logo
Construction of private bunkers in Spain rises 200% as fears of war in Europe grow

Construction of private bunkers in Spain rises 200% as fears of war in Europe grow

Euronews01-04-2025
ADVERTISEMENT
The Russian invasion of Ukraine and rising geopolitical tensions have sparked an increase in interest in survivalism in Spain.
The private construction of bunkers has risen by 200% since the war started, according to industry companies. This trend is spreading across Europe, with Germany, France, and the Baltic countries being the best prepared.
Many families are looking for high-security shelters. Euronews gained access to one that can withstand nuclear radiation, featuring anti-radiation showers, concrete and steel walls, and armoured doors. The owner installed it due to fears of an armed conflict in Europe.
This bunker was developed by VIP Bunker, with its manager, Fernando Díaz, describing it as an "apartment with high security, where one could live for months," equipped with 1,000 litres of drinking water and various backup power systems.
A view of Pokrovsk, the site of heavy battles with Russian troops, in the Donetsk region, 25 March, 2025
AP Photo
However, with an average cost of €150,000 these shelters are a luxury few can afford.
This has led some citizens to create safe spaces in their homes, storing non-perishable food. Meanwhile, the European Union (EU) has urged citizens to prepare 72-hour survival kits and called on governments to improve civilian-military cooperation.
Preparing for 'greater threats'
European leaders have stressed the need for being prepared.
"We need to think big because the threats are greater," said Hadja Lahbib, Commissioner for Crisis Management.
Meanwhile Roxana Minzatu, Commissioner for Preparedness, added, "The pandemic showed that acting together, in solidarity, is crucial. It makes us stronger."
Lieutenant Colonel Manolo Cámara, author of the book "Prepárate" (Get Ready), has been training civilians in survival for years and he has noticed a shift.
"There wasn't much interest before. With the possible war in Europe, people have started to worry, although in Spain, much less than in the rest of the EU," he said.
In his courses, held in various Spanish cities, he teaches essential skills, he tells us "You need to have your backpack ready, know how to start a fire, find water, build a shelter, and navigate with a map. In a war, food, water, and medical support will be scarce. You need to know how to act."
Ukrainian servicemen fix a bomb on a Vampire attack drone on the front line near Chasiv Yar, 31 March, 2025
AP Photo
For the lieutenant colonel, knowledge is key, "The most important thing in your backpack is what doesn't weigh: knowing how to use it. You need a family plan with meeting points and evacuation routes."
Ignacio Ortega, head of Instruction at the Spanish School of Survival, agrees with the rise in interest, he said, "People from all walks of life come to us — not just from security fields, but entire families and independent professionals. Since the war in Ukraine, the profile has changed: before, they were nature lovers, now they are regular families scared of the future."
With around 2,000 students annually, Ortega emphasises the importance of prevention.
ADVERTISEMENT
"The best survival is the one you avoid. Before any activity, assess the risks and prepare with resources and knowledge." He adds that urban crises are the most hostile.
"Most people will experience a survival situation in the city, without electricity or supplies, not in an idyllic forest."
Nuclear war on the horizon?
Tensions between Russia and NATO have popularised the term "nuclear war." Some experts speak of a paradigm shift, as the EU insists on stockpiling supplies in case of conflict.
France, Norway, Finland and Sweden are in the process of distributing war manuals, while Russia is mass-producing mobile nuclear shelters, highlighting the urgency for countries in the conflict's orbit.
ADVERTISEMENT
In Spain, the demand for private bunkers surged after the Ukraine invasion.
Women work in a tunnel of a coal mine in the Dnipropetrovsk region, 30 January, 2025
AP Photo
The government is preparing a National Civil Protection Plan for "military risk," but there are only four public nuclear shelters in the country, mostly located in the capital: the residence of the Spanish Prime Minister, the Moncloa Palace, the Torrejón base, El Capricho park, and the Ébora Hotel (Toledo).
Metro tunnels could be used as shelters, although nuclear radiation would still reach them.
With around 400 private bunkers estimated, Spain is far behind countries like France and Germany.
ADVERTISEMENT
Cámara reflects: "It's difficult to have a shelter at home, but if you have a second home in the countryside or a friend in another area, use it as an alternative."
Related
Zelenskyy: Nuclear power plants 'belong to the people of Ukraine'
Could another European country develop its own nuclear weapons?
Cost is a barrier, a typical bunker costs around €150,000. Companies like VIP Bunker offer luxury models that exceed €350,000, as well as more affordable options based on the owner's needs.
An effective bunker must be at least 10 meters deep, with sturdy walls, air and water filtration, and impact-resistant doors. If it's nuclear-proof, it should have steel coatings.
Because public options are limited, many people are choosing to prepare on their own.
ADVERTISEMENT
Experts interviewed by Euronews believe this trend is growing, "There's no need to go crazy, but you should be ready."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Protesters oppose Trump's Alaskan summit with Russian President Putin
Protesters oppose Trump's Alaskan summit with Russian President Putin

