Lawyer tapped to study Giant Mine legacy comes with no 'preconceived notions'
The lawyer and former British Columbia politician recently appointed to assess the historical impacts of the N.W.T.'s Giant Mine on Indigenous communities says he plans to travel to Yellowknife this month to meet with those affected firsthand.
Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Gary Anandasangaree named Murray Rankin as the ministerial special representative in a news release last week, saying Rankin's "experience and knowledge will support future recommendations to address the harms that resulted from the Giant Mine operations."
The mine operated near Yellowknife between 1948 and 2004. The site is one of the most contaminated in Canada. Since 2021, a $4-billion remediation project to clean up the site and contain 237,000 tonnes of highly toxic arsenic trioxide dust underground has been underway.
In a statement this week, the Yellowknives Dene First Nation, which has been pushing for a federal apology and compensation for years, said it welcomes Rankin's appointment and is hopeful for a resolution.
"The mine contaminated our core harvesting area. We no longer trust it as a safe place to harvest," said Ndilǫ Chief Fred Sangris. "We will share our peoples' message with Mr. Rankin that the damage is still felt today and will be felt for generations."
Murray Rankin joined guest host Shannon Scott on CBC's The Trailbreaker on Tuesday.
This interview has been edited for length and clarity.
Why are you the right person for this job?
Well, I hope I'm the right person. I have had a long relationship with Minister Anandasangaree. We've done some, I think, pretty important things in British Columbia together on treaty making, for example, and reconciliation efforts. And I have worked as a lawyer with First Nations and with governments and with industry for a long time. I think the minister thought I might be able to give him advice and help to resolve this longstanding issue. It's been going on for some 56 years of the mine's operation, and then 20 years since, and there's some significant issues that need to be addressed.
What are your goals for this position?
My goals are to do what the minister has asked me to do, namely to work with the communities affected. There are several First Nations, in particular the Yellowknives Dene First Nation, of course, but there's Métis people as well, Tłı̨chǫ, and others that have been involved. The objective is to provide him with some very practical recommendations to try to address this longstanding problem. It's been around, as you know, for so long and promises have been made over the years — not all of them appear to have been met.
So the idea is to come up with recommendations as to what extent the government of Canada bears responsibility. What are the specific impacts on the Indigenous peoples that were affected by the mine over the years, and to try to both heal the land and heal the people who were affected by this mine.
One of the agreements that hasn't come to fruition yet around this is an apology and compensation. In 2021, the federal government signed an agreement to look into issuing that apology. What's your understanding of why that hasn't happened yet?
I'm trying to get to the bottom of that. You're absolutely right. There was talk as well in 2021 of a negotiating table, they called it. And that was something that a former minister, Carolyn Bennett, committed to. That doesn't appear to have got off the ground. The N.W.T. MP, Michael McLeod, had brought in a petition. It got, I think, like thousands of names, you know, 32,000 people signed it calling for that compensation and apology. So the government of Canada has been doing whatever they've been doing and there's of course lots of work going on on the physical remediation, the environmental impacts of the contaminated site, but the impacts on the First Nations that were affected — it's my job to try to find out what can be done about that.
I want to read a statement from Yellowknives Dene Chief Ernest Betsina about your appointment. He says "for decades we have advocated for an apology and compensation for the harms that our people have suffered as a result of Canada's authorization and administration of Giant Mine. We are hoping for a resolution for our claim before more of our elders pass away." Chief Betsina obviously wants a timely resolution. What is your timeline?
My timeline is, and I've been in correspondence with the Yellowknives Dene just yesterday, and I'm hoping to come up to Yellowknife in a week or so. I've got arrangements that are currently being made to meet him and his people and to discuss all of that.
I have the benefit of not really having spoken in the past, so I can hit the ground running with, if you will, a clean slate. My job is to report not to the public service, but to the minister himself and that I think gives me the opportunity to hear from them firsthand without any preconceived notions of what has happened or should happen.
On that note, given the longstanding calls for justice over Giant Mine, how do you plan to address any skepticism about this process?
Well, I hope I can, through the various conversations I have with a wide range of people, get to the bottom of it. There's obviously different perspectives on what has been done and what should be done. So my job is simply to listen to all sides of the issue and to try to come up with my best advice, my independent advice to the minister.
Ultimately it's the government of Canada that will have to decide what to do with my report. I will do that within the next few months. This has been, I think everyone agrees, taking far too long to get going and it's my job to show action as quickly as I can. That's why I've been immersed in trying to learn about this from reading. And now I have to get in, talk to the people who are directly affected, and that's what I intend to do, beginning a week or so from now.
How long will you be in Yellowknife?
