Retailers Accepting Crypto Payments – With Instant Settlement in Cash: By Shane Rodgers
Cryptocurrency payments are gaining interest in the retail world, from luxury watches to fast food. As consumers express interest in paying with digital assets, businesses see a means of gaining a larger customer base.
With a new generation of crypto payment solutions now available, businesses can accept crypto seamlessly, converting it instantly to their local currency. The merchants never touch the crypto, so there is no need to worry about crypto volatility, wallets to manage, or compliance headaches.
A Shift in Retail Payments
Consumer desire to use crypto at checkout is growing fast. The numbers back it up: 65 million Americans now own crypto, and according to Capital One, 80% would like to use it for everyday purchases.
These consumers may be shopping for luxury items, but they also want to pay for groceries, plane tickets, and even fast food with digital currency. What's more, crypto users typically spend twice as much as those using traditional cards.
Retailers are responding. In the United States alone, over 6,000 merchants already accept Bitcoin payments, and a Deloitte survey reveals that 85% of retailers see crypto as a tool to engage new audiences.
Early Adoption Across Sectors
The pay by crypto option isn't just theoretical — businesses are already seeing the impact. PDX Beam has been piloting its payment gateway with dozens of merchants across diverse industries, from diamond sellers to luxury car dealerships. By offering crypto-based payment these businesses are accessing a new demographic of spenders.
One international fast-food chain is launching a crypto payment pilot in ten Miami-Dade locations, part of its expansive U.S. presence of 6,800 outlets. These tests could soon bring crypto payments to the mainstream of fast-food transactions.
Beyond individual retailers, major retail payment players behind the scenes are getting involved. A $7.5 billion financial institution has signed a deal to process crypto payments, while a private equity group is using PDX Beam to enable crypto transactions for its portfolio of retailers.
Eliminating Crypto Exposure for Merchants
For most merchants, the biggest worry is dealing with crypto's price swings and the operational headaches of managing digital assets. PDX Beam's modern crypto-to-cash gateway eliminates that concern entirely. When a customer pays in crypto, the system instantly converts it to local currency and deposits the funds directly into the merchant's account — usually within seconds.
Retailers don't touch the crypto themselves, meaning there's no exposure to volatility and no need to maintain separate crypto accounts. Plus, because these payments settle on blockchain rails, they help reduce the risk of chargeback fraud, offering merchants an extra layer of security.
Lower Fees and Instant Settlement
Another major benefit is the fees associated with crypto payments. While traditional card payments come with fees that can reach 3-4% for standard transactions and up to 7% in high-risk sectors (including cannabis stores), crypto payments bypass these intermediaries, lowering transaction costs to less than half Visa/MC charges.
Settlement speeds are another major advantage. Credit card transactions can take days to clear, but crypto payments through these new gateways settle in real time or the same day — helping retailers improve cash flow.
Positioning for the Future
The shift toward crypto payments isn't slowing down. Big banks like JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs are launching crypto products, and the U.S. government is laying the groundwork for regulations that will support the growing digital asset economy. Worldpay forecasts that crypto spending worldwide will more than double by 2030, from $16 billion to $38 billion.
For retailers, the takeaway is clear: crypto payments aren't a passing trend. Consumers want to use it, and with modern gateways eliminating risk and complexity, merchants can meet this demand safely and efficiently.
