
Scientists reveal research that could change theories about life on Mars
New research has challenged a long held theory about a peculiar Martian landmark, potentially changing the way scientists understand the red planet's capacity to sustain life.
The findings call into question the theory that dark streaks on Martian slopes indicate the presence of liquid water, suggesting instead that these features are the result of dry processes.
A study of roughly half a million of these streaks, captured in satellite imagery dating back to the 1970s, points to the accumulation and movement of dust as the likely culprit, reinforcing the image of Mars as a dry, inhospitable planet.
Scientists analysed approximately 87,000 satellite images, including data from NASA 's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, focusing on these transient streaks.
Co-leader of the study Adomas Valantinas said: "The tiny dust particles can create flow-like patterns without liquid. This phenomenon occurs because extremely fine dust can behave similarly to a liquid when disturbed - flowing, branching and creating finger-like patterns as it moves downslope"
The postdoctoral researcher in planetary sciences at Brown University added: "It's similar to how dry sand can flow like water when poured. But on Mars, the ultra-fine particles and low gravity enhance these fluid-like properties, creating features that might be mistaken for water flows when they're actually just dry material in motion."
The streaks, which appear suddenly and fade over several years, typically measure between 1,970 and 2,540 feet long and often exhibit branching patterns as they navigate around obstacles.
The study proposes that fine dust particles from the Martian atmosphere settle on sloped terrain. Events like wind gusts, meteorite impacts, or marsquakes then dislodge this accumulated dust, causing it to flow down the slopes, creating the streaked appearance.
This contradicts previous interpretations that considered these streaks as potential signs of liquid water flows, and therefore, possible habitats for life.
The streaks are predominantly located in the northern hemisphere of Mars, clustered in three main regions: Elysium Planitia, Arabia Terra, and the Tharsis volcanic plateau, home to the immense Olympus Mons volcano.
Researchers said limitations in the resolution of the satellite images mean they account for only a fraction of slope streaks. They estimated the actual number at up to two million.
Water is considered an essential ingredient for life. Mars billions of years ago was wetter and warmer than it is today. The question remains whether Mars has any liquid water on its surface when temperatures seasonally can edge above the freezing point.
It remains possible that small amounts of water - perhaps sourced from buried ice, subsurface aquifers or abnormally humid air - could mix with enough salt in the ground to create a flow even on the frigid Martian surface. That raises the possibility that the slope streaks, if caused by wet conditions, could be habitable niches.
"Generally, it is very difficult for liquid water to exist on the Martian surface, due to the low temperature and the low atmospheric pressure. But brines - very salty water - might potentially be able to exist for short periods of time," said planetary geomorphologist and study co-leader Valentin Bickel of the University of Bern in Switzerland.
Given the massive volume of images, the researchers employed an advanced machine-learning method, looking for correlations involving temperature patterns, atmospheric dust deposition, meteorite impacts, the nature of the terrain and other factors. The geostatistical analysis found that slope streaks often appear in the dustiest regions and correlate with wind patterns, while some form near the sites of fresh impacts and quakes.
The researchers also studied shorter-lived features called recurring slope lineae, or RSL, seen primarily in the Martian southern highlands. These grow in the summer and fade the following winter. The data suggested that these also were associated with dry processes such as dust devils - whirlwinds of dust - and rockfalls.
The analysis found that both types of features were not typically associated with factors indicative of a liquid or frost origin such as high surface temperature fluctuations, high humidity or specific slope orientations.
