Al-Majalla at 45: A legacy of excellence, a future of innovation
Since its establishment in 1980, Al-Majalla has held a unique position in the media landscape as a reliable source of news and bold intellectual discourse. Over the decades, it has earned the trust of thought leaders and decision-makers, delivering in-depth, balanced analyses that explore and analyze the issues shaping our world. Al-Majalla has conducted exclusive interviews with global and regional leaders, published groundbreaking investigative reports spanning politics, culture, economics, and technology, and served as a premier platform for the most important political and intellectual voices from the Middle East and beyond.
For more than four decades, Al-Majalla has provided unique coverage of pivotal events in regional and global history, led by a distinguished group of journalists and editors-in-chief who have left a significant mark on the media landscape, including Abdulrahman Al-Rashed, Othman Al-Omair, and Adel Al-Toraifi. Throughout its history, the magazine has been a trusted source for insightful perspectives and precise analyses on significant historical milestones. Al-Majalla was among the first to recognize the Iranian threat, closely monitoring Iran-backed organizations and movements. It extensively covered the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, being the first to report on the Kuwaiti government's meeting in Saudi Arabia in 1990. The magazine also provided detailed coverage of Palestinian President Yasser Arafat's departure from Beirut in 1982, uncovering the secret negotiations that led to his exit.
Over the years, Al-Majalla has interviewed some of history's most influential figures, including US President Ronald Reagan, British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, King Hussein of Jordan, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, poet Nizar Qabbani, and boxer Muhammad Ali. As a trusted reference, Al-Majalla has also attracted a distinguished group of writers, intellectuals, and specialists from across the region and the world, such as Nobel Prize-winning novelist Naguib Mahfouz, Syrian poet Nizar Qabbani, and Sudanese novelist Tayeb Salih.
Since its relaunch two years ago, Al-Majalla has achieved significant milestones and secured exclusive interviews, reinforcing its prestigious status in the region and beyond. Among its key achievements was an exclusive report on a 'ceasefire proposal' in Gaza, which gained widespread attention from major Arabic and international media outlets.
It also exclusively published the 'full story' of former Syrian President Bashar Assad's escape, revealing details never told before about the days leading to the fall of the Assad regime. Other widely covered investigative pieces included 'top-secret' communications between Israel and the Assad regime and the Hamas-Fatah agreement on Gaza governance.
Additionally, Al-Majalla conducted exclusive interviews with key political figures shaping today's landscape, such as former Turkish President Abdullah Gül and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte — making it the first Arab media outlet to interview him after he assumed his new position.
Jomana R. Alrashed, CEO of SRMG, reflected on Al-Majalla's enduring legacy: 'For over four decades, Al-Majalla has documented the transformations of the region and the world, staying at the forefront of unfolding events while maintaining a steadfast commitment to in-depth, credible, and accurate reporting. Its legacy stands as a testament to a clear editorial vision, upheld by an exceptional team of distinguished journalists and intellectuals, driven by unwavering passion and dedication.'
Speaking on Al-Majalla's relaunch two years ago in a refreshed and modernized format, Alrashed highlighted the evolving role of media: 'In today's rapidly shifting media landscape, we must honor our strong heritage while embracing modern platforms and formats that resonate with the next generation of readers, leaders, and decision-makers. Our role extends beyond news reporting — we are a mirror to reality, a window into the future, and a bridge that connects generations politically, culturally, and socially.'
Beyond its journalistic achievements, the platform has been recognized for its visual storytelling and illustrative journalism, winning prestigious awards alongside major international media institutions like The New York Times, The Washington Post, and The Economist. Among these accolades were two international awards from the Society of Illustrators in New York, honoring the artwork 'A Grim Anniversary' on the first year of the Russia-Ukraine war and 'Pursuing Fusion' on nuclear fusion. The magazine also made the shortlist for the 2025 Communication Arts Awards, competing among 2,867 artistic entries worldwide.
The transformation over the past two years has led to remarkable success. Page views have surged by 910 percent, daily visitors have increased by 714 percent, and monthly visitors have grown by 629 percent.
