
Despite Kennedy's claims, vaccines have been tested in placebo-controlled studies – nearly 260 of them
New in medicine
Children's health
Federal agenciesFacebookTweetLink
Follow
US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has repeatedly claimed in public statements that most vaccines recommended for children in the US have not been tested against placebos, and particularly inert placebos such as saline solution or water.
'The only vaccine that has been tested in a full-blown placebo trial against an inert placebo was the Covid vaccine,' Kennedy said May 14 in testimony before the US Senate's Health, Labor, Education and Pensions Committee.
'The other 76 shots that children in this country received between birth and 18 years old, none of them have been safety tested in prelicensing studies against the placebo, which means we don't understand the risk profile for those products, and that's something I intend to remedy,' he told Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Connecticut.
In 2023, Kennedy told Fox News host Jesse Watters: 'Vaccines are exempt from prelicensing placebo-controlled trials, so that there's no way that anybody can tell the risk profile of those products or even the relative benefits of those products before they're mandated. And we should have that kind of testing.'
HHS is acting on Kennedy's claims, too. The department recently announced it will require all new vaccines be tested in placebo-controlled trials before they're licensed for use, a change it called 'a radical departure from past practices.'
These claims made Dr. Jake Scott's ears perk up. Scott, an infectious disease specialist at Stanford University, knew that the assertions couldn't be true, and now he says he has the proof.
Scott launched a project in April to round up every randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of vaccines in the medical literature, including studies run in other countries, since some vaccines used in the US are tested overseas.
It took five weeks to arrive at a number: There have been 258 placebo-controlled clinical trials of vaccines, according to Scott and a team of volunteers who scoured databases of medical literature. More than half of those studies tested vaccines against inert placebos.
Based on Scott's research, at least nine of the 16 vaccines that are routinely recommended by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for children have been tested against inert placebos, while several more have been tested against active placebos.
In scientific research, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials are considered to generate the highest-quality evidence. That's because they split their study participants into equal groups; some get the study intervention or treatment, while others get a placebo or dummy remedy.
Placebos are often carefully designed to look, taste or even smell like the intervention that's being tested. The idea is to keep both the participants and the researchers themselves in the dark about who's getting the real thing until the end of the study, when the results are analyzed and reported, to prevent any potential bias.
HHS did not respond to CNN's request for comment on the new project's findings or clarification on Kennedy's statements.
On April 22, Scott posted a link to a shared Google spreadsheet online, along with some ground rules about which trials could and couldn't be included. The studies had to be in humans; no animal studies or lab-only investigations allowed. The researchers also used a particular set of search terms, with no limits on dates, languages or pathogens. The team then read each study that was found to make sure it met the specified criteria for inclusion in the review.
'It took off,' Scott said. He estimates that the project had five or six core contributors, but they had help from around the world.
Together, they scoured PubMed, the database of medical research maintained by the National Library of Medicine, as well as reference lists from Cochrane, the World Health Organization and the CDC.
Dr. Isaac Bogoch, an infectious disease specialist at the University of Toronto, said he was blown away when he saw the final list of studies, which included about 2.5 million participants in total.
'The body of evidence for many of the vaccines that we use is very impressive, and the data is robust,' said Bogoch, who didn't contribute to the project. 'This type of work is extremely important in era of unprecedented vaccine hesitancy.'
Scott said the research proves that Kennedy's statements are 'demonstrably false.'
To understand why, it's useful to break down the parts of Kennedy's argument, which he has repeated in different iterations for years.
Kennedy has shifted the goalposts, but there are a few things he has said would make a clinical trial meet his requirements: First, an inert placebo, meaning a placebo control that didn't have any biological effects on the body, like water or saline solution. Kennedy has said that without comparison to an inert placebo, the true side effects of vaccines can't be fully understood.
He also uses the term 'prelicensing,' meaning the research is conducted before the US Food and Drug Administration has approved the vaccines. The FDA sometimes accepts enough evidence to approve a vaccine but then will require more safety studies and monitoring after approval. Kennedy and other critics argue that more safety testing should be done before the vaccines are approved in the first place.