The initial trip, I expect to be there for a few days and then I'm going to, of course, be coming back because as you can imagine, there have been mountains of research and reports over the years and I've got to get to the bottom of that. It's a significant learning curve for me.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Indigenous leaders on lessons learned from Trans Mountain as Carney aims to fast-track major projects
Two former Indigenous leaders on both sides of the debate over the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion say the federal government can't ignore First Nations on future infrastructure projects it seeks to approve. Their comments come as Prime Minister Mark Carney aims to fast-track major projects, such as pipelines and mines, through his government's newly adopted 'Building Canada Act.' Following years of delays and legal challenges, the expanded Trans Mountain pipeline, known as TMX, began operating last year. The project took more than 10 years to complete, after a court cited inadequate consultation with Indigenous groups in its decision to quash the federal government's initial approval of the expansion. The Canadian Press spoke with two former Indigenous leaders – one who supported TMX and one who opposed it – about what lessons have been learned from Trans Mountain, and whether they expect anything different from Carney's plans to accelerate more major projects. Leah George-Wilson, former chief of the Tsleil-Waututh Nation, doesn't believe Ottawa has learned any lessons. 'I think we will see more First Nations turning to the courts over this piece of legislation,' she said of the Building Canada Act. Opinion: How Indigenous peoples and the private sector can work together to get major projects done George-Wilson's B.C.-based First Nation fought in court against the Trans Mountain expansion pipeline, which ends in Burrard Inlet, part of her people's ancestral territory. They initially succeeded in reversing the Trudeau government's approval of the project in 2018 over a lack of consultation. However, after the government reapproved the project in 2019, First Nations such as Tsleil-Waututh were unable to stop it. It was during this legal battle that the federal government purchased the Trans Mountain project from Kinder Morgan, which had been preparing to withdraw. The TMX saga has left George-Wilson feeling pessimistic about the government's approach to other projects. 'Even today … the government has not responded to the significant impacts that Trans Mountain has had and continues to have on our community,' she said. She says she is not reassured by Carney's promise to respect section 35 of the Constitution Act – which guarantees the ancestral rights of Indigenous peoples – nor by the meetings he held over the summer with Indigenous leaders on his government's plans to quickly approve infrastructure projects. Some Indigenous communities have said they were not consulted during the drafting of the new legislation and fear it will infringe on their rights. Nine First Nations in Ontario have already filed a legal challenge against the Building Canada Act. With the law, Carney wants to speed up projects that Ottawa considers to be in the national interest, with the goal of limiting approval times to two years. 'I don't think this piece of legislation is going to speed up the projects at all because they're going to end up in court,' she said. Opinion: Why the Carney government should treat the TMX pipeline as a model investment However, Joe Dion a former grand chief in Alberta, says he thinks the Carney government will respect Section 35 and honour the principle of free, full, and informed consent of First Nations. 'For the government to revoke this section or to go against it would be a national shame. So I don't think it's going to happen,' said Dion, who is the CEO and director of the Western Indigenous Pipeline Group. The group includes dozens of Indigenous communities that, in partnership with Pembina Pipeline Corporation, want to acquire TMX. Ottawa has signalled its intention to divest itself of the pipeline ever since it purchased it from Kinder Morgan, though it has not yet done so. Dion believes that things have changed significantly since the Trans Mountain saga began, and believes the Carney government intends to fully involve Indigenous communities in future projects labelled as in the national interest. 'The government is now saying that the First Nations and the Indigenous groups will have equity, will have ownership in these projects,' he said in an interview. 'When TMX started, there was no promise of that at all … We had to fight for it, we have to fight for it." Dion acknowledges that the Building Canada Act has drawn criticism from many Indigenous communities, but he said, 'You will never have unanimity, whether it's First Nations or non-First Nations.' In his view, projects that would 'severely affect' Indigenous communities will simply not go ahead, and won't be selected as being in the national interest.
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
Indigenous Services Canada conducts forensic audit at Poundmaker Cree Nation in Sask.
