The Guardian Advertising Awards 2025: winners revealed
The Guardian Advertising Awards are back for a second year, with the 2025 winners announced at a ceremony in London last night (Thursday 22 May). Imogen Fox, the Guardian's global chief advertising officer, introduced the evening's celebrations alongside James Fleetham, the Guardian's director of advertising.
The awards celebrate advertising campaigns that have run across Guardian channels over the past year, highlighting unforgettable examples of scale, influence and integrity - the unique formula offered to advertisers by the Guardian.
Some of the best examples of advertising that have featured on the Guardian were entered by brands and agencies to compete in five categories. The winners in each category are:
Everyday brands: EuroMillions and Hearts & Science: There Will Be Signs
Brands connecting with big moments: Audible and Wavemaker: 1984 - Glitching Into Culture
Premium brands: R.M. Williams and Electric Glue: The Daycationer
Brands doing the right thing: Macmillan Cancer Support and Zenith: Macmillan Coffee Morning
Challenger brands: QVC and EssenceMediacom: Menopause Your Way
In addition, there was also a Grand Prix award selected by the judges for the campaign deemed to have gone above and beyond the entry criteria. The judges selected QVC and EssenceMediacom: Menopause Your Way for the prestigious prize. The campaign was praised for its bravery, strong sense of purpose, and inclusive portrayal of women in a space where diversity is often overlooked. They also commended its smart and effective use of Guardian Labs content, which struck a relatable and sensible tone around menopause, without sensationalism. The campaign was also noted for delivering impressive results, with some of the articles ranking among the Guardian's most-read branded content for several weeks.
This year's award winners were chosen by a specially selected panel of judges made up of some of the most influential leaders and experts from across the media and advertising industry. The judging panel included: Andy Nairn, co-founder, Lucky Generals; Pippa Glucklich, CEO, Electric Glue; Ben Malbon, vice-president, brand and creative marketing, EMEA, Google; Clarice Metzger, strategy director, Revolt London; Nik Wheatley, co-founder, Notorious Communications; Monica Majumdar, head of strategy, Wavemaker UK; Ruben Schreurs, group CEO, Ebiquity Plc; Zoe Kalar, CEO and founder, WeAre8; Laura Chase, managing director, WeAre8; Nick Manning, founder, Encyclomedia International; Emma Withington, chief planning and strategy officer, Havas Media Network.
Lily Bryant, senior brand development specialist, QVC UK, said:
'Partnering with the Guardian allowed us to combine their vast reach and trusted editorial voice with QVC's expertise and product offering, creating a campaign which normalised the conversation around Menopause. The campaign proudly challenged taboos and shifted perceptions of QVC, asserting the authority we have in this space as a retailer. Winning both the Challenger Brands award and the Grand Prix award is an honour to the whole team'.
Ruben Schreurs, group CEO, Ebiquity Plc, said:
'Congratulations to all the winners; the submissions were genuinely inspiring and impressive. A common theme was the overwhelming evidence that trusted news is highly effective and brand-safe, along with the creative usage of the uniquely varied ad formats and platforms provided by the Guardian to advertisers. If there was an award for industry awards - the Guardian would get my vote this year.'
James Fleetham, director of advertising, Guardian Media Group, said:
'Huge congratulations to all the brands and agencies awarded a prize in this year's awards. It's been another brilliant year for celebrating the scale, influence and integrity of the Guardian's multimedia partnerships. We've especially enjoyed highlighting the breadth of campaigns the Guardian has delivered – a true reflection of the innovation and value that we continue to offer our advertisers.'
The award-winning brands will feature across the Guardian both in print and online, to celebrate their outstanding campaigns and achievements.
You can find more information on the awards and a full list of entries shortlisted here.
If you are an advertiser interested in working with the Guardian, please contact advertising.enquiries@theguardian.com.
[Ends]
For more information please contact media.enquiries@theguardian.com.
Notes to editors
About the Guardian Media Group
Guardian Media Group is among the world's leading media organisations. Its core business is Guardian News & Media (GNM), publisher of theguardian.com, one of the largest English-speaking quality news websites in the world.