Euronews

timean hour ago

  • Euronews

Protesters oppose Trump's Alaskan summit with Russian President Putin

Protesters gathered at a park in Anchorage on Friday in support of Ukraine, unfurling a large Ukrainian flag and chanting "Peace to Ukraine," as US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin held face-to-face talks. The high-stakes summit in Alaska could determine the trajectory of the war in Ukraine and the fate of European security. The summit gives Trump a chance to prove he is a master dealmaker and global peacemaker. For Putin, it's an opportunity to negotiate a deal that would cement Russia's gains. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders were not invited to participate in the talks. The meeting could have far-reaching implications, with foreign governments watching closely. "I don't think any solution without the Ukrainian's input is going to end the war in a just and fair way," said Peter Casey, a resident of Anchorage. "I think that Trump and Putin want to make a deal for themselves that benefits them and doesn't bring a just end to the conflict," he added. Many residents of Anchorage questioned Putin's motives in these talks, arguing that he's long displayed a pattern of only pursuing his interests. They also believe that a peace treaty, in the event that Trump is able to eventually broker a ceasefire, means very little. 'Putin doesn't want peace. He wants Ukraine and anything that doesn't push him away from Ukraine will not bring peace because he won't stop,' said Blake Severson. 'We've signed peace treaties, Chechnya signed a peace treaty, Georgia signed a peace treaty, Ukraine signed a Peace Treaty. And Russia has been invading them for 11 years.' Severson added that a 'a peace deal is not going to do anything to stop Putin', instead asserting that the only real counter to Putin is 'bloodying his nose and fighting back against his aggression'. Many were also critical of Trump for inviting Putin for these talks in the United States, stressing that it was highly inappropriate to play host to a man wanted by the International Criminal Court. 'I wish they weren't here,' said Julie, 'I think inviting a dictator and a war criminal to American soil is a little bit much.' Julie noted that she believes Trump directly communicating with his Russian counterpart is a good initiative that may bridge the gap and inch Kyiv and Moscow closer towards peace. She however remained cautious, noting that Trump has made many promises in the past which he's yet to deliver on. 'I think Trump made a lot of promises during his campaign that he would end the war quickly, within 24 hours, if I recall. And he needs to show that he's doing something about it, and so he's got to do something,' added Julie. The talks, which took place at the Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, lasted for around two-and-a-half hours. The two leaders said in a press conference following their private talks that the meeting was highly constructive. Trump and Putin also stated that the Alaska Summit is a first step and that more direct talks are needed in the future to hopefully come to a peace agreement. Trump has expressed his desire for Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to participate in future rounds of talks. It is not yet known when the next round of talks between the leaders could take place, but officials say it is likely to happen 'soon'. The Russian leader suggested Moscow as the venue for the next meeting during a joint press conference with Trump following their meeting, to which Trump said 'I can see it possibly happening'.