"It all comes back to habitability and the search for life," Bickel said. "If slope streaks and RSL would really be driven by liquid water or brines, they could create a niche for life. However, if they are not tied to wet processes, this allows us to focus our attention on other, more promising locations."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Musk ally escalates Tesla chief's feud with Trump
An Elon Musk ally whose nomination to run NASA for Donald Trump was withdrawn the same day the 'First Buddy' departed the White House claims he lost his job out of revenge. Jared Isaacman (pictured), 42, had his nomination pulled Friday after a 'thorough review' of his 'prior associations,' Trump said. Isaacman has been a close collaborator with Musk ever since buying his first chartered flight on Musk's SpaceX company in 2021. It has been heavily speculated that Sergio Gor, an official in the White House Presidential Personnel Office, pushed Isaacman out the door over disputes with Musk and failure to consult him and other personnel officials on some decisions. Speaking to the All-In Podcast following his exit, Isaacman said that he still supports President Trump but suggests the speculation is correct. 'I mean, people can draw their own conclusions but I think the directions people are going in seems to check out to me,' Isaacman said. He even suggested that it wasn't personal between him and Trump, saying 'one person decided to make a move' to oust him. Isaacman also believes the nomination was withdrawn to coincide with his friend Musk parting ways with the administration . 'I had a pretty good idea, I don't think the timing was much of a coincidence. Obviously, there was more than one departure that was covered on that day,' he said. Isaacman blamed 'some people' with 'axes to grind' against either him or Musk, saying he was a 'good, visible target.' He described someone, presumably Gor, as 'an influential advisor coming in and saying: 'Here's the facts and I think we gotta' kill this guy.'' 'I want to be overwhelmingly clear: I don't fault the president,' Isaacman added. The president maintains he backflipped on billionaire entrepreneur Jared Isaacman's appointment after learning of his past donations to the Democrats. But MAGA loyalists suspect Trump may have been set up to make the call by insiders who have it out for Elon Musk and are looking to hurt him by punishing his friend. Trump ally Laura Loomer wrote: 'There is reason to believe that Isaacman may be facing retaliation because of his friendship with Elon Musk. If so, this would suggest there is a coordinated hit job on Isaacman in an effort to damage ties between President Trump and Elon Musk before the 2026 midterms. Is President Trump aware of the ulterior motives by some individuals in the administration who have an interest in seeing Isaacman's nomination pulled?' The New York Times revealed on Sunday that Trump reportedly knew about Isaacman's donations from the moment he chose to nominate him to run NASA. Isaacman told All-In that he disclosed over the years he had donated to prominent Democrats, including in the past two campaign cycles. Musk has also donated to Democrats in the past, before going on to become the single largest benefactor to the MAGA movement during the last campaign in his push to see Trump return to the White House. Isaacman was selected by Trump at the height of his bromance with Musk, who has a long and storied connection with the fellow billionaire. It is understood that Musk lobbied for Isaacman's appointment and that Trump deferred to the SpaceX founder for the final decision. At the time, Trump described Isaacman as 'an accomplished business leader, philanthropist, pilot and astronaut.' He had been approved by a Senate committee and was headed to a confirmation vote this week when Trump suddenly pulled his nomination. The president gave Musk a heads up on Friday - his last day at the White House - that he intended to do so. Musk's time in the White House was fraught with tension and pushback from some of Trump's closest advisors, some of whom didn't like the access Musk had to the president and the power he wielded over departments with his Department of Government Efficiency . This has sparked rampant speculation that in the wake of his official departure as a Special Government Employee, that some of his foes are exacting revenge by getting in Trump's ear about Isaacman's nomination. Republican Senator and Trump ally Tim Sheehy wrote on X: 'Astronaut and successful businessman @RookIsaacman was a strong choice by President Trump to lead NASA. I was proud to introduce Jared at his hearing and strongly oppose efforts to derail his nomination.' It is understood that some of Trump's allies had been pressing him about Isaacman's donations to the Democrats in recent days, prompting Trump to renege on his offer. Loomer said despite his liberal ties, Isaacman was an ideal candidate to lead NASA, with 'unmatched credentials.' 'Isaacman was on track to get over 70 Senate votes. So why the sudden reversal and talks to pull his nomination?' she asked. 'Because the Deep State doesn't want President Trump to have allies like this in his administration.' White House assistant press secretary Liz Huston pushed back against any suggestion that the decision was not Trump's. 