioner Donald Palmer said in an interview with Utah News Dispatch on Friday. Tuesday — which is also Utah's municipal primary — is National Poll Worker Recruitment Day, when the U.S. Election Assistance Commission kicks off a nationwide effort to encourage more people to volunteer at their local county clerks office and sign up to be election workers ahead of the November general election. 'Where there's a primary, there's always going to be a general (election),' Palmer quipped, saying the aim of scheduling National Poll Worker Recruitment Day on the same day of municipal primaries is to recruit more poll workers ahead of the 2025 November election, when voters typically turn out in higher numbers. 'Go see for yourself': These poll workers want to demystify the voting process for you By raising awareness on a day when Utahns are thinking about their local elections, Palmer said he hopes more Utahns will consider being a part of the process this fall. Across the nation, clerks are seeing a 'dramatic decrease in the number of poll workers available,' Palmer said, noting that for the 2024 presidential election, 772,000 Americans served as poll workers, according to the 2024 Election Administration and Voting Survey Report. That's down from what's typically been 1 million. While it's been getting incrementally easier to recruit election volunteers since 2020, recruitment efforts have trended easier since 2020, still about 48% of clerks' elections jurisdictions across the nation reported it's either 'very difficult' or 'somewhat difficult' to find poll workers, according to that survey. Of that 48%, 14.3% said it's 'very difficult' while 33.6% said it's 'somewhat difficult.' While Utah is not facing a dire poll worker shortage, Palmer said he's still encouraging Utahns to volunteer, noting that what he hears most from Utah clerks is a need to help process by-mail ballots since the vast majority of Utah voters use the state's vote-by-mail system. He also said some counties are in more need than others — noting that rural areas with smaller populations often face more challenges recruiting poll workers. In Utah during the 2024 November election, 104,350 people cast ballots in person on Election Day and 36,381 people voted early in person, while about 1.3 million by-mail ballots were cast and counted, according to the national survey. By comparison, Utah only reported 1,110 total poll workers for that election. That survey also showed that in 2025, about 40% of Utah's poll workers were new recruits. Palmer said that shows there's been 'a lot of turnover' and 'a need for poll workers' in Utah — demonstrating that people are not volunteering anymore, likely because they're getting older or are no longer able to. 'We have an aging population of poll workers,' Palmer said. He noted that the survey found the vast majority of poll workers in 2024 were over the age of 40, with nearly 60% ages 61 and older. That includes 31.1% that were between the ages of 61 and 70, and 28.1% that were 71 and older. Republicans are losing trust in elections, even in Utah. What should be done? 'It really does (show) we need to start recruiting younger and middle-aged Americans to really fill the gap. Because at some point, they're going to retire,' he said. Palmer urged younger Utahns — who may not even be aware of the opportunity to serve their communities in this way — to consider being an election worker. 'I really encourage people to try (volunteering) at least one or two elections, because it will give you great insight, and the people that continue on year after year, some of these folks, they absolutely love it. They're going to do it for the rest of their lives,' he said. 'So we really do want young people and other Americans to see the voting process.' He also said more people being involved in local election processes can help combat rising distrust in election security. 'It's right on the ground. You can see how the voting process works,' he said. 'You really do, as a poll worker, get to see the checks and balances within a polling place. You get to see the efforts that go into chain of custody and how we make sure the ballots equate to the number of people that have voted. And the care that's taken with those ballots. … It really is the best place to understand how the voting process works.' 'There really does need to be replacement poll workers as we move to the future,' he said. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
04-08-2025
- Yahoo
Utah's local primary elections are coming soon and, with new laws, have tight deadlines
Ballots await processing at the Davis County Administrative Building in Farmington on Election Day, Tuesday, Nov. 5, 2024. (Photo by Spenser Heaps for Utah News Dispatch) This month most counties in Utah will oversee primary elections for local offices ahead of the Nov. 4 general election. With a portion of a new election law now effective, clerks will have less time to receive mail-in ballots. But, those planning to vote in advance can still cast their votes in various methods. Every county — except for Daggett, Grand, Morgan, Piute, Rich and Uintah — have at least one primary race for mayors offices and city councils happening on Aug. 12, according to the Utah Lt. Governor's Office. Utah County residents are also electing candidates for school board. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX 'A lot of these people that we're electing at the local level are making decisions on things like roads, parks, schools in some cases, and zoning, and permits, and libraries, and police and fire, and setting your tax rates and fees,' Cambria Cantrell, elections coordinator at the lieutenant governor's office said. 'So local elections matter as much as, if not, sometimes more than any other.' The deadline to register to receive a by-mail ballot has passed. However, voters can still send in their ballots by mail. Unlike other elections, there isn't a specific last day to postmark a ballot, but Cantrell warns, voters should send them in as soon as possible. That's because a phase of HB300, an election law the Utah Legislature passed this year, now requires clerks to receive any votes sent by mail by 8 p.m. on election night. 'We are encouraging people, if they plan to mail their ballot, to do it early, just to allow plenty of time for it to get through the Postal Service system,' Cantrell said. Dropboxes in every city across the state are also a good option to submit the ballots that may not make it on time in the mail. This is also the first election under HB69, a 2025 law banning clerks from accessing and disclosing voter records for personal purposes. Utahns may also notice a change in their ballot envelope design. Utah County and other jurisdictions that hadn't made the change yet implemented privacy tabs to prevent individual ballots from being traced back to voters' personal information. In another change, while it isn't required yet, some counties started adding a spot where voters can provide the last four digits of their social security or driver's license numbers for verification, a phase of HB300 that will officially become effective statewide in 2029. Voters who are registered to vote but haven't received their ballots in their mail have until Tuesday, Aug. 5, to request one, Cantrell said. The deadline for voters using the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act is Aug. 11. Same-day registration is also available for those voting in person. Voters may visit the state's election website to read more about the candidates running for public office in their cities. Early voting times vary depending on the county. Municipal primaries like these are generally less popular among voters. Turnout in most counties is often in the 20% to 30% range, Cantrell said. That's a little lower than turnout in primary elections for statewide offices, which last year was in the 46% to 47% range. Because some races lack candidates in opposing parties, meaning offices will be decided in party primaries, state election officials encourage Utahns to participate. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE Solve the daily Crossword