Pushing Kyiv to give up land 'will force Ukrainians to the streets'
Pushing Kyiv to give up land 'will force Ukrainians to the streets'

Euronews

time14 hours ago

  • Euronews

Pushing Kyiv to give up land 'will force Ukrainians to the streets'

A possible deal to end Russia's war against Ukraine will include 'land swapping' from both sides, US President Donald Trump said, which in reality means territorial concessions for Ukraine. Kyiv forces do not occupy any of Russia's territory, meaning there could be no deal regarding returning Moscow its land. All of the land in question is the territory Russia has occupied in Ukraine since the first invasion in 2014 followed by Moscow's all-out war in 2022. If Trump pressures Ukraine to relinquish its territory, he would not be convincing Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Instead, he will have to persuade the people of Ukraine. And unlike Trump, Zelenskyy understands who will have the last word, just as he knows that even he cannot convince the Ukrainian people of what they reject. The county's civil society demonstrated it well enough, including just weeks ago. Anton Liagusha, Dean of the Graduate Department of Social Sciences and Humanities at the Kyiv School of Economics, told Euronews that if Ukrainian authorities are pressured into territorial concessions, 'it will force the Ukrainian people to take to the streets.' 'This will not so much be a story of protest against the authorities, but a cry from the Ukrainian people to the whole world to be treated as a great country in the centre of Europe, and not just viewed by the US as a piece of land," Liagusha said. "Ukrainians are a full-fledged nation, and Ukraine is a great state with its own legislation.' Liagusha explained that ever since Ukraine became an independent county, the society has clearly established its decisive power when 'during the Revolution of Dignity (in 2014), and before that the Orange Revolution (in 2004) and before that the Revolution on Granite in 1991, we saw that people do not accept power in terms of authoritarianism and clear hierarchy.' 'The president in Ukrainian society is not a king, meaning that his will does not determine the will of the entire Ukrainian people," he pointed out. 'We all hear what society says' Since the beginning of Russia's full-scale invasion in early 2022, this balance of power has crystallised even more clearly 'when we see in Ukrainian society that almost every family has been affected by this war, directly or indirectly," according to Liagusha. 'People are fighting against the aggressor, for democracy, and for our country to become a member of the European Union and be part of Europe," he said. And so, whatever decisions are made with the participation of the president, it means that these decisions can be confirmed by Ukrainian society through direct street demonstrations.' This was proven yet again in July when thousands of Ukrainians took to the streets to protest against the bill that could have effectively eliminated the independence of the country's anti-corruption institutions. Thousands of Ukrainians demonstrated until Zelenskyy proposed a new bill only days later to restore the independence of the anti-corruption bodies. Nationwide protests forced the government to overturn the initial bill in a move widely seen as a win for democracy in Ukraine, even during Russia's all-out war. Demonstrators made it clear that their anger was directed solely at the bill, and their demands were limited to restoring the independence of anti-corruption bodies. But after three revolutions in just over 30 years, one of which resulted in ousting the pro-Russian Victor Yanukovich in 2014, Ukrainian presidents and authorities are very sensitive to the voice of the street. Having signed a new bill, Zelenskyy himself said, 'We all hear what society says. We see what people expect from state institutions to ensure justice and the efficiency of each institution.' Zelenskyy surely knows what to expect from Ukrainian civil society should there be pressure to cede territories. But Ukraine's foreign partners, specifically the US, do not seem to comprehend it. When asked why, Liagusha said the reasons can be explained by the level of comfort of life. 'Life in the United States and many European countries is more or less stable and comfortable," he explained. "These societies have long lacked experience with large-scale protests and the high level of activity seen in Ukrainian civil society.' Liagusha also points out that Western democracies primarily view Ukrainian civil society as self-organised groups of people that are created or organised to solve specific tactical problems and issues. 'There is no understanding that the volunteer movement, civil society for the protection of human rights, and activists in various fields are truly such a society and are the creators of the new Ukrainian state.'

Trump-Putin Alaska summit: High stakes at historic meeting
Trump-Putin Alaska summit: High stakes at historic meeting

Euronews

time17 hours ago

  • Euronews

Trump-Putin Alaska summit: High stakes at historic meeting

As Donald Trump is hosting Vladimir Putin for a historic summit in Alaska, Ukraine and Europe are holding their breath for what the meeting can bring. For the US president, the summit represents an unprecedented opportunity to establish himself as a peacemaker and push Russia to a ceasefire. For Putin, this is a chance to change tack despite his unwillingness to engage in direct negotiations with his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Ukraine's president has not been invited to the summit at the US military Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, but Trump hopes he will be present for the second round of talks. The question remains, will there be a second meeting after the negotiations in Alaska? Follow our live updates as Euronews journalists around Europe bring you the latest developments in the blog below:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store