'The Administrator of NASA will help lead humanity into space and execute President Trump's bold mission of planting the American flag on the planet Mars,' she said. 'It's essential that the next leader of NASA is in complete alignment with President Trump's America First agenda and a replacement will be announced directly by President Trump soon.' And Trump himself appeared to quell concerns that he and Musk were on the outs on Sunday night, sharing a new picture to Truth Social of him with the former First Buddy and one of Musk's sons. Musk left his role less than a week ago and just days ahead of schedule, signing off with a warm X post praising Trump. However, he has since gone on a days-long rampage against Trump's landmark 'big, beautiful bill' and lamented the treatment of his baby-faced DOGE henchmen during his time in the White House. He said: 'I was disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not just decreases it.' And in the days since his departure, a laundry list of allegations have surfaced about the simmering tensions between Musk and a handful of Trump's other allies. Former Chief Strategist Steve Bannon told that Musk's turbulent time in the White House was marred when he physically 'shoved' 62-year-old Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent after he was confronted over wild promises to save the administration 'a trillion dollars'. 'Scott Bessent called him out and said, 'You promised us a trillion dollars (in cuts), and now you're at like $100 billion, and nobody can find anything, what are you doing?'' the prominent MAGA figure revealed. 'And that's when Elon got physical. It's a sore subject with him. 'It wasn't an argument, it was a physical confrontation. Elon basically shoved him.' Bannon said the physical altercation came as the two billionaires moved from the Oval Office to outside Chief of Staff Susie Wiles' office, and then outside the office of the then National Security Advisor, Mike Waltz. 'Trump 100%' sided with Bessent after the clash, he added. 'I don't think Bessent has any bad blood, but he's got a job to do and he's going to do it.' The revelations of the Musk-Bessant clash follow an explosive New York Times report that alleged Musk was using a cocktail of drugs on the campaig n trail including ketamine, ecstasy and psychedelic mushrooms. Bannon added that Musk also lost status in Trump's orbit when it was leaked to the New York Times in March that the billionaire was preparing to receive top-secret military briefings on China, which Trump abruptly stopped. 'People in the administration and the White House realized he didn't have any idea what he's doing,' Bannon said. 'They cauterized the damage.' Separately, reports claimed Musk insulted Marco Rubio, the Secretary of State, by accusing him in front of Trump, of not cutting back on his staff and clashed with Transport Secretary Sean Duffy for not firing enough air traffic controllers . He also called Peter Navarro, the architect of Trump's trade policy, 'a moron.'


Geeky Gadgets
32 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
ChatGPT Plus vs. Copilot Pro: The Essential AI Decision Guide for 2025
Choosing between ChatGPT Plus and Copilot Pro requires a clear understanding of their unique capabilities and intended use cases. Both tools use advanced artificial intelligence to enhance productivity, but they cater to distinct audiences and purposes. The video below from Simple Alpaca provides an in-depth comparison of their features, strengths, and ideal applications to help you make an informed decision. Watch this video on YouTube. ChatGPT Plus: A Versatile Conversational AI ChatGPT Plus, the premium offering from OpenAI, is designed to elevate conversational AI to new levels of performance. Its core strength lies in its advanced natural language processing (NLP) capabilities, allowing it to generate human-like text with remarkable fluency and coherence. Whether you're brainstorming ideas, drafting content, or seeking answers to complex questions, ChatGPT Plus delivers responses that are both contextually relevant and easy to understand. For professionals aiming to streamline their workflows, ChatGPT Plus offers several advantages over the free version, including faster response times and improved reliability. It is particularly effective for tasks such as: Drafting emails or documents: Save time by generating polished, professional text quickly. Save time by generating polished, professional text quickly. Generating creative content ideas: Explore innovative concepts for projects, articles, or campaigns. Explore innovative concepts for projects, articles, or campaigns. Exploring technical or non-technical topics: Engage in conversational interactions to deepen your understanding of various subjects. While ChatGPT Plus is not specifically designed for programming, it can process and explain technical concepts effectively, making it a flexible tool for users across diverse industries. Its versatility ensures it can adapt to a wide range of professional and personal applications. Copilot Pro: AI-Powered Coding Assistance Copilot Pro, developed by GitHub in collaboration