In some instances, Kennedy has also said that these studies should be large, including many participants, and long-running. In general, larger studies have greater statistical power to show subtle differences between groups. And the longer a trial follows its participants, the more confident researchers can be in the durability of their results.
Although scientists agree that larger and longer clinical trials are the most reliable, these studies are expensive to conduct. They can take years to run, which delays the possibility of getting an effective intervention to people. It can also be difficult to find participants who can stick with the monitoring requirements of a study for longer periods of time.
In recent testimony, however, even Kennedy seemed to be softening his stance on this particular stipulation, agreeing that other types of studies can provide solid evidence, too.
'You know that the Cochrane Collaboration in 2016 published a study that showed that the predictive capacity of placebo-controlled trials, which are the gold standard, is actually not any better than good observational trials in retrospective trials. So we can do those kind of studies without subjecting people to an unethical experiment,' Kennedy said during a May 20 Senate budget hearing when asked about the need to test established vaccines in large, lengthy placebo-controlled trials.
In his 2021 book, 'The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health,' Kennedy repeats the claim that vaccines for children haven't been tested against inert placebos, saying that he and groups he's affiliated with have explicitly asked to be shown such studies. He cites two letters between the Informed Consent Action Network or ICAN, a group run by his close associate Del Bigtree, and HHS.
The letter from ICAN asserts that in contrast to most other FDA-approved medications, 'vaccines are not required to undergo long-term double-blind inert-placebo controlled trials to assess safety. In fact, not a single one of the clinical trials for vaccines given to babies and toddlers had a control group receiving an inert placebo.'
The HHS letter refutes this claim: 'Contrary to statements made on page two of your letter, many pediatric vaccines have been investigated in clinical trials that included a placebo.' The letter goes on to say inert placebos are not necessary to understand the safety of a new vaccine, and so they haven't been required.
Still, Scott says the evidence is clear: Of the 258 placebo-controlled vaccine studies he and his colleagues found, about half – 128 – included inert placebos.
When it comes to vaccines routinely recommended for children, specifically, Scott found that at least nine of the 16 on the CDC's regular schedule have been tested against inert placebos: These are the vaccines against Covid-19; rotavirus; polio; influenza; measles, mumps and rubella; human papillomavirus; varicella, or chickenpox; pneumococcal; and H-flu, or Haemophilus influenzae.
One of the largest of these trials was on the polio vaccine. The placebo-controlled part of the study included more than 400,000 grade-schoolers. Half got the inactivated polio vaccine created by Dr. Jonas Salk, and the other half were given injections of an inert placebo, which was saline solution.
The trial was conducted in 1954, and the results were announced in April 1955. So great was the urgency to get the vaccine to kids that the FDA licensed it the same day.
'It's frankly astounding that someone who made such easily disprovable claims is now heading HHS and continues to promote similar misinformation,' Scott said of Kennedy in an email to CNN. 'We compiled this evidence specifically to counter these false narratives with hard data.'
Scott says he and his colleagues hope to have their project published in peer-reviewed medical journal soon. For now, it's available in a publicly posted spreadsheet.
Vaccine trials that don't use inert placebos will sometimes use what are known as active placebos. These comparison shots have some biological effect but don't interfere with scientists' ability to interpret the results of their study.
Active placebos are used for a variety of reasons. In some parts of the world, for example, where it might be difficult to recruit participants, researchers might give the control group an unrelated vaccine to make sure they're getting some benefit by enrolling in the study.
One study published last year in the Lancet, testing a vaccine against malaria, gave participants in the control group a vaccine against rabies instead. Rabies vaccines don't protect against malaria, so they wouldn't interfere with researchers' ability to tell whether the malaria shot actually worked.
Other active placebos in the studies in Scott's project included shots that contained only an adjuvant, an ingredient that's added to vaccines to trigger a stronger immune response.
Dr. Greg Poland, who studies how adults and children respond to vaccines at the Mayo Clinic, said it would be a mistake to assume that active placebos can't be valid and rigorous ways to test vaccines.
Adjuvants, such as aluminum, are often the reason people get soreness around an injection site. Giving just the adjuvant can guard against even psychological bias in control participants who might guess that they didn't get a real vaccine if they didn't feel anything after their shots. It also allows researchers to isolate the benefits and side effects of the vaccine proteins, since everyone got the adjuvant.