By enabling crypto transactions without ever directly handling digital assets, retailers can meet the needs of this new generation of shoppers who are living increasingly digital-first lives.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
36 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Washington Post in talks with Substack about using its writers
The Washington Post has held talks with Substack about hosting pieces by its writers, the site's co-founder has said, as a host of legacy media brands embrace the newsletter platform in the battle for readers. In an interview with the Guardian, Substack's Hamish McKenzie said he had spoken to the Post about its plans to widen the types of opinion pieces on its website. He said there had been a 'change in mindset' from traditional media, which once viewed Substack with suspicion. He said many now saw the platform as an opportunity to adapt to what he described as 'the most significant media disruption since the printing press'. UK news companies including the Daily Mail, the Telegraph and Reach, which publishes the Daily Mirror, have all launched newsletters on Substack. McKenzie said the Post had approached Substack about hosting its writers. 'We've talked to them, but there's no formal agreement or partnership, and they wouldn't need to talk to us to be able to go out and attempt to do those things,' McKenzie said. 'They need to persuade the writers, creators, the journalists, publishers, not us. 'If they're helping to bring more exposure to those writers and drive audiences to them, if it's designed in that way – and I'm not 100% sure what the ultimate outcome is going to be – that could be really good for everyone.' Substack has become increasingly influential since its launch in 2017. It allows anyone to publish and distribute digital content, primarily through newsletters, and charge a subscription. It has also been branching out into podcasts and video. The potential tie-up comes after Jeff Bezos, the billionaire owner of the Post, provoked its comment editor to walk out after he announced its comment pages would be more narrowly focused on pieces that supported and defended 'personal liberties' and 'free markets'. The move was seen as an attempt by Bezos to safeguard his relationship with President Trump. However, the Post – under its British chief executive and publisher, Will Lewis – is trying to find other ways of drawing in readers following reported losses of $100m (£74m) last year, including a project to host comment pieces from other sources on its website. Reach has launched dozens of Substacks this year alone, covering topics from book trends to Liverpool FC. The Telegraph has just started to post content on a royal family Substack, while the Daily Mail has a Substack dedicated to showbiz news. 'All of a sudden really, a bunch of legacy news organisations are trying to see how they can take advantage of Substack,' McKenzie said. 'That's a really welcome change in mindset. At first people looked at us as if we were a curious instrument and then they started to look at us as maybe we were a threat, because some talent would prefer to go independent on Substack rather than be in a newsroom. 'People are starting to understand that Substack is not just a publishing system that helps people make money, but it's also a network and it represents new land to build on, where new media products can be born and built. Legacy institutions can build those just as well as newcomers. It's a big opportunity era.' He said Substack was supposed to be a 'disruptor of social media', rather than the traditional media, allowing longer writing instead of viral content. He said he had 'no regrets whatsoever' about having resisted overtures from Elon Musk to buy the site. McKenzie said Substack was trying to find new workable models for media amid the struggles of traditional outlets to hold on to rapidly fragmenting audiences. 'It's not a problem with demand for quality journalism,' he said. 'It's a problem with the business model and so there has to be a reinvention. We're almost at the point where the fire has razed through the forest and there are a few trees still standing. It's time to replant the forest. We're living through the most significant media disruption since the printing press.' Substack allows anyone to create digital content, which then sits on a dedicated website and can be sent directly to the inboxes of subscribers. It has also branched out into audio and video features in an attempt to benefit from the podcast boom. Crucially, it allows writers to charge a subscription for some or all of their pieces. The ability to monetise content has allowed some established writers to break away from traditional titles and go it alone. According to an analysis by the Press Gazette, the number of Substack newsletters with at least $500,000 (£369,000) in annual subscriptions revenue alone has doubled in two years. Some of the writers on the site have become influential in US politics, including Bari Weiss and Matt Yglesias. In the UK, it has provided a platform for new local news sites where newspapers have disappeared from the map or had their reporting staff significantly cut back. New ventures include The Manchester Mill, launched by the journalist Joshi Herrmann, and London Centric, launched by the former Guardian journalist, Jim Waterson.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Lionel Messi in Miami – a football failure but a money-spinning triumph
