Ronnie Dugger, trailblazing founder of The Texas Observer, dies at 95
Ronnie Dugger, the founding editor of The Texas Observer once referred to as the 'godfather of progressive journalism in Texas,' died Tuesday in Austin. He was 95.
His death was related to Alzheimer's disease complications, said his daughter, New York Times health and science editor Celia W. Dugger.
Dugger launched the Observer in 1954, when he was just 24 and a recent graduate of the University of Texas at Austin. He wanted to create not just a newspaper, but something to serve 'the rolling, ongoing community of liberal and left, radical, some centrist and conservative, decent people, still moored in this still oligarchical political hellhole, beautiful Texas,' he wrote in the Observer in 2014, recalling the time when the publication was created.
He wrote the Observer's mission statement, which is still displayed on its website today: 'We will serve no group or party but will hew hard to the truth as we find it and the right as we see it.'
Gus Bova, the Observer's editor-in-chief, described Dugger as a 'trailblazing journalist in Texas.'
'He insisted on covering stories that, in the 1950s, the major daily papers wouldn't touch. He drove around Texas in this broken-down little old car, finding stories of KKK violence in East Texas or issues faced by Mexican Americans in San Antonio or the border,' Bova said. 'Now we see journalism like that...But then it was really something different that he started.'
The Austin-based Observer has been awarded multiple national awards in its 71-year history. The New York Times Book Review once called it 'that outpost of reason in the Southwest.' In 2023, the publication almost shut down because of funding issues, but then it crowdsourced more than $300,000 and continued its operations.
Ceila Dugger said 'journalism runs in the family.' Dugger's grandson, Max Bearak, also works at The New York Times. She said she was inspired to join the profession by her father's belief in the power of the press.
'Our house was just alive with people who were in the thick of Texas politics, trying to make this a better state,' she said. 'It was impossible not to be infected as a young person by all of that.'
Dugger was known for his indefatigable work ethic. In a 1974 op-ed, Dugger's former colleague, historian Lawrence Goodwyn, reflected on how Dugger stood out from other young journalists, in their early thirties at the time, who were already worn out because of the high-paced reporting in Texas politics. Goodwyn recalled a conversation with one of them who said, 'I don't know how Dugger does it.'
Jim Hightower, who was the Observer's editor in the 1970s, recalled that at that time, there was barely any coverage of progressive candidates in Texas. Dugger wanted to change that.
'His integrity was not sanctimonious. It was not some stiff concept to put on a wall...but honesty and truth,' he said. 'His belief in journalism that guided my own ever since is that you tell the truth. You tell what you see, what you hear, what you smell. And do so with as much liveliness as you possibly can.'
Dugger was concerned with more than just Texas politics. He wrote biographies of Lyndon B. Johnson and Ronald Reagan. And he was strongly against nuclear weapons, as reflected in his first book, 'Dark Star: Hiroshima Reconsidered in the Life of Claude Eatherly of Lincoln Park, Texas.'
Bova said that up through last year, he was still talking about nuclear weapon threats, democracy and journalism, and would read The New York Times every morning.
Outside of journalism, Dugger was passionate about Russian literature, loved reading, and 'wrote thousands of poems that were never published,' his daughter said.
On top of all the national recognition Dugger received throughout his career, Joe Holley wrote in the Observer's obituary for Dugger, 'he will always be associated with the scrappy little Austin-based political journal created in his image.'
Disclosure: New York Times and University of Texas at Austin have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
First round of TribFest speakers announced! Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Maureen Dowd; U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-San Antonio; Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker; U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California; and U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas are taking the stage Nov. 13–15 in Austin. Get your tickets today!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Russian Intelligence Says It Collects WeChat Data. What Does That Mean?