Indigenous Services Canada is conducting a forensic audit at Poundmaker Cree Nation in Saskatchewan, making it the third such audit into First Nations spending made public in the province since 2024, CBC Indigenous has learned. The audit will examine spending on federally funded programs over the last seven years, with a focus on social assistance, education and Jordan's Principle, according to a source with knowledge of the situation. CBC Indigenous is not identifying the source because they weren't authorized to speak publicly and fear reprisal. The community is on Treaty 6 territory near North Battleford, about 170 kilometres northwest of Saskatoon. In a statement, Indigenous Services Canada (ISC) confirmed the investigation is happening but declined to provide details. "As part of Indigenous [Services] Canada's efforts to ensure accountability and transparency in the spending of public funds, the department conducts evaluations, internal audits, financial reviews and forensic audits each year," wrote spokesperson Pascal Laplante. "We confirm that we are proceeding with a forensic audit of Poundmaker Cree Nation. To respect privacy, we do not comment on specific forensic audits beyond confirming if one is being undertaken." The band's administration office was closed from Aug. 11 to Aug. 15 due to auditors being in the office, according to a notice posted to the community's administrative Facebook page. Over the phone on Monday, Poundmaker Chief Duane Antoine said the nation is not currently in a position to comment. Similar audits In March 2024, ISC informed the Federation of Sovereign Indigenous Nations (FSIN) that Ottawa would conduct a forensic audit of FSIN's spending over a five-year period dating back to April 2019. FSIN represents 74 First Nations in Saskatchewan. Poundmaker cut ties with FSIN in 2022. This summer, James Smith Cree Nation went public with concerns about FSIN's handling of federal pandemic relief money. "Last year, James Smith Cree Nation raised concerns about a $1 million discrepancy in COVID-19 funding that was expected to flow through FSIN," said local Chief Kirby Constant in a July 14 statement. That statement followed a June 2025 report in Prince Alberta-based local news outlet paNOW that said the FSIN audit's initial findings raised questions about $20 million in spending. CBC Indigenous has not independently verified that report. Then on July 25, Constant announced ISC would be conducting a forensic audit of his community, reviewing spending back to April 2018. "This forensic audit is a necessary and welcome step. I support it fully and will ensure that everyone tasked with working on your behalf for the nation co-operates fully," Constant said in a July 25 statement. Some Poundmaker members have sought answers about their finances for years. In 2015, a Poundmaker councillor called for a forensic audit after a ballot box was reportedly taken and burned during a byelection of disputed legitimacy. In 2001, the department then known as Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC) ordered an audit at Poundmaker but the band office was destroyed by fire the evening before the audit was to begin.
Winnipeg Free Press
4 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Indigenous leaders on Trans Mountain lessons as Building Canada Act moves forward
OTTAWA – Two former Indigenous leaders on both sides of the debate over the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion say the federal government can't ignore First Nations on future infrastructure projects it seeks to approve. Their comments come as Prime Minister Mark Carney aims to fast-track major projects, such as pipelines and mines, through his government's newly adopted 'Building Canada Act.' Following years of delays and legal challenges, the expanded Trans Mountain pipeline, known as TMX, began operating last year. The project took more than 10 years to complete, after a court cited inadequate consultation with Indigenous groups in its decision to quash the federal government's initial approval of the expansion. The Canadian Press spoke with two former Indigenous leaders — one who supported TMX and one who opposed it — about what lessons have been learned from Trans Mountain, and whether they expect anything different from Carney's plans to accelerate more major projects. Leah George-Wilson, former chief of the Tsleil-Waututh Nation, doesn't believe Ottawa has learned any lessons. 'I think we will see more First Nations turning to the courts over this piece of legislation,' she said of the Building Canada Act. George-Wilson's B.C.-based First Nation fought in court against the Trans Mountain expansion pipeline, which ends in Burrard Inlet, part of her people's ancestral territory. They initially succeeded in reversing the Trudeau government's approval of the project in 2018 over a lack of consultation. However, after the government reapproved the project in 2019, First Nations such as Tsleil-Waututh were unable to stop it. It was during this legal battle that the federal government purchased the Trans Mountain project from Kinder Morgan, which had been preparing to withdraw. The TMX saga has left George-Wilson feeling pessimistic about the government's approach to other projects. 'Even today … the government has not responded to the significant impacts that Trans Mountain has had and continues to have on our community,' she said. She says she is not reassured by Carney's promise to respect section 35 of the Constitution Act — which guarantees the ancestral rights of Indigenous peoples — nor by the meetings he held over the summer with Indigenous leaders on his government's plans to quickly approve infrastructure projects. Some Indigenous communities have said they were not consulted during the drafting of the new legislation and fear it will infringe on their rights. Nine First Nations in Ontario have already filed a legal challenge against the Building Canada Act. With the law, Carney wants to speed up projects that Ottawa considers to be in the national interest, with the goal of limiting approval times to two years. 'I don't think this piece of legislation is going to speed up the projects at all because they're going to end up in court,' she said. However, Joe Dion a former grand chief in Alberta, says he thinks the Carney government will respect Section 35 and honour the principle of free, full, and informed consent of First Nations. 'For the government to revoke this section or to go against it would be a national shame. So I don't think it's going to happen',' said Dion, who is the CEO and director of the Western Indigenous Pipeline Group. The group includes dozens of Indigenous communities that, in partnership with Pembina Pipeline Corporation, want to acquire TMX. Ottawa has signalled its intention to divest itself of the pipeline ever since it purchased it from Kinder Morgan, though it has not yet done so. Dion believes that things have changed significantly since the Trans Mountain saga began, and believes the Carney government intends to fully involve Indigenous communities in future projects labelled as in the national interest. 'The government is now saying that the First Nations and the Indigenous groups will have equity, will have ownership in these projects,' he said in an interview. 'When TMX started, there was no promise of that at all … We had to fight for it, we have to fight for it.' Dion acknowledges that the Building Canada Act has drawn criticism from many Indigenous communities, but he said, 'You will never have unanimity, whether it's First Nations or non-First Nations.' In his view, projects that would 'severely affect' Indigenous communities will simply not go ahead, and won't be selected as being in the national interest. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 18, 2025.
