
Green-energy madness will turn NYC family homes into firetraps
You've got to be kidding me.
A massive lithium-ion battery facility is being quietly pushed into the heart of Middle Village, Queens — right across the street from PS/IS 128, where hundreds of children go to school.
And it doesn't stop there: It's also next door to an animal hospital, a day-care center and a children's fun house.
This is not a joke. It's a fire hazard disguised as green infrastructure, as part of the City of Yes.
And I'm here to say: Not in my neighborhood. Not next door to our kids.
Not without a fight.
NineDot Energy, the company behind this plan, is eyeing a residential lot smack in the middle of a residential neighborhood — a place where kids ride bikes, families walk their dogs and teachers relax on their lunch break.
It's the last place a dangerous industrial-battery facility should ever be allowed.
These lithium-ion battery systems, necessary to comply with the impossible clean-energy goals of Albany's 2019 Climate Act, are a disaster waiting to happen.
Look no further than Moss Landing, Calif. — where a giant battery facility caught fire this year and burned for five days, releasing toxic smoke and forcing over 1,000 residents to evacuate.
A month later, it caught fire again.
In 2023 alone, lithium-ion battery fires in New York City killed 18 people and injured 150.
And those were from smaller batteries — imagine what a 40-foot container full of high-capacity battery racks could do in the middle of a neighborhood if it explodes.
Now imagine that happening across the street from a school with thousands of kids inside.
This project is being allowed as-of-right — meaning no public hearing, no environmental review, no input from the community — as part of the City of Yes for Carbon Neutrality, a citywide zoning amendment that I strongly opposed and voted against.
And Middle Village isn't alone: Similar giant battery sites and proposals are popping up in residential areas all over the outer boroughs — Brooklyn, Queens, Staten Island, The Bronx.
The communities most at risk are the ones with the least political clout, and the most working-class families.
This is what happens when City Hall passes sweeping legislation without doing its homework — without understanding the consequences.
They called it 'green,' wrapped it in nice language, and pushed it through without asking: What happens when we site hazardous battery facilities in the middle of residential communities?
Moss Landing knows.
This wasn't about climate. It wasn't about helping everyday New Yorkers.
It was about helping developers and special interests. The same groups who pushed for this plan — who stood to benefit financially — were the ones who helped write the rules.
And too many of my colleagues in the City Council did their bidding, whether as useful idiots or because they were in on it.
That's why I've joined a lawsuit with the Common Sense Caucus to strike down the entire City of Yes zoning overhaul — because it's being used to fast-track projects like this one that put people at risk.
And we're also exploring a separate legal action specifically targeting the carbon-neutrality piece of the zoning law that makes this battery facility possible.
We're demanding accountability. And we're demanding a full stop to the reckless placements of these facilities.
Let me be clear: I'm not against clean energy. I support renewable power, responsible planning and real solutions to our climate challenges.
But that doesn't mean handing our neighborhoods over to developers and crossing our fingers that nobody gets hurt.
We can build a sustainable city without turning schools into blast zones and blocks of family homes into firetraps.
I'm calling for the city to place an immediate moratorium on all large-scale lithium-ion battery facilities in residential areas, until real safeguards are in place and real people have a say.
That means public hearings, fire-safety reviews, community input and accountability — not just backroom deals and rubber stamps.
Middle Village is not a testing ground. Our families will not become the green lobbyists' collateral damage.
We've fought too hard to keep this community safe, and I'm not about to let it go up in flames — literally.
This is about common sense. And I'll keep fighting until it prevails.
City Council Member Robert Holden (D) represents District 30 in Queens.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
LA Mayor Bass Seeks Peace After Trump Calls in National Guard
Politics By and Isabela Fleischmann Save Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass called for peace as thousands of people demonstrating against immigration raids clashed with security forces for a third day. 'Our city has been through a lot,' Bass told reporters during a press conference at City Hall. 'The most important thing is that our city is peaceful.'


