logo
Is breakfast really the most important meal of the day?

Is breakfast really the most important meal of the day?

BBC News16-07-2025
We've all heard that the advice about having a good breakfast can set us up for the day. But does that mean this meal can makes us healthier and thinner – or is it something else?
Along with old classics like "carrots give you night vision" and "Santa doesn't bring toys to misbehaving children", one of the most well-worn phrases in the arsenal of tired parents everywhere is that breakfast is the most important meal of the day. Many of us grow up believing that skipping breakfast is a dietary travesty, but the number of us who take time to eat it can vary.
Around three-quarters of Americans regularly eat breakfast, while in the UK, around 94% of adults and just 77% of adolescents will regularly eat breakfast. A study in Switzerland showed only two thirds of adults there regularly consume the meal.
When pressed for time, the morning breakfast is often the first thing to go. How many of us eat it while on the run, or gladly exchange a a bowl of cereal, a couple of slices of toast or a pastry for a few extra minutes in bed?
Yet, the clue for why breakfast is supposed to be important is in its name: we're advised to eat it to break our overnight fast.
"The body uses a lot of energy stores for growth and repair through the night," explains dietician Sarah Elder. "Eating a balanced breakfast helps to up our energy, as well as protein and calcium used throughout the night."
But there's widespread disagreement over whether breakfast should be deemed so important. As well as the rising popularity of fasting diets, there have been concerns around the sugar content of cereal and the food industry's involvement in pro-breakfast research – and even one claim from an academic that breakfast is "dangerous".
So what's the reality? Is breakfast a necessary start to the day… or a marketing ploy by cereal companies?
You might also like:• Is sugar really bad for you? • We don't need nearly as much protein as we consume • The truth about eating eggs
Can skipping breakfast cause weight gain?
The most researched aspect of breakfast (and breakfast-skipping) has been its links to obesity. Scientists have different theories as to why there's a relationship between the two.
In one US study that analysed the health data of 50,000 people over seven years, researchers found that those who made breakfast the largest meal of the day were more likely to have a lower body mass index (BMI) than those who ate a large lunch or dinner. The researchers argued that breakfast helps increase satiety, reduce daily calorie intake, improve the quality of our diet – since breakfast foods are often higher in fibre and nutrients – and improve insulin sensitivity at subsequent meals, which can be a risk for diabetes.
But as with any study of this kind, it was unclear if that was the cause – or if breakfast-skippers were just more likely to be overweight to begin with.
To find out, researchers designed a study in which 52 obese women took part in a 12-week weight loss programme. All had the same number of calories over the day, but half had breakfast, while the other half did not.
What they found was that it wasn't breakfast itself that caused the participants to lose weight: it was changing their normal routine. The women who said before the study that they usually ate breakfast lost 8.9kg when they stopped having breakfast, compared to 6.2kg in the breakfast group. Meanwhile, those who usually skipped breakfast lost 7.7kg when they started eating it – and 6kg when they continued to skip it.
If breakfast alone isn't a guarantee of weight loss, why is there a link between obesity and skipping breakfast?
Alexandra Johnstone, professor of appetite research at the University of Aberdeen, argues that it may simply be because breakfast-skippers have been found to be less knowledgeable about nutrition and health.
"There are a lot of studies on the relationship between breakfast eating and possible health outcomes, but this may be because those who eat breakfast choose to habitually have health-enhancing behaviours such as not smoking and regular exercise," she says.
A 2020 review of 45 studies looking into the relationship between breakfast and obesity confirmed that skipping breakfast increases the risk of obesity. The same effect has been found in children.
Does it matter when we eat breakfast?