'You're literally saying, 'OK, we're testing a vaccine that has ingredient A plus B against a non-vaccine placebo that has ingredient B.' So the only thing different between the two of them is the actual vaccine,' Poland said.
An active comparator might also be used rather than an inert placebo because of ethics. When there's already a vaccine that's considered to be safe and effective against an infection, it's considered unethical to deny study participants the chance to get it. In that case, companies that want to test a new and improved version of a vaccine against an older one would normally have to offer participants in their control group the older vaccine. Many modern vaccines have been compared against older versions of the same vaccine.
Flu vaccines are a good example, Poland says. If you were testing an improved type of flu vaccine, chances are that the board that oversees your clinical trial wouldn't approve a study that used an inert placebo – especially if you were testing it in a vulnerable group, like people over 65, for whom an infection is more likely to be dangerous.
'It's unethical because the recommendation is that everyone, each flu season, receive an influenza vaccine. So it'd be unethical to enroll people in a study where they may just get placebo and not get any benefit of protection,' Poland said.
Poland said he's been puzzled by Kennedy's statements, too. He's concerned that they are getting traction with the public now that Kennedy is the head of the nation's health agencies.
'This notion that there are no placebo-controlled vaccine trials is patently false, but it's a really interesting phenomenon that I have a hard time understanding,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Associated Press
19 minutes ago
- Associated Press
New to The Street to Air Show #683 on Bloomberg, Featuring BioVie, FLOKI, PetVivo, and NRx Pharmaceuticals
NEW YORK CITY, NY / ACCESS Newswire / August 9, 2025 / New to The Street, one of the nation's longest-running business television brands, will broadcast Show #683 on Bloomberg today at 6:30 PM EST. This week's episode features four dynamic companies making waves in healthcare, biotech, blockchain gaming, and sports partnerships: BioVie Inc., FLOKI, PetVivo Holdings, Inc., and NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The program, airing as sponsored programming, will also mark the television commercial debut of FLOKI, introducing the fastest-growing Valhalla Game to Bloomberg's national audience. Pedro Vidal, Chief Relationship Officer of FLOKI, discusses how the FLOKI Trading Bot has become the leader on the BNB Chain, giving traders advanced, user-friendly tools to maximize opportunities in the crypto market. Vidal also highlights the Valhalla Game's explosive success, where assets acquired in-game can be used in the real world - a groundbreaking integration of gaming and blockchain utility. Gamers are already winning Vera tokens, with over 100,000 Veras minted to date. For more information, visit and Jonathan Javitt, Founder, Chairman, and CEO of NRx Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:NRXP), discusses the Company's recent Citizen Petition to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) seeking the removal of benzethonium chloride from all forms of ketamine sold in the United States. Benzethonium chloride, a preservative with known toxicity, is no longer allowed in hand cleansers, topical antiseptics, and many ophthalmic products. NRx has developed a preservative-free ketamine formulation with three-year stability, filed a supporting patent, and is pursuing FDA approval, including a potential labeled indication for treating suicidal depression under the FDA Commissioner's National Priority Voucher Program. Cuong Do, President and CEO of BioVie Inc. (NASDAQ:BIVI), provides an update on two ongoing Phase 3 clinical trials for Bezisterim. The first trial targets newly diagnosed Parkinson's patients entering therapy for the first time - potentially making Bezisterim the first new therapy for Parkinson's disease in more than 50 years. The second trial focuses on long COVID, specifically how Bezisterim may alleviate brain fog and fatigue, conditions affecting an estimated 17 million Americans. Both trials are expected to deliver top-line data in the first half of 2026. John Lai, CEO of PetVivo Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:PETV), joins Chase Chamberlin, Managing Partner at Commonwealth, to discuss their strategic partnership in the thoroughbred horse racing industry. Together, they aim to advance equine wellness by introducing PetVivo's innovative SPRYNG™ with OsteoCushion™ Technology into elite racing circles, offering a natural solution to maintain joint health in performance horses. About New to The Street For over 16 years, New to The Street has broadcast weekly as sponsored programming on Bloomberg Television and Fox Business, conducting more than 2,000 interviews with leaders from public and private companies. The brand operates the largest and fastest-growing digital business channel, New to The Street TV on YouTube, with over 3.16 million subscribers, delivering all-business, no-ads content. As a complete media ecosystem, New to The Street combines long-form television interviews, short-form TV commercials, iconic outdoor billboards, and the largest digital business platform to deliver predictable media for companies seeking to share their stories with investors, customers, and global audiences. For more information about upcoming episodes and featured companies, visit: Media Contact: Grace Bongiorno New to The Street [email protected] SOURCE: New to The Street press release