Russian counterintelligence agents are analyzing data from the popular Chinese messaging and social media app WeChat to monitor people who might be in contact with Chinese spies, according to a Russian intelligence document obtained by The New York Times. The disclosure highlights the rising level of concern about Chinese influence in Russia as the two countries deepen their relationship. As Russia has become isolated from the West over its war in Ukraine, it has become increasingly reliant on Chinese money, companies and technology. But it has also faced what the document describes as increased Chinese espionage efforts. The document indicates that the Russian domestic security agency, known as the F.S.B., pulls purloined data into an analytical tool known as 'Skopishche' (a Russian word for a mob of people). Information from WeChat is among the data being analyzed, according to the document. The document offers insights into the espionage tactics of two authoritarian governments that are preoccupied with surveillance. According to the document, the system processes detailed data on WeChat users, including account logins, contact lists and message archives, some of which are extracted from phones seized from people of interest to Russia's spy hunters. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Chinese Students Reconsider the U.S. as Republicans Threaten Their Visas
Over lunch at the University of Texas at Austin, a professor from China and two Chinese students spoke dispiritedly this week of the directive issued by Secretary of State Marco Rubio to 'aggressively revoke' visas of Chinese nationals studying in 'critical fields.' They also talked about a Republican bill in Congress that would ban Chinese student visas to the United States. Even if such matters never come to pass, said Xiaobo Lü, a professor of government at the university in Austin, 'the damage is already being done.' 'Chinese students are practical,' he said. 'They now have to consider whether, if they come to America, their studies will be disrupted. There's no removing that uncertainty. That ship has sailed.' The two students accompanying Dr. Lü to lunch, who asked not to be named for fear that their visa status might be at risk, described several recent conversations with Chinese friends. One had decided to turn down offers at two prestigious American journalism schools and had opted instead for the program at the University of Hong Kong. Another said no to a coveted slot at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in favor of a modest local government job. A third Chinese friend, currently studying at Johns Hopkins University, is mulling whether to pack his bags and finish his degree back home. Their accounts align with sentiments shared by a senior academic official at the University of Texas, who said that several excellent graduate school candidates from China had withdrawn their applications. The official added that a number of Chinese students on the Austin campus were afraid to criticize the measures. He spoke on condition of anonymity because he shared those fears. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
New York Times
4 hours ago
- New York Times
How a Times Reporter Eluded a Ban on the Word ‘Gay'
In the In Times Past column, David W. Dunlap explores New York Times history through artifacts housed in the Museum at The Times. The Advocate, a national L.G.B.T.Q. newsmagazine, took The New York Times to task in its issue of Dec. 9, 1986, for what the magazine regarded as this newspaper's indifference, if not hostility, to the gay community. Among the articles in The Advocate was 'The 'G' Word,' about The Times's refusal to adopt the word 'gay.' At the time, there was an explicit prohibition in The New York Times Manual of Style and Usage: 'gay. Do not use as a synonym for homosexual unless it appears in the formal, capitalized name of an organization or in quoted matter.' Gay men found this rule to be demeaning. I know, because I was one of them. As a closeted young reporter on The Times's Metro desk, however, I didn't stand a chance of persuading the publisher, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger (1926-2012), or the executive editor, A.M. Rosenthal (1922-2006), to overturn a ban they had put in place in 1976. So I waged guerrilla warfare instead. Whenever I wrote articles of particular concern to gay readers, I peppered the text with 'gay' as much as I could — in accordance with the stylebook rule. I also tried to limit use of the clinical, antiquated 'homosexual.' The point was not to be subversive, but to leave readers with the impression that my articles were written in idiomatic English. For instance, 42 years ago, I covered the transformation of a former New York City public school in Greenwich Village into what is now the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Community Center. 'Homosexual' appeared only once in the article (apart from the headline, 'Sale of Site to Homosexuals Planned,' which I didn't write). But 'gay' appeared six times, in the names of organizations and in direct quotations. That 1986 Advocate issue is in the Museum at The Times, as is a copy of the old stylebook, opened to the 'gay' entry. The editor to whom the book belonged, Thomas Feyer, drew an 'X' through the entry in June 1987, when the rule was superseded by a memo from Allan M. Siegal (1940-2022), an assistant managing editor. 'Starting immediately,' Mr. Siegal wrote, 'we will accept the word gay as an adjective meaning homosexual, in references to social or cultural patterns and political issues.' That made my life easier, in many ways. Today, the stylebook says: 'gay (adj.) is preferred to homosexual in most contexts.'