Intermittent fasting, which involves fasting overnight and into the next day, is gaining ground among those looking to lose or maintain their weight or improve their health.
One pilot study published in 2018, for example, found that intermittent fasting improves blood sugar control and insulin sensitivity and lowers blood pressure. Eight men with pre-diabetes were assigned one of two eating schedules: either eating all their calories between 9am and 3pm, or eating the same number of calories over 12 hours. The results for the 9am-3pm group were found to be on par with medicine that lowers blood pressure, according to Courtney Peterson, the study's author and assistant professor of nutrition sciences at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Still, the study's small size means more research is needed on its possible long-term benefits.
If skipping breakfast (and other food outside of a restricted time slot) could potentially be good for you, does that mean breakfast could be bad for you? One academic has said so as eating early in the day causes our cortisol to peak more than it does later on. This causes the body to become resistant to insulin over time and can lead to type 2 diabetes.
But Fredrik Karpe, professor of metabolic medicine at Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, argues this isn't the case. Instead, higher levels of cortisol in the morning are just part of our body's natural rhythm.
Not only that, but breakfast is key to jumpstarting our metabolism, he says. "In order for other tissues to respond well to food intake, you need an initial trigger involving carbs responding to insulin. Breakfast is critical for this to happen," Karpe says.
A randomised control trial found that skipping breakfast disrupted the circadian rhythms and led to larger spikes in blood glucose levels after eating. Eating breakfast, the researchers conclude, is essential for keeping our body clock running on time.
A 2023 review of Japanese adolescents found that skipping breakfast was associated with pre-diabetes – particularly among those who were overweight.
Peterson says those who skip breakfast can be divided into those who either skip breakfast and eat dinner at a normal time – getting the benefits of intermittent fasting, if not breakfast – or those who skip breakfast and eat dinner late.
"For those who eat dinner later, their risk of obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease goes through the roof. While it seems breakfast is the most important meal of the day, it might actually be dinner," Peterson says. "Our blood sugar control is best early in the day. When we eat dinner late, that's when we're most vulnerable because our blood sugar is worst. There's more research to do, but I'm confident you shouldn't skip breakfast and have dinner late."
She says we should think of our circadian rhythm as an orchestra.
"There are two parts of our circadian clock. There's the master clock in the brain, which we should think of as analogous to a conductor of an orchestra, and the other half is in every organ, which has a separate clock," she says.
And that "orchestra" is set by two outside factors: bright light exposure and our eating schedule.
"If you're eating when you're not getting bright light exposure, the clocks that control metabolism are in different time zones, creating conflicting signals as to whether to rev up or down."
It's like two halves of an orchestra playing different songs, Peterson explains, and this is why eating late impairs blood sugar and blood pressure levels.
Researchers from the University of Surrey and University of Aberdeen have looked into the mechanisms behind how the time we eat influences body weight. Findings published in 2022 suggest that a bigger breakfast and smaller dinner is beneficial to weight control, as a bigger breakfast led to a smaller appetite for the rest of the day.
The health benefits of eating breakfast
Breakfast has been found to affect more than just weight. Skipping breakfast has been associated with a 27% increased risk of heart disease, a 21% higher risk of type 2 diabetes in men, and a 20% higher risk of type 2 diabetes in women.
This may be because skipping breakfast affects glucose and lipid control, and insulin levels, say researchers behind a 2023 study on fasting and diabetes. They tracked the diets of more than 100,000 people over an average of seven years, and found that the risk of developing the disease was significantly higher among the participants who regularly ate breakfast after 9am, compared to those who ate it before 8am.