There will be a time, said Lionel Messi's friend and former Argentina team-mate Sergio Agüero, when football (soccer) in the United States will be divided into two periods: Before Messi and After Messi. That may well be true. The bigger question, though, is what effect will Messi have had on that shift? After all, with the forward, 38 this month, kicking off Fifa's bloated and so far unloved Club World Cup in the cloying heat of Miami at a far from sold-out Hard Rock Stadium at 1am on Sunday (UK time), it could be the start of the countdown to his time in the US drawing to a close. Messi is out of contract at Inter Miami at the end of this year, having signed with a fanfare as a free agent in July 2023 from Paris St-Germain in one of the most extraordinary deals ever constructed in sport. The expectation remains that he will re-sign, although there have been murmurings that he has grown increasingly frustrated of late with the club's struggles and has shown flashes of anger towards referees. That is despite Miami bringing in those who played alongside him at Barcelona in Luis Suárez, Sergio Busquets, Jordi Alba and head coach Javier Mascherano. There is a fear that should Miami bomb at the Club World Cup – a competition he has already won three times, albeit in a vastly different format – it may make up his mind to quit. But this has strongly been played down by the club, whose managing owner, Jorge Mas, says that contract negotiations are ongoing and that he wants Messi to 'finish his career here'. They hope to make an announcement within weeks. Anything but a contract extension would be damaging for Miami, who are desperate for Messi to lead them into their new stadium at the $1billion (£850 million) Freedom Park next year, and for US soccer. It is no coincidence that he was wooed to the US at a time when in consecutive years they were hosting the Copa America – which Messi won with Argentina – this summer's Club World Cup and then the 2026 World Cup, where 75 per cent of the fixtures will be played in the country and where it is hoped he will have his international swansong. This is about finance and geopolitical influence. And, thankfully, also football. A standout player in a very average league In a sense, the Club World Cup is a test run for the bigger prize: that World Cup. The first US World Cup in 1994 launched Major League Soccer two years later. The hope is that hosting it again will power MLS, which has undeniably stalled, to a new level. And to do that they need the Messi effect. One of the challenges MLS faces is that Americans want to watch the best, and MLS is simply not the best league in the world. But by association with Messi, it does become more important, and he remains by far the biggest name and is marketed as the face of football. For example, the UK-based sports intelligence firm Twenty First Group ranks MLS alongside the Ukrainian Premier League – 19th in the world – for having top players (just eight spread across six teams and Messi the stand-out). To put that in perspective, the Premier League has 258 of the top 1,250 players; La Liga is second with 185. MLS knows it must change if it is to achieve its global aim and there are claims that Messi being there has already started the conversations – about switching the season to be in line with Fifa's calendar, about allowing more spending. Even, maybe, about introducing relegation and promotion, although that still seems anathema to US owners. The big question remains: what will the difference be when Messi leaves MLS? There is a parallel with David Beckham, who is co-owner of Miami and played an integral role in wooing Messi. When Beckham signed for LA Galaxy in 2007 – when he was still just 32 – it took MLS to one level. Messi's mission is to take it to the next one. But will his time be as seismic as Beckham's? Eye-watering money, for life The Messi effect can also be divided into two areas: money and on-field success. Messi's signing was always likely to be a commercial success and the spoils have quickly piled up. But the danger remains that Messi will become nothing more than a commercial blip. Even if that blip has been astonishing. When Messi signed, his income per year was estimated at $60 million. But that does not tell half the story. It is made up of salary, signing-on bonus, but also a potentially lucrative deal to eventually award him equity in the team. Only Beckham was granted something similar – even if MLS paid a high price by allowing him to buy Miami's place in the league for just $25million, with the club now valued at $1 billion (£737 million). Not that he owns all of it. Messi's contract has similar benefits. With a trigger to own a percentage of Miami after he retires, Messi will be an MLS stakeholder, which the Americans hope will tie him into their league for the long term. On top of that, he has separate deals with Adidas, Fanatics and Apple. The latter, in particular, is significant. Messi signed in the first season when all MLS games were shown by Apple, behind a paywall, in a 10-year, $2.5 billion media rights deal with his own remuneration linked to new subscriptions. In terms of a league broadcast partner putting a player into the profits, we have never seen anything like that before. There was