In the UK, Guardian Media Group publishes the Guardian newspaper six days a week. It was first published in 1821. Since launching its US and Australian digital editions in 2011 and 2013, respectively, traffic from outside of the UK now represents about two-thirds of the Guardian's total digital audience. The Guardian also has an international digital edition and a new European edition that launched in 2023.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
In markets where the winner takes all, there's only one company worth buying
Questor is The Telegraph's stock-picking column, helping you decode the markets and offering insights on where to invest. Market leadership can be a huge advantage in business. Dominating a market allows a company to outspend its rivals in areas that drive sales, such as marketing and product innovation. Meanwhile, scale can lower the cost of making goods, providing services and distribution. Once businesses establish leadership, they often command significant 'pricing power' because customers have few viable alternative sources of supply – a particularly good characteristic to have with the threat of tariffs looming. The markets that best lend themselves to fostering leaders tend to be niches as they are only big enough to support limited numbers of players, which accelerates the winner-takes-all dynamic. French buildings product and services company Legrand has a keen appreciation of this. It describes itself as 'a giant in profitable niches' and says two thirds of sales come from markets in which it boasts a number one or two leadership position. The pricing power this gives the group was underlined during rampant inflation earlier this decade. Between 2019 and 2023 the group matched cost increases with price rises of 23pc, while managing to achieve annualised sales growth of 9.2pc. Meanwhile, Legrand is confident it can mitigate an expected $150-to-200m tariff hit though price increases coupled with savings and supply chain changes. The company's strong competitive position is reflected in a record of dividend growth every year since its 2006 Paris IPO. British buyers of the shares, which are available through major brokers, need to fill out the correct paperwork to minimise withholding tax and should check for additional dealing costs. Legrand sells digitalisation and electrical products and services to the construction industry. It offers a vast array of products including cabling, lighting, EV charging and datacentre kit, to name a few. It supports its competitive position with solid research and development spending, averaging about 5pc of sales, and boasts a huge network of third-party distributors and installers across 180 countries. Its most important geographies are Europe and the Americas, which account for just over two fifths of sales each. Legrand also taps into long term megatrends – the energy transition is driving demand for electrification and energy-efficiency solution, a housing shortage and aging population in developed economies is benefiting digitisation. Plus, the recent surge in spending on AI has powered a sharp rise in datacentre demand, which the company expects to account for 20-to-25pc of sales this year. Just under half of sales are exposed to what the group defines as its higher growth markets and brokers forecast annualised sales increases for the group as a whole of 6.5pc for the next three years. However, an appetite for acquisitions and plans to spend €5bn on deals between 2025 and 2030 could boost growth further. One of the problems with targeting niche markets is that, by definition, they are not big, which limits growth. Legrand's solution to this is to make many small acquisitions that consolidate its dominance and moves it into attractive adjacent markets. It estimates 60pc of sales in its higher growth operations are acquired. The businesses Legrand buys tend to have lower margins than its own operations, which is unsurprising given the benefits to profitability that leadership and scale brings. However, the group's impressive operating margin of just over 20pc is expected to remain stable in the coming years as Legrand consistently grinds out new savings from recent acquisitions and existing operations. The business model and growth prospects resonate with many of the world's best fund managers, and 11 of these individuals, all identified as among the top-performing 3pc of equity managers globally by financial publisher Citywire, hold shares in Legrand. The high level of smart money interest results in Citywire awarding the company its highest Elite Companies rating of AAA. While leadership in niche markets coupled with strong brand recognition and reputation underpins demand, the company's fortunes are unavoidably linked to the health of the construction industry globally. Currently, the rampant growth from datacentres is offsetting weakness elsewhere, particularly Europe. While management has yet to see any clear signs of a recovery in Europe, it expects a pickup towards the end of 2025. If a recovery can add to the tailwind from the AI boom, there is room for the shares rating to improve based on the current valuation of 21 times forecast next year's earnings, but expectations for ongoing, profitable growth should provide momentum in its own right.