One reason for some of the health benefits associated with eating breakfast – at least in the Western world – may be its nutritional value, partly because some cereals are fortified with vitamins. In one study on the breakfast habits of more than 8,000 people in the UK, researchers found that people who consumed breakfast regularly had a higher overall micronutrient intake, partly driven by current UK fortification of vitamins in breakfast cereals, bread and spreads, the researchers say. There have been similar findings in Australia, Brazil, Canada, Indonesia and the US.
Breakfast is also associated with improved brain function, including concentration and language. A review of 54 studies found that eating breakfast can improve memory, though the effects on other brain functions were inconclusive. However, one of the review's researchers, Mary Beth Spitznagel, a clinical psychologist at Kent State University in Ohio, says there is "reasonable" evidence breakfast does improve concentration – there just needs to be more research.
"Looking at studies that tested concentration, the number of studies showing a benefit was exactly the same as the number that found no benefit," says Spitznagel. "And no studies found that eating breakfast was bad for concentration."
What's most important, some argue, is less whether we eat breakfast but what we eat when we do.
High-protein breakfasts have been found to be particularly effective in reducing food cravings and consumption later in the day, according to research by the Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation.
While cereal remains a firm favourite among breakfast consumers in the UK and US, a 2020 Action on Sugar survey of 120 breakfast cereals found that a third were high in sugar, and only three cereals were low in sugar.
But some research suggests if we're going to eat sugary foods, it's best to do it early. One study found that changing levels of the appetite hormone leptin in the body throughout the day coincide with having our lowest threshold for sweet food in a morning, while scientists from Tel Aviv University have found that hunger is best regulated in the morning. They recruited 200 obese adults to take part in a 16-week-long diet, where half added dessert to their breakfast, and half didn't. Those who added dessert lost an average of 40lbs (18kg) more – however, the study was unable to show the long-term effects.
A review of 54 studies found that there is no consensus yet on what type of breakfast is healthier and it concluded that the type of breakfast doesn't matter as much as simply eating something.
Another factor to consider is where you eat breakfast. A 2022 study looking at the breakfast habits of almost 4,000 young people found that those who eat breakfast out of the home were more likely to have psychosocial behavioural problems than those who eat breakfast at home. One reason for this, the researchers say, is that the social context of having breakfast as a family may be linked to having a more nutritious breakfast.
Final take
While there's no conclusive evidence on exactly what we should be eating and when, the consensus is that we should listen to our own bodies and eat when we're hungry.
"Breakfast is most important for people who are hungry when they wake up," Johnstone says.
For instance, research shows that those with pre-diabetes and diabetes may find they have better concentration after a lower-GI breakfast such as porridge, which is broken down more slowly and causes a more gradual rise in blood sugar levels.
Everybody starts the day differently – and those individual differences, particularly in glucose function, need to be researched more closely, Spitznagel says.
In the end, the key may be to be mindful of not over-emphasising any single meal, but rather looking at how we eat all day long.
"A balanced breakfast is really helpful, but getting regular meals throughout the day is more important to leave blood sugar stable throughout the day, which helps control weight and hunger levels," says Elder.
"Breakfast isn't the only meal we should be getting right."
*This article was originally published on 27 November 2018. It was updated on 16 July 2025 to include recent research.
--
Join one million Future fans by liking us on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter or Instagram.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Death of girl left alone by fake ID worker was unlawful, jury inquest concludes
Death of girl left alone by fake ID worker was unlawful, jury inquest concludes