To continue to stay ahead in the digital era, Al-Majalla launched its talk show, Hadith Al-Majalla, featuring influential figures discussing key cover stories. Guests have included American expert Andrew Tabler, former Lebanese Prime Minister Fouad Siniora, former Palestinian Foreign Minister Nasser Al-Qudwa, and former Iraqi Foreign and Finance Minister Hoshyar Zebari. The magazine also hosted a panel discussion at the renowned Frontline Club in London, where former US Ambassador Robert Ford participated in a debate as part of the Debating MENA series, attended by top media figures, diplomats, and experts.
Editor-in-Chief of Al-Majalla Ibrahim Hamidi said: 'Today, we celebrate 45 years since the founding of Al-Majalla. This distinguished legacy, crafted with expertise and foresight by leading journalists and intellectuals, presents both an opportunity and a challenge for us. It is an opportunity to build upon this rich heritage with a modern, forward-thinking approach that resonates with the world today, and a challenge that motivates us to preserve, enrich, and elevate this legacy with the highest standards and ambitious goals.
'Over the past two years, in the age of the information revolution, we have focused on delivering insightful, in-depth content, enhanced by elegant language and cutting-edge visual and interactive media, distributed across social platforms to reach a wide and diverse audience. Our mission is to serve as a dynamic bridge that connects our region to the world and unites generations. Just as Al-Majalla transformed magazine journalism more than four decades ago, we now aim to take competitiveness to new, uncharted heights.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Lebanon's Patriarch: Hezbollah must surrender weapons after state asserts monopoly on arms
Lebanon's top Christian cleric escalated his criticism of Hezbollah on Tuesday, saying the Iran-backed group has no right to keep its arsenal after the government decided that only the state can bear arms. Maronite Patriarch Bechara al-Rai said there is now a rare political consensus to strip all weapons from groups outside the Lebanese Armed Forces. 'This is the first time there is consensus among the president, the parliament speaker, and the prime minister to monopolize weapons under state control. This brings peace to Lebanon. No one can live without peace,' Rai told Al Arabiya in an interview. His comments come after months of cross-border fighting between Hezbollah and Israel that devastated southern Lebanon and large swathes of the country's capital and Bekaa Valley and displaced tens of thousands. The Lebanese government announced this month that it would enforce a monopoly on arms, a move condemned by Iran, Hezbollah's main backer. Rai said Hezbollah's credibility as an armed 'resistance' had collapsed once the state asserted its exclusive authority. 'We cannot accept one person, the secretary-general [of Hezbollah], to decide war and peace. The constitution says this is a government decision,' he said. The patriarch accused Tehran of undermining Lebanon's sovereignty. 'Iran crosses red lines because it stands with one side in Lebanon, the Shia sect and Hezbollah. It cannot give weapons to one side. This is blatant aggression and intervening in domestic affairs,' he said. Rai said he would not visit Tehran right now, citing its 'bad policies,' revealing that he turned down a previous invitation just over four years ago to visit Iran. Rai urged Hezbollah to embrace its Lebanese identity and stop taking directions from Tehran. 'You are Lebanese. Live as Lebanese and don't look to Iran like you used to,' he said, adding that the Shia of Lebanon 'were present in government and parliament long before the resistance' and that their political role does not depend on weapons. The patriarch recalled comments by Hezbollah's former secretary-general, Hassan Nasrallah, that the group receives its money, food, weapons and directions from Iran. 'Then how are you a Lebanese citizen? You are Lebanese, just like me. But you need to pledge allegiance to the Lebanese state, not Tehran.' He dismissed warnings of another civil war as 'an exaggeration,' saying no one was prepared to start another civil war and that the Lebanese people were fed up with constant wars since 1975. 'No one wants war anymore.' The patriarch also addressed Lebanon's fraught relationship with Israel, ruling out normalization for now but leaving the door open in the future. 'In the future, when there is no danger to Lebanon, why wouldn't there be a deal?' He acknowledged Israeli aspirations to expand its borders and create the 'Kingdom of David,' but said a strong Lebanese state that asserted its sovereignty over all its territory was the best way to prevent that from happening. Despite his sharp criticism, Rai said dialogue with Hezbollah remains open. 'We still have ongoing dialogue with Hezbollah, and we are honest with them. Bkerki will not sugarcoat, it will speak for the interests of Lebanon,' he said.