also talk that a prime motivator for the company was the South American market, where it was not dominant and Android still had a far larger footprint. What is intriguing is whether it has actually worked. Apple boasted of a huge increase in subscriber numbers – not that they were published – but more recently there has been speculation that the company might take advantage of a rumoured break clause after year five of the contract. What is not in dispute is that an early Apple TV+ docuseries Messi Meets America was a flop and was panned by critics. In terms of social media it has been trumpeted that before Messi arrived Miami had fewer than one million Instagram followers. Now they have 17 million – although Messi himself has 505 million. Messi has also drawn record crowds. This season, 72,610 watched Miami away to Kansas City and 65,612 at Foxborough. The Houston Dynamos even issued an apology to their angry fans for Messi not playing in their fixture, after they jacked up prices, offering them free tickets in return. Don Garber, the MLS commissioner, has claimed that Messi's pink Miami shirt is Adidas' top-seller – not just in football but for any of the company's shirts. MLS insists that Messi has helped put the league 'in front of a global audience' and 'piqued the interest of sports fans in our country'. Mas has likened Messi to Michael Jordan. The footballing magic is fading In pure football terms, Messi's move to the MLS is more complicated. This season in particular has been underwhelming for Miami, despite Messi being named MLS's most valuable player, even though he only played half the games, scoring 20 times and earning 16 assists in just 19 matches. He is still playing well, but it already feels a far cry from when he arrived in a blaze of publicity and excitement and his impact was immediate and dazzling. Messi's first hat trick with Inter Miami 🎩 (via @MLS) — B/R Football (@brfootball) October 20, 2024 Messi scored a free-kick in the dying seconds to win on his debut followed by a flurry of crucial, typically brilliant goals as Miami charged up from bottom of the league table and won their first-ever trophy, the Leagues Cup, with a strike in the final and with a host of celebrities – Leonardo Di Caprio, Kim Kardashian, Will Ferrell, Edward Norton, Selena Gomez – flocking to their games. 'It's like a movie,' Beckham purred. It certainly felt like it. Unfortunately Messi got injured and Miami reverted to type, missing out on the play-offs and the football has not really been the same ever since with Mascherano, in his first meaningful role as manager, struggling. Of the seven trophies they have had the chance to win with Messi, Miami have won two: that Leagues Cup followed by the Supporters Shield, which is awarded for gaining the most points. It was that prize that, controversially, Fifa president Gianni Infantino seized on to award Messi, sorry Miami, the final slot reserved for a Club World Cup host in the enlarged 32-team competition. It was a loophole, nothing more, with the argument in the US that the place should have gone to the MLS Cup winners, LA Galaxy. Clearly it should have done. But they do not have Messi. And Infantino wanted Messi – just as he wanted Saudi-based Cristiano Ronaldo and tried to force that to happen – to help christen his new baby, this tournament, with capacity crowds and a fervour of interest. The fear is that will not happen, with tickets being sold off cheaply for the inaugural game of Miami versus the Egyptian side Al-Ahly – although there is some credence to the argument that Fifa probably should have taken Messi on the road rather than in his home stadium, where Miami residents have ready access to see him. In fairness, demand has been strong for Real Madrid against Al-Hilal on June 18 in the same stadium, with the cheapest seats priced at $244 (£180). That may owe partly to a boost from the hiring of Xabi Alonso as head coach and the signing of Trent Alexander-Arnold. But the fact is Messi needs to achieve more on-field success with Miami, even if that sounds harsh given his age and the reality that, clearly, he cannot do it on his own. Even when he won the last World Cup in Qatar he had an Argentina side carefully built around him. Miami have tried to do that by bringing in a host of former Barcelona thirtysomethings. It has not had the same effect and the truth is Miami and Messi will not succeed until they win a trophy that really matters – such as the MLS Cup or the Concacaf Champions League. Can Miami win the Club World Cup? Without a doubt Messi – who returned from Buenos Aires immediately after Argentina's World Cup qualifier draw against Colombia on Wednesday, when he asked to be substituted – has been held back for this tournament. But winning it feels like a long shot, given the formidable opposition. Indeed, Miami will do well to get out of a group that also contains Porto and the Brazilian club Palmeiras. 'Messi is the one everyone wants to watch' In US, the attention around Messi has turned Miami into something of an unpopular club, one that other fans even want to see fail. Such is football rivalry, with Mas having described it as simple 'jealousy', although that usually follows a team being dominant on the pitch and hoovering up all the trophies, as well as having the glitz and glamour. It all places the spotlight even more firmly on Messi. There will be those who want to see if he, and Miami and, by extension, MLS and football in the US, fail at this Club World Cup. There will be those who want to see if he has still got it, to know if he can even turn back the clock and do what he did in Qatar at the last World Cup. 