The Independent

time14 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Death of girl left alone by fake ID worker was unlawful, jury inquest concludes

The death of a teenage girl, who was left alone at a children's mental health ward by an inexperienced agency worker using fake ID, has been ruled as an unlawful killing by an inquest jury. Ruth Szymankiewicz was being treated for an eating disorder at Huntercombe Hospital in Berkshire and had been placed under strict one-to-one observation when on February 12 2022, she was left on her own by the member of staff responsible for watching her. The 14-year-old was able to shut herself in her bedroom at the hospital's psychiatric intensive care unit – also known as Thames ward – where she self-harmed. She died two days later at John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford. On Thursday, an inquest jury sitting at Buckinghamshire Coroner's Court in Beaconsfield returned a conclusion of unlawful killing. 'Ruth was not prevented from accessing the harmful material which could be used to self-harm,' the jury foreman told the hearing. 'Ruth's care was insufficient to allow for discharge.' The foreman added Ms Szymankiewicz's parents were not given 'adequate information' about her care on the ward. Jurors could be seen crying as they recorded their conclusion, as well as the coroner and members of the family. The agency worker responsible for watching Ms Szymankiewicz – a man then known as Ebo Acheampong – had never worked in a psychiatric hospital environment before coming to Huntercombe on February 12 2022 for his first shift. A police investigation later found he was hired by the Platinum agency – which supplied staff for Huntercombe Hospital – under a false name. Mr Acheampong never returned to work at the hospital following the incident and fled the UK for Ghana. The court heard the ward was missing at least half of its staff on the day Ms Szymankiewicz, who had self harmed several times in the past, was left unsupervised. Mr Acheampong was originally working on a different ward, but was asked to join the team on Thames ward because they were so short-staffed nurses could not go on breaks, jurors were previously told. A risk management form known as a 'Datix incident' had been filed on the day by Michelle Hancey – a support worker with 18 years' experience at Huntercombe – who raised concerns the Thames ward team would 'fail to monitor patients on prescribed special observation because of staff shortage'. During the inquest, jurors were shown CCTV footage of the moment Mr Acheampong left Ms Szymankiewicz unsupervised while she sat in the ward's lounge watching TV, enabling her to leave the room. She had been placed on the 'level three observation' plan following earlier incidents of self-harm – meaning she had to be kept within eyesight at all times. In the footage, Mr Acheampong can be seen leaving the room repeatedly – at first only for seconds at a time, then for two minutes – prompting the teenager to walk up to the door and look into the lobby, seemingly waiting for the opportunity to leave the room. She was last captured on CCTV walking out of the ward's day room 'completely on her own' before going straight to her bedroom and closing the door behind her, coroner Ian Wade KC told the inquest. Around 15 minutes passed before a nurse discovered the teenage girl and raised the alarm. Huntercombe Hospital had been inspected twice by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) prior to the incident, the inquest previously heard. It was rated as 'overall inadequate' in a CQC report dated February 2021. Active Care Group, which owned Huntercombe at the time of Ms Szymankiewicz's death, has since closed the facility.

NHS Fife told to ‘progress corrective actions' urgently on single-sex spaces
NHS Fife told to ‘progress corrective actions' urgently on single-sex spaces