Arab News
3 hours ago
- Arab News
Where did Iran's Arab supporters disappear?
A deathly silence looms over the Arab street, unmoved by the wave of dramatic events in the region. We have not seen demonstrations, protests, or sit-ins in the Arab countries, and in my view, this is the first time in seven decades or more that such displays have vanished. What has befallen Iran is no small matter; its military losses and nuclear facilities are immense — facilities that cost billions of dollars, and much blood and sweat to build. To its ballistic and nuclear losses, we can add the loss of the popular current it had cultivated across the region, from Iraq to Morocco. When the Lebanese government took its bold decision to confiscate Hezbollah's weapons, the response was limited to just a few dozen motorcycles roaming Beirut's streets in protest. So, what happened to the human waves, the millions who once flooded the streets at a mere gesture from the party's leader or from Tehran? The collapse of Iranian influence is clear within Arab regions, like the collapse of Nasserism after its defeat in the 1967 war. It lost the ability to mobilize the street and resorted to relying on its socialist party members and labor unions to attend events after the masses — who once filled the squares with passion and spontaneity in response to radio appeals that dominated people's awareness and emotions for nearly two decades — dwindled. In the wake of that defeat, a sense of shock and betrayal spread across the region, which had been waiting for the liberation of Palestine. People do not admire the defeated Abdulrahman Al-Rashed Iran, too, once enjoyed dominance and popular support in the region, defying attempts to block its ideas and curb its activities. It managed to raise generations of Arabs on its ideas. Tehran opened its doors and arms to extremist Sunnis, including leaders of Al-Qaeda, overlooking their anti-Shiite ideology, and supported most Sunni opposition groups and movements against their governments. It built an organic, deeply coordinated relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood. It organized nearly annual conferences and seminars for Arab nationalists and communists. It spent heavily to woo Arab politicians and intellectuals; books were published, and odes of praise were written in support of the imam's regime and in its defense. Tehran gathered Shiites, Sunnis, and Arab Christians alike — thinkers from the Gulf, Egypt, the Levant, the Maghreb, Sudan, Yemen, and Arab diaspora communities. It climbed onto many Arab media outlets to promote Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's line. At times, we could hardly understand how it managed to reconcile all these contradictions. In Tripoli — a city with tensions against the Shiites of Beirut — there were Sunni groups that, since the 1980s, continued to pledge allegiance to Tehran. In Jordan, among the Muslim Brotherhood, some openly declared their affection for Tehran's leaders. Numerous works emerged in its defense: in Egypt, for example, 'Iran and Political Islam'; in Kuwait, 'Iran and the West: Conflict of Interests'; in the Gulf, conferences were held under the banner of 'rapprochement' between sects, celebrating the history of Abbasid Caliph Al-Nasir Li-Din Allah. All these activities might have been laudable, were it not for the fact that the intentions behind them were not out of love for ending or easing sectarian strife, but rather as part of a political project of domination. Tehran was managing elite and grassroots movements in dozens of Arab cities; protests against novels, films, negotiations, and regimes. But in the recent wars, following the October 2023 attack, the kind of mobilization we were used to in every confrontation faded. The first reason: People do not admire the defeated. The second: The apparatuses that used to orchestrate these gatherings have lost their connections and their resources have dried up. The Arab street venerates the victorious hero until he falls, then replaces him with another hero. Its believers have been shaken by successive defeats, just as Nasserists were shattered by the setbacks of the 1960s. The remaining challenge is to hold on to its supporters within its Shiite popular base; they are the ones most harmed and who still live the trauma of shock. With time, the Shiites of Lebanon will come to realize the truth — that they are victims of Hezbollah and Iran; that it is a burden on them, rather than a support. For four decades they have borne the confrontation with Israel and the consequences of ties with Iran: economic and personal sanctions, the destruction of their areas and neighborhoods, the targeting of their remittances from Africa and the Americas, and more.