The Guardian
31 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘Yes, there was a riot, but it was great': Cabaret Voltaire on violent gigs, nuclear noise – and returning to mark 50 years
Fifty years ago, Cabaret Voltaire shocked the people of Sheffield into revolt. A promoter screamed for the band to get off stage, while an audience baying for blood had to be held back with a clarinet being swung around for protection. All of which was taking place over the deafening recording of a looped steamhammer being used in place of a drummer, as a cacophony of strange, furious noises drove the crowd into a frenzy. 'We turned up, made a complete racket, and then got attacked,' recalls Stephen Mallinder. 'Yes, there was a bit of a riot, and I ended up in hospital, but it was great. That gig was the start of something because nothing like that had taken place in Sheffield before. It was ground zero.' Mallinder and his Cabaret Voltaire co-founder Chris Watson are sitting together again in Sheffield, looking back on that lift-off moment ahead of a handful of shows to commemorate the milestone. 'It is astonishing,' says Watson. 'Half a century. It really makes you stop, think and realise the significance.' The death in 2021 of third founding member Richard H Kirk was a trigger for thinking about ending things with finality. 'It'll be nice if we can use these shows to remind people what we did,' says Mallinder. 'To acknowledge the music, as well as get closure.' It's impossible to overstate how ahead of their time 'the Cabs' were. Regularly crowned the godfathers of the Sheffield scene, inspiring a wave of late 1970s groups such as the Human League and Clock DVA, they were making music in Watson's attic as early as 1973. Their primitive explorations with tape loops, heavily treated vocals and instruments, along with home-built oscillators and synthesisers, laid the foundations for a singular career that would span experimental music, post-punk, industrial funk, electro, house and techno. 'There was nothing happening in Sheffield that we could relate to,' says Mallinder. 'We had nothing to conform to. We didn't give a fuck. We just enjoyed annoying people, to be honest.' Inspired by dadaism, they would set up speakers in cafes and public toilets, or strap them to a van and drive around Sheffield blasting out their groaning, hissing and droning in an attempt to spook and confuse people. 'It did feel a bit violent and hostile at times, but more than anything we just ruined people's nights,' laughs Mallinder, with Watson recalling a memory from their very first gig: 'The organiser said to me after, 'You've completely ruined our reputation.' That was the best news we could have hoped for.' Insular and incendiary, the tight-knit trio had their own language, says Mallinder. 'We talked in a cipher only we understood – we had our own jargon and syntax.' When I interviewed Kirk years before his death, he went even further. 'We were like a terrorist cell,' he told me. 'If we hadn't ended up doing music and the arts, we might have ended up going around blowing up buildings as frustrated people wanting to express their disgust at society.' Instead they channelled that disgust into a type of sonic warfare – be it the blistering noise and head-butt attack of their landmark electro-punk track Nag Nag Nag, or the haunting yet celestial Red Mecca, an album rooted in political tensions and religious fundamentalism that throbs with a paranoid pulse. Watson left the group in 1981 to pursue a career in sound recording for TV. Mallinder and Kirk invested in technology, moving away from the industrial sci-fi clangs of their early period into grinding yet glistening electro-funk. As the second summer of love blazed in the UK in 1988, they headed to Chicago instead – to make Groovy, Laidback and Nasty with house legend Marshall Jefferson. 'We got slagged off for working with Marshall,' recalls Mallinder. 