The Independent

time14 minutes ago

  • The Independent

NHS Fife told to ‘progress corrective actions' urgently on single-sex spaces

NHS Fife has been told by the UK's equality watchdog to 'progress corrective actions without delay' regarding single-sex spaces after the health board admitted it failed to carry out an equality impact assessment previously. The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) wrote to NHS Fife regarding access to single-sex facilities for staff on February 21, after the employment tribunal brought by nurse Sandie Peggie against the health board adjourned. Ms Peggie was suspended after she complained about having to share a changing room with transgender medic Dr Beth Upton at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy, Fife, on Christmas Eve 2023. She was placed on special leave after Dr Upton made an allegation of bullying and harassment, and cited concerns about 'patient care'. Ms Peggie has lodged a claim against NHS Fife and Dr Upton, citing the Equality Act 2010, including sexual harassment; harassment related to a protected belief; indirect discrimination; and victimisation, and the case has been adjourned until September. Baroness Kishwer Falkner, chairwoman of the EHRC, said NHS Fife previously admitted no equality impact assessment had been carried out and one is now expected around September 30, having been commissioned retrospectively. The EHRC recently directed NHS Fife to take 'corrective action' to ensure compliance with regulations which require public bodies to assess how policies and practices affect people with protected characteristics. On June 10, it held a meeting to reiterate that the Scottish Government has a duty to ensure public bodies comply, following the UK Supreme Court ruling in April that the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the 2010 Equality Act 'refer to a biological woman and biological sex'. On July 23, NHS Fife 'assured the EHRC that it has taken steps in several areas, including a full review and audit of changing, toilet and locker room facilities', and it 'committed to ensuring there will be no delay in progressing all the compliance actions directed', according to the regulator. Baroness Falkner said the EHRC had 'urged NHS Fife to progress the corrective actions we directed without delay' to 'protect staff from discrimination and harassment'. Maya Forstater, chief executive of human rights charity Sex Matters, said: 'This directive to NHS Fife is an unprecedented intervention from the EHRC. 'While long overdue, this is a clear instruction to NHS Fife – and all employers – that it cannot get away with continuing to flout the Equality Act. 'There have been relentless efforts to undermine the Supreme Court judgment since it was handed down. 'This leads to women being subjected to bullying, harassment and discrimination if they stand up, as Sandie Peggie did, for their right to undress with dignity and privacy. 'The EHRC has the power to hold employers, service providers and public sector bodies to account.' The employment tribunal held further hearings in July before adjourning until September. Scottish Conservative equalities spokeswoman Tess White said: 'This damning directive from the EHRC confirms that on top of being negligent, incompetent and biased, NHS Fife broke the law in relation to the Sandie Peggie case. 'It's abundantly clear that the positions of the chief executive and senior health board colleagues are completely untenable. 'The shameful admission from the health board confirms that Sandie Peggie was hung out to dry from the very beginning, simply for standing up for her rights as a woman. Fairness and accountability must prevail. 'The First Minister must clear out those at the top of NHS Fife and finally demand that it, and all other public bodies, upholds the clear and unequivocal Supreme Court ruling entitling women to single-sex spaces.' Baroness Falkner said: 'The policies and practices of all Scottish health boards must comply with the Equality Act 2010. 'We will continue to engage with NHS Fife and monitor its progress and the outcome of the measures it has committed to taking, to ensure compliance with the Equality Act and Public Sector Equality Duty.' NHS Fife said it welcomes continued engagement and oversight from the EHRC. It said: 'We are committed to working constructively with the EHRC to provide assurance that we fully understand, and are meeting, our obligations under the Equality Act 2010 and the Public Sector Equality Duty. This includes considering the implications of the recent Supreme Court ruling and the EHRC's interim guidance. 'A comprehensive review and audit of our facilities has been completed, and an equality impact assessment is under way. This will be concluded and published by September 30, 2025. 'Our priority is to ensure that all NHS Fife policies and practices protect the rights of our staff and comply fully with equality legislation.'

Parents are 'causing ADHD in their children' with key nutrition mistake, claims top professor
Parents are 'causing ADHD in their children' with key nutrition mistake, claims top professor

Daily Mail​

time15 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Parents are 'causing ADHD in their children' with key nutrition mistake, claims top professor