with OpenAI, is a specialized tool tailored for software developers. Its primary focus is on providing intelligent coding assistance, offering features that streamline the development process. By analyzing the context of your codebase, Copilot Pro can: Suggest relevant code snippets: Quickly generate code suggestions that align with your project requirements. Quickly generate code suggestions that align with your project requirements. Automate repetitive coding tasks: Reduce time spent on routine tasks, such as writing boilerplate code. Reduce time spent on routine tasks, such as writing boilerplate code. Help identify and resolve errors: Enhance debugging efficiency by offering insights and solutions. One of Copilot Pro's standout features is its seamless integration with popular development environments like Visual Studio Code. This ensures developers can incorporate it into their workflows without disruption. Whether you're writing new code or maintaining legacy systems, Copilot Pro enhances productivity by allowing you to focus on solving complex challenges rather than getting bogged down by repetitive tasks. Key Factors to Consider When deciding between ChatGPT Plus and Copilot Pro, it's essential to evaluate your specific needs and priorities. Consider the following factors: Target Audience: ChatGPT Plus is ideal for individuals seeking a versatile conversational AI for general tasks, while Copilot Pro is specifically designed for developers working on software projects. ChatGPT Plus is ideal for individuals seeking a versatile conversational AI for general tasks, while Copilot Pro is specifically designed for developers working on software projects. Primary Use Cases: ChatGPT Plus excels in natural language processing, making it suitable for creative writing, brainstorming, and knowledge exploration. Copilot Pro focuses on coding assistance, offering tools for code generation and debugging. ChatGPT Plus excels in natural language processing, making it suitable for creative writing, brainstorming, and knowledge exploration. Copilot Pro focuses on coding assistance, offering tools for code generation and debugging. Workflow Integration: Copilot Pro integrates directly into development environments, streamlining the coding process. ChatGPT Plus operates as a standalone conversational tool, offering flexibility across various tasks. Copilot Pro integrates directly into development environments, streamlining the coding process. ChatGPT Plus operates as a standalone conversational tool, offering flexibility across various tasks. Pricing and Value: Both tools require a subscription, but their value depends on your specific needs. Developers may find Copilot Pro indispensable for its coding features, while ChatGPT Plus appeals to users seeking a broader range of applications. By carefully assessing these factors, you can determine which tool aligns best with your professional or personal objectives. Which Tool Is Right for You? The choice between ChatGPT Plus and Copilot Pro ultimately depends on your goals and the nature of your work. If your focus is on creative tasks, brainstorming, or exploring ideas, ChatGPT Plus offers a robust conversational AI experience. Its versatility makes it a valuable asset for professionals in fields such as content creation, education, and customer support. Conversely, if you are a developer or work extensively with code, Copilot Pro is likely the better fit. Its ability to generate code, debug errors, and integrate seamlessly with development tools can significantly enhance your productivity and simplify your workflow. By automating repetitive tasks and providing intelligent suggestions, Copilot Pro allows you to concentrate on solving complex programming challenges. Both tools represent significant advancements in AI technology, but their strengths cater to different needs. By evaluating your specific requirements—whether they involve natural language processing or programming support—you can choose the tool that best enables you to achieve your goals efficiently and effectively. Below are more guides on ChatGPT Plus from our extensive range of articles. Source & Image Credit: Simple Alpaca Filed Under: AI, Guides Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.


The Independent
42 minutes ago
- The Independent
A dwarf star birthed a giant planet – but scientists don't know how
Astronomers have discovered an unusually large exoplanet orbiting the small star TOI-6894, located 240 light-years away in the constellation Leo, challenging existing planetary formation theories. The planet, a gas giant similar in size to Saturn, orbits a red dwarf star that is only about one-fifth the mass of our sun, a pairing that defies current models predicting smaller planets around such stars. This discovery marks the smallest-known star to host such a large planet, about 40 per cent smaller than previous record holders. Researchers have been left puzzled by the finding, but suggest it indicates that giant planets can form around even the smallest stars. Data from Nasa 's TESS and the European Southern Observatory 's VLT were used in the study, and there are plans to further investigate the planet's composition using the James Webb Space Telescope.