'People were going, 'England has got its own dance scene. Why aren't you working with Paul Oakenfold?' But we're not the fucking Happy Mondays. We'd already been doing that shit for years. We wanted to acknowledge our connection to where we'd come from: Black American music.' This major label era for the group produced moderate commercial success before they wound things down in the mid-1990s. But in the years since, everyone from New Order to Trent Reznor has cited the group's influence. Mallinder continued to make electronic music via groups such as Wrangler and Creep Show, the latter in collaboration with John Grant, a Cabs uber-fan. Watson says leaving the group was 'probably the most difficult decision I've ever made' but he has gone on to have an illustrious career, winning Baftas for his recording work with David Attenborough on shows such as Frozen Planet. He recalls 'the most dangerous journey I've ever made' being flown in a dinky helicopter that was akin to a 'washing machine with a rotor blade' by drunk Russian pilots in order to reach a camp on the north pole. On 2003 album Weather Report, Watson harnessed his globetrotting field recording adventures with stunning effect, turning long, hot wildlife recording sessions in Kenya surrounded by buzzing mosquitoes, or the intense booming cracks of colossal glaciers in Iceland, into a work of immersive musical beauty. When he was at the Ignalina nuclear power plant in Lithuania with Oscar-winning composer Hildur Guðnadóttir, recording sounds for the score to the 2019 TV series Chernobyl, he couldn't help but draw parallels to his Cabs days. 'It was horrific but really astonishing – such a tense, volatile, hostile environment,' he says. 'But it really got me thinking about working with those sounds again, their musicality and how it goes back to where I started.' Sign up to Sleeve Notes Get music news, bold reviews and unexpected extras. Every genre, every era, every week after newsletter promotion Mallinder views Watson's work as a Trojan horse for carrying radical sounds into ordinary households. 'The Cabs may have changed people's lives but Chris is personally responsible for how millions of people listen to the world,' he says, with clear pride. 'And one of the things that helped make that happen was the fact that he was in the Cabs, so through that lens he opened up people's ears.' Watson agrees, saying Cabaret Voltaire 'informed everything I've ever done'. Watson's field recordings will play a part in the upcoming shows: he'll rework 2013 project Inside the Circle of Fire, in which he recorded Sheffield itself, from its wildlife to its steel industry via football terraces and sewers. 'It's hopefully not the cliched industrial sounds of Sheffield,' he says, 'but my take on the signature sounds of the city.' These will be interwoven with a set Mallinder is working on with his Wrangler bandmate Ben 'Benge' Edwards as well as longtime friend and Cabs collaborator Eric Random. 'We've built 16 tracks up from scratch to play live,' says Mallinder. 'With material spanning from the first EP' – 1978's Extended Play – 'through to Groovy …' Mallinder says this process has been 'a bit traumatic – a very intense period of being immersed in my past and the memories that it brought, particularly of Richard. This isn't something you can do without emotion.' Mallinder and Kirk were not really speaking in the years leading up to his death, with Kirk operating under the Cabaret Voltaire name himself. 'Richard was withdrawn and didn't speak to many people,' says Mallinder. 'And I was one of those people. He wanted to be in his own world. It was difficult because I missed him and there was a lot of history, but I accepted it.' There will be no new music being made as Cabaret Voltaire because, they stress, tsuch a thing cannot exist without Kirk. Instead, it's a brief victory lap for the pair, a tribute to their late friend, as they sign off on a pioneering legacy with maybe one last chance for a riot. 'Richard would probably hate us doing this but it's done with massive respect,' Mallinder says. 'I'm sad he's not here but there's such love for the Cabs that I want to give people the opportunity to acknowledge what we did. You can't deny the music we made is important – and this is a way to celebrate that.' Cabaret Voltaire play a Forge Warehouse, Sheffield, 25 October, then tour the UK from 17 to 21 November. Tickets on sale 10am 6 June
The Guardian
31 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Israel fears the threat of trade sanctions — but is the EU ready to follow through?