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
KCSO Deputy Gets Help with Cancer and Home Repairs
Kern County Sheriff's Deputy Jasmine Francisco is currently battling cancer while also facing unexpected financial hardship after discovering black mold in the home she had just purchased for her daughters. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
NFL reveals reasons why smelling salts are banned in 2025
The 2025 season will introduce some new rules and technology to the NFL, but one change in particular has upset one of the league's best tight ends. The San Francisco 49ers' George Kittle interrupted an interview on NFL Network to voice his displeasure over a new rule banning smelling salts. "I honestly just came up here to air a grievance," Kittle said during an episode of "Inside Training Camp Live" featuring teammate Fred Warner. "Our team got a memo today that smelling salts and ammonia packets were made illegal in the NFL. And I've been distraught all day." Kittle was especially upset because he uses smelling salts often during NFL games. "I'm an every drive guy," Kittle said. "I considered retirement. We got to figure out a middle ground here guys. Somebody help me out, somebody come up with a good idea... I miss those already." Jordan Addison suspension: Vikings WR gets three game ban, NFL announces Training camp scuffle: Baltimore Ravens and Indianapolis Colts get into joint practice brawl While the NFL did change its smelling salt policy, it did not result in them actually being banned. USA TODAY Sports obtained the league memo and here's what the NFL told teams. NFL statement on smelling salts A league official confirmed to USA TODAY Sports that the teams are now prohibited from providing players smelling salts during games. The official declined to be identified because of the sensitivity of the matter. The memo that the NFL sent to teams today read: "In 2024, the FDA issued a warning to companies that produce commercially available ammonia inhalants (AIs), as well as to consumers about the purchase and use of AIs, regarding the lack of evidence supporting the safety or efficacy of AIs marketed for improving mental alertness or boosting energy. The FDA noted potential negative effects from AI use. AIs also have the potential to mask certain neurologic signs and symptoms, including some potential signs of concussion. As a result, the NFL Head, Neck, and Spine Committee recommended prohibiting the use of AIs for any purpose during play in the NFL. In light of this information, effective for the 2025 NFL season, clubs are prohibited from providing or supplying ammonia in any form at NFL games. For clarity, 'ammonia' refers to ammonia capsules, inhalers, ammonia in a cup, and any form of 'smelling salts.' This prohibition applies to all club personnel (including but not limited to team physicians, athletic trainers, strength and conditioning coaches and coaches or other personnel). The prohibition applies through the entirety of all NFL games, including during all pregame activities, and halftime, and applies on the sideline and in stadium locker rooms." However, while NFL teams are no longer allowed to distribute smelling salts, their players are still allowed to use them, as the NFLPA clarified Wednesday. "We were not notified of this club policy change before the memo was sent out," the NFLPA wrote in a message to its players, per ESPN. "To clarify, this policy does not prohibit player use of these substances, but rather it restricts clubs from providing or supplying them in any form. The NFL has confirmed this to us." Why do NFL players use smelling salts? NFL players have used smelling salts for years. Some players claim it provides them with a pick-me-up or makes them more alert. "The ammonia wakes you up, opens your eyes," DeMarcus Lawrence explained to ESPN in 2017. "You'll be on the bench, you start to get a little tired and you got to wake your body up, and that's what that little ammonia does for you." However, medical opinions vary about whether smelling salts provide those effects or are simply a placebo. Concerns also exist about the ammonia capsules masking severe injuries. That's why many boxing organizations have banned smelling salts and also why the NFL has elected to outlaw its clubs from distributing them ahead of its 2025 season. USA TODAY Sports' Jacob Camenker also contributed to this report. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Why the NFL is banning smelling salts for 2025 season