New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Eric Adams signs executive order adopting Holocaust remembrance group's definition of antisemitism
Mayor Eric Adams signed an executive order Sunday adopting the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's definition of antisemitism, as he vowed to ramp up the city campaign to combat Jew hatred. He also introduced legislation urging the City Council to approve the IHRA definition, which would make it official law. The IHRA definition is considered by many Jewish leaders to be the standard in fighting antisemitism. 4 Mayor Eric Adams signed an executive order Sunday adopting the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's definition of antisemitism. Matthew McDermott 'Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities,' the IHRA definition states. Adams announced the order during a discussion with Dr. Phil Sunday night at the Tribeca Synagogue. It comes as he faces re-election and plans to run as an independent on an 'End Semitism' ballot line. 4 Adams also introduced legislation urging the City Council to approve the IHRA definition, which would make it official law. Paul Martinka 'Antisemitism is a vile disease that's been spreading across our nation and our city. What's worse, since Hamas' terror attacks on October 7, 2023, we have seen this hateful rhetoric become normalized on our campuses, in our communities, and online as antisemitic propaganda far too often masquerades as 'activism,'' Adams said. More than half of the hate crimes reported in the city in March victimized Jews, even though they account for just 11 percent of the population, the mayor noted. 4 Adams announced the order during a discussion with Dr. Phil Sunday night at the Tribeca Synagogue. LP Media 'We know this moment demands bold, decisive action to crack down on anti-Jewish hatred,' Adams said. 'Today, we signed a landmark executive order to adopt an internationally recognized definition of antisemitism, but we must go further. I am calling on the City Council to join this commitment to target antisemitism everywhere it exists and immediately pass a bill to codify this definition into law. It's time we all come together to eradicate this hatred from our city, once and for all.' 4 More than half of the hate crimes reported in the city in March victimized Jews, even though they account for just 11 percent of the population. Kevin C Downs forThe New York Post At the state level, former Gov. Andrew Cuomo — who's also running for mayor — issued an order barring state entities from doing business with firms that back the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement against Israel before his resignation. Gov. Kathy Hochul has retained the policy. State Comptroller Tom DiNapoli has his own pro-Israel policy. In 2021, he announced that he pulled $111 million in investments out of the firm that owns Ben & Jerry's because of the ice cream maker's boycott of Israel's occupied territories. DiNapoli is the sole manager of the $274 billion state Common Retirement Fund.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Voters could be given the option to vote on removing NYC mayors from office
The Brief A Charter Revision Commission recommended that voters be given the opportunity to vote on a new removal process for New York City mayors. As of today, there are two ways a New York City mayor can be removed. "Staff recommend that the Commission consider creating a process for mayoral removal beyond those currently available to the Governor or Committee on Mayoral Inability." NEW YORK CITY - New Yorkers could soon have the power to remove sitting New York City mayors over misconduct. What we know A Charter Revision Commission, the NYC Commission to Strengthen Local Democracy, recommended that voters be given the opportunity to vote on a new removal process for New York City mayors. For context, Charter Revision Commissions are temporarily appointed government bodies that review the New York City Charter, which is essentially the framework for how the city is governed. These commissions can propose changes to the charter that are then voted upon by the public in a general election. Click to open this PDF in a new window. The Commission to Strengthen Local Democracy met on June 6 – one of the changes proposed is granting the New York City Council the ability to begin the process of removing a mayor. "Staff recommend that the Commission consider creating a process for mayoral removal beyond those currently available to the Governor or Committee on Mayoral Inability," reads one portion of the Preliminary Staff Report released. The process in mind would allow the Council to file mayoral misconduct charges with a supermajority vote (over two-thirds), then hold a hearing for the mayor in question to respond to said misconduct charges. The findings would be decided upon by another supermajority vote – after that point, it would be in the hands of the voters. A ballot question on whether to remove the sitting mayor would be presented to the voters – only a majority, not a supermajority, would be required to remove the mayor. Read the entire updated list of recommendations, including the aforementioned process, here. As of today, there are two ways a New York City mayor can be removed. The New York governor is able to serve a NYC mayor with charges, after which said mayor would have a chance to defend themself – the governor would then decide personally whether to remove them. The alternative is a bit more complicated. The City Charter cites that a special committee can be assembled to remove a mayor: an inability committee. This committee would comprise the corporation counsel, the city comptroller and the speaker of the City Council, as well as the borough president who has served the most consecutive years in office and the deputy mayor. Four of the five members would have to vote to remove the mayor. Who they are This specific Charter Revision Commission (CRC) was created by the City Council in November 2024. It has 17 commissioners, nine of which are appointed by the Council speaker; the remaining commissioners are appointed by the mayor, public advocate, comptroller and the five borough presidents. The panel will hold hearings about its suggested recommendations, then issue a final report later on. The backstory New York Governor Kathy Hochul announced earlier this year that she would not use her authority to remove New York City Mayor Eric Adams from office – the calls for Adams' removal came after New York prosecutors were directed by the U.S. Department of Justice to "dismiss" federal criminal charges that had been made against Adams Adams had been accused of accepting luxury travel perks and illegal campaign contributions from foreign nationals in exchange for political favors, including helping Turkish officials resolve city approvals for a diplomatic building in Manhattan. The Source This article includes information from several New York City government offices and an updated list of recommendations made by the NYC Commission to Strengthen Local Democracy.