After many months of inaction and complicity in the face of Israel's destruction of Gaza, Europe is finally beginning to stir. Tens of thousands of people killed and attacks on schools and hospitals had apparently not been enough. But, along with the blocking of humanitarian aid and open calls for ethnic cleansing, Israel's actions finally became too severe to ignore, deny or justify. In recent weeks, a cascade of unusually strong statements, diplomatic rebukes and threats of sanctions has emerged from European capitals – each move amplifying the next, as if a long-dormant herd has suddenly jolted into motion. Among these developments, the most significant may be the possible suspension of the EU-Israel association agreement, which grants Israel preferential access to the world's largest single market. Last month, the Dutch foreign minister, Caspar Veldkamp, broke the EU's silence with a letter demanding a formal review of Israel's compliance with article 2 of the agreement, which requires it to 'respect human rights'. That move triggered a wave of other EU states lining up behind the idea. At the 20 May meeting of EU foreign ministers, a clear majority – 17 member states – backed the Dutch proposal. EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, who had appeared sceptical ahead of the meeting, seemed to shift during the discussion and at the end clearly announced the launch of the review. Is this a real turning point or just more empty words? That remains to be seen. What is clear is that the EU's dynamics have shifted. A year ago, when Spain and Ireland – the governments most vocal about the Palestinian plight – proposed the same review idea, they found little support. The Netherlands, by contrast, is traditionally closer to Israel and sits in the EU's middle ground on this issue. It is this broad centre, which up until now favoured dialogue and close ties with Israel, that has now shifted and aligned with the more critical flank. Only Israel's staunchest backers – including Germany, Italy, Hungary and the Czech Republic – remained in a minority voting against the review. The review is only the first step: an examination of whether Israel is breaching article 2, which defines respect for human rights as an 'essential element' of the agreement. Given the scale of violations and crimes in Gaza and the West Bank, backed up by findings from international courts, such a review shouldn't even be necessary. As one Irish campaigner put it: 'It's like standing in front of a burning building and asking for a review of whether there's a fire.' The facts are clear – but even acknowledging them is politically explosive. The review, which is expected to be done by the next EU foreign ministers' meeting on 23 June, now depends on two key figures: Kallas and the European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen. Will they confirm the obvious – that Israel is in breach of article 2 – and draw the logical consequences? Or will they seek to shield EU-Israel ties from any rupture? Kallas, a liberal from Estonia, had until recently avoided much criticism of Israel, though now seems to have moved along with the EU's political centre. Von der Leyen, a German Christian Democrat, represents the bloc's more Israel-aligned wing. She was the face of the EU's initial blanket support for Israel's devastating response to Hamas's 7 October 2023 atrocities, and then fell largely silent as civilian deaths in Gaza soared. But last week, for the first time, she stated that Israel's killing of civilians is 'abhorrent' and 'cannot be justified under humanitarian and international law'. That language points unmistakably toward the only credible conclusion the review can reach. Once the review is completed, EU foreign ministers will discuss options for next steps, which should include suspending the association agreement. A full suspension would require unanimity among all 27 member states – an impossible bar given diehards such as Hungary. But suspending the agreement's preferential trade component – the most economically significant part – requires only a qualified majority: 15 member states representing at least 65% of the EU population. The trade pillar is where the real leverage lies. The EU is Israel's largest trading partner, accounting for 32% of its total trade. Israel, by contrast, represents just 0.8% of the EU's trade. Revoking preferential access wouldn't stop trade, but would impose a tangible cost on Israel in the form of higher tariffs and reduced market access. The EU could also suspend Israel's participation in Horizon Europe, the union's flagship research programme – a prospect already causing alarm in Israel's academic sector. Reaching a qualified majority is still a tall order. Not all states that voted for the review necessarily favour actual suspension. And to meet the 65% population threshold, Germany or Italy – large states that opposed the review – would need to shift. For now, that seems unlikely. But if Israel continues its current extremist course, pressure will mount. Chancellor Friedrich Merz's unusually strong rebuke of Israel last week suggests that not even Berlin's backing can be taken for granted. And if the EU decided to ignore the findings of an honest review, it would render article 2 meaningless and undermine human rights clauses in EU agreements around the world. Since the 1990s, the EU has invoked such clauses over 20 times to suspend benefits over serious violations, mostly in Africa. That's why the possibility of suspension cannot be dismissed. Unless Israel fundamentally changes course, the likelihood will only grow. For Europe, this is an opportunity to step out of its self-imposed irrelevance and begin to matter again. Pressure-free dialogue has completely failed. When the EU held an association council meeting with Israel in February and politely urged more aid to Gaza and a halt to settlement expansion, Israel responded by blocking all aid and accelerating settlement growth. Only after the Dutch initiative began gaining traction did Israeli officials start pushing internally to allows some aid into Gaza, citing the threat of EU sanctions. To prevent the looming horror of ethnic cleansing and annexation, the EU must go further and impose a real economic and political cost on Israel. If it does, the prospect of restoring suspended benefits could then become the EU's most powerful lever to encourage a different path: one that leads not to endless oppression and violence, but to peace and security based on equality. Martin Konečný runs the European Middle East Project (EuMEP), a Brussels-based NGO