'We know Leo is there and for the world, for the fans, it was very important that Inter Miami was included because, whether some like it or not, Messi is the one everyone wants to watch,' Agüero declared in a statement provided by Fifa. It is fascinating, especially for a global audience who do not possess an Apple TV subscription and have not been following MLS. In fact, it probably all adds up to what Infantino wanted when he commissioned a new trophy from Tiffany &Co, set up a new competition shoehorned in Messi. Fifa needed Messi. But what happens in the next few weeks will go a long way to defining the Messi effect in America and whether it will be a ripple or a halo. At present opinion is divided.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Why female athletes are challenging the NCAA's $2.8bn settlement
College athletes spent decades fighting for the right to make money from their name, image and likeness (NIL). In 2021, they won. Now, a $2.8bn NCAA settlement is set to compensate hundreds of thousands of current and former athletes who missed out on those earnings. But not everyone thinks the deal is fair. Eight female athletes filed an appeal this week, arguing the agreement violates Title IX, the US law banning sex-based discrimination in education. They say the way the money is divided, largely favoring football and men's basketball players, shortchanges women by more than $1bn. Their appeal has paused all back payments, potentially delaying them for more than a year. However, the NCAA's new plan to allow schools to pay current players directly starting 1 July will still go ahead. So what does this all mean for athletes as well as the future of college sports? Here's what's going on … The NCAA agreed to pay $2.8bn to compensate athletes who were previously barred from earning income off their name, image, and likeness (NIL), including things like video game appearances, jersey sales, or social media sponsorships. The settlement covers athletes going back to 2016. It also clears the way for a major change: beginning 1 July 2025, colleges will be allowed to directly share revenue with current players, up to $20.5 million per school per year. It's a major shift from the NCAA's traditional amateurism model, which argued that athletes should only be compensated with scholarships, not salaries or endorsement income. Eight female athletes who competed in soccer, volleyball, and track have filed an appeal. Their names include Kacie Breeding (Vanderbilt) and Kate Johnson (Virginia), along with six athletes from the College of Charleston. They argue the deal violates Title IX, the federal law that bans sex-based discrimination in education. Specifically, they say the settlement gives up to 90% of the money to men in football and basketball, depriving women of $1.1bn in rightful compensation. Title IX is a 1972 US law requiring equal access and treatment for men and women in federally funded education programs, including athletics. Colleges must offer comparable resources, scholarships and participation opportunities across men's and women's sports. The female athletes argue that since NIL bans affected both genders equally, compensation for those bans must also be equitable, and that using historical TV revenue (which favors men's sports) ignores systemic barriers women have faced in marketing and media exposure. US district judge Claudia Wilken approved the settlement last week and rejected Title IX-based objections, saying they fell outside the scope of the antitrust case. The female athletes disagree and are now asking the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to intervene. Because of the appeal, no back pay will be distributed until the court rules. That delay could last several months or longer. According to the NCAA's lead attorney, the organization will continue funding the settlement pool, but the money will sit untouched until the case is resolved. The current payout formula is based on historical media revenue and licensing data. Because football and men's basketball generated the majority of money for schools – especially through TV contracts – those athletes stand to receive the most compensation. Critics say that approach bakes in decades of inequality, because women were denied the same marketing exposure and investment in the first place. Some worry that schools will cut so-called 'non-revenue' sports – like wrestling, swimming or gymnastics – to fund revenue-sharing with top athletes. Others fear this pushes college sports closer to a professional minor league system, undermining education and competitive balance. Still others say that without clear Title IX guidance, women may continue to be marginalized even in a post-amateurism era. The Ninth Circuit will now review the appeal. Briefs are due by 3 October, and while both sides say they'll push for speed, appeals in this court have been known to take 12 to 18 months. Until the case is resolved, no back payments will be made to athletes who played between 2016 and 2021. But the revenue-sharing era is coming, whether or not the NCAA is ready for it.