A leading professor has waded into the debate about ADHD being 'caused' by poor diet choices—and shared a totally new perspective. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a behavioural condition defined by inattentiveness, hyperactivity and impulsiveness. It affects around five per cent of children in the US. Some 3.6 per cent of boys and 0.85 per cent of girls suffer in the UK, with the majority of diagnoses coming between the ages of 6 and 12. Symptoms typically appear at an early age and become more noticeable as a child grows. These can include constant fidgeting, excessive movement or talking, acting without thinking and having little to no sense of danger. ADHD's exact cause is unclear but is thought to involve genetic mutations that affect a person's brain function and structure—although many experts (and naysayers) have linked the hyperactivity element of the condition to diet. Professor Emeritus David Benton, of Swansea University, explained that while people have previously focused on telling the parents of ADHD children to avoid E numbers and additives, perhaps they should look at the bigger picture. Writing for The Conversation, he asks why the focus hasn't been on what foodstuffs the chemicals are typically present in—which are predominantly ultra-processed foods (UPFs). He explained: 'Having a high intake of additives correlates with a high intake of ultra-processed food—usually a diet high in sugar and fat, while low in fibre, protein, vitamins and minerals. 'So, why assume that additives are the problem, and not the rest of the diet?' UPF is an umbrella term used to cover anything edible made with colourings, sweeteners and preservatives that extend shelf life. Ready meals, ice cream and tomato ketchup are some of the best-loved examples of products that fall under the umbrella UPF term, now synonymous with foods offering little nutritional value. They are different to processed foods, which are tinkered to make them last longer or enhance their taste, such as cured meat, cheese and fresh bread. Numerous studies have uncovered links between fizzy drinks, biscuits and ready meals and a catalogue of health problems, including heart disease and even some cancers. Professor Benton continued that low-income parents often rely on UPFs in order to feed their families due to cost restrictions, and it might be no coincidence that ADHD is often diagnosed in children from this demographic. He said: 'Eating ultra-processed food—and therefore additives – is more common among low-income families, who are also at greater risk of ADHD. 'To some extent ADHD may be an indication of poverty, and a generally poor diet, reflecting the financial need to eat cheaper ultra-processed foods.' However, if you think swapping your child to a diet of whole grains, fresh produce and dietary basics like milk and eggs will help reduce their hyperactivity, Professor Benton disagrees. He explained that previous studies revealed that even 'clean' diets had the potential to cause changes in behaviour. Citing a study from 1985 in which children were fed a very limited menu before certain foods were gradually reintroduced to see what triggered a reaction, it wasn't just sweets and fizzy drinks that left them bouncing off the walls. Professor Benson writes: 'It found that at least one of the children reacted adversely to 48 of the foods in their diet with signs of hyperactivity. 'With cows' milk this was true for 64 per cent of children in the study. 'For grapes it was 49 per cent, hens' eggs 29 per cent, fish 23 per cent, apples 13 per cent and tea 10 per cent. 'These are not ultra-processed foods, but we need to explore whether they contain chemicals that influence the biology of some individuals.' He added that nearly 80 per cent of them 'reacted to a preservative and a colouring, although the doses used were greater than would be normally consumed'. And, crucially, 'no child reacted only to these additives, and different children reacted to different foods, only removing additives wouldn't eliminate symptoms'. Professor Benton concluded that frustratingly, when it comes to reducing hyperactivity in children with ADHD it's not a one size fits all solution, and parents need to address their children's overall diet, not just focus on avoiding certain things. 'For parents concerned about their child's ADHD, it's worth remembering that food additives are unlikely to be the sole cause,' he said. 'If a child's behaviour seems linked to diet, keeping a food diary can help identify patterns. 'But any elimination diet should be approached with care and expert advice, to avoid doing more harm than good. 'Ultimately, every child is different, and what works for one may not work for another.' The UK is the worst in Europe for eating UPFs, which make up an estimated 57 per cent of the national diet. They are thought to be a key driver of obesity, which costs the NHS around £6.5billion a year treating weight-related disease like diabetes, heart disease and some cancers. Last year, disturbing data also suggested that children who ate lots of UPFs show early signs of poor heart health and diabetes risk factors from as young as three years old. WHAT IS ADHD? Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a behavioural condition defined by inattentiveness, hyperactivity and impulsiveness. It affects around five per cent of children in the US. Some 3.6 per cent of boys and 0.85 per cent of girls suffer in the UK. Symptoms typically appear at an early age and become more noticeable as a child grows. These can also include: Constant fidgeting Poor concentration Excessive movement or talking Acting without thinking Inability to deal with stress Little or no sense of danger Careless mistakes Mood swings Forgetfulness Difficulty organising tasks Continually starting new tasks before finishing old ones Inability to listen or carry out instructions Most cases are diagnosed between six and 12 years old. Adults can also suffer, but there is less research into this. ADHD's exact cause is unclear but is thought to involve genetic mutations that affect a person's brain function and structure. Premature babies and those with epilepsy or brain damage are more at risk. ADHD is also linked to anxiety, depression, insomnia, Tourette's and epilepsy. There is no cure. A combination of medication and therapy is usually recommended to relieve symptoms and make day-to-day life easier.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store