Saudi Gazette
4 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Mediators await Israeli response to new Gaza ceasefire proposal
CAIRO — Arab mediators are awaiting a formal response from Israel after Hamas said it had accepted a new proposal for a Gaza ceasefire and hostage release deal. The plan was presented by Qatar and Egypt, which are trying to avert a major new Israeli offensive to occupy Gaza fully. Qatar said it was "almost identical" to a US proposal for a 60-day truce, during which around half of 50 hostages held in Gaza - 20 of whom are believed to be alive - would be handed over and the two sides would negotiate a lasting ceasefire and the return of the rest. In recent days, Israel's government has said it would no longer accept a partial deal - only a comprehensive one that would see all the hostages freed. Local media quoted a senior Israeli official saying: "Israel's position hasn't changed - release of all hostages and fulfilment of other conditions defined for ending the war." Later this week, the Israeli cabinet is expected to approve the military's plan to occupy Gaza City, where intensifying Israeli strikes have already prompted thousands of people to Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced Israel's intention to conquer all of Gaza - including the areas where most of its 2.1 million Palestinian residents have sought refuge - after indirect talks with Hamas on a ceasefire deal broke down last Monday night, a Hamas statement announced that the armed group and other Palestinian factions had approved a ceasefire proposal presented by Egyptian and Qatari mediators to their delegations in Cairo the previous official Taher al-Nunu told Al-Araby TV that they had not sought any amendments to the proposal, which he described as "a partial deal leading to a comprehensive deal".He also emphasised that on the first day of its implementation, negotiations would begin with the aim of agreeing a permanent ceasefire."We hope that the 60 days of ceasefire will be sufficient to conclude a final agreement that will completely end this war," he foreign ministry spokesman, Majed al-Ansari, told reporters in Doha on Tuesday that the proposal was "98%" similar to the one presented by US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff."I won't go into the details of the language that is on the table right now. But what I can say is that it is very close, almost identical to what was there on the table," Ansari said."It is within the confines of the Witkoff plan... It's a continuation of that process. Obviously, it's in the details where the devil lies."Witkoff had proposed a 60-day truce that would see Hamas release 10 living hostages and the bodies of 18 dead hostages in two phases, in exchange for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners and detainees held in Israeli jails. He also said that negotiations on a final agreement to end the war would begin on the first day of the accepted Witkoff's plan, but Hamas rejected it, partly because it did not include a guarantee that the temporary ceasefire would lead to a permanent media reported that Israeli officials were examining the new proposal and Hamas's to public broadcaster Kan, Netanyahu has not ruled out the possibility of a partial deal despite his recent statements that he will only accept a comprehensive Saturday night, his office put out a statement saying that Israel would "agree to a deal on condition that all the hostages are released in one go, and in accordance with our conditions for ending the war".Those conditions included the disarming of Hamas, the demilitarisation of Gaza, Israeli control of the Gaza perimeter, and the installation of a non-Hamas and non-Palestinian Authority governance, it said in a video on Monday that he had discussed with senior Israeli military commanders their "plans regarding Gaza City and the completion of our missions"."Like you, I hear the reports in the media, and from them you can get one impression — Hamas is under immense pressure," he President Donald Trump meanwhile wrote on social media: "We will only see the return of the remaining hostages when Hamas is confronted and destroyed!!! The sooner this takes place, the better the chances of success will be."However, the families of hostages fear the new offensive in Gaza City could endanger those being held Sunday night, hundreds of thousands of Israelis gathered in Tel Aviv to demand that their government agree a deal with Hamas to end the war now and bring all the hostages home. Netanyahu accused the demonstrators of hardening Hamas's negotiating Israeli military launched a campaign in Gaza in response to the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken least 62,004 people have been killed in Gaza since then, according to the territory's Hamas-run health of Gaza's population has also been displaced multiple times; more than 90% of homes are estimated to be damaged or destroyed; the healthcare, water, sanitation and hygiene systems have collapsed; and UN-backed global food security experts have warned that the "worst-case scenario of famine is currently playing out" due to food shortages. — BBC
